The body responds to extreme experiences by secreting stress hormones. These are often blamed for subsequent illness and disease. However, stress hormones are meant to give us the strength and endurance to respond to extraordinary conditions. People who actively do something to deal with a disaster—rescuing loved ones or stranger, transporting people to a hospital, being part of a medical team, pitching tents or cooking meals—utilize their stress hormones for their proper purposes and therefore are at much lower risk of becoming traumatized. (Nonetheless, everyone has his or her breaking point, and even the best-prepared person may become overwhelmed by the magnitude of the challenge.) Some violent transactions (id est, murder, assault, and rape) take shape as one-on-one conflicts between known acquaintances. This is not generally the case with robbery. The vast majority of robbery offenders and victims have no prior relationship. More than 75 percent of robbery victims describe their attackers as strangers. Men, African Americans, and the elderly are almost never attacked by known assailants. Furthermore, unlike other violent crimes, only 5 percent of all robberies occur between individuals who are related to one another by blood or marriage. Almost all robbery transactions involve a lone victim; however, it is not uncommon for multiple perpetrators to join in the attack. Victim reports reveal that 94.5 percent of the persons who were rubbered in 2022 were alone at the time of the attack. The offender dynamic is somewhat different. #RandolphHarris 1 of 22

In 2022, 43 percent of all robbery victims claimed that they were attacked by multiple assailants. No other form of violent crime experiences this level of group offending. A number of observations can be made about the setting of the average robbery event. One, robberies are equally distributed across daytime and nighttime hours. Two, victim reports suggest that robberies take place in a variety of locales; about half of the robbery victimizations take place in open-air venues (exempli gratia, in streets, parks) and another 30 percent take place at or near the victim’s home. Keep in mind that the data focuses largely on personal victimizations. Those offenders who target commercial establishments are largely omitted from these data. Fortunately, the FBI’s Uniform Crime Reports solicits information on the robbery setting. While these data show that public streets remain the favorite setting for robbery (a little less than 50 percent of known cases), commercial and/or financial establishments are targeted in roughly 25 percent of the cases, and private residence comprise another 13 percent of the cases. Given the risks and complexities that go along with pulling off a robbing in an institutional setting, one might expert that robbers would target the most lucrative businesses. This is not the case. Only a small fraction of these robberies occur at banking establishments (average yield in 2022 = $5,000) while a surprising majority transpire in “low budget” convenience stores (average yield in 2022 $700). The participants in the robbery transaction are disproportionately young, men. #RandolphHarris 2 of 22

In 2022, individuals between the age of 12 and 24 experienced a robbery victimization rate that exceeded five per 1,000 persons or households. That victimization rate was roughly double the one for persons between the ages 25 and 49 and nearly five time the rate for persons 50 years or older. A similar age pattern emerges among the offender population. Roughly three and ten robbery victims estimate that their attacker(s) were under the age of 20 and an estimated six in tend claim that they were attacked by a person(s) under the age of 30. These data indicate that robbery is an intra-aged crime. The majority of robbery victims and offenders are men. Males accounted for two thirds of the robbery victims in 2022. This translated into victimization rates for men (3.8 per 1,000) that more than doubled that for women (1.7). Most robbery victims claim that they were attacked by male assailants—a man was present in 99.2 percent of all multiple-offender robberies and 93.9 percent of all single-offender robberies that occurred in 2022. Clear racial disparities exist among robbery offenders and victims. In fact, 80 percent of the robbery victims were white and 16 percent black. A full 21 percent identify themselves as Hispanic. When one factors in relative representation in the U.S.A. population, the following robbery victimization rates emerge: 5.3 (per 1,000) for Hispanic, 3.6 for African Americans, and 2.6 for whites. A more extreme picture emerges among the offender group. African Americans accounted for more than half (55 percent) of the robbery arrests that were reported by law enforcement authorities. This means that the robbery arrest rate for blacks is more than 6 times that of whites. #RandolphHarris 3 of 22

The robbery victimization rate for the average American was estimated to be 2.8 per 1,000 persons or households in 2022. That same years, Hispanic males experienced a victimization rate of 7.9 percent; for black males, it was 6.4. In addition, black males between the ages of 16 and 19 were victimized at a rate of 27.6 per 1,000 persons or households. Most robberies unfold as extremely abrupt, but unmistakably volatile exchanges. Regardless of whether the attacks take form as a street mugging or bank robbery, it is in the offender’s best interest to move quickly and purposefully. Most robberies follow a set chronology of events. First, the attacker must get the victim’s undivided attention and clearly state his or her intentions—eight in ten (83.1 percent) robbery victims report that their attackers introduced some unprovoked threat or act of force into the equation. This defining moment is called the declaration of stick-up and can take on a variety of shapes, ranging from a verbal statement to the passing of a note to a bank teller. This initiating step is forceful, direct, and seeks to place the offender in complete control of the victim’s emotions and behavior. Next, the robber must go about his or her efforts to collect the desired money and/or valuables from the victim. This is clearly the most unpredictable stage of the game. Here, the attacker hopes that his or her threats and posturing will produce unwavering compliance from the victim. This is seldom without complication—only one third of all robbery victims simply submit to their attackers’ wishes. #RandolphHarris 4 of 22

Once the robbery offender has successfully or unsuccessfully confiscated the victim’s valuables, he or she then goes about closing out the interaction. In addition to physically fleeing the scene, most offenders try to obscure their identity from any potential onlookers. Robbery offenders tend to have long, pronounced criminal careers. Criminal history checks revealed that 62 percent of the accused robbers had a prior felony rap sheet. Nearly one in three (29 percent) had at least five felony arrests to his or her credit. A full 40 percent of the robbers in the sample had been convicted of a prior felony. Furthermore, 70.2 of the released robbers in our recidivism study had been rearrested within 3 years. No other category of violent offenders lead such active criminal careers. It is tempting to think of robbers as offense specialists (id est, deal exclusively in robbery or similar offense). This is not an unrealistic suggestion given that would-be thieves have a host of targets from which to choose. There are clearly enough potential persons and financial institutions to keep a person busy in a one-dimensional criminal career. Recidivism explain that 20 percent of robbers who are released from prison are typically rearrested on another robbery within three years. However, interviews with known robbery offenders reveal the presence of a much broader criminal repertoire. Most robbers describe themselves as opportunists—persons who will pursue any course of action that is likely to yield desired ends. The drugs/crime connection serves to further solidify these individuals’ commitment to a diversified criminal portfolio. A survey of state prison inmates found that 30 percent claimed to have committed their most recent offense in an effort to get money to buy drugs. #RandolphHarris 5 of 22

On the whole, the available data suggest that most robbers are criminal generalists. They are individuals who grow accustomed to a certain way of life; a life that includes fast living, heavy spending, and habitual drug use. This Worldview requires offenders to seek a constant flow of cash that can be sustained only by a diversified and highly active commitment to crime. Few would disagree that there are instrumental motives resent in the mindset of the average robber. The most immediate goal of this type of offense is to deprive the victims of their valuables for personal consumption. Nonetheless, news reports are full of stories in which thieves expose themselves to high levels of risk in order to collect on very small sums of money. Convenience store robberies and/or the taxicab stick-ups are prime examples. The growing presence of these high-risk, low-yield robberies had led numerous researchers to conclude that expressive motives also play an important part in the cognitive aspect of robbery. For example, many robbers allege that they commit their crimes for emotional gratification or revenge. More importantly, these researchers have shown that inner-city street norms bestow a great deal of status onto individuals who are willing to live by the “survival of the fittest” credo. Many robbers commit their crimes while under the influence of drugs and/or alcohol. Nearly 33 percent of persons robbed in 2022 had reason to believe that the assailant(s) was under the influence of drugs or alcohol at the time of the attack. Not surprisingly, the accounts of known offenders suggests that the actual percentages may be somewhat higher. #RandolphHarris 6 of 22

Interviews with a sample of imprisoned robbers revealed that 40 percent were under the influence of drugs or alcohol when they committed the violent theft that led to their incarceration. This impairment can limit the offenders’ ability to make sound and reasoned decision. This speaks further to the drugs/crime connections that impacts robbery. Planning does not appear to play a large role in most robberies. Most violent thieves operate as alert opportunists—when in need of cash, they head out into the streets with the necessary weaponry and a behavioral script for how they would like to see the robbery event unfold. At the same time, they may have learned from past experience that most robberies are unpredictable, and thus view meticulous planning as a waste of time. Interviews with habitual robbers reveal that even the most seasoned thieves feel a need to invoke some sort of normative neutralization to help set themselves and other at ease about their behavior. Robbers often times blame the victim, claiming that the naïve fool had it coming. Others adopt a “survival of the fittest” mentality, asserting that they are simply doing what must be done to get by in life. Still others speak of a “natural order on the streets,” in which robbery is just another way of making a living. Regardless of the content, the message is clear: Robbers negotiate their identities like any other person. Among all the threats to man’s vital interests, the threat to his freedom is of extraordinary importance, individually and socially. And robbery certainly threatens these conditions. #RandolphHarris 7 of 22

In contrast to the widely held opinion that this desire for freedom is a product of culture and more specifically of learning-conditioning, there is ample evidence to suggest that the desire for freedom is a biological reaction of human organism. It is a remarkable fact that all human beings—the children of the powerful as well as those of the powerless—share the common experience of once having been powerless and of having fought for their freedom. While a person is struggling in lonely silence to find their way back to life again, to give birth to a new path that comes from within to restore one’s spirit and passion for life, one needs strong, unqualified affirming voices. When it seems, and indeed is true, that one’s life is dissolving around one, know that God is always there. In choosing yourself over your reflection of self, God will always be there. When one decides that, whatever the price, one has to be in touch with oneself, has to follow one’s own instincts, God will be there. God allows people to access their strong, unqualified, affirming voice. And many people are thankful for God. The Lord was always prepared to meet again the antagonist whom He has foiled in the wilderness, and who had left Him only “for a season” (Luke 4.13). So when He discerned Satan at work in Peter, He exposed him in one swift sentence, even mentioning his name (Matt. 16.23). Addressing the Jewish people, He likewise stripped aside the mask of the hidden foe and said, “Ye are of your father, the devil” (John 8.44); with keen-edged words He spoke of him as the one who was lying to them and prompting them to kill Him (John 8.40-41). #RandolphHarris 8 of 22

