Randolph Harris II International Institute

The Time was Scarce Profaned by Speech—Let Me Not Mar that Perfect Dream!

Play that song again. You keep playing it and you keep singing it. If her spirit’s wandering, she will hear it and it will comfort her. The problem of human’s existence is unique in the whole of nature; humans have fallen out of nature, as it were, and are still in it; they are partly divine, partly terrestrial; partly infinite, partly finite. The necessity to find ever-new solutions for the contradictions in one’s existence, to find ever-new solutions for the contradictions in one’s existence, to find ever-higher forms of unity with nature, one’s fellow humans and oneself, is the source of all psychic forces which motivates humans, of all one’s passions, affects and anxieties. Humans are not content if only their physiological needs—their hunger, thirst, and intimacy—are satisfied. These instinctual needs are not sufficient to make a person happy; they are not even sufficient to make a person sane. The archimedic point of the specifically human dynamism lies in this uniqueness of the human situation; the understanding of human’s psyche must be based on the analysis of human’s needs stemming from the conditions of one’s existence. The problem,then, which the human race as well as each individual has to solve is that of being born. We are the offspring of God, and God in these last days has seen fit to place of in communication with himself. “Establish peace throughout the land, that there should be no wars, not contentions, no stealing, nor plundering, nor murdering, nor any manner of iniquity,” reports Mosiah 29. 14. #RandolphHarris 1 of 11

Physical birth if we think of the individual, is by no means as decisive and singular as it appears to be. It is, indeed, an important change from intrauterine into extra uterine life; but in many respects the infant after birth is not different from the infant before birth; it cannot perceive things outside, cannot feed itself; it is completely dependent on the mother, and would perish without her help. Actually, the process of birth continues. The child begins to recognize outside objects, to react affectively, to grasp things and to coordinate one’s movements, to walk. However, birth continues.The child learns to speak, it learns to know the use and functions of things,it learns to relate itself to others, to avoid punishment and gain praise and liking. Slowly, the growing person learns to love, to develop reason, to look at the World objectively. One begins to develop one’s powers; to acquire a sense of identity, to overcome the seduction of one’s senses for the sake of an integrated life. Birth then, in the conventional meaning of the word, is only the beginning of birth in the broader sense. The whole life of the individual is nothing but the process of giving birth to oneself; indeed, we should be fully born, when we die—although it is the tragic fate of most individuals to die before they are born. When we consider the visions of eternity, and contemplate God and our own destiny in the economy of Heaven the Angles rejoice in blooming hope and immortal glory. #RandolphHarris 2 of 11

From all we know about the evolution of the human race, the birth of a human is to be understood in the same sense as the birth of the individual. When a person has transcended a certain threshold of minimum instinctive adaption, one has become elevated; but when one was as helpless and unequipped for human existence as the individual infant is at birth. The birth of human beings began with the first members of the species homo sapiens, and human history is noting but the whole process of this birth. It has taken human beings hundred of thousands of years to take the first steps into human life; humans went through a narcissistic phase of magic omnipotent orientation, through totemism, nature worship, until human beings arrived at the beginnings of the formation of conscience, objectively humanly love. In the last four thousand years of human’s history, one has developed visions of the fully born and fully awakened human, visions expressed in not too different ways by the great teachers of human in Egypt, China, India, Palestine, Greece and Mexico. True position before God, Angels, and people allow humans to soar above all things of time and sense and burst the cords that bind humans to Earthly objects. “The Lord work with his power in all cases among the children of humans, extending the arm of mercy towards them that put their trust in him,” reports Mosiah 29.20. #RandolphHarris 3 of 11

 The fact that human’s birth is primarily a negative act, that of being thrown out of the origin aloneness with nature, that one cannot return to where one came from, implies that the process of birth is by no means an easy one. Each step into one’s new human existence is frightening. It always means to give up a secure state,which was relatively known, for one which is new, which one has not yet mastered. Undoubtedly, if the infant could think at the moment of the severance of the umbilical cord, one would experience the fear of dying. A loving fate protects us from this panic. However, at any new step, at any new stage of our birth, we are afraid again. We are never free from two conflicting tendencies: one to emerge from the womb, from the lower form of existence into a more human existence, from bondage to freedom; another return to the womb, to nature, to certainty and security. In the history of the individual, and of the race, the progressive tendency has proven to be stronger, yet the phenomena of mental illness and the regression of the human race to positions apparently relinquished generation ago, show the intense struggle which accompanies each new act of birth. In one point of view, humans appear very poor, weak, and imbecile, and very insignificant: in another point of view, humans appear wise, intelligent, strong, honorable,and exalted. It is just in the way that one looks at humanity. #RandolphHarris 4 of 11

The three types of anxiety are interwoven in such a way that one of them gives the predominant color but all of them participate in the coloring of the state of anxiety. All of them and their underlying unity are existential, i.e. they are implied in the existence of humans as human, one’s finitude, and one’s estrangement. They are fulfilled in the situation of despair to which all of them contribute. Despair is an ultimate or boundary-line situation. One cannot go beyond it. Its nature is indicated in the etymology of the word despair: without hope. No way out into the future appears. Nonbeing is felt as absolutely victorious. However, there is a limit to its victory; nonbeing isfelt as victorious, and feeling presupposed being. Enough being is left to feel the irresistible power of nonbeing, and this is the despair within the despair.The pain of despair is that a being is aware of itself as unable to affirm itself because of the power of nonbeing. Consequently it wants to surrender this awareness and its presupposition, the being which is aware. It wants to get rid of itself—and it cannot. Despair appears in the form of reduplication,as the desperate attempt to escape despair. If anxiety were only the anxiety of fate and death, voluntary death would be the way out. The courage demanded would be the courage not to be. The final form of ontic self-affirmation would be the act of ontic self-negation. People are changeable in their opinions, thoughts, reflections and actions.  #RandolphHarris 5 of 11

However, the despair is also the despair about guilt and condemnation. An there is no way of escaping it, even by ontic self-negation. Death by suicide can liberate one from the anxiety of fate and death—as some know. However, it cannot liberate from the anxiety of guilt and condemnations, as the Christians know. This is a highly paradoxical statement, as paradoxical as the relation of the moral sphere to ontic existence generally. However, it is a true statement, verified by those who have experienced fully the despair of condemnation. It is impossible to express the inescapable character of condemnation in ontic terms, that is in terms of imaginings about the immortality of the soul. For every ontic statement must use the categories of finitude, and immortality of the soul would be the endless prolongation of finitude and of the despair of condemnation (a self-contradictory concept, for this finis means end). The experience, therefore, that death by suicide is noway of escaping guilt must be understood in terms of the qualitative character of the moral demand, and of the qualitative character of its rejection. Guilt and condemnation are qualitatively, not quantitatively, infinite. They have an infinite weight and cannot be removed by a finite act of ontic self-negation.This makes despair desperate, that is, inescapable. There is “No Exit” from it #RandolphHarris 6 of 11

The anxiety of emptiness and meaninglessness participates in both the ontic and the moral element in despair. Insofar as it is an expression of finitude it can be removed by ontic self-negation: This drives radical skepticism to death by suicide. Insofar as it is a consequence of moral disintegration it produces the same paradox as the moral element in despair:there is no ontic exit from it. This frustrates the suicidal trends in emptiness and meaninglessness. One is aware of their futility. In view of this character of despair it is understandable that all human life can be interpreted as a continuous attempt to avoid despair. And this attempt is mostly successful. Extreme situations are not reached frequently and perhaps they are never reached by some people. The purpose of an analysis of such a situation is not to record ordinary human experiences but to show extreme possibilities in the light of which the ordinary situations must be understood. We are not always aware of our having to die, but in the light of the experience of our having to die our whole life is experienced differently. In the same way the anxiety which is despair is not always present. However, the rare occasions in which it is present determine the interpretation of existence as a whole. As children of God, we did not originate from chaotic mass of matter, moving or inert, but came forth possessing, in an embryonic state, all the faculties and powers of God. #RandolphHarris 7 of 11

Humans stand proudly erect as the head of all creation and the representative of God on Earth. However, we still possess only the powers that belong to humans. This may be why some people avoid human interaction by acing inferior. There is a large number of people who passively allow the power people to succeed, if only because they have chosen to wear the mask of weakness. The motives, as before, as mixed. Some do this as a defensive maneuver. Take the following example: Elizabeth is 35 years of age, and a mother of two. She has a good mind, many talents, but seems tremendously inferior in social situations. It is hard to know if she is inferior, feels inferior, or just plays inferior. Her husband, George, is a competent, someway domineering, middle-class businessman. He has a great need to be right most of the time, and Sarah lets him be right as often as he needs to be. She will make mistakes, fumble, proclaim her inabilities, and general act as if she were the weakest, most ineffective, most helpless person in the World. George seems to enjoy being needed, being competent, being right. Elizabeth is an example of the person who portrays The Weakling. George needs to be strong and competent, and Elizabeth is going to see to it that he comes off as just that. What is Elizabeth’s motivation? In her childhood, she found that boys liked girls who acted weak and helpless. This became a necessary role for her to play, she thought. Even when she found boys who liked girls to be competent and themselves, she felt more comfortable with The Weakling role. #RandolphHarris 8 of 11

Others know that the person who portrays a weak and innocuous role will not be attacked. It is a very effective defense. Very few people will attack someone who is lying down, looking totally defenseless. And think of all the sky, non aggressive people who are allowed to go their own way because nobody perceives them as threatening, if they are perceived at all! The Weakling is often a manipulative and very aggressive person in hiding. You may recall the character of Uriah Heep in Dickens’ David Copperfield. Heep, wringing his hands and proclaiming his ‘umbleness managed to get into powerful situation, without others knowing much about it .Usually we find that a person plays The Weakling as a ploy to put aggressors off guard. When an aggressor lets down his guard in the face of a no contest plea, The Weakling walks off with some advantages. It is an effective technique for manipulating people, but it is also a sneaky and limited way of living one’s life. There is also Sweet Georgia Brown—this woman who never utters a discouraging word. She is always smiling, always cordial, always has a kind and friendly word. She has millions of sweet, wonderful friends, but none of then know her any deeper than her sweet face and smile. She is able of letting people see her mask and no more. #RandolphHarris 9 of 11

Underneath, she is full of anger and bitterness. She resents being a woman, not because of anything intrinsically wrong with womanhood, but because she has to be the kind of woman people expect. She wears a mask of sweetness because it fits the stereotype of docile, affectionate, good woman she had been expected to grow into. She has resented her brother being able to live their own lives, go where they pleased, when and with whom they pleased. She had had to help her mother. When she did grumble, she was spanked and told she was not being ladylike. A lady, she was informed, accepted with good grace what life had to offer her. Enough spankings and enough rejections had accompanied her few exhibitions of assertiveness that she soon learned to tuck that part of her away and be just what her mother and aunts expected her to be. Since there were enough people outside her family who also responded optimistically to this role, it became easier and easier to play. Soon, it was the only self she could really portray well. Many people, male and female alike, play this nice guy or sweet Georgia role. It is easier to be liked and loved than to struggle to be significant or respect. Incidentally, many common stereotypes are perpetuated by the people who are best descried by them simply because they will not or cannot take the trouble to declare themselves as full human beings. Passivity, sweetness or compliance are easier than asserting individuality. #RandolphHarris 10 of 11

There are also people who avoid human interaction by acting aggressive. There is a group of people, also partial actualizers, who exhibit hostile or sour faces toward everything and everyone. They often act like bullies, some actually hurting people, and others act more like bulldogs; they just look mean. The effect is the same. Distance. Nobody will risk crossing them or trying for any closer relationship. A few of these people are deeply warm and human on the inside, but they hide their vulnerability behind a rough exterior. No doubt they have learned the hard way that exposed sensitivity, like Achilles’ heel, is a natural target for the arrows of exploiters. On the Supernatural TV Series, Dean Winchester, while actually a humanitarian, wore a mask that said, “Do not get too close,and do not try to get to know me. I will play a professional role, but the man inside is private property.” As readers and viewers well know, the warmth often showed through in private moments. Many others who specialize in this rough-hewn exterior, in and out of fiction, are usually much kinder than their bark would indicate. Occasionally, as in bullying types, there is little or no kindness lying dormant. The bluff for these hurt or rejected people serves to protect others as well as themselves from their underlying fear and hostility. “From everyone who has been given much, much will be demanded; and from the one who has been entrusted with much, much more will be asked,” reports Luke 12.48. #RandolphHarris 11 of 11

Happy Thanksgiving!

