We believe in being honest. Complete honesty is necessary for our salvation. If we accept salvation on the terms it is offered to us, we have got to be honest in every thought, in our reflections, in our meditations, in our private circles, in our deals, in our declarations, and in every act of our lives. God is honest and just in all things. “I perceive that it has been made known unto you, by the testimony of His word, that He cannot walk in crooked paths; neither doth he vary from that which he hath said; neither hath He a shadow of turning from the right to the left, or from that which is right to that which is wrong; therefore, His course is one eternal round,” reports Alma 7.20. Honest people love truth and justice. They are honest in their words and actions. They do not lie, steal, or cheat. If you do what is righteous, when you think about it, there would be to reason to lie. Those who choose to cheat and lie and deceive and misrepresent become slaves of the enemy. Lying is intentionally deceiving others. Bearing false witness is one form of lying. The Lord is not pleased with dishonesty, and we will have to account for our lies. “And our spirits must have become like unto Him, and we become devils, angels to a devil, to be shut out from the presence of our God, and to remain with the father of lies, in misery, like unto himself; yea, to that being who beguiled our first parents, who transformeth himself nigh unto an angel of light, and stirreth up the children of men unto secret combinations of murder and all manner of secret works of darkness,” reports 2 Nephi 9.9. #RandolphHarris 1 of 22

The altruistic ideal is set up for aspirants as a practical means of using the will to curb egoism and crush its pettiness. However, these things are to be done to train the aspirant in surrendering his personal self to his higher self, not in making him subservient to other human wills. The primacy of purpose is to be given to spiritual self-realization, not to social service. This above all others is the goal to be kept close to his heart, not meddling in the affairs of others. Only after he has attended adequately—and to some extent successfully—to the problem of himself can he have the right to look out for or intrude into other people’s problems. This does not mean, however, that he is to become narrowly self-centered or entirely selfish. On the contrary, the wish to confer happiness and the willingness to seek the welfare of mankind should be made the subject of solemn dedication at every crucial stage, every inspired hour, of his quest. However, prudence and wisdom bid him wait for a more active altruistic effort until he has lifted himself to a higher level, found his own inner strength, knowledge, and peace, and has learnt to stand unshaken by the storms, passions, desires, and greeds of ordinary life. “And there shall also be many which shall say: Eat, drink, and be merry; nevertheless, fear God—He will justify in committing a little sin; yea, lie a little, take the advantage of one because of his words, dig a pit for thy neighbour; there is no harm in this; and do all these things, for tomorrow we die; and if it so be that we are guilty, God will beat us with a few stripes, and at last we shall be saved in the kingdom of God,” reports 2 Nephi 28.8. #RandolphHarris 2 of 22

Hence it is better for the beginner to keep himself any pretension to altruism, remaining silent and inactive about them. The dedication may be made, but it should be made in the secrecy of the inmost heart. Better than talk about it or premature activity for it, is the turning of attention to the work of purifying himself, his feelings, motives, mind, and deeds. Just as the word compassion is so often mistaken for a foolish and weak sentimentality, so the words egoless, unselfishness, and unself-centeredness are equally mistaken for what they are not. They are so often thought to mean nonseparatness from other individuals or the surrender of personal rights to other individuals or the setting aside of duty to us for the sake of serving other individuals. This is often wrong. The philosophical meaning of egoism is that attitudes of separateness not from another individual on the same imperfect level as us but from the one universal life-power which is behind all individuals on a deeper level than them all. When we allow the personal ego to rule us, when we allow the personal self to prevent the one universal self from entering our field of awareness, we are separated from that infinite mind. Jesus’ preachment of love of one’s neighbour as oneself is impossible to follow in all fullness until one has attained the height whereon his own true self dwells. #RanolphHarris 3 of 22