And when, in the store on the lake, He is awakened suddenly, He is at once alert to meet the foe, and stands with calm majesty to rebuke the storm which the prince of the power of the air had roused against Him and the disciples (Mark 4.38-39). In brief, we find the Lord, right on from the wilderness victory, unveiling the powers of darkness as He went forward in steady mastery over them. Behind what appeared “natural,” He sometimes discerned a supernatural power which demanded His rebuke. He rebuked the fever in Peter’s wife’s mother (Luke 4.39), just as He rebuked the evil spirits in other and more manifest forms, while in other instances He simply healed the sufferer by a word. Now note the vast difference between the attitude of Satan himself to the Lord and that taken by the lesser spirits of evil. Satan, the prince, tempts Jesus, seeks to hinder Him, prompts the Pharisees to oppose Him, hides behind a disciple to divert Him, and finally takes hold of a disciple to betray Him and sways the multitude to put Him to death; but the spirits of evil bowed down before Jesus, beseeching Him to “let them alone” and not to command them to go into the abyss (Luke 8.31). The realm of this deceiver-prince is specifically mentioned by the Apostle Paul in his description of him as “prince of the power of the air” (Eph. 2.2), the aerial or “Heavenly places” being the special sphere of the activity both of Satan and his hierarchy of powers. Even the derogatory name “Beelzebub,” means “the god of the files,” suggestively speaks of the aerial nature of his powers. #RandolphHarris 9 of 22

The Lord’s description of Satan’s working through “fowls of the air” (Matt. 13.4, 19) strikingly corresponds to these other statements, together with John’s language about the “whole World lying in the evil one” (1 John 5.19)—the atmosphere itself being the sphere of operation of these aerial spirits. And this realm in which the whole human race must move is said to be now “in the evil one.” The foundation of Christian belief is not the historical Jesus, but the biblical picture of Christ. Existential experience of the mysterium tremendum et fascinans—ultimate concern—is destined to play a role in advancing the holy experiences to the idea of God. God is the abyss and ground of being. The holy is liberated from the dominance of the ethically good. The relation of religion and morality is not an external one, but the religious dimension, source, and motivation that are implicit in al morality, acknowledge or not. The holy is first experiences as a numinous reality and only secondly as a moral demand. Religion is no longer seen by some to be confined to institutions, cult, and doctrine—in a word, to the churches—but religion is now the state of being ultimately concerned. There is religion in the narrow sense of institutionalized and formalized religion, and in the large sense of being grasped by an ultimate concern. Justification through faith rends every human claim in the face of Hod and every identification of God and man, and yet man is justified in the midst of his guilt and doubt. #RandolphHarris 10 of 22

In the light of this principle, the cross of Christ is seen as the embodiment of the divine Yes and No against the World, an interpretation which forms the core of Tillichian Christology and dogma. A union of this Protestant principle with the historicocritical biblical research may led some to reject nineteenth-century liberal dogmatic theology which replaces the crucified Christ by the historical Jesus, and which dissolves the paradox of justification into moral categories. The substance of my religion is and remains Lutheran. It embodies the consciousness of the “corruption” of existence, the repudiation of every social Utopia, including the metaphysics of progress, the knowledge of the irrational demonic character of life, an appreciation of the mythical elements of religion, and a repudiation of Puritan legality in individual and social life. In personal dimensions of life and tastes, there are things that may exercise a certain influence upon one’s theology, though perhaps indirectly. The ones some may consider are the love of the sea, one’s preference for the city, one’s interest in art. From the age of eight, I spent several weeks, even months, at the seashore every year. The meeting of sea and the land means for some a boundary-experience of the infinite and the finite. The sea with its never-resting, limitless expanse and depths become a symbol for the absolute, the ground and the abyss. Its dynamism suddenly erupts in an ecstacy of storm and waves which aggressively break over the land that quietly rests in its self-sufficient finitude. The sea provides an element of phantasy that one may consider essential to living thought. #RandolphHarris 11 of 22

One’s love for nature, however, goes hand-in-hand with preference for the bustling life of the city. The city is indispensable for developing the critical side of intellectual and artistic endeavor. Furthermore, in a large urban center one finds concentrated all the important political and social trends. To the realism of the city, some attribute the escape from a romantic hostility against technology. And, strange to say, the experience of the city is analogous to the experience of the sea: The impression of the big city is somehow similar to that of the sea: infinity, openness, unrestricted space! However, beyond that it was the dynamic character of life in Berlin that affected me. The discovery of art (in the sense of the visual arts, but especially painting) is an event of far-reaching consequences. Turning to it by way of reaction during the fearful, ugly, destructive pandemic, allows one to discover the marvels of architecture. All the bookish church history in the World could never provide the kind of insights occasioned by the mosaics of the early Roman basilicas. For ultimate reality is experienced and expressed directly in religious symbols and myths, but the artists, while intending nothing but good art, cannot help but indirectly express ultimate reality. Besides being telescoped into the life of one man, these dimensions are linked together by other bonds of unity. In all of them one discerns the deep current of religious concerns—in the search for Christian community, in the theological view of history, in the quest for a philosophy that is realistic and open to the transcendent, and in a sensitivity to the presence of the holy in nature and art. #RandolphHarris 12 of 22

One life can be unity because it unifies. It can unify by drawing together the conflicting elements of an age in transition: authority and autonomy, theory and practice, nature and technology, idealism and existentialism, World was and World unity. There is an urgent cry of human hope and despair not only in the thoughts of many people, but also in their experience as we deal with massive corruption, hyperinflation, and a president who does not represent the American people. Theology, as a function of the church, is the methodological interpretation of the Christian faith for the human situation. Thus, it mediates between two poles, the eternal and the temporal. The eternal pole is the Christian message, and one function of theology is to state its truth. The temporal pole is the human situation, and the other function of theology is to respond to its needs. The “situation” does not refer to the psychological or sociological condition of individuals or even of groups, as for instance, a feeling of uncertainty that demands an uncomplicated unequivocal reassurance. Rather, it signifies the totality of man’s creative self-interpretation in a special period, that is the sum of the artistic, the scientific, philosophical, economic, political, and ethical forms in which men of a certain era express their understanding of life. If one stresses the unchangeable truth of the message (kerygma) over against the changing demands of the situation, the theology is kerygmatic. Such a theology preserves the Christian faith from the relativities of mundane exigencies. The drawback, however, is that kerygmatic theology hurls the message at the situation like a stone. It establishes no common ground with those in the situation, and so runs the risk of being irrelevant. #RandolphHarris 13 of 22

If, on the other hand, one first listens attentively to the questions implied in the temporal situation and then responds with the power of the eternal message, that theology is “apologetic.” Apologetic theology is “answering theology.” It bears no semblance to the discredited relic that has borne the name in the past. Apologetic theology searches for the common ground between the message and the situation by listening to the questions that the situation poses before answering in terms of the message. The danger in such a procedure is that the word of the message may be distorted amid the clamor of the questions. However, apologetic theology is important for two reasons, one is because it is a fact, and because of the conviction. The fact is that for the last three hundred years the central problem of theology has been the adaption of the Christian faith to the modern mind. For instance, we no longer stone the unfaithful. We pray for them, send them to counseling or separate from them. With such an evolutionary synthesis, it is possible—and necessary—if Christianity is to avoid becoming a fossilized curiosity and if civilization is not to lose one of its most powerful stimulants. The Gospel records refer repeatedly to the workings of evil spirits. They show that wherever the Lord moved, the emissaries of Satan sprang into active manifestation in the bodies and minds of those they indwelt, so that the ministry of Christ and His apostles was directed actively against them. Again and again we read: “He went into their synagogues through all Galilee, preaching and casting out demons” (Mark 1.39; He “cast out many demons, and He suffered not the demons to speak, because they knew Him” (Mark 1.34). #RandolphHarris 14 of 22

Why have socialist economic systems failed so miserably? The best laid Five Year Plan of Stalin and his successors “gang agley” because the workers and the managers lacked adequate incentives. Most importantly, the system offered no reward for doing a good job rather than a merely adequate one. People had no reason to show initiative or innovation, and every reason to  cut corners wherever they could—fulfilling quantity quotas and slacking on quality, for example. A market economy has a better natural incentive mechanism, namely the profit motive. A company that succeeds in cutting costs, or introducing a new product, makes a greater profit; one that lags behind stands to lose money. However, even this does not work perfectly. Each employee or manager in a company is not fully exposed to the chill wind of competition in the market, and the top management of the firm has to devise its own internal carrots and sticks to obtain the desired standards of performance from those below. When two firms join forces for a particular project, they have the added problems of designing a contract that will share the incentives between them in the right way. We bring out the important idea for the design of incentive schemes through a series of examples. Imagine yourself as the owner of a high-tech company in California trying to develop and market a new computer chess game, Wizard 1.0. If you succeed, you will make a profit of $200,000 from the sales. If you fail, you make nothing. Success or failure hinges on what your expert player-programmer does. One can either put one’s heart and soul into the work, or just give it a routine shot. With high-quality, effort, the chances of success are 80 percent, but for routine effort, the figure drops to 60 percent.  #RandolphHarris 15 of 22

Chess programmers can be fired for $50,000, but they like to daydream, and will give only their routine effort for this sum. For high-quality effort, you have to pay $70,000. What should you do? Low-Quality Effort: Chance of success is 60 percent, average revenue is $120,000, salary payments are $50,000, and average profit = revenue – salary which is $70,000. High-Quality Effort: Chance of success is 80 percent, average revenue is $160,000, salary payments are $70,000 and average profit = revenue – salary, which is $90,000. A routine effort will get you $200,000 with a 60 percent chance, which comes out to $120,000 on average. Subtracting the $50,000 salary leaves an average profit of $70,000. The corresponding calculation if you hire a high-effort expert is 80 percent of $200,000 minus $70,000, that is, $90,000. Clearly you do better to hire a high-effort expert at the higher salary. However, there is a problem. You cannot tell by looking at the expert’s working day whether one is making routine effort or quality effort. The creative process is mysterious. The drawings on your programmer’s pad may be the key to a great graphics display that will ensure the success of Wizard 1.0, or just doodles of pawns and bishops to accompany one’s day dreaming. Knowing that you cannot tell the difference between routine effort and quality effort, what is to prevent the expert from accepting the salary of $70,000 appropriate for high effort, but making routine effort just the same? Even f the project fails, that can always be blamed on chance. After all, even with genuine quality effort, the project can fail 20 percent of the time; this was just that kind of bad luck. #RandolphHarris 16 of 22