Some Rainbow Coming from the Fair with a Vision of the World Before the Judgment-Seat of God

We are cast of Heaven and bound to Earth like it is an intense dream. Our goal is rediscover the love of Heaven so we can return. Humans, in respect to their bodies and their physiological functions, belong to the kingdom of God. One of the most common images in Western and Eastern religions alike … Continue reading

Are Any Human Eyes Near to Whom One Could Entrust with Love and Meet at the Junction of Eternity?

We notice smallest things—things overlooked before, by this great light upon our minds. Today we come across a person who acts and feels like an automation; who never experiences anything which is really their own; who experiences oneself entirely as the person he or she think he or she is supposed to be; whose artificial smile has replaced genuine laughter; whose meaningless chatter has replaced communicative speech; whose dulled despair has taken place of genuine pain. Two statements can be made about this person. One is that the individual suffers from a defect of spontaneity and individuality which may seem incurable. At the same time, it may be said that one does not differ essentially from millions of others who are in the same position. For most of them, the culture provides patterns which enable them to live with a defect without becoming ill. It is as if each culture provided the remedy against the outbreak of manifest neurotic symptoms which would result from the defect produced by it. Suppose that in our Western culture movies, radios, television, sports events and newspapers ceased to function for only four weeks. With these main avenues of escape closed, what would be the consequences for people thrown back upon their own resources? “Godly sorrow brings repentance that leads to salvation and leaves no regret, but this Worldly sorrow brings death,” reports 2 Corinthians 7.10. #RandolphHarris 1 of 12

I have no doubt that even in this short time, without any form of media, thousands of nervous breakdowns would occur, and many more thousands of people would be thrown into a state of anxiety, not different from the picture which is diagnosed clinically as neurosis. If the opiate against the socially patterned defect were withdrawn, the manifest illness would make its appearance. For some people, the pattern provided by the culture does notwork. Many are often those whose individual defect is more severe than that of the average person, so that the culturally offered remedies are not sufficient to prevent the outbreak of manifest illness. (A case in point is the person whose aim in life is to attain power and fame. While this aim is, in itself, a pathological one, there is nevertheless a difference between the person who uses his or her powers to attain this aim realistically, and the more severely sick one who has so little emerged from one’s infantile grandiosity that one does not do anything toward the attainment of one’s goal but waits for a miracle to happen and, thus feeling more and more powerless, ends up in a feeling of futility and bitterness.) However, there are also those whose character structure, and hence whose conflicts, differ from those of the majority, so that the remedies which are effective for most of their fellow people are of no help to them. #RandolphHarris 2 of 12

Among the group of people whose conflicts differ from those of the majority, we sometimes find people of greater integrity and sensitivity than the majority, who for this very reason are incapable of acing the cultural opiate, while at the same time they are not strong and healthy enough to live soundly against the stream. The foregoing discussion on the difference between neurosis and the socially patterned defect many give the impression that if society only provides the remedies against the outbreak of manifest symptoms, all goes well, and it can continue to function smoothly, however great the defect created by it. History shows us, however, that this is not the case. It is not always personal doubt that undermines and empties a system of idea and values. It can be the fact that they are no longer understood in their original power of expressing the human situation and of answering existential human questions. (This is largely the case with the doctrinal symbols of Christianity.) Or they lose their meaning because the actual conditions of the present period are so different from those in which the spiritual contents were created that new creations are needed. (This was largely the case with artistic expression before the industrial revolution.) #RandolphHarris 3 of 12

In such circumstances a slow process of waste of the spiritual contents occurs, unnoticeable in the beginning, realized with a shocks it progresses, producing the anxiety of meaninglessness at its end. Ontic and spiritual self-affirmation must be distinguished but they cannot be separated. Human’s being includes one’s relation to meanings. One is human only by understanding and shaping reality, both their World and oneself, according to meanings and values. One’s being is spiritual even in the most primitive expressions of the most primitive human being. In the first meaningful sentence all the richness of human’s spiritual life is potentially present. Therefore the threat to one’s spiritual being is a threat to one’s whole being. The most revealing expression of this fact is the desire to throw away one’s ontic existence rather than stand the despair of emptiness and meaninglessness. The death instinct is not an ontic but a spiritual phenomenon. Dr. Freud identified this reaction to the meaninglessness of the never-ceasing and never-satisfied libido with human’s essential nature. However, it is only an expression of one’s existential self-estrangement and of the disintegration of one’s spiritual life into meaninglessness. If, on the other hand, the ontic self-affirmation is weakened by nonbeing, spiritual indifference and emptiness can be the consequence, producing a circle of ontic and spiritual negativity. #RandolphHarris4 of 12

Nonbeing threatens from both sides, the ontic and the spiritual; if it threatens the one side it also threatens the other. It is true indeed, that human beings, in contrast to other living beings, shows an almost infinite malleability; just as one can eat almost anything, live under practically any kind of climate and adjust oneself to it, there is hardly any psychic condition which one cannot endure, and under which one cannot carry on. One can live free, and as a slave. Rich and in luxury, and under conditions of half-starvation. One can live as a warrior, and peaceably; as an exploiter and robber, and as a member of co-operating and loving fellowship. There is hardly a psychic state in which a person cannot live, and hardly anything which cannot be done with one, and for which one cannot be used. All these considerations seem to justify the assumption that there is no such thing a nature common to all humans, and that would mean in fact that there is no such thing as a species of humans, expect in a physiological and anatomical sense. Yet, in spite of all this evidence, the history of humans shows that we have omitted one fact, Despots and ruling cliques can succeed in dominating and exploiting their fellow humans, but they cannot prevent reactions to this inhuman treatment. Their subjects become frightened, suspicious, lonely and, if not due to external reasons, their systems collapse at some point because of fears,suspicious and loneliness eventually incapacitate the majority to function effectively and intelligently. #RandolphHarris 5 of 12

Whole nations, or special groups within ruling cliques, can be subjugated and exploited for a long time, but they react. They react with apathy or such impairment of intelligence, initiative and skills that they gradually fail to perform the functions which should serve their rulers. Or they react by the accumulations of such hate and destructiveness as to bring about an end to themselves, their rulers and their system. Again their reaction may create such independence and longing for freedom that a better society is built upon their creative impulses. Which reaction occurs, depends on many factors: on economic and political ones, and on the spiritual climate in which people live. However, whatever the reactions are, the statement that people can live under almost any condition is only half true; it must be supplemented by the other statement, that if one lives under conditions which are contrary to one’s nature and to the basic requirements for human growth and sanity, one cannot help reacting; one must either deteriorate and perish, or bring about conditions which are more in accordance with one’s needs. Human nature and society can have conflicting demands, and hence a while society can be sick. #RandolphHarris 6 of 12

Human nature is common to the human race, throughout all cultures and ages, and of certain ascertainable needs and strivings inherent in that nature. Radoslav  Hvorostovsky is 29 years of age and an insurance producer. He has a bright and sparkling personality, at least in the superficial sense of that word. He has a quick wit and an enormous memory for humor. He knows more stories than any ten people around him. Radoslav had had twelve different jobs since he got out of the Army at 21. His training was in business management, but some how Radoslav never got into a management slot. It was not his clowning around; that won him a lot of friends and made his dismissal or by-passing difficult for his superiors. They had agonized over the decision to give a promotion to Radoslav. Even when the evidence showed that he could not handle administrative decisions or control his subordinates, the superiors would shake their heads at the thought of telling Radoslav that he was not going to get the advancement. However, Radoslav did not really want the job. It entailed far more responsibility than he felt he could handle. He could not give orders and back them up. He did not like firing people or hurting them, because he did not like not being liked. So, he presented himself as jovial, easy-going, lovable, Radoslav Hvorostovsky. #RandolphHarris 7 of 12

At parties Radoslav had people cracking up and rolling on the floor. He got a lot of satisfaction from his audiences’ applause, but he got much more satisfaction from knowing that nobody really took him seriously, and none of them would give him any kind of real responsibility. Radoslav was a Life of the Party because it protected him from having to look at any other aspect of himself. He knew, but hid from, the fears he had about decision-making and being responsible. In a sense, his self-acknowledgment makes him a more actualizing person than the one who, perhaps, is not away of why he plays certain games. However, Radoslav also felt a dull, nagging sense of dissatisfaction in one’s own life. He had more ability than he exhibited but was afraid that showing it would put him on the spot, make him come through with more than he cared to do. The Croupier is a person who literally rakes money across tables in a gambling casino. The person who in everyday life portrays oneself as The Croupier is one who not only talks about how much money he or she makes, very often one actually makes it. Whether this person is a talker about money-making or  tycoon, this person’s whole portrayal of oneself is that of being economically wise. One describes oneself as a money person and tends to evaluate everything and everyone in dollars and cents: “That shack of mine really sets me back a bundle,” or “He or she is a 3 million-dollars-a-year type, a really fine person!” #RandolphHarris 8 of 12

The economic type of individual has allowed his or her economic interest to dominate one’s life and success is equated with monetary gain for oneself as well as for others. One spends much time taking about the big deals one is involved with, the bonus one just got or is going to get, the fantastic sums that have been lost become someone (not the individual) lacked foresight, the difference between what one makes and what another person makes, or did make at a similar age. This economic mask is much more common than we might at first thing. Somewhere in one’s life, The Croupier has come to place money far above any other values in human existence. Perhaps one had an impoverished childhood or was seduced by seeing somebody get rich quick. Whatever the motivation, one limits one’s life-expression to that which can be shown on an accounting ledger. Big Spender (B.S.) is another, fairly similar, economic type of mask wearer.B.S., as we will call this person, has found that if one throws money around, buys enough gifts and trinkets, one has a steady supply of friends. These friends are, of course, as constant as one’s supply of cash. Gold-digger often associates with B.S. Gold-digger is not always a female, incidentally. If male, he is person who allows his friendship, patronage, support, or laughter to be bought. #RandolphHarris 9 of 12