Obedience to it would mean identifying oneself with the neighbour’s physical pain and emotional suffering so that they were felt not less keenly than one’s own. One could not bear that when brought into contact with all kinds of human sorrow that shadow of life. It could be borne only when one had crushed its power to affect one’s own feelings and disturb one’s own equilibrium. Therefore, such love would bring unbearable suffering. By actively identifying oneself with those who are sorrowing, by pushing one’s sympathy with them to its extreme point, one gets disturbed and weakened. This does not improve one’s capacity to help the sufferer, but only lessens it. To love others is praiseworthy, but it must be coupled with balance and with reason or it will lose itself ineffectually in the air. Not to let his interest in other matters or his sympathy with other persons carry him away from his equilibrium, his inner peace, but to stop either when it threatens to agitate his mind or disturb his feelings, is wisdom. Love of the divine is our primary duty. Love of our neighbour is only a secondary one. Compassion is the highest moral value, the noblest human feeling, the purest creature-love. It is the final social expression of man’s divine soul. For he is able to feel with and for another man only because both are in reality related in harmony by the presence of that soul in each one. #RandolphHarris 4 of 22

There must be an end, a limit to his sacrifices on behalf of others. They must not play upon his kindness to the extent of ruining his own life. He may help them, certainly, but there are various other ways to do so than by surrendering what is essential to his own life to satisfy their emotional demands or material desires. For this notion of love is a sadly limited one. To bestow it only on a wife or a child, a sweetheart, or a sister, is to bestow it in anticipation of its being returned. Man finds in time that such giving which hopes for a getting is not enough. Love cannot stop there. It seeks to grow beyond the restricted circle of a few friends and relations. Life itself lead him on to transcend it. And this he does firstly, by transcending the lure of the pitiful transient flesh and secondly, by transforming love into something nobler and rarer—compassion. In the divine self-giving of this wonderful quality and in its expansion until all mankind is touched, love finally fulfills itself. Jesus taught, “Thou shalt not steal,” reports Matthew 19.18. Stealing is taking something that does not belong to us. When we take what belongs to someone else or to a store or to the community without permission, we are stealing. Taking merchandise or supplies from an employer is stealing. To become completely honest, we must look carefully at our lives. If there are ways in which we are being even the least bit dishonest, we should repent of them immediately. When we are completely honest, we cannot be corrupted. #RandolphHarris 5 of 22

The ideas of activation, responsibility, participation—that is, of the humanization of technological society—can find full expression only in a movement which is not bureaucratic, not connected with the political machines, and which is the result of active and imaginative efforts by those who share the same aims. Such a movement itself, in its organization and method, would be expressive of the aim to which it is devoted: to educate its members for the new kind of society in the process of striving for it. The first step would be the formation of a National Council which could be called the “Voice of America Conscience.” I think of a group of, say, fifty Americas whose integrity and capability are unquestioned. While they might have different religious and political convictions, they would share the humanist aims which are the basis for the humanization of technological society. They would deliberate and issue statements which, because of the weight of those who issued them, would be newsworthy, and because of the truth and rationality of their contents would win attention from at least a large sector of the American public. Such Councils could also be formed on a local level, dealing with the general questions bet specifically with the practical questions relevant for the city or state which they represented. One could imagine that there might be a whole organization of Councils of the Voice of American Conscience, with a nationally representative group and many local groups following basically the same aims. #RandolphHarris 6 of 22

The National Council would deal with the broad aspects of national affairs, that is, foreign and domestic policies, while the local councils would take up the questions relevant to state and communities, again concerned with broad aspects rather than with details of execution. For example, the National Council would debate the question of the Afghanistan War, our foreign policy in Asia, our assistance to the development of less affluent nations and Ukraine, the reconstruction of our cities, the problems of values, education, and culture. The local councils would debate problems of conservation, city planning, slum clearance, relocating industries, etcetera. These debates would not be conducted on a general and abstract level. On the contrary, they would constitute the best thinking of the best minds in America. Often the Counsil would form subcommittees to study special problems and call upon specialists for advice. It would be up to the Voice of American Conscience (1) to clarify the issues, (2) to show the real possibilities and alternatives, (3) to recommend solutions, (4) to respond to statements and actions by other important social bodies, and to any criticism of their own recommendations. The examination of the issues and the recommended solutions would be rooted in the rationality and humanist values which the best in American culture stands for. #RandolphHarris 7 of 22