When you cannot observe the quality of effort, you have to base your reward scheme on something you can observe. In the present instance that can be only the ultimate outcome, namely success or failure of the programming effort. This does have a link to effort, albeit an imperfect one—higher quality of effort means a greater chance of success. This link can be exploited to generate an incentive scheme. What you do is offer the expert a remuneration that depends on the outcome: a larger sum upon success and a smaller sum in the event of failure. The difference, or the bonus for success, should be just enough to make it in the employee’s own interest to provide high-quality effort. In this case, the bonus must be big enough so that the expert expects a higher effort will raise one’s earnings by $20,000, from $50,000 to $70,000. Hence the bonus for success had to be at least $100,000: a 20 percent increase in the chance of getting a $100,000 bonus provides the necessary $20,000 expected payment for motivating high-quality effort. It remains to find the separate sums to be paid in the event of success or failure. That needs a little calculation. The answer is that you should pay the employee $90,000 for success, and one should pay you a find of $10,000 in the event of failure. With this incentive scheme, the programmer’s incremental reward for success is $100,000, the minimum necessary for inducing quality effort. The average payment to one is $70,000 (an 80 percent chance of $90,000 and a 20 percent chance minus $10,000). This leaves you, the owner, an average profit of $90,000 (an 80 percent chance of $200,000 minus the average salary of $70,000). If you could observe quality of effort by direct supervision, this is exactly what you could have gotten. The incentive scheme has done a perfect job; the unobservability of effort has not made any difference. #RandolphHarris 17 of 22

In essence, this incentive scheme sells 50 percent of the firm to the programmer in exchange for one’s effort. One’s net payments are then either $90,000 or -$10,000, and with so much riding on the outcome of the project it becomes in one’s interest to supply high-quality effort in order to increase the chance of success (and one’s profit shares of $100,000). The only difference between this contract and the fine/bonus scheme is in the name. While the name may matter, we see there is more than one way to achieve the same effect. However, these solutions may not be possible, either because assessing a fine on an employee may not be legal or because the worker does not have sufficient capital to pay the $10,000 for one’s 50 percent stake. What do you do then? The answers is to go as close to the fine solution or equity-sharing as you can. Since the minimum effective bonus is $100,000, the worker gets $100,000 in the event of success and nothing upon failure. Now the employee’s average receipt is $80,000, and your profit falls to $80,000. With equity-sharing, the worker has only one’s labor and no capital to invest in the project. However, one still has to be given a 50 percent share to motivate one to supply high-quality effort. So the best you can do is sell one 50 percent of the company for one’s labor alone. The inability to enforce fines or get workers to invest their own capital means that the outcome is less good from your point of view—in this case, by $10,000. Now the unobservability of effort makes a difference. #RandolphHarris 18 of 22

Another difficulty with the fine/bonus scheme or equity-sharing is the problem of risk. The worker’s incentives arise from one taking a $100,000 gamble. However, this large risk may not be evaluated by the statistical average of the outcomes. In this case, the worker has to be compensated both for supplying high-quality effort and for bearing risk. The bigger the risk, the bigger the compensation. This extra compensation is another cost of a firm’s inability to monitor its workers’ efforts. Often the best solution is a compromise; risk is reduced by giving the worker less than ideal incentives and consequently this motivates less than an ideal amount of effort. In other instances you may have other indicators of the quality of effort, and you can and should use them when designing your incentive scheme. Perhaps the most interesting and common situation is one in which there are several such projects. If there are more observations, even though success is only an inexact statistical indicator of the quality of effort, it can be made more precise. There are two ways in which this can be done. If the same expert works for you on many projects, then you can keep a record of one’s string of successes and failures. You can be more confident in attributing repeated failure to poor effort quality rather than the working of chance. The greater accuracy of your inference allows you to design a better incentive scheme. The second possibility is that you have several experts working on related projects, and there is some correlation in the success or failure of the projects. If one expert fails while others around one are succeeding, then you can be more confident that one is a shirker and not just unlucky. Therefore rewards based on relative performance—in other words, prizes—will generate suitable incentives. #RandolphHarris 19 of 22

When an employer designs incentives to motivate a worker, the problems are only one-sided. More complicated and more interesting are the problems of joint ventures in which each side has to provide the right incentives to motivate the other. Ubiquitination is the systematic spread of the new media system around the World and down through every economic layer of society. A potential nightmare facing high-tech governments derives from the split-up of populations into the info-rich and the info-poor. Any government that fails to take concrete actions to avoid this division courts political upheaval in the future. Yet this dangerous polarization is hardly inevitable. In fact, one can imagine considerable equality of access in the emerging society, not because of compassion or political good sense on the part of the affluent elites, but because of the workings of what might be called the Law of Uniquity. This law holds that strong commercial, as well as political, incentives will arise for making the new electronic infrastructure inclusive, rather than exclusive. In its infancy the telephone was regarded as a luxury. The idea that everyone would someday have a phone was simply mystifying. Why on Earth would everybody want one? The fact that almost everyone in the high-tech nations now has a phone, rich and poor alike, did not stem from altruism but from the fact that the more people plugged into a system, the more valuable it became for all users and especially for commercial purposes. The same proved true, as we have seen, in the early development of postal services. #RandolphHarris 20 of 22

The industrial economy needed a way to send bills to, or advertise to, or sell newspapers and magazines to everyone, not just the rich. And today, once more, as fax machines and email have replaced the industrial-era post office, similar pressures are accelerating the spread of the new technology. There were 2.5 million fax machines in the United States of America in 1989, churning out billions of pages of faxed documents per year. There are no 43 million fax machines in operation. The more faxes out there, the greater the value of the system to all concerned. It is, therefore, in the distinct self-interest of the affluent to find ways of extending the new systems to include, rather exclude, the less affluent. DVDs and Blu-ray discs and players are being replaced by streaming services. Video streaming services are used by nearly 2 billion people Worldwide, while music streaming platforms have 524 million users. Their combined numbers of users total to more than 2.3 billion. Such a level is more than half of the total number of internet users globally which currently stands at 5.03 billion. Cable television is also being left in the past. As of September 2002, 65 percent of adult pay for cable and 82 percent of USA adults claim that streaming shows provide more entertaining shows than cable does. Streaming services now provide a wider variety of entertainment compare to cable, cater batter to the busy schedules of today’s younger populations and are also producing better quality television due to higher budgets. #RandolphHarris 21 of 22

The widest diffusion of communication capabilities is an inseparable part of the new system of wealth creation. The direction is almost inevitably toward what the old Bell phone company called “universal service”—id est, ubiquity—combined with interactivity, mobility, convertibility, and connectibility. Finally, the new infrastructure is global in scope. As capital flows electronically across national borders, zipping back and fourth from Zurich to Hong Kong, Hong King to Norway, Norway to Tokyo, Tokyo to Wall Street in milliseconds, information traces equally complex pathways. A change in U.S.A. T-bill rates or the yen-deutsche mark ratio is instantly known around the World, and the morning after the big event in Los Angeles, youngsters in Ho Chi Minh City discuss the latest Grammy winners. The mental borders of the state become as permeable as its financial frontiers. The combination of these six principles produces a revolutionary nervous system for the planet, capable of handling vastly enlarged quantities of data, information, and knowledge at much faster transmission and processing rates. It is a far more adaptable, intelligence, and complex nervous system for the human race than ever before imagined. However, what is amazing, is technology is so advanced, but public WiFi is still hard to find in most cities. Traffic is still a major problem. And a lot of old technology is still being used. For instance, there are touch screen elevators and voice command elevators, but many new construction projects are still going with the traditional push button. #RandolphHarris 22 of 22

Cresleigh Homes

On paper, #Havenwood Model 1 is the smallest home in the community – but you’d never guess from this photo! Our homes are designed for maximum livability, and the 3 bedroom, 2 bathroom home lets the whole family spread out.

Did you know all our Havenwood homes also come with a Google Home Hub and Home Mini?! “Alexa, play coffee shop jazz.” 🎶

#CresleighHomes

One of the ways memory of helplessness is stored is as muscle tension or feelings of disintegration in the affected body areas: head, back, and limbs in accident victims, the private parts and rectum in victims of sexual abuse. The lives of many trauma survivors come to revolve around bracing against and neutralizing unwanted sensory experiences, and most people I see in my practice have become experts in such self-numbing. They may become serially obese or anorexic or addicted to exercise or work. At least half of all traumatized people try to dull their intolerable inner World with drugs or alcohol. The flipside of numbing is sensation seeking. Many people cut themselves to make the numbing go away, while others try bungee jumping or high-risk activities like prostitution and gambling. Any of these methods can give them a false and paradoxical feeling of control. When people are chronically angry or scared, constant muscle tension ultimately leads to spasms, back pain, migraine headaches, fibromyalgia and other forms of chronic pain. They may visit multiple specialists, undergo extensive diagnostic tests, and be prescribed multiple medications some of which provide temporary relief but all of which fail to address the underlying issues. Their diagnosis will come to define their reality without ever being identified as a symptom of their attempt to cope with trauma. My interviews with wife rape survivors revealed that women not only developed strategies for coping during the sexual assaults, but they also developed strategies for emotional survival after each incident of sexual abuse. #RandolphHarris 1 of 18

Emotional survival is defined as the extent to which women are able to reconstruct their lives so that the experience of sexual violence does not have an overwhelming and continuing negative impact on their lives. Following their experiences of wife rape, the women in this sample, like other sexual assault survivors, worked not only to exist but also to put back together the pieces of their lives. Six women in this study began to do this by terminating their relationships with their partners immediately following their first experience of wife rape. Thus, as I indicated earlier, they did not take steps to manage the violence. They emotionally survived the assault by distancing themselves from their partners, seeking the help of service providers and turning to friends. Gwen was raped once by her partner after she returned home from having major surgery. Following the rape, she remembered getting dressed and leaving the house in a daze: “I wound up at the police department, and then I found out husbands can rape their wives, so they sent me to a doctor for a rape test [kit] and then…I signed a criminal complaint and called [a rape crisis center] the next day.” However, the majority of women in this sample were raped multiple times by their partners. These women developed strategies to cope after each assault. Kayla typifies the reaction of many women in this sample. She recalled what happened one time after she was raped: “He fell asleep and I got up and cleaned myself up and then I pretended that nothing happened. I thought about the kids coming over, and I just didn’t deal with it [the rape]. I thought to myself, it wasn’t that bad.” #RandolphHarris 2 of 18

Kayla’s recollection reveals the complex process of coping after sexual abuse and indicates several of the strategies women I interviewed used to put their lives back together again—cleaning themselves up, forgetting about the incident, justifying the assault, and minimizing the effects of the violence. Like other survivors of sexual assault, most of the women I interviewed felt the need to “be clean” following their experiences of rape. For example, Sally told me, “I went into the shower and I washed myself and scrubbed myself. I did everything a rape victim would do. Everything. It was like you knew what had been done to you and that this was something all rape victims do. And you knew you had to heal yourself because if you didn’t heal yourself, nobody else would.” After each sexual assault, Sara said she would “take shower after shower because I felt so dirty and I couldn’t get clean.” Two other strategies women used were to rationalize the violence and minimize the severity of the assault. It Is important for women who decide to stay in the relationship, either because they do not want to leave or are unable to leave the marriage, to discount the trauma of the rape. Similarly, minimizing the effects of sexual violence allows women to define the violence in a way in which they do not have to immediately act, possibly because they see no other available options or because they fear the consequences of their actions. Thus, for most women to be able to remain in the marriage, they must “work” on their emotions, transforming the social reality of their situation, so that they do not see themselves as victims or their husbands as rapists. #RandolphHarris 3 of 18