For a dollar, a drink, a dinner, Gold-digger will provideB.S. with all the love and all the companionship one might require. Thesepeople will sell themselves to the highest bidder. Whatever type of personality in demand, that is what Gold-digger will be. Women who wear the Gold-digger mask are usually people who have never learned that they can be valuable as full-fledged persons. They are only learned to seek out the Big Spenders in life. If aperson will take care of them economically, that is what they will settle for. Culture and civilization develop an ever-increasing contrast to the needs of humans,and creates a social neurosis. If the evolution of civilization has such a far-reachingsimilarity with the development of an individual, and if the same methods areemployed in both, would not the diagnosis be justified that many systems ofcivilization—or epochs of it—possibly even the whole of humanity—have becomeneurotic under the pressure of the civilizing trends? To analytic dissection of these neuroses, therapeutic recommendations might follow which could claim agreat practical interest. I would not say that such an attempt to apply psychoanalysis to civilized society would be fanciful or doomed to fruitlessness. However, it behooves us to be very careful, not to forget that after all we are dealing only with analogies, and that it is dangerous, not only with people butalso with concepts, to drag them out of the region where they originated and have matured. #RandolphHarris 10 of 12

The diagnosis of collective neurosis of an individual we canuse as a starting point the contrast presented to us between the patient and one’s environment which we assumed to be normal. No such background as this wouldbe available for any society similarly affected; it would have to be  some other way. And with regard to any therapeutic application of ourknowledge, what would be the use of the most acute analysis of social neuroses, since no one possesses the power to compel the community to adopt in therapy? Inspite of all these difficulties, we may expect that one day someone will venture upon this research into the pathology of civilized communities. A sane society is one that which corresponds to the needs of human—not necessarily to what one feels to be one’s needs, because even the most pathological aims can be felt subjectively as that which the person wants most; but to what one’s needs are objectively, as they can be ascertained by the study of humanity. It is our first task then, to ascertain what is the nature of human beings, and what are the needs which stem from this nature. #RandolphHarris 11 of 12

We then must proceed to examine the role of society in the evolution of humans and to study the recurrent conflicts between human nature and society—and the consequences of these conflict, particularly as modern society is concerned. In addition to conscious minds and material objects, there are at work in the Universe spiritual plastic powers, which are capable, like minds, of acting and of having purposes but not of being conscious. They operate even in the human soul, as is particularly clear in our dreams; the activities of organisms derive wholly from our dreams; the activities of organisms derive wholly from them. God works through such powers, although he does not directly govern their day-to-day activities, and it is by virtue of their presence in nature that nature can properly be described as spiritual. “God shall give unto you knowledge by His Holy Spirit, yea, by the unspeakable gift of the Holy Ghost, that has not been revealed since the World was until now; which our forefathers have awaited with anxious expectations to be revealed in the last times, which their minds were pointed to by the Angels, as held in reserve for the fulness of their glory; a time to come in the which nothing shall be withheld, whether there be one God or many gods, they shall be manifest,” reports Doctrine and Covenants 121.26-28. #RandolphHarris 12 of 12

Why, God Would be Content with but a Fraction of the Love Poured thee Without a Stint

Thousands of people in our World are wearing masks. Since a mask is usually a part of an identity, these mask-wearers are not necessarily phonies. However, some wear masks that pass off only one part of themselves as their entire identity. Those who show only a limited bit of themselves are not particularly sick or disturbed. They may or may not need psychotherapy; nevertheless they are living only partially. To speak of a whole society as lacking in mental health implies a controversial assumption contrary to the position of sociological relativism held by most social scientist today. They postulate that each society is normal inasmuch as it functions, and that pathology can be defined only in terms of the individual’s lack of adjustment to the ways of life in his or her society. To speak if a sane society implies a premise different from sociological relativism. It makes sense only if we assume that there can be a society which is not sane, and this assumption, in turn, implies that there are universal criteria for mental health which are valid for the human race as such, and according to which the state of health of each society can be judged. This position of normative humanism is based on a few fundamental premises. #RandolphHarris 1 of 15

The species of human can be defined not only in anatomical and physiological terms; its members share basic psychic qualities, the laws which govern their mental and emotional functioning, and the aims for a satisfactory solution of the problem of human existence. It is true that our knowledge of human beings is still so incomplete that we cannot yet give a satisfactory definition of human beings in a psychological sense. It is the task of the science of humans to arrive eventually at a correct description of what deserves to be called human nature. What has often been called human nature is but one of its many manifestations—and often a pathological one—and the function of such mistake definition usually has been to defend a particular type of society as being the necessary outcome of human’s mental constitution. Nonebing threatens humans as a whole, and therefore threatens one’s spiritual as well as one’s ontic self-affirmation. Spiritual self-affirmation occurs in every moment in which a person lives creatively in the various sphere of meaning. Creative, in this context, has the sense not of original creativity as performed by the genius but of living spontaneously, in action and reaction, with the contents of one’s cultural life. #RandolphHarris 2 of 15

In order to be spiritually creative one need not be what is called a creative artist or scientist or statesperson, but one must be able to participate meaningfully in their original creations. Such a participation is creative insofar as it changes that in which one participates, even if in very small ways. Some people wear the mask of Autocracy. They adopt a face and posture that say: “I want you to know m only as the leader, the boss, the one who runs the show.” They toss their weight around, give orders, interfere with the ongoing operations of things, veto group decision, or boast of their own single-handed accomplishments. These people who we have dubbed The Power People, are unwilling to acknowledge or display any other part of their personality. They deny any tenderness, concern, agreeableness, or sympathy. They consider the role of powerful, influential person to be adequate for them. It meets all their needs, or at least all those that concern them. It gets for them a certain amount of respect or fear, or even dislike; and for some, being disliked is a very important motivation. Why? Is it because they are full of guilt and seek out dislike as a form of punishment or penance? Possibly. #RandolphHarris 3 of 15

Or do people like to be disliked because people are so full of dislike for others that they perceive dislike as the only acceptable emotion? Possibly. Or is it because they project their own dislike onto others and are justifying their negativisms by calling it protection against the hostility they find all about? Again, possibly. These are some of the motivation we find in the power people. Are some people born power-seeking? Is there an innate drive or gene for power-lust? The best evidence still supports the hypothesis that leaders and rulers and executives and despots are made, not born. Certainly, any careful study of the history of monarchies will show that some kings’ children have not been kingly material. Our conclusions are that for a variety of motives, some people ignore or eliminate all other sides to their personalities and present themselves to the World as powerful, born leaders, influential. Often, because of what sociologist call self-fulfilling prophecy, these people cause their wishes to come true. They play their roles so well that everyone, including themselves, believes the power exists—and gradually, it does. Against such reactionary use of the concept of human nature the Liberals, since the eighteenth century, have stressed the malleability of human nature and the decisive influence of environmental factors. #RandolphHarris 4 of 15

True and important as such emphasis is, it has led many social scientists to an assumption that human’s mental constitution is a black piece of paper, on which society and culture write their test, and which has no intrinsic quality of its own. This assumption is just as untenable and just as destructive of social progress as the opposite view was. The real problem is to infer the core common to the whole human race from the innumerable manifestation of human nature, the normal as well as the pathological ones, as we can observe them in different individuals and cultures. The task is furthermore to recognize the laws inherent in human nature and the inherent goals for its development and unfolding. This concept of human nature is different from the way the term human nature is used conventionally. Just as humans transforms the World around them, so they transform themselves in the process of history. One is one’s own creation, as it were. However, just as one can only transform and modify the natural materials around one according to their nature, so one can only transform and modify oneself according to one’s own nature. “I know that it shall come to pass; and they sell themselves for naught; for, for the reward of their pride and their foolishness they shall reap destruction; for because they yield unto the devil and choose works of darkness rather than light, therefore they must go down to hell,” reports 2 Nephi 26.10. #RandolphHarris 5 of 15

The point of view taken here is neither a biological nor sociological one if that would mean separating these two aspects from each other. It is rather one transcending such dichotomy by the assumption that the main passions and drives in humans result from the total existence of human beings, that they are definite and ascertainable, some of them conducive to health and happiness, others to sickness and unhappiness. Any given social order does not create these fundamental strivings but it determines which of the limited number of potential passions are to become manifest or dominant. Humans as they appear in any given culture are always a manifestation of human nature, a manifestation, however which in its specific outcome is determined by the social arrangements under which one lives. Just as the infant is born with all human potentialities which are to develop under favorable social and cultural conditions, so the human race, in the process of history, develops into what it potentially is. The creative transformation of language by the interdependence of the creative poet or writer and the many who are influenced by these individuals directly or indirectly and react spontaneously to one is an outstanding example. #RandolphHarris 6 of 15

Everyone who lives creatively in meanings affirms oneself as a participant in these meanings. One affirms oneself as receiving and transforming reality creatively. One loves oneself as participating in the spiritual life and as loving its contents. One loves them because they are one’s own fulfillment and because they are actualized through the individual. The scientist loves both the truth one discovers and oneself insofar as one discovers it. One is held by the content of discovery. This is what one can call spiritual self-affirmation. And if one has not discovered but only participates in the discovery, it is equally spiritual self-affirmation. Such an experience presupposed that the spiritual life is taken seriously, that it is a matter of ultimate concern. “And there are many churches built up which cause envyings, and strifes, and malice. And there are also secret combinations, even as in times of old, according to combinations of the devil, for he is the founder of all these things; yea, the founder of murder, and works of darkness; yea, and he leadeth them by the neck with a flaxen cord, until he bindeth them with his strong cords forever. However, the Lord God worketh not in darkness. He doeth not anything save it be for the benefit of the World; for he loveth the World, even that he may draw all people unto him. Wherefore, he commandeth none that they shall not partake of his salvation,” reports 2 Nephi 26.21-24. #RandolphHarris 7 of 15

A spiritual life in which this is not experienced is threatened by nonbeing in the two forms in which it attacks spiritual self-affirmation: emptiness and meaninglessness. We use the term meaninglessness for the absolute threat of nonbeing to spiritual self-affirmation,and the term emptiness for the relative threat to it. They are no more identical than are the threat of death and fate. However, in the background of emptiness lies meaninglessness as death lies in the background of vicissitudes of fate.The anxiety of meaninglessness is anxiety about the loss of an ultimate concern, of a meaning which gives meaning to all meanings. This anxiety is aroused by the loss of a spiritual center, of an answer, however, symbolic and indirect, to the question of the meaning of existence. The anxiety of emptiness is aroused by the threat of nonbeing to the special contents of the spiritual life. A belief breaks down through external events or inner processes: one is cut off from creative participation in a sphere of culture, one feels frustrated about something which one had passionately affirmed, one is driven from devotion to one object to devotion to another and again on to another, because the meaning of each of them vanishes and the creative eros is transformed into indifference of aversion. #RandolphHarris 8 of 15