These Councils would balance the structure based on political power represented by the government, the legislature, and the political parties. They would be the voice of reason and conscience, addressing themselves to the organs of power and to the population. Whenever the Councils did not arrive at unanimous solutions, one or more minority reports would be issued. It is easy to underestimate what such Council could do by pointing out that they would have no power. This is true in an obvious sense; it is not quite so true in a more subtle sense. Technological society, more than any society before, rests upon knowledge, on education in science and rational thought. While the average professional is not a true scientist but a mere technician, the development of scientific ideas depends on the development of scientific theory; this means that economic and political progress rest in the long run on the progress of culture. Those who represent culture have no direct power; but since the progress of society depends on their contribution, their voice will be taken seriously by a new class of people with college educations (teachers, technicians, programmers, laboratorians, research workers, professionals, etcetera) whose cooperation is a vital necessity for the functioning of the social system. Extreme importance should be attached to the training of will-power and the habit of making firm decisions, also the habit of being always ready to accept responsibilities. #RandolphHarris 8 of 22

The deliberate training of fine and noble traits of character in our schools today is almost negative. In the future much more emphasis will have to be laid on this side of our educational work. Loyalty, self-sacrifice, and discretion are virtues which a great nation most possess. And the teaching and development of these in the school is a more important matter than many other things now included in the curriculum. To make the children give up habits of complaining, whining, and howling when they are hurt, etcetera, also belongs to this part of their training. If the educational system fails to teach the child at an early age, when the boy has grown to be the man and is, for example, in the trenches, the postal service is used for nothing else than to send home letter of weeping and complaint. If our youths, during their years in the primary schools, had had their minds crammed with a little less knowledge, and if instead they had been better taught how to be masters of themselves, it would have served us well during the 2020-2024 years. Lacking an influential military caste, the United States of America never developed a strong military cult audacious enough to glorify war for its own sake. Such outbursts as Roosevelt’s “Strenuous Life” speech were rare; and it was also rare for an American writer to extol war for its effects upon the race, although Rear Admiral Stephen B. Luce, one of Mahan’s patrons, once declared that war is one of the great agencies of human conflict and that “strife in one form or another in the organic would seems to be the law of existence…Suspend the struggle, well called the battle of life, for a brief space, and death claims the victory.” #RandolphHarris 9 of 22

Most writers on war seemed to agree with Spencer that military conflict had been highly useful in developing primitive civilization but has now long outlived its value as an instrument of progress. The advocates of preparedness did not usually take the stand that there is anything inherently desirable in war, but rather quoted the old maxim, “If you wish for peace, prepare for war.” “Let us worship peace, indeed,” conceded Mahan, “as the goal at which humanity must hope to arrive; but let us not fancy that peace is to be had as a boy wrenches an unripe fruit from a tree.” Others took the position that strife is inherent in the nature of things and must be anticipated as an unhappy necessity. Once the martial fever of the short and easy war with Spain had subsided, the psychology of the American people between 1898 and 1917 was surprisingly nervous and defensive for a nation that was rapidly rising in stature as a World power. Encouraged by the eugenics movement, men talked of racial degeneracy, of race suicide, of decline of western civilization, of the effeteness of the western peoples, of the foreign peril. Warnings of decay were most commonly coupled with exhortations to revivify the national spirit. The higher races can live only live in the temperate zone, and will be forever barred from effective colonization in the tropics. Overpopulation and economic exigencies will give rise to state socialism, which will extend its tentacles into every corner of western national life. Because of the increasing dependence of the citizen upon the state, nationalism will grow, and religion, family life, and old-fashioned morality will decline. There will also be a consolidation of peoples into great centralized empires, for only these will have the capacity to survive. #RandolphHarris 10 of 22