Many abused wives reconstruct their experiences by holding themselves, rather than their husbands, responsible. Although self-blame is a characteristic more commonly associated with wives who are battered than with those who are raped, a significant number of raped wives (estimates range from 6 percent to 20 percent) engage in self-blame. The length of time a women remains in the violent relationship and the extent to which she holds traditional ideals about the family are directly related to self-blame. In this sample, one third of the women initially blamed themselves to some extent for their husband’s actions. Many of these women felt they had failed in their roles as wives so they were able to rationalize that it was their own fault that the forced sex occurred. For example, both Sonya and Cory were incest survivors who were generally not interested in having sexual intercourse with their partners. They felt their unresponsiveness was the cause of the sexual abuse. Sonya said, “I wouldn’t let him touch me for the first 2 months after we got married because of what I went through with my father….and I was afraid he was going to go and get an annulment, and I felt like part of the problem of our marriage is because I can’t. It’s like I want to have sex with him, but I keep having flashbacks about what happened to me, and I just can’t handle it. And I knew he’s my husband.” Some people who have been raped may feel unsure about sex and may not want to enjoy it after a rape or are mentally and physically unable to because their feelings are distorted, and/or their body is injured. #RandolphHarris 4 of 18

These women viewed sex as their marital obligation and felt their husbands were being neglected because they were unable to fulfill their duties. Thus, they did not, at last initially, blame their husbands for raping them. Three other women I interviewed did not blame their husbands for assaulting them but instead blamed drug or alcohol use for triggering the attacks. Crack cocaine was one substance that several of the women blamed for changing their partners from loving individuals into sexually and physically abusive men. These examples indicate that rather than viewing their husbands as assailants, these women perceived them as the victims in some way. By constructing the violence in this way, their husbands were free from blame, and they were able to remain in their relationships and cope with the sexual abuse. It was not uncommon for victims of rape to minimize or limit the impact of incidents that they defined as abusive to some degree. Many of the women in this sample also minimized the extent of the sexual violence they had suffered. For example, after each rape, Debbie would tell herself, “That wasn’t that bad. I got through that one so I’ll get through another.” Similarly, Becky thought, “I love him and I know he really loves me, so it [the abuse] wasn’t so bad.” These women were hesitant to acknowledge the severity of their experiences because for a variety of reasons, including emotional and economic ties, they were not in a position to leave. Thus, rather than leave the relationships, they redefined their experiences in ways that were acceptable to them and developed elaborate coping strategies allowing them to survive from day to day. However, eventually all of these women reached a point where they were unable to cope with the violence any longer and ended their relationships. #RandolphHarris 5 of 18

A high value can be placed on loneliness or from empathy for others undergoing such experiences. Looking back on childhood, for many people it was very lonely—at least all the requirements were there—and yet one may not have been aware of it as such; one may not think of calling it by that name. As a child, when an individual is hospitalized, they may have no real understanding of the situation. Being given shots every four hours, having several blood transfusions per day, and learning that one may not live is shocking. However, sometimes people want time away from their parents and their parents’ friends so they can be a lone and experience a real life without being manipulated. By being close to oneself, confronting oneself, and learning who you are and what about you is artificial is a crucial part of development. When a person is alone, two things may change: one is one’s decision to undergo psychoanalysis, and the other is their intimate relationship with their girlfriend. Both of these are acute and unavoidable confrontations of oneself with oneself. Both are quite painful, particularly the relationship with the girl, for one may feel like she never really accepted one as one was (perhaps this may be mutual), and yet neither party wants to break it off either. And at the same time one never has experienced such violence of emotion—love or hate—except for as a preteen. Feelings which one never suspected of having inside well up to overwhelm the individual, often feelings of lust or hate. #RandolphHarris 6 of 18

It is impossible for one to really feel again those feelings a one is stagnant. One knows they happened, some as recently as two or three months ago, and yet to recall them is exceedingly difficult. Partly because they are part of a whole complex which one would probably prefer submerged out of the picture. At the same time, one knows when one reads poetry now one responds with more feeling and understanding then before all of this happened. Now is that not strange? It is just like music. When you fall in and out of love the songs have more feeling, or when you know you are an outcast or doing your best, you can really connect with how the artist may be feeling. I had completely forgotten an experience that happened to me this summer. I went down on foot into the bottom of the Grand Canyon. It is hard for me to really believe that I could have been totally unaware of what I was getting in for, and yet I acted that way. I took with me a camera, a few biscuits, and a small canteen of water; I ended up walking, with occasional rest periods, for 14 or 15 hour, with next to no food or water. Why did I do it? I have no understanding of it, and yet connections are forming in my mind. If you will, it was senseless, stupid, and yet I had been guided by sense I would have avoided with this experience. I have rarely wanted (or perhaps I have had the want beaten out of me) to communicate my inmost thoughts to others, because I know that they will not understand. I have very rarely withheld my sympathy from anyone, but I just now wonder if that is not some kind of compensation for the fact that I do withhold other things. #RandolphHarris 7 of 18

For a while now, I do not know how long exactly, I have felt prepared to die. By that I do not mean at all that I want to (though I have felt that too), but rather that I was alive enough to die. I went through a long period when I was very anxious about death. However, this past week I looked at the parade of planets, and somehow realized that I could accept my death as mine because when you die, your mind releases a chemical and every living essence goes into another realm. And maybe that is where we experience true freedom. Heaven and Hell may be a myth. There is some kind of pleasure in knowing that my death is waiting for me somewhere. Distinctions between the various workings of prince Satan and his demonic agents should be definitely noted, so to understand their devious methods at the present day. For to many, the Adversary is merely a tempter, while they little dream of his power as a deceiver (Rev. 12.9), hinderer (1 Thess. 2.18), murderer (John 8.44), liar (John 8.44), accuser (Rev. 12.10), and a false angel of light; and still less do the imagine the hosts of spirits under his command, constantly besetting their path, bent upon deceiving, hindering, and prompting to sin. A vast host is wholly given up to wickedness (Matt. 12.43-45), delighting to do evil, to slay (Mark 5.2-5), to deceive, to destroy (Mark 9.20)—and has access to men of every grade, prompting them to all kinds of wickedness, being satisfied only when success accompanies their wicked plans to ruin the children of men (Matt. 27.3-5). #RandolphHarris 8 of 18

There is, however, a distinction between Satan, the prince of the demons (Matt. 9.34), and his legion of wicked spirits—a difference in rank which is clearly recognized by Christ and may be noted in many parts of the Gospels (Matt. 25.41). We find Satan in person challenging the Lord in the wilderness temptation, and Christ answering him as a person, word for word, and thought for thought, until he retires, foiled by the keen recognition f his tactics by the Son of God (Luke 4.1-13). We read of the Lord describing him as the “prince of the World” (John 14.30); recognizing him as ruling over a kingdom (Matt. 12.26); using imperative language to him as a person, saying, “Get thee hence”; while to the Jewish people He describes his character as “sinning from the beginning,” and being a “murderer” and a “liar.” He is the “father of lies” who “abode not in the truth” (John 8.44) having departed from the position which he once held as a great archangel of God. Moreover, he is called “that wicked one” (1 John 3.12), the “Adversary,” and that “old serpent” (Rev. 12.9). In respect of the devil’s method of working, the Lord speaks of hum as “sowing tares,” which are “sons of the evil one,” among the wheat, the sons of God’s kingdom (Matt. 13.38-39)—thus revealing the Adversary as possessing the skill of a mastermind, who directs, with executive ability, his work as “prince of the World” throughout the whole inhabited Earth, having power to place the men who are called his “sons” wherever he wills. #RandolphHarris 9 of 18

We read, also, of Satan watching to snatch away the seed of the Word of God from all who hear it—once again indicating his executive power in the World-wide direction of his agents, whom the Lord describes as “fowls of the air.” In His own interpretation of the parable (Matt. 13-3-4, 13, 19; Mark 4.3-4, 14-15; Luke 8.5, 11-12) Jesus said tht by these “fowls” (plural) He meant the “evil one” (Matt. 13.19), “Satan” (Satanas, Mark 4.15), or the “devil” (diabolos, Luke 8.12). We must remember, however, from the general teaching of other parts of the Scripture that the devil is but one person, and does much of his work through the wicked spirits he has at his command. For although Satan is able to transport himself with lighting velocity to any part of his World-wide dominions, he is not omnipresent. But what shall be the spiritual center of this new World? Already religion has been largely replaced by political and social movements with their new myths of nation and social justice. Yet they have not proved to equal to the task, and so, today, at the center of the World there is a vacuum which demonic forces struggle to fill. The vacuum is an absence of meaning: The spiritual disintegration of our day consists in the loss of an ultimate meaning of life by the people of the Western civilization. Through the racial and gender wars started around the World by the sinful state of California, they have left behind pessimism and cynicism. “The World is going crazy.” Well, many people around the World believes the craziness is seeping from California, to the rest of America and then globally. Whatever the explanation one attaches the philosophy of California, one thing is unmistakably clear. #RandolphHarris 10 of 18

The scholars of this generation differ from the generations of their teachers in that the former have been thrust into history, forced to face up to it realistically, and to interpret it theologically. The renowned theological faculties of Berlin, Tubingen, and Halle there existed a consensus that identified the last four centuries of theology with the history of Germany theology. Consequently, it is our feeling that only in Germany is the problem of how to unite Christianity and the modern mind taken seriously. All this was a mixture of limitation, arrogance, and some elements of truth. It has been felt that Germany, after 1800, succeeded to ancient Greece as the center of philosophy. One trait in particular is supped to account for the superiority: the attempt to reunite, in a great synthesis, Christianity with the modern mind. It is in its heart philosophy of religion, it is Weltanschauung, a vision of the World as a whole. And we despised every philosophy which was less than this. Two events have broken the gip of this intellectual provincialism: the fact that the supposedly superior Germany culture could produce Mr. Hitler; and secondly, his emigration to the quite different intellectual climate of the United States of America. Many people, like the Mayor of Sacramento, California USA; Daryl Steinberg, blame America from the creation of Mr. Hitler and if you ask many citizens is not much better than Mr. Hitler. In fact, he does not even try to help the residence of his city, he leaves them sleeping in masses on the street to die, but spends hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars on sports entertainment, instead of housing. #RandolphHarris 11 of 18