Everything is tried and nothing satisfies. The contents of the tradition, however, excellent, however praised, however loved once, lose their power to give content today. And present culture is even less able to provide the content. Anxiously one turns away from all the concrete contents and looks for an ultimate meaning, only to discover that is was precisely the loss of a spiritual center which took away the meaning from the special contents of the spiritual life. However, a spiritual center cannot be produced intentionally, and the attempt to produce it only producer deeper anxiety. The anxiety of emptiness drives us to the abyss of meaninglessness. Some people refuse to display any part of themselves except their intellect. In a college environment, The Intellectual often snows or frighten one’s opponents with one’s intellectual power. One is a master of rhetoric and backs one’s opponents into a corner without lifting a finger. When attacked for one’s aggressiveness, The Intellectual may shrug and say, “The illogic of one’s own argument defeated him or her,” or “That person does not have the capacity to follow my train of thought.” Thus, The Intellectual exhibits one’s superiority without every falling into the position of being labeled the aggressor. #RandolphHarris 9 of 15

Some people play Intellectual because they find too many defects in portraying other aspects of themselves. They may not be adequate to compete athletically or in interpersonal effectiveness, so they razzle and dazzle ‘em with their footwork, only it is intellectual footwork. This is partly a mechanism identified as Compensation. Often a fragile, puny, undersized boy cannot play sports, cannot attract a female, and cannot make it socially or interpersonally. So, he buckles down to come the all-time Honors Student who wins admiration for his brainpower, if not for his musclepower or drinking skills. This is an important role for many people and is not to be interpreted as always unhealthy. Some people simply need one area to excel in and they pick the academic or intellectual arena. The unself-actualizing aspects consist of their unwillingness or inability to admit that this is what they are doing. The approach of normative humanism is based on the assumption that, as in any other problem, there are right and wrong, satisfactory and unsatisfactory solutions to the problem of human existence. Mental health is achieved if a person develops into full maturity according to the characteristics and laws of human nature. #RandolphHarris 10 of 15

 Mental illness consists in the failure of such development. From this premise the criterion of mental health is not one of individual adjustment to a given social order, but a universal one, valid for all people, of giving a satisfactory answer to the problem of human existence. What is so deceptive about the state of mind of the members of a society is the consensual validation of their concepts. It is naively assumed that the fact that the majority of people share certain ideas or feelings proves the validity of these ideas and feelings. Noting is further from the truth. Consensual validation as such has no bearing whatsoever on reason or mental health. Just as there is a folie a deux there is a folie a millions. The fact that millions of people share the same vices does not make these vices virtues, the fact that they share so many errors does not make the errors to be truths, and the fact that millions of people share the same forms of mental pathology does not make these people sane. There is, however, an important difference between individual and social mental illness, which suggests a differentiation between two concepts: that of defect, and that of neurosis. #RandolphHarris 11 of 15

If a person fails to attain freedom, spontaneity, a genuine expression of self, one may be considered to have a severe defect, provided we assume that freedom and spontaneity are the objective goals to be attained by every human being. If such a goal is not attained by the majority of member of any given society, we deal with the phenomenon of socially patterned defect. The individual shares it with many others; one is not ware of it as a defect, and one’s security is not threatened by the experience of being different, of being an outcast, as it were. What one may have lost in richness and in a genuine feeling of happiness, is made up by the security of fitting in with the rest of humankind—as one knows them. As a matter of fact, one’s very defect may have been raised to a virtue by one’s culture, and thus may give one an enhanced feeling of achievement. Emptiness and loss of meaning are expressions of the threat of nonbeing to the spiritual life. This threat is implied in a person’s finitude and actualized by an individual’s estrangement. It can be described in terms of doubt, its creative and its destructive function in a person’s spiritual life. #RandolphHarris 12 of 15

People are able to as because one is separated from, while participating in, what one is asking about. In every question an element of doubt, the awareness of not having, is implied. In systematic questioning systematic doubt is effective. This element of doubt is a condition of all spiritual life. The threat to spiritual life is not doubt as an element but the total doubt. If awareness of not having has swallowed the awareness of having, doubt has ceased to be methodological asking and has become existential despair. One the way to this satiation the spiritual life tries to maintain itself as long as possible by clinging to affirmation which are not yet undercut, be they traditions, autonomous conviction, or emotional preferences. And if it is impossible to remove the doubt, one courageously accepts it without surrendering one’s convictions. One takes the risk of going astray and the anxiety of this risk upon oneself. In this way one avoids the extreme situation—till it becomes unavoidable and the despair of truth becomes complete. Then people try another way out: Doubt is based on human’s separation from the whole of reality, on one’s lack of universal participation, on the isolation of one’s individual self. #RandolphHarris 13 of 15

So one tries to break out of this situation, to identify oneself with something transindividual, to surrender one’s separation and self-relatedness. One flees from one’s freedom of asking and answering for oneself to a situation in which no further questions can be asked and the answers to previous questions are imposed on one authoritatively. In order to avoid the risk of asking and doubting one surrenders the right to ask and to doubt. One surrenders oneself in order to save one’s spiritual life. One escapes from one’s freedom in order to escape the anxiety of meaninglessness. Now one is no longer lonely, not in existential doubt, not in despair. One participates and affirms by participation the contents of one’s spiritual life. Meaning is saved, but the self is sacrificed. And since the conquest of doubt was a matter of sacrifice, the sacrifice of the freedom of the self, it leaves a mark on the regained certitude: a fanatical self-assertiveness. Fanaticism is the correlate to spiritual self-surrender: it shows the anxiety which it was supposed to conquer, by attacking with discorporate violence those who disagree and who demonstrate by their disagreement elements in the spiritual life of the fanatic which one must suppress in oneself. Because one must suppress them in oneself one must suppress them in others. #RandolphHarris 14 of 15

One’s anxiety forces one to persecute dissenters. The weakness of the fanatic is that those who one fights have a secret hold upon one; and to this weakness one and one’s group finally succumb. It may be said that the person who is overwhelmed by a feeling of one’s own powerlessness and unworthiness, by unceasing doubt as to whether one is saved or condemned to eternal punishment, who is hardly capable of genuine joy, suffers from a severe defect. Yet this very defect was culturally patterned; it was looked upon us particularly valuable, and the individual was thus protected from the neurosis which one would have acquired in a culture where the same defect gave one a feeling of profound inadequacy and isolation. Many people are seized by one and the same affect by one object that one believes this object to be present even if it is not. If this happens while the person is awake, the person is believed to be insane. However, if the greedy person think only of money and possessions, the ambitious one only of fame, one does not think of them as being insane, but as people who avoid human interaction by acting superior; generally one has contempt for them. However, factually greediness, ambition, and so forth are forms of insanity, although usually one does not think of them as illness. #RandolphHarris 15 of 15

God Permits Industrious Angels Afternoons to Play and Calls the Angels Home Promptly at the Setting Sun

No matter how urgent our social needs are, all of us have needs for solitude, for times alone with ourselves. Again, the optimum selfhood experiences includes a balance of solitariness, sociality, and peripheral interaction (spectatorship). There is in each of us a need for privacy and time alone. It is not so much a need to reject or repudiate others it is a need to go within, to get acquainted or re-acquainted with our selfhood. We like to roam about or own house with no one to disturb us. We can get to our own Within sleep or in church or in solitary walks in the country. Or we can attempt to commune with the Universe. “And the Lord will remember the prayers of the righteous, which have been put up unto him for them,” reports Mormon 5.21. This experience is like a periodic need to get back to natural roots. Sitting and enjoying a forest, watching the Sun change angles in the sky as it becomes visible, or disappears, is a commonly favored method. Watching the sea from the beach, wading in a swimming pool are other ways. What is behind this need?Maybe at times we do get tired of other people—their opinions, their conversations, their directives. Or perhaps we tire of the necessity of relating to others. When this happens, we need to move out of the other-directed circle into the area of solitary or inner-directed thinking, feeling, and doing and reassure ourselves that we have something or someone. #RandolphHarris 1 of 16

Those who are able to move Within know themselves to be significant and feel that they have a right to solitary experiences. They do not feel lonely when they actually enjoy very congenial company! In early childhood, our first play experiences are solitary. We discover the pleasures of fingers and toes, of blocks and dolls and we enjoy using our new found coordination to manipulate toys or the physical environment. We are engrossed with the involvement and seldom experience loneliness of those times. Next comes parallel play,where we still play by ourselves but alongside others, with minimal social interaction. Then we learn to play cooperatively, and sharing and exchanging and bargaining become important parts of our social experience. This evolution from solitary to parallel to cooperative play is not a matter of discarding one form for another. The entire history of an evolution is invariably present in the optimum development. We all retain the Child as well as the Adult and the Part,the need to play or be solitary is present along with the needs for parallel and cooperative experiences. We have reduced the average working hours to about half what they were one hundred and sixty-three years ago. We today have more free time available than our forefathers dared to dream of. However, what has happened? We do not know how to use the newly gained free time; we try to eliminate the time we have saved, and are glad when another day is over. #RandolphHarris 2 of 16

Why should I continue with a picture which is known to everybody? Certainly, if an individual acted in this fashion, serious doubts would be raised as to one’s sanity; should one, however, claim that there is nothing wrong, and that one is acting perfectly reasonably, then the diagnosis would not even be doubtful any more. Yet many psychiatrists and psychologist refuse to entertain the idea that society as a whole may be lacking in sanity. They hold that the problem of mental health in a society is only that of the number of unadjusted individuals, and not that of a possible unadjustment of the culture itself. What is the incidence of mental illness in the various countries in the Western World? It is a most amazing fact that there are no data which answer this question. While there are exact comparative statistical data on material resources, employment, birth and death rates, there is no adequate information about mental illness. At the most we have some exact data for a number of countries, like the United States and Sweden, but they only refer to admissions of patients to mental institutions, and they are not helpful in making estimates of comparative frequency of mental illness. These figures tell us just as much about improved psychiatric care and institutional facilities as they tell us about increase in incidence of mental illness. #RandolpHarris 3 of 16

The fact that more than half of all hospital beds in the United States are used for mental patients on whom we spend an annual sum of over a billion dollars many not be an indication of any increase in mental illness, but only of an increase in care. Some other figures, however, are more indicative of the occurrence of the more severe mental disturbances. If 17.7 percent of all rejected enlistees in the last war were for reason of mental illness, this fact certainly bespeaks a high degree of mental disturbance, even if we have no comparative figures referring to the past, or to other countries.The only comparative data which can give us a rough indication of mental health,are those for suicide, homicide and alcoholism. No doubt the problem of suicide is a most complex one, and no single factor can be assumed to be the cause. However, even without entering at this point into a discussion of suicide, I consider it a safe assumption that a high suicide rate in a given population is expressive of a lack of mental stability and mental health. That it is not a consequence of material poverty is clearly evidence by all figures. The most least affluent countries have the lowest incidence of suicide, and the increasing material prosperity in Europe was accompanied by an increasing number of suicides. As alcoholism, there is no doubt that it, too, can be a symptom of mental and emotional instability. #RandolphHarris 4 of 16