Large armies, great cities, huge national debts will hasten cultural eclipse. The decline of competition, coupled with state education, will render the intellectual more mechanical in its operations and deprive it of the initiative that alone is capable of outstanding achievement in the arts. The result will be a World of old people, scientific rather than esthetic, unprogressive, stable, without adventure, energy, brightness, hope, or ambition Meanwhile other races will not fail in vitality, for biology shows that some are more fertile than others. Genocide is a horrible idea, but other nations will on the contrary be likely to challenge the supremacy of western civilization by industrial rather than military means. Perhaps the best that the governing races can do is face the future with courage and dignity. If all this should come to pass, it is idle to say that our pride of place will not be humiliated. “We were struggling among ourselves for supremacy in a World which we thought of as destined to belong to the Aryan races and to the Christian faith; to the letters and arts and charm of social manners which we have inherited from the best times of the past. We shall wake to find ourselves elbowed and hustled, and perhaps even thrust aside by peoples who we looked down upon as servile, and thought of as bound always to minister to our needs. The solitary consolation will be that the changes have been inevitable. It has been our work to organize and create, to carry peace and law and order over the World, that others may enter in and enjoy. Yet in some of us the feeling of caste is so strong that we are not sorry to think we shall have passed away before it arrives,” reports Charles Pearson. #RandolphHarris 11 of 22

Pearson’s fears were the beginning of a reaction from the optimism expressed by Fiske and Strong in the 1880’s. For middle-class intellectuals, reeling under the shock of the panic of 1893 and the deep social discontents of the prolonged depression that followed, his prophecies of doom had a ring of truth. They were particularly suited to the morbid mood that overcame Henry Adams in the 1890’s. He wrote to C.M. Gaskell: “I am satisfied that Pearson is right, and that the dark races are gaining on us, as they have already done in Haiti, and are doing throughout the West Indies and our Southern States. In another fifty years, at the same rate of movement, the white races will have to reconquer the tropics by war and nomadic invasion, or be shut up, norther of the fortieth parallel.” Pearson’s fears are once again being heard echoing through Congress. Republicans realize that with the southern border being invaded by 20,000,000 illegal immigrants in the past four years, and national security being threated that is Donald Trump does not win the 2024 election, not only will they lose the nation, but it could also be the demise of the American Empire. The American Empire will have to fight for its existence. It will not gain or secure nor secure this existence by singing documents like that of The American Rescue Plan. However, for its existence and defence it will precisely need those things which our present system believes can be repudiated. The more worthy its form and its inner national being, the greater will be the envy and opposition of its adversaries. The best defence will not be in the arms it possesses but in its citizens. Bastions of fortresses will not save it, but the living wall of its men and women, filled with an ardent love for their country and a passionate spirit of national patriotism. #RandolphHarris 12 of 22

Americans must realize that the science may also be a means of promoting a spirit of pride in the nation. Not only the history of the World but the history of civilization as a whole must be taught in the light of this principle. An inventor must appear great not only as an inventor but also, and even more so, as a member of the nation. The admiration aroused by the contemplation of a great achievement must be transformed into a feeling of pride and satisfaction that a man of one’s own race has chosen to accomplish it. However, out of the abundance of great names in American history, the greatest will have to be selected and presented to our young generation in such a way as to become solid pillars of strength to support the national spirit. The spirit of nationalism and a feeling for social justice must be fused into one sentiment in the hearts of the youth. Then a day will come when a nation of citizens will arise which will be welded together through a common love and a common pride that shall be invincible and indestructible forever. The dread of chauvinism, which is a symptom of our time, is a sign of its impotence. Since our epoch not only lacks everything in the nature of exuberant energy but even finds such a manifestation disagreeable, fate will never elect it for the accomplishment of any great deeds. If they had not been inspired by ardent and even hysterical passions, the greatest changes that have taken place on this Earth would have been inconceivable, but only by the bourgeois virtues of peacefulness and order. #RandolphHarris 13 of 22