American intellectual life is characterized by its imitation relating of theory to practice and by its wide-open horizons. Protestant theology in American cannot rest content with theorizing, but draws out practical conclusions; hence its special contribution in the field of social ethics. Mention has already been made of how its theological horizons have been kept broad, but there is a certain typically American unity of theological discussion, competition, and teamwork. In general, the American bent for practicality permits a widespread concrete realization of religious truth, while the European drive for ultimate insures it profundity. The European danger is a lack of horizontal actualization; the American danger is a lack of vertical depth. There should be a chief concern between the relationship of the infinite and the finite. Our discussions should center around God’s relation to the World and to man. The absolute objectifies itself in nature and becomes conscious of itself through the reflection of man, nature is unconscious but on the way to consciousness, and reaches it with the birth of man. (Also, keep in mind, some people believe Satan is God.) Human consciousness is that which realized God; consequently, all history is the history of religion, and that is true when you look at the crusades and the establishment of America and the wars in other countries. Many of them start over religion. It is in history that man comes to a consciousness of God; thus, even the cultural process is religious in its roots and can be considered from the viewpoint of the history of religion. All men and women have a religious experience. The polarity of mysticism and sense of guilt (Mystik und Schuldbewusstsein) is brought about by man’s union with and separation from God. #RandolphHarris 12 of 18

Mysticism means the feeling of union with the absolute; it implies the principle of identity of absolute and individual spirit. Guilt means the consciousness of opposition to God; it implies the experience of conflict between the holy Lord and the sinful creature. I began my philosophical school in German idealism and can never unlearn what I there acquired. By idealism, one usually means the identity of thought and being as the principle of truth. Between the human spirit and reality there exists a correspondence which is best expressed in the concept of meaning (Sinn). The system is an expression of a specific but limited encounter with reality. Man lives in existence and not in essence, as the idealists would have him do. The depths of psychology is related to existentialism as part to whole. Their common root is the protest against the philosophy of essence or consciousness which has dominated modern industrial society and endangered freedom, individuality, and creativity. Dr. Freud’s discovery of the irrational, unconscious level of man heled enormously to combat this philosophy. Depth psychology and existentialism are both basically concerned with man’s existential predicament—temporal, spatial, finite and estranged—as opposed to man’s essential nature. There are certain unmistakably existential themes in theology: the original goodness of being and of man, the universal fall, and salvation as healing or making whole a disrupted World. Transposed into philosophical language, these themes are: essential goodness, existential estrangement, and the teleological nature of man which points to a unity beyond the essence and existent. #RandolphHarris 13 of 18

However, while theology contributes its insights to the existentialist movement, existentialism returns the favor. It opens up a whole new psychological dimension in the immense religious literature of the past. It rediscovers sin as a state of separation instead of a series or moral acts. It lays bare the demonic structures that shape conscious decision. It reinforces the meaning of grace as acceptance of the unacceptable—recall the manner in which an analyst handles one’s patient. And, finally, it raises the question of human existence which systematic theology must answer by the reinterpretation of religious symbols. Every individual can relate to skirmishes with friends or family members in which they wrestled the television remote control of the last Eggo waffle away from one’s wanton adversary. If you are coming up short on material, embark on an afternoon visit to your local playground or daycare center and you are sure to find dozens of examples of children using force to gain exclusive rights to their favorite today. These are mundane and seemingly harmless instances of people using force to get what they want. The most extreme manifestations of forcible taking, thefts that often involve weapons and produce serious bodily harm are becoming more common in some communities. The Model Penal Code says an individual is guilty of robbery when he or she inflicts or threatens to inflict serious bodily injury upon another while in the course of committing a theft. The legal notion of what constitutes “in the course of committing a theft” includes those behaviors associated with the individual’s attempt to take the item as well as the flight (escape) efforts that follow. #RandolphHarris 14 of 18

In addition, most jurisdictions specify that the assailant need not be armed with a weapon. Any aggressive action on top of the minimal effort required to extract and carry the targeted item away is generally enough to satisfy the force requirement of the robbery statue. Robbery poses a quandary for scholars who prefer to classify crimes as either violent, property, or public order offenses. A robbery is not a simple theft, nor is it a simple act of interpersonal violence. Instead, a robber combines elements of property theft and violence into a single criminal transaction. This prompts some to treat robbery as a unique conceptual entity—an aggravated property crime. On a more practical level, the unpredictable and multifaceted nature of the crime means that the given offense may allow for criminal justice authorities to purse multiple charges against a single perpetrator—it is not uncommon for perpetrators to have charges of theft, fraud, assault, possession of stolen property, burglary, and/or weapons possession stacked on top of a robbery rape. Robbery is treated as a form of violent crime. An estimated 650,795 attempted or complete robberies occurred in the United States of America in 2022. This figure represents 11 percent of the total number of violent offenses that year (second to assault). This translates into a victimization rate of 2.8 robberies per 1,000 persons or households. Police are never made away of a considerable portion of the robberies that occur each year. Roughly 40 percent of robbery victims choose not to notify law enforcement authorities. Generally, 250,000 robberies are withheld from being reported to law enforcement. #RandolphHarris 15 of 18

Considerable physical, emotional and financial losses stem from robberies.  Nearly one-third of the robberies (almost 350,000 annually) were shown to produce some form of injury. Of these injuries, 81 percent were describe as minor (id est, bruises, cuts, scratches) while 19 percent were deemed severe (id est, flesh wound, broken bones, loss of consciousness, internal bleeding). More than one-half (53 percent) of the injuries required medical treatment and one in four resulted in a emergency room visit. Surveys of our nation’s hospitals reveal that emergency room personnel administer care to well over 20,000 robbery victims annually. The financial costs of robbery are also sizeable. The FBI states that $532 million in property losses were produced by the more than 400,000 robberies that were investigated by police. This translates to an average dollar loss per incident of $1,258. Given the large numbers of robberies that go unreported to police, one can reasonably assume that somewhere in the neighborhood of $1 billion in property is lost to robbery offenders each year. Most notably, robbery victimization rates reached an all-time high of 7.4 per 1,000 persons or households. Robbery victimization rates are traditionally higher in the western and southern regions of the United State of America. Victimization rates in the Midwest and Northeast (2.1 and 2.7, respectively) were noticeably lower than in the West and South (3.1 and 3.0 per 1,000 respectively). The District of Columbia, Maryland, New York, California are most burdened by robbery calls. Conversely, Vermont, North Dakota, Wyoming, Montana, and South Dakota weigh in at the bottom of the state-level rankings. #RandolphHarris 16 of 18

As is the case with all forms of violent crime, increased population density yields significantly higher robbery victimization rates. City dwellers experienced a robbery victimization rate of 4.9 per 1,000 persons or households. This compares to reported rates of 2.2 in suburban areas and 1.4 in rural locales. Of our major cities, the FBI lists Atlanta, Newark, and Miami as having the highest robbery rates. At the other end of the spectrum, San Jose, Mesa, and El Paso are major cities with low robbery rates. U.S. robbery rates tend to exceed those experienced in other developed nations. Our robbery rate is 165.4 per 100,000 persons This was surpassed only by Spain which posted a rate of 168.9. Significantly lower robbery rates were experienced in France, England, and Wales, Australia, Canada, Germany, Israel, and Japan. Robbery is a classic example of an unskilled crime where the offender enlists fear and intimidation tactics to achieve his or her goals. Weaponry and robbery often go hand in hand—roughly half of all robbery victims recently claimed that their assailant was armed: 29.9 percent of attackers were said to carry a gun, 13.6 a knife or sharp object, and 4.6 percent relied on a blunt object (id est, club, pipe, baseball bat). At the same time, almost four in every ten attacks took the form of “strong arm robberies” in which the offender relied only on the threat or use of brute force. Alternative sources of data suggest that the numbers of gun-toting robbers may be significantly higher. A full 42 percent of the robberies that police investigated were found to involve some sort of firearm. Luckily, less than 10 percent of the inmate sample reported firing shots. The FBI estimated a robbery-by-firearm rate of 59.5 per 100,000. #RandolphHarris 17 of 18

Gun control advocates often attribute our high robbery rates to this country’s fascination with firearms. Reports estimate 223 million firearms were circulating throughout the United States of America. Add to that roughly 4 million new firearms that are purchased each year and another 300,000 or so that get reported stolen, and it becomes abundantly clear that there are plenty of guns to go around. Some have argued that rigorous gun control measures would significantly reduce our robbery rates. However, an in-dept study found that injuries occurred far less frequently in robberies involving a gun than did when a knife, club, or no weapon present. S the perceived lethality of the situation decreased (id est, knives were less threatening than guns), robbery victims exhibited a greater willingness to resist or challenge their attackers. Both good news and bad news flow from these findings. Resisting seems to increase the chances that the victim will remain in control of his or her valuables. However, this course of action increases the likelihood that the attacker will turn to a weapon of choice as an equalizer. In the case of a gun, this generally results in dire consequences for the victim. Look forward and reason backward. It is better to give than to receive when you are the victim of a robbery. Most material items can be replaced and it is best to walk away with your life. Time is money. And sometimes giving away money is certainly worth your time. A robbery is like a negotiation, but you have no power. A lot of people think the United States of America is frequently robbed, but is the World’s Super Power.  The fact that the greater share in bargaining agreements goes to the more patient side also very unfortunate for the United States of America. Our system of government, and its coverage in the media, fosters impatience. When negotiations with other nations on military and economic matters are making slow progress, interested lobbyists seek support from congressmen, senators, and the media, who pressure the administration for quicker results. Our rival nations in the negotiations know this very well, and are able to secure greater concession from us. #RandolphHarris 18 of 18

Cresleigh Homes

Isn’t Residence Four at #MagnoliaStation at #CresleighRanch gorgeous?! 😍

This 2-story, 3,489 square foot home features 4 bedrooms, 3.5 bathrooms, and a true 3-car garage. The spacious great room and loft upstairs allow for extra space to use however you and your family please! https://cresleigh.com/magnolia-station/residence-5/

Plus each Cresleigh home comes fully equipped with an All Ready connected home, including a video door bell, digital deadbolt for the front door, connect home hub, two smart switches & USB outlets, plus we’ll even gift you a Google Home Hub & Google Home Mini! 🎁

Don’t miss the opportunity to purchase your brand new dream home at Magnolia Station! We’re now selling!