 The motives for homicide are probably less indicative of pathology than those for suicide. However,though countries with a high homicide rate show a low suicide rate, their combined rates bring us to an interesting conclusion. If we classify both homicide and suicide as destructive acts, our tables demonstrate that their combined rate is not constant, but fluctuating between the extremes of 35.76  and 4.24 (per 100,000 of adult population). This contradicts Dr. Freud’s assumption of the comparative constancy of destructiveness which underlies his theory of the death instinct. It disproves the implication that destructiveness maintains an invariable rate, differing only in directions toward the self or the outside World. Denmark, Switzerland, Finland, Sweden and the United States of America are the counties with the highest suicide rates,and the highest combined suicide and homicide rate, while Spain, Italy, Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland are those with the lowest suicide and homicide rate. The figures for alcoholism show that the same countries—the United States, Switzerland, Sweden and Denmark—which have the highest suicide rate, have also the highest alcoholism rate, with the main difference that the United States of America are leading in this group, and that France has the second place, instead of the sixth place it has with regard to death by suicide. #RandolphHarris 5 of 16

This evidence is startling and challenging indeed. Even if we should doubt whether the high frequency of suicide alone indicates a lack of mental health in a population, the fact that suicide and alcoholism figure largely coincide, seems to make it plain that we deal here with symptoms of mental unbalance. We find then that the countries in Europe which are among the most democratic, peaceful and prosperous ones, and the United State of America,the most prosperous country in the World, show the most severe symptoms of mental disturbance. The aim of the whole socioeconomic development of the Western World is that of the materially comfortable life, relatively equal distribution of wealth, stable democracy and peace, and the very countries which have come closet to this aim show the most severe signs of mental unbalance! It is true that these figures in themselves do not prove anything, but at least they are startling. Even before we enter into a more thorough discussion of the whole problem, these fundamentally wrong with our way of life and with the aims toward which we are striving. Could it be that the middle-class life of property, while satisfying our material needs leaves us with a feeling of intense boredom, and that suicide and alcoholism are pathological ways of escape from this boredom? #RandolphHarris 6 of 16

Could it be that these figures are a drastic illustration for the truth of the statement that people live not by bread alone, and that they show that modern civilization fails to satisfy profound needs in humans? If so,what are these needs? Fate and death are the way in which our ontic self-affirmation is threatened by nonbeing. Ontic, from the Greek on, being,means here the basic self-affirmation of a being in its simple existence. (Onto-logical designates the philosophical analysis of the nature of being.) The anxiety of fate and death is more basic, most universal, and inescapable. All attempts to argue it away are futile. Even if the so-called arguments for the immortality of the soul has argumentative power (which they do not have)they would not convince existentially. For existentially everybody is aware of the complete loss of self which biological extinction implies. The unsophisticated mind knows instinctively what sophisticated ontology formulates: that reality has the basic structure of self-World correlation and that correlation and that with the disappearance of the one side the World, the other side, the self,also disappears, and what remains is their common ground but not their structural correlation. It has been observed that the anxiety of death increases with the increase of individualization and that people in collectivistic cultures are open to this type of anxiety. #RandolphHarris 7 of 16

The observation is correct yet the explanation that there is no basic anxiety about death in collectivist cultures is wrong. The reason for the difference from more individualized civilization is that the special type of courage which characterizes collectivism, as long as it is unshaken, allays the anxiety of death. However, the very fact that courage has to be created through many internal and external (psychological and ritual) activities and symbols shows that basic anxiety has to be overcome even in collectivism.Without its at least potential presence neither war nor criminal law in these societies would be understandable. If there were no fear of death, the threat of the law or of a superior enemy would be without effect—which it obviously is not. Humans as in every civilization is anxiously aware of the threat of nonbeing and needs the courage to affirm oneself in spite of it. The anxiety of death is permanent horizon within which the anxiety of fate is work. For the threat against human’s ontic self-affirmation is not only the absolute threat of death but also the relative threat of fate. Certainly the anxiety of death overshadows all concrete anxieties and gives them the ultimate seriousness. They have,however, a certain independence and, ordinarily, a more immediate impact than the anxiety of death. #RandolphHarris 8 of 16

The term fate for this whole group of anxieties stresses one element which is common to all of them: their contingent character, their unpredictability, the impossibility of showing their meaning and purpose. One can describe this in terms of the categorical structure of our experience. One can show the contingency of our temporal being, the fact that we exist in this and no other period of time, beginning in a contingent moment, ending in a contingent moment, filled with experiences which are contingent themselves with respect to quality and quantity. One can show the contingency of our spatial being (our finding ourselves in this and no other place, and the strangeness of this place in spite of its familiarity); the contingent character of ourselves and the place from which we look at our World; and the contingent character of the reality at which we look, that is, our World. Both could be different: this is their contingency and this produces the anxiety about our spatial existence.One can show the contingency of the causal interdependence of which one is apart, both with respect to the past and to the present, the vicissitudes coming from our World and the hidden forces in the depths of our own self. Contingent does not mean causally undetermined but it means that the determining causes of our existence have no ultimate necessity. They are given, and they cannot be logically derived. #RandolphHarris 9 of 16

Contingently we are put into the whole web of casual relations. Contingently we are determined by them in every moment and thrown out by them in the last moment. Fate is the rule of contingency, and the anxiety about fate is based on the finite being’s awareness of being contingent in every respect, of having no ultimate necessity. Fate is usually identified with necessity in the sense of an inescapable causal determination. Yet it is not causal necessity that makes fate a matter of anxiety but the lack of ultimate necessity, the irrationality, the impenetrable darkness of fate. The threat f nonbeing to human’s ontic self-affirmation is absolute in the threat of death, relative in the threat of fate. However, the relative is a threat only because in its background stands the absolute threat. Fate would not produce inescapable anxiety without death behind it. And death stands behind fate and its contingencies not only in the last moment when one is thrown out of existence but in every moment within existence. Nonbeing is omnipresent and produces anxiety even where an immediate threat of death is absent. It stands behind the experience that we are driven, together with everything else, from the past toward the future without a moment of time which does not vanish immediately. It stands behind the insecurity and homelessness of our social and individual existence. It stands behind the attacks on our power of being in body and soul by weakness, infirmary, accident. #RandolphHarris 10 of 16

In all these forms fate actualizes itself, and through them the anxiety of nonbeing takes hold of us. We try to transform the anxiety into fear and to meet courageously the objects with which we struggle that produce the anxiety but the human situation as such. Out of this the question arises: Is there a courage to be, a courage to affirm oneself in spite of the threat against human’s ontic self-affirmation? Many people cannot be alone. For them, to be alone is to be lonely, isolated, exiled. They have no inner resources upon which to draw or which they can enjoy. When they are alone, they are literally alone: no one is there! This is a tragedy. These are the people who are compulsive about their social activity: they must be around others, they must have the opinions and the regard of others. These same people have no ideas or suggestion or direction of their own. Ask them what they are going to do for fun that night and they are just as likely to ask you what you are going to do and say, “I think that is a good idea. Mind if I join you?” Unable to count on themselves, they are exceedingly empty or devoid of ego strength or beneficial self-esteem. #RandolpHarris 11 of 16

A psychiatric designation for many of these people who need to be around people all the time is Inadequate Personality. They have trouble getting or holding jobs, making and keeping friends, giving or accepting love. However, for the self-actualizing person, there are many times in one’s varied life experience that one enjoys getting of by oneself, to explore one’s root-relationships with nature or to find out more about oneself. One is able to experience newness and refreshment from these times. They re-create in one a sense of personal appreciation. These times of solitary experiencing can do other re-creative things for us. We can experience our own physical being. Most of us have grown away from the sheer enjoyment of our physical bodies, and solitary self-experiencing puts us into direct communion with our physical nature. Whether we are sailing alone over the ocean or walking through the park, we become increasingly conscious of our bodies. Sailing, for instance, demands continual vigilance and the body becomes attuned to the slightest change in wind or the tension of the sheet or tiller. At a time like this we are dramatically reminded that the body is more than a container for vital organs. “And a portion of that Spirit dwelleth in me, which giveth me knowledge, and also power according to my faith and desires which are in God,” Alma 18.35. #RandolphHarris 12 of 16

The body-consciousness experience helps us to regain the understanding of just how deeply rooted we are in nature. It also helps us to see how important body functioning is to the functioning of everything else we do. We become aware that the body is capable of communicating its needs and desires to our mental consciousness and that we should learn how to pay more attention to this communication. How many times, when we are with others, do we get the message that we are tired, and yet ignore it. We feel it is rude to yawn or excuse ourselves to go to bed, though this is precisely what our bodies and our knowledge are telling us to do. In times of solitary experiencing, we get back to holistic experiencing and sleep when we are sleepy, eat when we are hungry, walk when we are restless, rest when we are tired, and do things more unnaturally. Afterward, our entire being is refreshed and more in tune. Why we do not take these clues more often to heat is one of the mysteries of cognitive life. “Seek good, not evil, that you may live. Then the LORD God Almighty will be with you, just as you say he is. Hate evil, love good; maintain justice in the courts,” reports Amos 5.14-15. #RandolphHarris 13 of 16

Another thing that solitude does for us is to give us more experience with the unconscious. We can enjoy our fantasies, our daydreams, our night dreams. In our imagination we can do or be anything we wish. And again,exploring our imaginations and the nature of our wishes and fantasies is an excellent way of discovering the reality that is our own being. Super-realists to the contrary, the dividing wall between reality and fantasy is not essential and impenetrable as they would have us believe. Many psychologist know that a self-actualizing,mentally healthy individual is often one who is highly skilled at leaping back and forth over the wall. However, make no mistake: one knows the wall is there,which side is one’s on, and how to get to the other side. Fantasy has a definite self-syntonic or beneficial aspect to it, just as dreams apparently have. We know too that much creativity is fostered by the imagination. Giving the fantasy life free rein at times may be a very healthy, even fun, experience for everyone; for the creative artist, it is a prime requisite for continued existence.#RandolphHarris 14 of 16

Humans are the most social beings—out of desperate need and exuberant play. As they grow up, other mammals unlearn to play—humans never do. In this, one is ever an infantilized being—and one capable of a maturity of such richness, depth, and complexity as no other mammals can attain. Play, even in its most complex and esoteric manifestations—the brilliant leas of the scientist reconstructing the Universe, the soaring poetry of the creative artist, the fabulous beguilements of the master confidence humans—draw every from and every renew the great and inexhaustible forces of the unconscious, liking humans to their evolutionary past, projecting them into a future ever changing yet ever the same, also lifting one beneficently out of the stream of time altogether into the joy of an unbound now of total absorption. Play can be found in, and thus, confound, all of its supposed antitheses. It is not work? However, work can be the highest play, for the scientist we have seen through Roe, the artists through Schneider, the shaman through Roheim, the comic through Lenny Bruce, and any person who love the task of that daily bread. “Wherefore, if a person has faith one must need to have hope; for without faith there cannot be any hope,” reports Moroni 7.42. #RandolphHarris 15 of 16

Re-creation and play, whether solitary or social, are essential and natural aspects of human experience. They have been de-emphasized or ignored in the past because we have never been too certain that they were right, partly because of the Work-Sin Ethic and partly because we could not put their benefits down on a balance sheet or productivity chart. From recent literature, clinical and laboratory studies, and our own personal experiences, we have been able to infer the existence of some survival value in these lighter experiences, like humor, pleasure, play, and laughter, because they have counterparts in every culture. In addition to mere survival value, they play a vital part in enhancing and enriching human experience. A healthy personality is one that is capable of experiencing the full range of human emotions and seeking out a full range of human experiences. Play, laughter, humor, and leisure-time activities are re-creational: they enable us to re-create and replenish the exhausted store of human strength and self-respect. “I will pour out my Spirit in those day. I will show wonders in the Heavens and on the Earth, blood and fire and billows of smoke. The Sun will be turned to darkness and the Moon to blood before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the LORD. And everyone who calls on the name of the LORD will be saved,” Joel 2.29-32. #RandolphHarris 16 of 16

I Years Had Been from Home and Now Before the Door I Dared Not Open—Lest a Face I Never Saw Before!