One thing is certain: our World is facing a great revolution. The only question is whether the outcome will be propitious for the American portion of mankind or whether the everlasting Democrat will profit by it. By educating the young generation along the right lines, the American Empire will have to see to it that a generation of mankind is formed which will be adequate to this supreme combat that will decide the destines of the World. That nation will conquer which will be the first to take this road. If they are allowed to go on, not only do certain life courses have predictable outcomes, but a certain dialogue of specific words spoken a certain way is necessary to establish the proper motivation for the outcome. In both the theater and in real life, the cues must be memorized and spoken exactly right so that other people will respond in a way that justifies and advances the action. If the hero changes his lines and his ego state, the other people respond differently. The two of them might then take off together instead of skulking around the castle—a bad play, but probably a better life. A script must be rehearsed and rewritten before it is ready for the most dramatic performance. In the theater there are readings, rewrites, rehearsals, and tryouts before the big time. A life script states off in childhood in a primitive form called the protocol. Here the other players are limited to parents, brothers, and sisters; or in an institution or foster home, to tablemates and those in charge. These all play their roles rather rigidly because every family is an institution, and the child does not learn much flexibility from them. #RandolphHarris 14 of 22

As he moves into adolescence, he begins to meet more people. He seeks out those who will play the roles his script requires (they will do it because he plays some role their scripts require). Currently, he rewrites his script to take account of his new environment. The basic plot remains the same, but the action is a little different. In most cases (except for adolescent suicide or murder), this is rehearsal—something like a small-town tryout. Through several such adaptations, he gets it into final form for the biggest production of all—the farewell performance, the final payoff on the script. If it is a “good” one, it takes place at a farewell dinner. If it is a “bad” one, he says good-by from a hospital bed, the door of a prison cell or psychiatric ward, the gallows, or the morgue. The whole organization of education and training which the American Empire is to build up must take as its crowing task the work of instilling into the hearts and brains of the youth entrusted to it the racial instinct and understanding of the racial idea. No boy or girl must leave school without having attained a clear insight into the meaning of patriotism and the importance of maintaining chastity unadulterated. Thus, the first indispensable condition for the preservation of our nation will have been established and thus the future cultural progress of our people will be assured. Almost every script has roles for “good guys” and “bad guys,” and for “winners” and “losers.” What is considered good or bad, and what is a winner or a loser, is something peculiar to each script, but it is noticeably clear that every script has these four characters, sometimes combined in two roles. #RandolphHarris 15 of 22

In a cowboy script, for example, the good guy is a winner, and the bad guy is a loser. Good means brave, quick on the draw, honest, and pure; bad may mean cowardly, slow on the draw, crooked, and interested in girls. A winner is someone who survives; a loser is hanged or gets shot. In a soap opera, a winner is a girl who gets a man; a loser is a girl who loses a man. In a paper-shuffle opera, the winner is the man who gets the best contract or the most proxies; a loser is a man who does not know how to shuffle papers. In script analysis, winners are called “princes” or princesses,” and losers are called “frogs.” The object of script analysis is to turn frogs into princes and princesses. To do this, the therapist has to find out who the good guys and the bad guys are in the patient’s script, and also what kind of a winner he can be. The patient fights being a winner because he is not in treatment for that purpose, but only to be made into a braver loser. This is natural enough, since if he becomes a braver loser, he can follow his script more comfortably, whereas if he becomes a winner, he must throw away all or most of his script and start over, which most people are reluctant to do. All scripts, whether in the theater or in real life, are essentially answers to the basic question of human encounter: “What do you say after you say Hello?” The Oedipal drama and the Oedipal life, for example, both hinges entirely on this question. Whenever Oedipus meets an older man, he first says Hello. The next thing he has to say, driven by his script, is: “Wanna fight?” If the older man say “No,” Oedipus has nothing further to say to him, and can only stand dumbly wondering whether to talk about the weather, the conduct of the current wars, or the terrible display on the Olympics mocking Christianity. #RandolphHarris 16 of 22