Violence seems to beget violence, from generation to generation. In violence, we do not just consider injuring others but also give the green light to doing so, often with a forceful as unrestrained as it is self-justified. Vengeance, bloodlust, severe dehumanization, rape, torture, acting with extreme prejudice—whatever its form, violence is aggression with no restraints, further fueled by a mindset that adds an emphatic, not-to-be debated stamp of approval. There are plenty of views about what constitutes and causes violence, but any deep understanding of violence has to include our capacity for extreme aggression and the dehumanizing of others, especially toward those who offend us. How do women cope with their experiences of wife rape? Women implement a variety of coping strategies to deal with the violence in their lives and protect themselves from harm. Women who are abused by their husbands must manage the violence and this involves the attachment of meaning to the violence and development of strategies to cope with it. The meanings the woman attaches to the violence and the resources she believes she has shape strategies for living with, or ending the violence. Women coping with sexual violence is defined as the actions take to avoid or control distress. Women’s coping responses are active, constructive adoptions to the experiences of abuse. The responses of any particular woman will depend on how she defines her experience, the context within which it occurs, and the resources which are available to her at the time and subsequently. #RandolphHarris 1 of 17

Just as battered women and other survivors of repeated acts of violence learn to manage the violence, my research indicates that wide rape survivors too develop strategies to cope with their experiences of sexual abuse, beginning with the first incident. For the majority of women in this study, the first forced sexual experience was merely one in a long line of abuses to come. Indeed, only seven women were able to escape the relationship after having been raped only once. Six of these women terminated their relationships immediately after the first incident of rape. Those women were either separated or seriously considering separation from their partners at the time of the rape, and several had the economic resources to survive on their own. For example, Rhonda and her husband were separated at the time of the incident but maintained an amicable relationship. On the night of the rape, he entered her house, which was not unusual, and then, she says, “It was like something just snaped in him. He grabbed me and said, ‘We gonna have sex, I need to f*ck.’” Rhonda was raped for 7 hours before her husband finally left. At the time of the rape, Rhonda owned her own home, had a job, and was already separated from her assailant, so the decision to remove herself from any further contact with her husband was easy to make. Whereas Rhonda’s circumstances allowed her to immediately end all contact with her husband, most of the women in this study were not in a position to do this. For example, although Karen also identified her first experience as rape, it took her 2 month to save money and finalize her plans to leave. She was raped 11 more times during this period. #RandolphHarris 2 of 17

The vast majority of women in this sample did not leave the relationship after the first incident but instead tried to manage the violence. After the first incident, all of the women reported feeling a similar sense of shock that the assault was happening to them and a general feeling of disbelief that someone they loved was responsible for their pain. Debbie is typical in her response to the first rape: “The first time, I though, ‘I don’t believe this is happening, I just don’t believe it.’ I was in shock—totally numb—and I don’t know how I ever got over being that numb. It just blew me out, and I thought this can’t be happening to me.” Most of the women reported that they though the first assault was an aberrant incident that would never happen again. Shock, confusion, anxiety, fear, helplessness, and a belief that this will only happen once are common psychological responses to victimization. Indeed, for most victims of haphazard crimes, this coping mechanism of treating the incident as a single occurrence may suffice. However, many survivors of wife rape (more than 80 percent of women in this sample) learn that the first incident is not aberrant but an ongoing problem. Thus, after the initial shock has ceased, survivors of wife rape are forced either to develop strategies to manage the violence or end the relationship. Two fundamental goals in managing violence are protecting oneself from injury and justifying the continuation of the relationship. #RandolphHarris 3 of 17

During the course of the relationship, a woman’s coping strategies often change as it becomes clear to her that she will or will not be able to avoid an assault. My interviews revealed that a variety of strategies were employed by women to protect themselves, including minimizing the risk of violence, diminishing injuries once the violence had begun, and emotionally surviving the violence. A primary way women in this sample tried to cope with being raped by their partners was to minimize the risk that violence would occur. As Sally told me, “You know what’s gonna happen, and you’re trying to think in your brain, how can I stop this without getting hurt? And you don’t know how to stop it without angering him because you know you’re going to get killed, and it’s like looking a murderer straight in the eye, and they have this cold-blooded look, and you know you’re dead unless you can do something.” There were several strategies implemented by women to minimize the risk that they would be sexually assaulted. Active resistance—most women in this sample attempted, on at least one occasion, to minimize the risk of violence by physically resisting their partners. One quarter of the women in this sample were successful at least once in resisting their husbands’ attempt to rape them. For example, Erica physically resisted to the point where her husband grew tired and gave up. On one occasion, Samantha was able to kick her husband in the groin and escape. Several other women used weapons, such as guns or knives, to deter their partners; Teri stabbed her partner in the arm with a kitchen knife. #RandolphHarris 4 of 17

Clearly, these women were courageous and creative in their attempts to resist their partners’ attacks. However, most of the women in this sample said they learn not to resist but merely to “give in.” Debbie recalled how she quickly learned not to resist her husband: “I love in an apartment where you go up the steps to get in, and do you know how many times I’ve been dragged up the stairs? Get away? It just doesn’t happen. So I learned quick, and then I never fought back or anything because it would just prolong the agony. It’s over quicker if I just give in.” Avoidance—most of the women in this sample found that a more successful strategy than active resistance was simple avoidance. Indeed, several women tried a tactic similar to Natalie’s: “He would come home from work angry over something and take it out on me. So I would try to stay out of his way.” Danielle knew that she was particularly at risk for being sexually assaulted after her husband watched pornographic movies, so she made extra efforts to avoid him at these times. Many women avoided the bedroom, feigned sleep, or went to bed only after they were certain their partners were asleep. Other women in this sample used more direct tactics to avoid their husbands. For example, Debbie particularly feared her husband when he had been drinking. When he came home drunk, she regularly took advantage of his ulcer by putting tabasco sauce into his food. The result was that he became very thirsty and continued to drink more beer, not realize why he was so thirsty. Debbie says that, “if I was lucky; he would pass out and leave me alone.” Otherwise, Debbie was forced to have sexual intercourse until he passed out from sheer exhaustion. #RandolphHarris 5 of 17

Placating their husbands—the most popular tactic for minimizing the risk of assault was for women to placate their husbands. Placation took many forms, including not seeing close friends of whom their husbands did not approve, quitting their jobs, distancing themselves from their families, maintaining a clean home, having dinner ready at specific times, and keeping the children quiet at all times. These were all components of what these women perceived as their roles as “good wives,” and they tried actively to meet their husbands’ expectations in order to avoid violent episodes. The majority of women told stories similar to this account by Annabel, who remained with her husband for 29 years: “I felt if I could just be what he wanted—a good wife—and stay at home, then he would stop.” Cory remembered thinking, “OK, I can play housewife, I can do that.” Like many battered women, most of the women in this sample understood that if they could fulfill their partners’ expectations about being a good wife and mother, they would reduce their risk of experiencing violence. However, it should be emphasized that these women were not merely passive in their acceptance of their husbands’ demands and gender role expectations; placating their partners was an active coping strategy used to minimize their risk of being abused. Although most of the women went to great lengths to please their husbands, they all learned that they could not manipulate every situation and avoid being sexually assaulted. #RandolphHarris 6 of 17

Thus, they tried to minimize their injuries as a way of maintaining some form of control over the violence. Stacey said, “I would try to manipulate him during the sex, not for my own needs or orgasms, but to control his anger and try to reduce it so I wouldn’t het really hurt.” Many of the women tried to appease their husbands sexually in order to minimize their risk of harm. For example, Annabel knew that she had to “service him [her husband] to keep the peace.” Natalie told me, “I would fake it (orgasm)—I was the best damn actress—I could have won an award. I even did things to him when there were tears in my eyes.” One quarter of the women in this sample said they sometimes performed oral sex on their husbands, although they despised this act, so that the abuse would end quickly. This was particularly difficult for several of the women, who were incest survivors and recall being forced to engage in fellatio with their assailants when they were children. Other women in this sample recalled engaging in what they referred to as “perverse” activities, such as anal intercourse and bondage, to reduce their risk of injury. Although she despised having anal intercourse, Lorraine remembered that she allowed her husband to do this so that he would not severely batter her in front of the children. When rape appeared inevitable, these women had little choice but to focus their energy on limited their injury and emotionally surviving the attack. All of the women who experienced more than one assault described mechanisms that allowed them to survive the actual rape. #RandolphHarris 7 of 17

When it comes to incest survivors, many victims of sexual assault resort to psychological measures to minimize the trauma. Some women find their time perception and sensory perception altered as they disassociate themselves from the experience or treat it as if it is happening to somebody else. This process is defined as “cutting off” as not just a coping strategy but also an act of resistance. In doing this, a woman refuses to let her partner control her mind and feelings. One of the most prevalent survival strategies was best described by Debbie as “orbing out.” She recalled, “He would be all over me, and then I just went out in my mind—I just wasn’t there anymore. I took myself somewhere else, and I fond out later that I had done that a lot. Even growing up and all, if anything hurts me, I orb out—I get total numb. Although this strategy was consistently employed, particularly by the one quarter of the women in this study who were survivors of incest, some women reported out-of-body experiences only during certain episodes. For example, Karen described having “out-of-body experiences—like I was watching from a corner of the room because I couldn’t feel anything”—only during the sexual assaults but not during the physical assaults. Several other women said they coped with the actual rape by focusing their thoughts ironically on the happy days of their marriages or on other aspects of their lives. For example, Kayla recalled, “I would lay there and pretend it’s not happening to me. I would think of shopping or the kids or whatever else I had to do.” Others, such as Rebecca and Wanda, repeated the same phrase continually in their minds in order to distract themselves from what was happening and help them to cope with the assaults. #RandolphHarris 8 of 17

All of these mechanisms enabled he survivors to cope during the actual time of crisis and to minimize emotional trauma. These offenders cannot be taken lightly. Please try to understand their philosophy of life and society. They have no fear of man-made laws or the laws of God…to them crimes as serious as murder comes easy…these people will stop at nothing. They are like a secretive society, bonded together by a common need and desire to mete out havoc on society. There are plenty of views about what constitutes and causes violence, but any deep understanding of violence had to include our own capacity for extreme aggression and the dehumanizing of other, especially toward those who offend us. The more intimate we are with our own violent urges and their roots, the less likely we are to be irresponsible with such urges, and the deeper our understanding will be of others’ violence. This does not necessarily mean that we will then be more likely to excuse or marginalize it or look the other way, but we will be able to more skillfully related to it and its origins, getting a deeper sense of how to best approach and work with it. As uncomfortable as it may be to bring our own violence or capacity for violence out of the shadows, we owe it to ourselves—and everyone else—to do so. People who are the victims of violence may feel a loneliness, accompanied with the terrors of manic-depression and suicide. It is not just the loneliness, not the shock, not the fear, not the sense of failure, but the sense of a dying, of a relationship dying, and no one can stop it, not really—not yourself, your work, your money, your efforts, your hopes, your dreams; not your realities, not your friends, not anybody. #RandolphHarris 9 of 17