The gentlemen had risen to see me off. I murmured my superficial farewells, and only then did the secret grip release me. Nonebeingis dependent on the being it negates. Dependent means two things. It points first of all to the ontological priority of being over nonbeing. The term nonbeing itself indicates this, and it is logically necessary. There could be no negation if there were no preceding affirmation to be negated. Certainly one can describe being in terms of non-nonbeing; and one can justify such a description by pointing to the astonishing prerational fact that there is something and not nothing. One could say that being is the negation of the primordial night of nothingness. However, in doing so one must realize that such an aboriginal nothing would be neither nothing nor something, that it becomes nothing only in contrast to something; in other words, that the ontological status of nonbeing as nonbeing is dependent on being. Secondly, nonbeing is dependent on the special qualities of being. In itself nonbeing has no quality and no difference of qualities. However, it gets them in relation to being. The character of the negation of being is determined by that in being which is negated. This makes it possible to speak of qualities of nonbeing and, consequently,of types of anxiety. #RandolphHarris 1 of 5

Up to now we have used the term nonbeing without differentiation, while in the discussion of courage several forms of self-affirmation were mentioned. They correspond to different forms of anxiety and are understandable only in correlation with them. I suggest that we distinguish three types of anxiety according to the three directions in which nonbeing threatens being. Nonbeing threatens human’s moral self-affirmation, relatively in terms of fate, absolutely in terms of death. It threatens human’s spiritual self-affirmation, relatively in terms of guilt, absolutely in terms of condemnation. The awareness of this threefold threat is anxiety appearing in three forms, that of fate and death (briefly, the anxiety of death), that of emptiness and loss of meaning (briefly, the anxiety of meaninglessness), that of guilt and condemnation (briefly, the anxiety of condemnation). In all three forms anxiety is existential in the sense that it belongs to existence as such and not to an abnormal state of mind as in neurotic (and psychotic) anxiety. The nature of neurotic anxiety and its relation to existential anxiety will be discussed in another chapter. We shall deal now with the three forms of existential anxiety, first their reality in the life of the individual, then with their social manifestations in special periods of Western history. However, it must be stated that the differences of types does not mean mutual exclusion. #RandolphHarris 2 of 5

We have seen for instance that the courage to be as it appears in the ancient times conquers not only the fear of death but also the threat of meaninglessness. Sometimes we find that in spite of the predominance of threat of meaninglessness, the anxiety of death and condemnation is passionately challenged. In all representatives of classical Christianity death and sin are seen as the allied adversaries against which the courage of faith has to fight. The three forms of anxiety (and of courage) are immanent in each other but normally under the dominance of one of them. However, nothing is more common than the idea that we, the people living in the Western World of the twenty first century,are eminently sane. Even the fact that a great number of individuals in our midst suffer from more or less severe forms of mental illness produces little doubt with respect to the general standard of our mental health. We are sure that by introducing better methods of mental hygiene we shall improve still further the state of mental health, and as far as individual mental disturbances are concerned, we look at them as strictly individual incidents,perhaps with some amazement that so many of these incidents should occur in a culture which is supposedly so sane. #RandolphHarris 3 of 5

Can we be so sure that we are not deceiving ourselves? Many an inmate of an insane asylum is convinced that everybody else is crazy, except oneself. Many a severe neurotic believes that one’s compulsive rituals or hysterical outbursts are normal reaction to somewhat abnormal circumstances. What about ourselves? Let us, in good psychiatric fashion, look at the facts. In the last one hundred and sixty-three years, in the Western World, have created a greater material wealth than any other society in the history of the human race. Everyone is looking with a mixture of confidence and apprehension to the World leaders of the various people, ready to heap all praise on them if the succeed in avoiding a war, and ignoring the fact that it is only these very World leaders who ever cause a war, usually not even through their bad intentions, but their unreasonable mismanagement of the affairs entrusted to them. In the last 3,000 years of history, no less than about eight thousand peace treaties were signed,each one supposed to secure permanent peace, and each one lasting on an average two years. Our direction of economic affairs is scarcely more encouraging. We live in an economic system in which a particularly good crop is often an economic disaster, and we restrict some of our agricultural productivity in order to stabilize the market, although there are millions of people who do not have the very things we restrict, and who need them badly. #RandolphHarris 4 of 5

Right now our economic system is function very well, because, among other reasons, we spend billions of dollars per year to produce armaments. Economists look with some apprehension to the time when we stop producing armaments, and the idea that the state should produce houses and other useful and needed things instead of weapons, easily provokes accusations of endangering freedom and individual initiative. We have a literacy above 90 percent of the population. We have radio, television, movies, a newspaper a day for everybody. However, instead of giving us the best of past and present literature and music, these media of communication, supplemented by advertising, fill the minds of people with the cheapest trash, lacking in any sense of reality, with sadistic phantasies which a halfway cultured person would be embarrassed to entertain even once in while. However, the mind of everybody, young and old, is thus poisoned, we go on blissfully to see to it that no immortality occurs on the screen. Any suggestion that the government should finance the production of movies and radio programs which would enlighten and improve the minds of our people would be met again with indignation and accusations in the name of freedom and idealism. “And now my children, see that ye take care of these sacred things, yea see that ye look to God and live. Go unto this people and declare the word, and be sober. My children, farewell,” reports Alma 37.44. #RandolphHarris 5 of 5

I Cannot Tell You, but You Feel it—Who Ponders this Tremendous Faith which is the Experiment of Our Lord!

It is tempting to try to live without an underworld, without soul, and without concern for the mysterious elements that touch on the spiritual and the religious. Anxiety and fear have the same ontological root but they are not the same actuality. This is common knowledge, but it has been emphasized and overemphasized to such … Continue reading

Proud of My Broken Heart– One Blessing is My Conformed Soul and this Enchanted Size

He works so hard. He suffers. He thinks. He has already traveled to Asia and Eastern Europe this year, and he will soon be going to Toronto and Guatemala and Mexico. I do not know how he can do these things. Imagine how the World itself could be transformed for good if every person lived up to their true potential, converted in the depth of one’s soul, a true and faithful commitment to build the kingdom of God. Courage is self-affirmation in-spite-of, that is in spite of that which tends to prevent the self from affirming itself. Nonbeing is the loss of self of the human soul. Courage, however, is usually described as the power of the mind to overcome fear. The effect of this awakening of at least the educated groups to an awareness of their own anxiety, and a permeation of the public consciousness by ideas and symbols of anxiety. Today, it has become almost a truism to call our time an age of anxiety. This holds equally for American and Europe. It is conceivable that in the light of an ontology of courage some fundamental aspects of anxiety may become visible. The first assertion about the nature of anxiety is this: anxiety is the state in which a being is aware of its possible nonbeing. However, it is not the abstract knowledge of nonbeing which produces anxiety, but the awareness that nonbeing is a part of one’s own being. It is not the realization of universal transitoriness, not even the experience of the death of others, but the impression of these events on the always latent awareness of our own having to die that produces anxiety. #RandolphHarris 1 of 10

Anxiety is finitude, experienced as one’s own finitude. This is the natural anxiety of human as human, and in some way of all living beings. It is the anxiety of nonbeing, the awareness of one’s finitude as finitude. The ensouled body is in communion with the body of the World and finds its healthy in that intimacy. Never say that it is not God’s will to give you what you ask. Do not faint and give up, but find out the reason you have not received; increase the intensity of your search and examine the evidence. “The law of the LORD is perfect, reviving the soul. The statues of the LORD are trustworthy, making wise the simple. The precepts of the LORD are right, giving joy to the heart. The commands of the LORD are radiant, giving light to the eyes. The fear of the Lord is pure, enduring forever. The ordinances of the LORD are sure and altogether righteous. They are more precious than gold, than much pure gold; they are sweeter than honey, than honey from the comb. By them is your servant warned; in keeping them there is great reward,” reports Psalm 19.7-11. We must train our eyes to look with compassion and appreciation. Soul is never far from attachment to particulars; a soulful body exercise will always lead us toward an affectionate relationship to the World. Human’s humor is one of their most important traits in the face of the tensions and pressures exerted on them. #RandolphHarris 2 of 10

The ability to laugh is crucial for crucial for a person’s mental health. When we relate to our bodies as having soul, we attend to their beauty, their poetry and their expressiveness. The person who can laugh at oneself is further along the road to self-respect and appreciation. To be able to kid oneself at times is not only a tension reliever, but it promotes a kind of necessary objectivity. There is a proper balance between extremes of objectivity (when the person never gets involved in anything) and subjectivity (where everything is directed at you and everybody is pointing at or talking about you). It might work like this: A young girl of 14 years of age is trying very hard to enhance her singing abilities. She has a good voice, knows music, and has made a number of public performances. However, she is extremely shy about her musical abilities because she has a soft voice, a falsetto. For instance, if her vocal teacher tells her that she should practice a particular section a few more times, sometimes her eyes fill with tears, because of some of the criticism she had received from others, and she thinks the teacher is implying she is not any good and has no future in music. She mentioned this, crying, in psychology class one day, and a male student innocently quipped that her sensitive nature and soft voice would make her a successful Rhythm and Blues singer. The rest of the class laughed and the young lady got up and left the room. #RandolphHarris 3 of 10

In talking with her about it later, her psychology instructor tried a simple tack. Although he rarely tells his students what they ought to do he told her that sensitivity to such remarks, to any kind of criticism, would make life in the entertainment field very difficult for her and that she ought to consider a strategy to deal with some of the unpleasant things that may come her way. He asked her if she felt she had the firm commitment to follow through in such a competitive business. The girl was being asked to stand back from her extreme subjectivity and evaluate some realities. The girl came to see the psychologist three days later, pointed a brave finger at him, and said he had given her somethings she spent time pondering about, and asked him what could he share with her about the music and the rigors of the profession that may help her with longevity in the industry. He turned her around and told her to continue, but to watch herself in a chamber of mirrors, and think about how you want people to see you and how you look and sounds. The girl had displayed a great deal of growth in discovering that when she took herself so seriously she looked like a diva. The way our unconscious mind works, we are actually attracted to—moved psychologically toward—what we think about. #RandolphHarris 4 of 10