The easiest way out is to mumble “Pleased to meetcha,” “Si vales bene est, ego valeo,” or “Everything in moderation,” and go on his way. However, if the older one says “Yes,” Oedipus answers “Groovy!” because now he has found his man and he know what to say next. To conceptualize something is to fit it into a class. Such abstracting and classifying is essential in human existence, because it frees a person to act in service of needs once the person has classified what has just been perceived. If I classify a person over there as a woman, and a married woman at that, I act differently toward her than if I classify her as an unmarried woman. When we conceptualize, however, we “close down” our perception, and we no longer notice the continuing disclosure of the being in question. Once I identified someone as “Mother,” I assume I know her, know what to expect of mothers in general and of mine in particular. In fact, concepts of persons and things inevitably go out of date, because every person and everything is more than we presently believe to be the case’ and everything changes in time. My mother today is not identical with my mother yesterday. In self-analysis resistances express themselves in the same three ways, but with an inevitable difference. Clare’s self-analysis produced only once an open and direct resistance, but it produced a great deal of diversified inhibition toward the analytical work and much evasive maneuvering. Occasionally, Clare felt a conscious emotional reaction to her analytical findings—such as her shock at discovering her sponging attitude to loved ones—but such reactions did not prevent her further work. And I believe that this is a typical picture of the way resistances operate in self-analysis. At any rate, it is a picture that we might reasonably expect. #RandolphHarris 17 of 22

Emotional reactions to the findings are bound to occur: the person will feel apprehensive, ashamed, guilty, or irritated about what he discovers in himself. However, these reactions do not assume the proportions they do in professional analysis. One reason for this is that there is no analyst with whom he can engage in a defensive fight, or whom he can make responsible: he is thrown back upon himself. Another reason is that he usually dies with himself more gingerly than an analyst would: he will sense the danger far ahead and almost automatically shrink back from a straight approach, resorting instead to one or another means of avoiding the problem for the time being. What does the patient want? If he has serious symptoms such as psychogenetic headaches, or a wash compulsion, or if he suffers from impotence, he wants to be cured of his symptoms. This is what motivated most of Dr. Freud’s patients to seek analytic help. In general, it is not too difficult to cure such symptoms psychoanalytically and it is, if anything, an underestimation to assume that at least 50 percent of such patients are cured. However, in the last eighty years, these patients with symptoms no longer constitute the majority of those seeking the help of the psychoanalyst. An increasing number of people come who do not suffer from any “symptom” in the traditional sense, but who suffer from what the French called over a century and a half ago la maladie du siècle; they suffer from a general unhappiness, from lack of satisfaction in their work, from lack of happiness in their marriages, from the fact that “they are without joy in the midst of plenty,” to use a Biblical expression. #RandolphHarris 18 of 22

This new type of patient often seeks nothing but the relief which the psychoanalytic procedure can give, even when it is not successful; the satisfaction of having somebody to talk to, of “belonging” to a cult, having a “philosophy.” The aim of therapy is often that of helping the person to be better adjusted to existing circumstances, to “reality” as it is frequently called; mental health is often considered to be nothing but this adjustment or, to put it differently, a state of mind in which one’s individual unhappiness is reduced to the level of the general unhappiness. The real problem, of man’s loneliness and alienation, of his lack of a productive interest in life, need not even be touched in this type of psychoanalysis. The purpose of most helping professions, including guidance counseling, is to enhance the personal development, the psychological growth toward a socialized maturity, of its clients. The effectiveness of any member of the profession is most adequately measured in terms of the degree to which, in his work with his clients, he achieves this goal. Our knowledge of the elements which bring about constructive change in personal growth is in its infant stages. Such factual knowledge as we currently possess indicates that a primary change-producing influence is the degree to which the client experiences certain qualities in his relationship with his counselor. In a variety of clients—normal, maladjusted, and psychotic—with many different counselors and therapists, and studying the relationships from the vantage point of the client, the therapist, or the uninvolved observer, certain qualities in the relationship are quite uniformly found to be associated with personal growth and change. #RandolphHarris 19 of 22