And then the victim comes to realize that there will be more grief to come, more hard realities to face, certainly more hurt and abuse; and they pray, and pray that in the breakdown of their home, their family, their relationship with their husband, that in some way their children ma find enough strength to endure and grow because that is where the real guilt and sense of failure lies. You know you can never repair what has been broke; it is to the children, not anybody else that you have a responsibility. It is them you need to feel for not mama or daddy, not really; it is to them that the dawn must speak and comfort and help grow; it is to them that hopefully out of the mess, their goodness might survive. Man as we know him is regarded not as a completed being but as a being in a certain definite phase of one’s possible transformation. This transformation is considered to be possible in one lifetime, that is, it is considered that a man born in one phase can, during one lifetime, pass into another. If we take the example of a butterfly then a man born in one phase can, during one lifetime, pass into another. If we take the example of a butterfly, then man is approximately a caterpillar. And the vast majority of people die as “caterpillars.” However, out of the masses of caterpillars a small percentage of transforming beings is constantly emerging. These evolving beings are, for us, people of higher mind. We can know of their existence by traces of their activity in history, chiefly in rt and in religions. Possessing a more perfect mind than ordinary people they possess greater knowledge. #RandolphHarris 10 of 17

We have schools that have as their aim to bring ordinary people, who have felt or realized the necessity of escaping from their present state, near to the ideas coming from people of higher mind, because these ideas alone can assist their transformation, that is, their transition to a new level of being. The solution of the thinker must be capable of exciting a sympathetic vibration in the personality of the man. Or more exactly, the thinker instinctively shies away from certain solutions and gravitates toward others simply because they strike or fail to strike a resonance in one’s temperament and background. The process of life can no longer be adequately described by the metaphor “level,” and the metaphor “dimension” must replace it. The multiplicity of beings demands a principle of organization which in the past was the hierarchical principle with the concomitant image of levels. Besides social and political levels, there are other processes described in terms of the body-soul level, the organic-inorganic level, the levels of religion and culture, and the levels of nature and supernature. Levels, however, are static, with no implications between them, and the only interaction is by interference, that is, control of one level by another, or revolt of one against the other. Since the Renaissance and the Reformation, however, these levels have been gradually broken down so that a new insight into the unity and compenetration of life demands a new metaphor. “Dimension” is a geometric image which expresses unity within diversity. Dimensions have their property that they meet in a point but do not interfere with each other. They do not life next to one another, nor above one another, nor below one another. They lie in one another, and are untied in the point where they meet. #RandolphHarris 11 of 17

Though all dimensions are present at any given point one of the will predominate in the process of life. This dominant dimension is called a “realm” (Bereich), as for example, the inorganic and organic realms and the historical and spiritual realms. The simultaneous presence of all dimensions is explained by the distinction between the potential and the actual. Both are realities, for the potential has a power for being that has not yet been activated. Potential dimensions exist within actual ones. Since the actualization of potencies is a gradual, evolutionary process that extends in its totality over millions of years, some dimensions will prevail over others. However, these successive realms do not constitute a pyramid of levels, for the lie within, not atop one another. One can say, therefore, that in the atom is present the spiritual power that created Shakespeare’s Hamlet, just as the movements of the atoms in Shakespeare’s body participated in the spiritual acts that produced Hamlet. Evidently, tensions and ambiguities exist in every life process, but these are not conflicts between levels. They are conflict between forces that operate in every dimension. The four dimensions are the social, historical, intellectual, and personal. No specifically religious dimension is constructed because religion cannot be confined to a special realm; it permeates all dimensions, giving them depth. #RandolphHarris 12 of 17

The hour of need always brings a corresponding measure of power from God to meet that need. The Church of Christ must lay hold of the equipment of the apostolic period for dealing with the ongoing influx of evil spirits hosts among her members. Believers today may receive the equipment of the Holy Spirit whereby the authority of Christ over the demon hosts of Satan is manifested, for this is proved not only by the instance of Philip the deacon in the Acts of the Apostles, but also by the writings of the “Fathers” in the early centuries of the Christian era. These writings show that the Christians of that time recognize the existence of evil spirits, knew that they influenced, deceived, and possessed men, and believed that Christ gave His followers authority over them through His name. And this authority through the name of Christ, is available for the servants of God even at this present time. The Spirit of God is making this known in many and diverse ways. God gave a recent object lesson through a Chinese Christian, Pastor His, who acted upon the Word of God in simple faith without the questioning caused by the mental difficulties of Western Christendom. And He has awakened a portion of the Church in the West through the last Revival in Wales—by an outpouring of the Spirit of God which has not only manifested the power of the Holy Spirit at work in the twentieth century as in the days of Pentecost, but has also unveiled the reality of satanic powers in active opposition to God and His people, spotlighting the need among the Spirit-filled children of God for equipment for dealing with them. #RandolphHarris 13 of 17

Incidentally, too, the Revival in Wales has thrown light upon the Scripture records, showing that the highest point of God’s manifested power among men are invariably the occasion for concurrent manifestations of the working of Satan. For it was like that when the Son of God came forth from the wilderness conflict with the prince of darkness and found the hidden demons in many lives aroused to malignant activity, so that from all parts of Palestine crowds of victims came to the Man before whom the possessing spirits trembled in impotent rage. The awakened part of the Church of today has now no doubt of the real existence of spirit-beings of evil, and that there is an organized monarchy of supernatural powers set up in opposition to Christ and His kingdom who are bent upon the eternal ruin of every member of the human race. And these believers know that God is calling them to seek the fullest equipment obtainable for withstanding and resisting these enemies of Christ and His Church. In order to understand the methodology of this deceiver-prince of the power of the air, and become acute to discern his program and his tactics in deceiving men, we should search the Scriptures thoroughly to obtain a knowledge both of his character and how hi evil underlines are able to possess and use the bodies of men. The World is in process of becoming a Kosmos, a unified, structured, historical whole in which all the parts interact with one another. However, the forms of thought and action are still chaotically individualistic, and so the World as a historical reality is being born in labor pains of two wars. #RandolphHarris 14 of 17

At almost the precise midpoint of the 20^th century, George Orwell published 1984, hi scorching indictment of totalitarianism. The book pictured a government in total control of the mass media. Mr. Orwell’s brilliant neologisms, like newspeak and doublethink, entered the language. The book became a powerful assault weapon in the fight against censorship and mind-manipulation, which is why it was banned for decades in the Soviet Union. While it helped rally forces opposed to dictatorship of the mind, however, the book’s projection of the future turned out to be highly questionable. Mr. Orwell correctly envisioned such technologies as two-way television screens that could be used to deliver the state’s propaganda to viewers while simultaneously spying on them, and his warnings about potential invasions of privacy are, if anything, understated. However, he did not foresee—nor did anyone else at the time—the most important revolution of our era: the shift from an economy based on muscle to one dependent on mind. He did not, therefore, anticipate today’s astonishing proliferation of new communication tools. The number and variety of these technologies is now so great, and changing so swiftly, that even experts are bewildered. To confront the army of technical abbreviations, from HDTV and ISDN to VAN, ESS, PABX, CPE, OCC, and CD-I, is to sink into alphabetical asphalt. Even to scan the advertisements for consumer electronics is to come away dazed. Rise above this clutter, however, and the basic outlines of tomorrow’s Third Wave media become strikingly clear. #RandolphHarris 15 of 17

The electronic infrastructure of the advanced economies will have six distinct features, some of which have already been foreshadowed. These half-dozen keys to the future are: interactivity, mobility, convertibility, connectivity, ubiquity, and globalization. When combined, these six principles point to a total transformation, not merely in the way we send messages to one another, but in the way we think, how we see ourselves in the World, and, therefore, where we stand in relationship to our various governments. Put together, they will make it impossible for governments—or their revolutionary opponents—to manage ideas, imagery, data, information, or knowledge as they once did. Our account of bargaining has so far focused on just one dimension, namely the total sum of money and its split between the two sides. In fact there are many dimensions to bargaining: the union and management care not just about wages but health benefits, pension plans, conditions of work, and so on. The United States of America and its NATO allies care not just about total defense expenditures, but how they are allocated. In principle, many of these are reducible to equivalent sums of money, but with an important difference—each side may value the items different. Such differences open up new possibilities for mutually acceptable bargains. Suppose the company is able to secure group health coverage on better terms than the individual workers would obtain on their own—say, $1,000 per year instead of $2,000 per year for a family of four. Now the workers would rather have health coverage than an extra $1,500 a year in wages, and the company would rather offer health coverage than an extra $1,5000 in wages, too. #RandolphHarris 16 of 17

It would seem that the negotiators should throw all the issues of mutual interest into a common bargaining pot, and exploit the differences in their relative valuations to achieve outcomes that are better for everyone. This works in some instances; for example, broad negotiations toward trade liberalization in the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) have had better success than ones narrowly focused on particular sectors or commodities. However, joining issues together opens up the possibility of using one bargaining game to generate threats in another. For example, the United States of America may have had more success in extracting concessions in negotiations to pen up the Japanese market to its exports if it threatened a breakdown of the military relationship, thereby exposing Japan to a risk of Soviet or Chinese aggression. The United States of America had no interest in actually having this happen; it would be merely a threat that would induce Japan to make the economic concession. Therefore, Japan would insist that the economic and military issues be negotiated separately. #RandolphHarris 17 of 17

CRESLEIGH HAVENWOOD

Lincoln, CA | from the high $600s

Now Selling!

No appointment needed! Cresleigh Havenwood features four distinct floor plans ranging from 2,293 – 3,377 square feet and offering up to five bedrooms.  Each plan has been thoughtfully designed and includes great features such as single story homes, guest suites, optional offices, garage workshops, and more! Get the most out of your new home with Cresleigh’s All Ready smart home featuring all the connectivity needed to keep your house running. Best of all, each Cresleigh home comes with owned solar included! 

Located off of Virginiatown Road and McCourtney Road, residents of the 83 homesites of Cresleigh Havenwood will benefit from a brand new neighborhood in the charming City of Lincoln. Palo Verde Park, is  just down the street and there’s plenty of recreation to take part in all around town

#CresleighHomes

. 