For that reason, when we encounter the inevitable barriers on our way to our goal, we will tend to look at the situation from the winner’s. Before we select a long-term goal, we should try to visualize how we can improve our performance. In everyday life, the ability to catch ourselves being too serious, bearing all the World’s burdens, saving the human race, helps us relieve some of the built-up tension through laughter. Laughter has other uses and meanings. For some it is the tension release chosen when they recognize the futility of trying harder. For example, a person may beat one’s head against the symbolic brick wall in trying to communicate with another individual. One may have to acknowledge that the communication may not take place with this person, or with the set of words, or in tis particular time or place. If one can then laugh it off, one finds oneself better equipped to experience similar frustration and, once the tension is released, may discover a more successful tactic. “Your hand will lay hold on all your enemies; your right hand will seize your foes. At the time of your appearing you will male them like a fiery furnace. In his wrath the LORD will swallow them up, and his fire will consume them. You will destroy their descendants from the Earth, their posterity from humankind. Though they plot evil against you and devise wicked schemes, they cannot succeed,” reports Psalm 21.8-11. #RandolphHarris 5 of 10

Laughing at the misfortunes of others is sometimes a form of sadism, wherein some pleasure is gained from observing the difficulties of others. Sometimes it is an acknowledgment of how much we identify with another person and how close a call we have had in not being the target or object of the misfortune. “There but for the grace of God go I,” is frequently uttered with amusement. Most laughter is a kind of reflex behavior that occurs when we recognize the irony in situations. Life is full of littler ironies. Humor enables us to safely experience them, or vicariously to go through them a second or third time. There are many incongruous things about life, too. We laugh at them partly because there may be something objectively humorous or absurd in them, but mostly because we really do not know what else to do. There are unmanageable. We cannot do very much to change or utilize them. Like the incongruity of environmental pollution. We construct a society that depends on industry. The industry converts raw materials into product and waste. The waste is disposed of, and it often clogs the very environment we are trying to improve. We take a fishing pole and try to get back to nature during an afternoon of fishing. However, the waters are filthy and the fish are diseased or dead. When we realize the vicious circle that has brought us to it, most of us have to shake our heads and laugh at the folly of humanity. #RandolphHarris 6 of 10

This point can be illustrated by the fact that various New York City newspapers not long ago suggested in all seriousness that to force the city’s electric power plant to consider cutting down on its air pollution everyone in the city should, on a specific night, refuse to turn on their lights and use candles instead. Many people were in favor of this dramatic boycott but almost no one saw the absurdity of over eight million people burning candles cutting down on smog—even with smokeless candles! (No one also considered how busy the fire department would be.) This type of humor, the acknowledging of the absurdities of human behavior, is the healthy kind of humor that the self-actualizing person experiences. One does not enjoy the hostile humor that laughs at those with limited physical and mental capabilities, the less affluent, nor the less fortunate. Sick and Cruelty jokes do not make one laugh; there is too much tragedy or sadness in them. It is in the absurd lengths to which some people carry their behavior that one finds humor. One of our jobs in becoming full-fledged adults is to embrace the pain we could not afford to feel during our younger years. Allowing oneself to live the unexperienced pain of the past is the only way to unclog our emotional system and live in the present. #RandolphHarris 7 of 10

Some laughter is hostile. Many of the best comedians today are capable of biting satire. They select a person or a stereotype of a person and make one the subject of their humor. When we laugh at them, we make a commentary on our own feelings about the objects of the joke, or how we feel about the situation in which we live, or about ourselves. Satire has always been an effective tool for directing hostility toward a person or group. Ans the satirist has a certain protection or immunity from retaliatory hostility. Jonathan Swift’s children’s tale, Gulliver’s Travels, is a biting satire on the British Empire and was protected by virtue of its being put in fictionalized form. Many people have never been aware of its original purpose. Nor are we aware of the political satire in most Mother Goose nursery rhymes we all learned as children. If the subject of satire feels the sting and is tempted to retaliate or at least get angry, the satirist’s easy response s “What is the matter? Dude, you cannot take a joke?” Being able to take a joke is an example of good sportspersonship. Pity the satirist, though. One may be a person who is unable to come out openly with his or her hostility and deal with it, mature person to mature person. Therefore, be gentle, patient, and loving with yourself. Explore ways to feel safe while experiencing and expressing the full rage of your emotions. #RandolphHarris 8 of 10

This is not to say that satire is not effective in terms of social change. Many political cartoonists get their point across to politicians better than all the constituent cards and letters could ever do. Political satire is rather ingenious. However, it is obvious that the satire, however subtle it may be, is meant to express some kind of hostility or resentment toward what is being depicted. Laughter is good one one’s mental health. Honest joy, open amusement, pure innocent delight are all aspects of well-developed selfhood. We are letting the Child in us come out to play. The Adult in us is too often serious, stuffy, objective, busy with data-processing of daily existence. The Parent is us is often busy with the data-processing of daily existence. The Parent in us is often busy judging what we do as right or wrong, good or evil, appropriate or inappropriate. The Child, which is the remnant of simple, basic, sensual open personhood, is vital to our fullest development. It is in the play activities, like sports, hobbies, art, dating, eating, and dancing, that we experience this very important part of us. Each of the three—Child, Adult, and Parent—is necessary, but none more than the other. Fortunate is the person who can watch a cartoon on TV and experience it as funny (Child), entertaining and diverting (Adult), and good (Parent). #RandolphHarris 9 of 10

Laughter is one of the ways in which we relax and re-create the self. The things we find humorous may vary, but the experiences of humor, of pleasure of enjoyment are extremely important and must be cultivated for the fullest experience of living. We live in times of great opportunities. God seeks to enlist soul who diligently go about the work of building the kingdom of those—those who, when faced with opposition and temptation, declare in their hearts that they are doing great work and cannot come down. When faced with ridicule and reproach, people of God proclaim, “I am doing great work and cannot come down.” Our Heavenly Father seeks those who refuse to allow the trivial to hinder them in their pursuit of the eternal. “Speak the truth in love,” reports Ephesians 4.15. Keep it mind, do not criticize another person’s feelings or try to change them. Only the person who has the feelings can change them. We can help most by listening and empathizing. We can show empathy by supportive listening—eye contact, nobs, pats, or hugs. Think for a moment what could be accomplished in our personal lives, in our professional lives, in our families, in our wards and branches. Think of how the kingdom of God could progress throughout the Earth. #RandolphHarris 10 of 10

The Past is Such a Curious Creature—What Soft Cherubic Beings these People are!

God has unlimited goodness, knowledge, and power. The omnipotence of God requires that he should be able to do what we would understand as being logically impossible, and thus the eternal truths are dependent on God’s will. The concept of self-preservation as well our interpretative concept self-affirmation, if taken ontologically, posit a serious question. What does self-affirmation mean if there is no self, e.g. in the inorganic realm or in the infinite substance, in being-itself? Is it not an argument against the ontological character of courage that it is impossible to attribute courage to large sections of reality and to the essence of all reality? Is courage not a human quality which can be attributed even to higher beings only by analogy but not properly? Does this not decide for the moral against the ontological understanding of courage? In stating this argument one is reminded of similar arguments against metaphysical concepts in history of human thought. Concepts like the World soul, microcosmos, instinct, the will to power, and so on have been accused of introducing subjectivity into the objective realm of things. However, these accusations are mistaken. They miss the meaning of ontological concepts. It is not the functions of these concepts to describe the ontological nature of reality in terms of the subjective or the objective side of our ordinary experience. #RandolphHarris 1 of 10

A human’s power is nothing in comparison to that of one’s maker. Indeed, a person is helpless to do anything expect sin unless one is assisted by the power and grace of God—God works in us both to will and to do.  It is the function of an ontological concept to use some realm of experience to point to the characteristics of being-itself which lie above the split between subjectivity and objectivity and which therefore cannot be expressed literally in terms taken from the subjective or the objective side. Ontology speaks analogously. Being as being transcends objectivity as well as subjectivity. However, in order to approach it cognitively one must use both. And one can do so because both are rooted in that which transcends them, in being-itself. It is the light of this consideration that the ontological concepts referred to must interpreted. They must be understood not literally but analogously. This does not mean that they have been produced arbitrarily and can easily be replaced by other concepts. Their choice is a matter of experience and thought, and subject to criteria which determine the adequacy or inadequacy of each of them. This is true also of concepts like self-preservation or self-affirmation, if taken in ontological sense. It is true of every chapter of an ontology course. #RandolphHarris 2 of 10

God knows what will come to pass, but his knowing does not cause anything to happen. Both Self-preservation and self-affirmation logically imply the overcome of something which, at least potentially, threatens or denies the self. There is no explanation of this something in the minds of some. If everything follows by necessity from the nature of the eternal substance, no being would have the power to threaten the self-preservation of another being. Every thing would be as if it is and self-affirmation would be exaggerated word for the simple identity of a thing with itself. Self-affirmation and self-preservation are powerful and part of growth. Therefore, the will does not strive for something it does not have, for some object outside of itself, but wills itself in the double sense of preserving and transcending itself. This is its power, and also its power over itself. Will to power is the self-affirmation of the will as ultimate reality. Life in this term is the process in which the power of being actualizes itself. However, in actualizing itself it overcomes that in life which, although belong to life, negates life. One could call it the will which contradicts the will to power. Life has many aspects, it is ambiguous. Its ambiguity most typically in the last fragment of the collection of fragments which is called the Will to Power. #RandolphHarris 3 of 10

Courage is the power of life to affirm itself in spite of this ambiguity, while the negation of life because of its negativity is an expression of cowardice. We can develop a prophecy and philosophy of courage in opposition to the mediocrity and decadence of life in the period which is to come. It is your dearest Self, your virtue what is good. The Self has itself, but at the same time it tries to reach to itself. Life is that special substance. The truth of virtue is that the Self is in it and not an outward thing. Courage is the affirmation of one’s self it is virtue altogether. The self whose self-affirmation is virtue and courage is the self which surpasses itself. Life creates life loves and what is has created is the will to power which is more than life. Life, willing to surpass itself, is the good life, and the good life is the courageous life. It is the life of the powerful soul and the triumphant body whose self-enjoyment is virtue. Such a soul banishes everything cowardly; it says: bad—that is cowardly. However, in order to each such a nobility it is necessary to obey and to command and to obey while commanding. This obedience which is included in commanding is the opposite of submissiveness. The latter is the cowardice which does not dare to risk itself. The submissive self is the opposite of the self-affirming self, even if it is submissive to a God. It wants to escape the pain of hurting and being hurt. #RandolphHarris 4 of 10

God’s views of all things from the perspective of eternity—the simultaneous and complete possession of infinite life. In such a conception there is no suggestion of succession in time, and God must thus see all things in a manner similar to that in which we view things spread out in a given moment. The obedient self, on the contrary, is the self which commands itself and risks itself thereby. In commanding itself it becomes its own judge and its own victim. It commands itself according to the law of life, the law of self-transcendence. The will which commands itself is the creative will. It makes a whole out of fragments and riddles of life. It does not look back, it stands beyond a bad conscience, it rejects the spirit of revenge which is the innermost nature of self-accusation and of the consciousness of guilt, it transcends reconciliation, for it is the will to power. In doing al this the courageous self is united with life itself and its secret. One acts voluntarily and freely, then, in doing what one wills, prefers, or chooses. The unconscious is the master of every fate and the captain of every soul. The courage to look into the abyss of nonbeing in the complete loneliness of one who accepts the message that we have to manifest God in our daily lives has the experience of courage and proves to be an outstanding key for the ontological approach to reality. #RandolphHarris 5 of 10