These elements are not constituted of technical knowledge or ideological sophistication. They are personal human qualities—something the counselor experiences, not something he knows. Constructive personal growth is associated with the counselor’s realness, with his genuine and unconditional liking for his client, with his sensitive understanding of his client’s private World, and with his ability to communicate these qualities in himself to the client. These findings have some far-reaching implications for the theory and practice of guidance counseling and psychotherapy, and for the training of workers in these fields. Compassion is an emotion felt by one ego when considering the suffering condition of another ego. However, spiritual development eventually lifts itself above all emotions, by which I do not of course mean above all feeling. The wish to help another person should not spring out of compassion alone, nor out of the aspiration to do what is right alone, nor out of the satisfaction derived from practicing virtue for its own sake alone. It should certainly come out of all these, but it should also come even more out of the breaking down of the ego itself. With that gone, there will be a feeling of oneness with all living creatures. This practice of self-identification with them is the highest form of love. #RandolphHarris 20 of 22

The mission of the Sacramento Fire Department is to provide a sustainable quality of life for the entire Sacramento community. They achieve this by protecting and preventing the loss of life and property through professional and efficient planning, preparation, training, fire prevention, public education, and deliver of emergency services. “In my early days, I never realized the heat and the smoke conditions in a fire and the punishment the fellows take in there. And along with that was the damage. You see people’s treasures just absolutely destroyed. Again, when you have people burned and killed, it isn’t that detaching thing it was before you got involved. And seeing the teamwork of the men, it’s fantastic. I loved from a quiet engine company to the downtown district of Sacramento. Down there is where I grew on the job, because of the experience in various types of fire. We got everything from ships to grain elevators to high rises and warehouses, and slum housing. I thought it was great. The guys are certainly aware of the dangers and are safety conscious. Once you become an officer, you become even more acutely aware of it. It’s a different thing to go diving in yourself, from sending somebody else in there. And as you go higher in rank, you’re sending more and more people into danger. There are times when the responsibility is awesome. But of course, when you get to the scene of the fire, you are methodically thinking of different things, and it really doesn’t enter your mind. It’s in the back of your mind, but you can’t dwell on it. #RandolphHarris 21 of 22

“I’ve been to many funerals of friends of mine who were killed. You know that it can happen, you read about it all the time, but when it happens to a firefighter it’s just like a person in your family dying, completely unexpected, like possibly in an auto accident. You know it’s there, but you kind of think it isn’t going to happen to you. And when it does, it’s an awful blow. But I have it, the danger, really affect the job. I’ve never worried about it going to a fire, or worried about myself. When you come back, though, you kind of second-guess everything—should I have done this, what if that happened—and you learn that way.” Exceeding the needs and expectations of those they serve with the highest level of valor, integrity and commitment is what the Sacramento Fire Department is dedicated to doing. Please donate to the Sacramento Fire Department and you could save lives and property. They provide optimum prevention and protection to our community. There lives a God! Each finite creature proclaims His rule on sea and land; throughout all changing forms of nature is clearly shown His mighty hand. In every place is heard the call: The Lord of Host has made us all. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation, under God, Indivisible, with Liberty and Justice for all. Remember to raise your children to love America, to love God and Jesus Christ, to respect law and order, buy goods made in America, and be kind and respectful to everyone, especially their elders. There lives a God! #RandolphHarris 22 of 22

The Winchester Mystery House

Please come and enjoy a delicious meal in Sarah’s Café, stroll along the paths of the beautiful Victorian gardens, and wonder through the miles of hallways in the World’s most mysterious mansion. For further information about tours, including group tours, weddings, school events, birthday party packages, facility rentals, and special events please visit the website: https://winchestermysteryhouse.com/

Please visit the online giftshop, and purchase a gift for friends and relatives as well as a special memento of The Winchester Mystery House. A variety of souvenirs and gifts are available to purchase. https://shopwinchestermysteryhouse.com/