 God is not deceiver; hence, we may conclude that we are not systematically misled with respect to those things which we have a strong natural tendency to believe and, accordingly, we are not misled in supposing that there is both a part and an external World. One of the faults in the way most of us think is the strong tendency to dichotomize, to divide things up into mutually exclusive opposites. If work is viewed as a curse, not working is viewed as a blessing. Mainly we view work as a necessary evil and our leisure time and days off as the necessary and balancing good. Partly because we still hold onto the Work-Sin Ethic and partly because of this dichotomous way of thinking, play takes on the interesting character of being something earned, a reward for working so hard. Most of us do not know how to use leisure time or play in a creative and restorative way. For some the reward comes from sleeping late on days off, refusing to do anything in the way of labor, avoiding chores or tasks, and resenting people or things that interfere with just laying about the house. #RandolphHarris 6 of 10

A few people occupy themselves with eating or drinking or smoking too much on their days off. Reward mechanisms take many forms, and for all that people may resent immature behavior, they fail to recognize that their work as rewardable at all is a juvenile attitude. Work in the general sense need not be such a drag as to engender this necessarily to escape into activities that are merely different without necessarily being pleasant or fun. Therefore, in order to discuss attitudes toward play, we must first consider attitudes toward work as play. There are lot of examples of work that must be considered nothing more than drudgery. However, it is possible to note that there are many people who are capable of finding enjoyment, even fun, it the most menial or tedious kinds of work. How? Possibly the answer, complex as it is, lies not in the nature of the work experience, but in the person doing the work. The person who brings to one’s work, ether ditch-digging or book-writing, a sense of personal expression is likely to enjoy one’s work. To actually be able to see work as an outgrowth of selfhood makes it more enjoyable. Many people report that their work is considered a chance to demonstrate their personal sense of selfhood. #RandolphHarris 7 of 10

People who take their work as an expression of themselves find work that enables them to test out certain skills or that gives them an opportunity to explore other, often hidden, skills. They take on new tasks, or do old tasks in new ways, because it is a form of self-expression. Any job, no matter how insignificant it may seem at the time, becomes a challenge in some sense. There is an increasing tendency on the part of aware people to seek out work that is meaningful to them and to whomever they work for. Many are unwilling to take just any job simply to earn money or job security. They recognize that in a complex and highly varied society such as ours there are thousands of different kinds of work, with some of the less traditional jobs and the newer ones offering individuals new chances to explore and express their selfhood. However, how does playfulness enter into working? It can be artificially inserted by those who try to find aspects of the work that are enjoyable, stimulating, fun. Or the work or the particular task may be visualized as a game. One of the advantages of playing at work is that overly self-absorbed people can learn not to take themselves quite so seriously, to be so concerned about how they look, or what others think or feel about them that they literally sit in judgment on themselves. #RanolphHarris 8 of 10

People who criticize themselves for the type of work they do or let the judgments of others get to them about their personal job or career choice are demonstrating a lack of confidence or self-liking. They are too dependent on external validation of their selfhood to be in the same category with self-actualizing people. Better than artificially creating games or play is attitude-changing. Work and play are not absolute polar extremes. Most jobs are situations that include relaxation and drudgery, challenge and monotony, delight and disgust, exhilaration and tedium, inspiration and irritation, fulfillment and frustration, self-satisfaction and service. The creative, self-actualizing people is capable of experiencing all of these and growing from them. It is important to feel motivated and inspired in your career. Without the drive to excel, your performance will lack passion and, in turn, your company may suffer. Productivity allows one to work in the most efficient manner, which makes room for downtime and encouraged work-life balance. If one is passionate about one’s, one is likely to take an active interest in learning every aspect of the business. Many people are too afraid to follow their dreams and do what they love, but keep in mind it is important that we challenge ourselves so we can achieve our vision. #RandolphHarris 9 of 10

Testimony is personal knowledge, based up the witness of the Holy Ghost, that certain facts of eternal significance are true. The Holy Ghost is the messenger for the Father and the Son and the teacher of and guide to all truth. This, by the power of the Holy Ghost we may know the truth of all things. The knowledge and spiritual conviction we receive from the Holy Ghost are the results of revelation Seeking for and obtaining these blessings require a sincere heart, real intent, and faith in Christ. A personal testimony also brings responsibility and accountability. “Neither take ye thought beforehand what ye shall say; but treasure up in your minds continually the words of life, and it shall be given you in the very hour that portion that shall be meted unto every person,” report Doctrine and Covenants 84.85. Therefore, let naturally occurring times happen where one can have a conversation and testify of specific blessings one has received during the course of relatively routine activities of that day, which is one of the reasons Sunday Dinner is so important to many God loving families. The truth is the scripture has always been a source of direction for many and Sunday Dinner is a time the family uses to illuminate the needs and better understand each other in a supportive and secure environment. #RandolphHarris 10 of 10

Pretty Tunes Play as the Sunshine Entertains Our Mines like Pearls so Divine and We Dream the Days Away

 

Last night she lay on the bed for hours. She was whispering things. I could not hear her. She would not talk to me. She would not come out of it. She would not get dressed for bed, or take anything to eat or drink. I lay beside her—what you told me to do. I held her. I even sang to her. Sleep does many things for us. In sleep there is the obvious function of resting the tired cells of the body. They are not called upon to fire and react as much as during sleep as during the average day. Do the cells are allowed to go through a longer period of what we call absolute refraction. In the period they build up potentially for future use more easily and efficiently than when they might be called on for quick reactivity with short periods of rest. Also in sleep we have the chance to escape from conscious and direct involvement with the World around us. We can shut out some of the pressures we face in a waking state, and one good turn gets most of the blanket. Sleep can also be an exquisite personal, and spiritual experience. Falling asleep can be an experience to look forward to each night. In a state of slumber, we experience the process of surrendering. That is important because in order to really derive enjoyment and true peace in this sublime state of being, we must be relaxed. Relaxation does not begin until after we have completed the last thing on our list. It is cultivated in intervals during the day. #RandolphHarris 1 of 6

Going to bed early and getting up early will allow the mind and body to become rested. Another definite function of sleep seems to be to give us a chance to dream. Recently, dreams have been the subject of much research, and we now know a bit more than we used to about them. When, after passing through a narrow defile, one suddenly reaches a height beyond which the ways part and a rich prospect lies outspread in different direction, it is well to stop for a moment and consider whither one shall turn next. We are in somewhat the same position after we have mastered this first interpretation of the dream. We find ourselves standing in the light of discovery. The dream is not comparable to the irregular sounds of a musical instrument, which, instead of being played by the hand of a musician, is struck by some external force; the dream is not meaningless, not absurd, does not presuppose that one part of our store of ideas is dormant while another part begins to awake. It is a perfectly valid psychic phenomenon, actually a wish-fulfillment; it may be enrolled in the continuity of the intelligible psychic activities of the waking state; it is built up by a highly complicated intellectual activity. Dreams seem to play a very important part in preserving our mental health. #RandolphHarris 2 of 6

When we are dreaming we are involved with what is called Rapid Eye Movement Sleep. REM Sleep comes right after a period of deep sleep during which no dreaming seems to take place. There may be four to six stages of REM sleep each night, lasting for only a few minutes. During this period the eye ball is actually moving underneath the closed eyelid, much as it does when it follows the ball in a tennis match. Subjects who are awakened when the recording instruments indicate they are in REM sleep report on their dreams, but they also give evidence that they are irritated by the interruption, leading dream experts to speculate that the dreaming is very important to them. Dr. Freud believe that dreams serve dynamic functions by protecting sleep and alleviating unconscious wishes. It is easy to show that the wish-fulfillment in dream is often undisguised and easy to recognize, so that one may wonder why the language of dreams has not long since been understood. There is, for example, a dream which I can evoke as often as I please, experimentally, as it were. #RandolphHarris 3 of 6

If, in the evening, I eat anchovies, olives, or other strongly salted foods, I am thirsty at night, and therefore I wake. The waking, however, is preceded by a dream, which has always the same content, namely that I am drinking. I am drinking long draughts of water; it tastes as delicious as only a cool drink can taste when one’s throat is parched; and then I wake, and find that I have an actual desire to drink. The cause of this dream is thirst, which I perceived when I wake. From this sensation arises the wish to drink, and the dream shows me this wish as fulfilled. It thereby serves a function. I sleep well, and am not accustomed to being waked by a bodily need. If I succeed in appeasing my thirst by means of the dream that I am drinking, I need not wake up in order to satisfy that this. It is thus a dream of convenience. The dream takes the place of action, as elsewhere in life. Unfortunately, the need of water to quench the thirst cannot be satisfied by a dream, as can my thirst can only be quenched if I get up and fetch a glass of water. I thus quite appropriately dreamt that my wife was giving me a drink from a vase; this vase was an Etruscan cinerary urn, which I had brought home from Italy, and had since given away. However, the water in it tasted so salt (apparently on account of the ashes) that I was forced to wake. #RandolphHarris 4 of 6

Another view holds that dreams simply express a need for some kind of cognitive activity, which is present during sleep as well as when awake. A third view suggests that dreams are more or less unimportant cognitive activities that express internal states during sleep. This would mean that intrinsic energy or tension is acted out through the symbolic content of the dream, regardless of the meaning of the content. All of these views are based on the research evidence we currently have concerning dreams. Whether we are aware of dreaming or not (and evidence suggests that we all do dream every night), sleep is an important part of our lives. We know from many studies that subjects will experience fantastic changes at all levels if they are deprived of it. Subject who have been kept awake experimentally for long periods of time report physical sensation they do not ordinarily have. Some subjects report tingling or numbness in the limbs. Some report headaches, nausea, dizzy feelings, and soreness in muscles. Others report mental confusion. A few have experienced hallucinations and delusions. All report a lowered threshold of tolerance for various stimuli. They have less patience, less ability to stand tension, less tolerance for bothersome noises. #RandolphHarris 5 of 6

Obviously, we need sleep and we need it to be relatively uninterrupted. However, since sleep is a function of both individual needs and cultural attitudes toward it, the amount needed varies with each individual. The average or the mean is generally expressed as eight hours. If the average work day is eight hors and the average sleep time is eight hours, what do we do with the remaining eight hours a day? In many cases they are more important, for the person may use them in such beneficial ways as to enhance one’s work and enable the sleep to come more readily. People who get adequate sleep receives more flashed of inspiration and insight during the day. “Cease to sleep longer than is needful; retire to thy bed early, that ye may not be weary; arise early, that your bodies and your minds may be invigorated,” reports Doctrine and Covenants 88.124. It is well to be up before day-break, for such a habit contributes to health, wealth and wisdom. Connection have also been made between keeping an early schedule and mental and emotional health. To those who feel defeated and downtrodden, look to the early hours of the day for your rescue because the World is usually a more beautiful place early in the morning. Life is so much more calm. Much more can be accomplished in a shorter amount of time. #RandolphHarris 6 of 6