Many view aggression not as innate, but as a disposition fueled and governed by personal and cultural conditioning. According to social learning theory, aggression is a self-serving learned behavior: we assume we need or deserve something, and we find that we can get it—and sometime even more—through being aggressive, whether directly or indirectly (as when we manipulate another into acting out our aggression). This starts very early in life. Very young children can get aggressive simply though seeing others getting what they want through being aggressive. Not surprisingly, aggression is commonly imitated when it seems that it is justified. Such justification can be very primitive, being no more than a matter of “I want it; therefore it should be mine.” The  logic is starkly simple: if you have it and I want it, and I can take it from you through being aggressive with you, then I will. This type of rationalization can be very dangerous. The experience of women who were raped by their partners differed not only by the type of violence they suffered but also in terms of the frequency of the incidents. For a few women in this sample, rape was a relatively rare occurrence. For example, Abigail was married to her partner for 25 years and was raped once early in the relationship. Other women were raped so frequently they lost count. Debbie was raped as often as three times a say over a period of 8 years. Most women (55 percent) were raped frequently—more than twenty times during the course of their relationship. Also, 50 percent of the women in the ample were raped more than twenty times. Although there is a wide range of experiences represented in this sample, rape was not an infrequent occurrence but the norm for most women. #RandolphHarris 1 of 18

Women who are raped by their husbands experience not only vaginal penetration but a variety of unwanted, forced sexual acts. In fact, marital rape survivors are more likely to experience unwanted oral and anal intercourse than women who are raped by acquaintances. About 57 percent of the women in my sample were vaginally raped by their partners. However, 40 percent of the women reported at least one incident of anal rape, and 33 percent have been forced to perform oral sex on their partners. Thus, we see considerable variation in the type of sexual violence women experienced and the frequency with which they were raped by their partners. The women in this sample offered many explanations for the rapes inflicted on them by their partners. However, it is significant to note that these explanations were offered after they had ended the violence. While the relationships were ongoing, many of the women said, they blamed themselves for the violence. In retrospect, they were more likely to hold their husbands responsible for sexually abusing them. One of the most popular explanations women offered was that their partner believed that he had the right to sexual intercourse on demand; when refused, he had the right to take it. Such thinking is created and perpetuated, not necessarily by the patriarchal family structure, but because of hierarchical or status seeking behavior in youth. When this type of aggression is supported by parental and social rewards, it becomes innate. Also, this type of aggressive behavior that some men impose on their wives can be part of social modeling. #RandolphHarris 2 of 18

Social modeling can play a huge role in the arising and development of aggression, as shown through research indicating that witnessing physical abuse between one’s parents is more strongly correlated to later involvement in marital violence than being hit by one’s parents. The glorification of aggression—admiring those who claw their way to the top, blitz the opposition, run over the competition—makes non-aggression seem bland, flat, not very pleasurable, and not very manly. Patriarchal society is unfairly blamed for all the ills in society. However, most patriarchs are not deviant. Also, the first thing people who when something grows wrong in the how is that there was not a strong role model. So, no matter what men do, they are seen to be at fault for everything that goes wrong. Nonetheless, the ideal of sex as a conjugal right is particularly evident among men who rape their wives. Research reveals that some men feel a sense of entitlement to their wives’ bodies and thus do not regard forced sex as rape. The majority of women in this sample indicated that their husbands felt a sense of ownership that gave them the sexual rights to their wives’ bodies at all times. For example, Wanda remembered that her husband tole her repeatedly “That’s my body—my ass, my tits, my body. You gave them to me when you married me and that belongs to me.” Similarly, Emily recalled that on the night her husband raped her, “he was saying something like I’m his wife and I’m supposed to have sex with him and by law I was his or something like that—his possession.” #RandolphHarris 3 of 18

When several of the women in this study informed their partners that the act they had committed was rape, the men still adamantly denied this because of their sense of sexual entitlement. For example, Rhonda’s husband told her, “You’re my wife—this ain’t rape.” When Terri confronted her partner, he said, “Girl, I didn’t rape you. How can I rape my own woman?” I have often heard other men express these kind of ideas, but they also tend to not be the most highly educated people. Often times, these ideas are shared by men who view sex as their duty and mission in life. In fact, many of us think that men who have like eight kids before the age of 40 are being reckless and making mistakes. However, they, in some cases, are doing this on purpose. Getting women pregnant is a for of control. Furthermore, the Christian Bible tells men to procreate. Also, as Dr. Darwin explained, it could also be about survival of one’s race. So not only may men get women pregnant as a form of control, it could also have something to do with their biological function. Whereas other men have different socializing. They want to be fathers, be their for their children, take care of them and establish a career, so they will usually be more careful about the number of children they produce to make sure they can afford them. There are people in society who believing in saving up for their child’s education. They want to rely as little of the government as possible. Whereas others may need government assistance or feel they are entitled to it. Nonetheless, even after eight of the women in the sample filed criminal charges against their partners for sexual assault, the majority of the men continued to deny that their actions could legally be rape. #RandolphHarris 4 of 18

When they were forbidden, for medical reason, to have sex with their partners, several women in this study said that their risk of being raped increased because their partners’ sense of entitlement was challenged. In one of the most brutal examples in my study, Stacy returned home from having a cesarean section to have this encounter with her husband, who was a physician: “I told him [my husband] I couldn’t have intercourse, and he told me ‘Skin heals in 72 hours.’ I’ll never forget that. Then he kneeled with a knee on either side of my shoulder and smacked his penis across my face and said, ‘You suck me, b*tch.’” Stacy’s husband reasserted “his rights” by forcing her to have an oral intercourse, after which he sodomized her. This sense of entitlement often lasts even after the couple is separated or divorced, as was the case with 20 percent of the women in this sample. For example, after she was separated, Lisa was raped frequently by her partner when he showed up to give his child support payments. She said, “I dreaded the weekends. It was like clockwork, and he would jut make me do it, and I knew it was coming and that made it worse.” When they are separated or divorced, women are particularly at risk of being raped because despite the dissolution of the marital bond, this sense of entitlement and the belief that their (ex) wives are their property live on. Several of the women in my sample believed that the sexual abuse was their partners’ attempt to punish either their loved ones or the women themselves. For example, Sally recalled the following exchange that occurred one night, just before her rape: “I think he thought I was his wife, and he could do anything to me, and if he wanted sex, he got sex. And he could do anything and do no wrong and I belonged to him. Like one night when my daughter came back from her date, he flipped because the boy didn’t shake his hand, and he screamed, ‘She’s never going out with him again.’ And he went on and on and said, ‘Now it’s time for you to pay. It’s time to pay up like you did the other night.’” #RandolphHarris 5 of 18

Sally was punished for the actions of her daughter’s boyfriend. Other women were raped as punishment for their own “sins,” as Natalie described here: “A lot of times it [rape] happened because he was so jealous. He always thought tht I was looking at other men. Like the time my brother and his friend—who I grew up with—were over, and he thought I was looking at his friend, and he was really mad. He started hitting me and then forced me to have sex.” Tanya remembered a similar linkage between punishment and rape: “He [her partner] would try to choke me, and then I would pass out. Then he would rape me. He would put me to sleep and then rape me. Sometimes when we were out somewhere, and he didn’t like something I did, he would ay ‘You wanna go to sleep?’ and laugh like it was real funny. It was like a punishment.” Like Natalie and Tanya, several women in this study recalled tht their partners force them “to pay” sexually as punishment. Ultimately, these women perceived the assaults as their partners’ attempt to control their behavior. The majority of women in this sample saw the sexual violence as their partners’ way to assert power and control over them. As Pam told me, “The more control he thought he was losing, the worse it got. If I got a job or I was doing good, he would take it away. He would beat me up and force me up and force me [to have sex] just to get that control back.” Nine of the women told me that their partners, in an ultimate attempt at control, raped them in order to impregnate them so they would not leave the relationship. In five cases, their partners’ efforts were successful. For example, Annabel said, “We had five children. I think he raped me to keep me pregnant all the time because he knew I would never leave the kids.” #RandolphHarris 6 of 18

Whereas some partners used pregnancy to control their wives, several women told me that their husbands were angered by their pregnancies, possibly because this represented a loss of control over them. Indeed, three women in this study talked about their partners’ attempts to make the “lost the baby” through increased violence and/or coerced abortions because they believed that their wives had been unfaithful to them. For example, Wanda recalled that her husband, “tried to force me to have an abortion because he didn’t believe it was his child….When I refused to get an abortion, he took me to [the] women’s clinic, and I was on the table and I was far enough along that the doctor said he couldn’t do it.” Although he was not successful in forcing his wife to have an abortion, her husband continued to sexually and physically abuse her throughout her pregnancy, Wanda said, possibly with the hope that she would lose the baby. In this sample, pregnancy was a factor that appeared to place women at a higher risk of being both physically and sexually abused. Researchers have noted that there is a correlation between battering and pregnancy. Women who were sexually abused by their partner were also more likely to be abused during pregnancy. One third of the women in my sample spoke about the increase in physical and sexual violence they experienced during pregnancy. The women who were raped during their pregnancies were traumatized, not only by the sexual assaults but also by the fear of how their unborn children might be affected by their partners’ violent behavior. However, most of the women felt that there was little they could do to stop the sexual abuse and their husbands’ attempts to dominate them in this way. #RandolphHarris 7 of 18

We see that there are a variety of explanations offered by women to explain the sexual violence in their lives. Furthermore, it is clear that the sexual violence the women in this sample experienced varied greatly. Indeed, no stereotypical depiction of the “average wife rape” emerges from their description. Despite individual differences among the participants’ experiences, there were similarities in how these women managed the sexual violence. Aggression is not just a matter of physiology or social conditioning, but a result of biological, psychological, and social factors operating in conjunction. Biological reductionism (assigning biology and genetics too much responsibility for bad behavior) leaves unchallenged our habit of overlooking or vastly underestimating the power of our conditioning to determine or aggressiveness. This can easily lead to an overreliance on medication to deal with aggressiveness, as if all we needed to do to truly reduce our aggressiveness was to take some pills. Where biological reductionism looks at aggression and sees not much more than “chemical imbalance” (a questionable concept that is started to lose its moorings), environmental reductionism (assigning external factors, such as family structure and cultural conditions, too much responsibility for bad behavior) looks at aggression and sees not much more than something simply requiring behavioral modification. Aggression cannot be reduced to physiology, nor to behavior, nor to cognition, nor to socialization, for it arises for each of us from a uniquely evolving weave of all these. #RandolphHarris 8 of 18

In the midst of aggression, we have an opportunity to experience the instinctual and the conditioned, the reflexive and the reflective, the biological and the biographical, all happening at the same time. We can begin with facing our aggressiveness; then unearth the anger that underlies it, developing more and more intimacy with that anger, eventually feeling deeply empowered, simultaneously vulnerable and filled with a healing courage. There is undeniable growth in such work, requiring both a keenly discerning awareness and a full “yes” to passion, bringing together heart, guts, and head in ways that sever our highest good. It is important to come to terms with the strong and powerful feelings we experience. Something is usually always very much alive in us of the pain we know. Each time some individuals try to speak of the pain they feel inside, they chock and the words never come out. It can be a struggle to say farewell to a World that one has known from the beginnings, a World of tenderness and caring, to know that with the end of a relationship, this World may never exist again. While offenders may have a chemical imbalance that causes them to abuse their wives, the life she provides for them may be the only comfort they know and that could be a reason why they fight so hard to keep it. Even though abuse does not justify their behavior. They too fear that loss of human support being sharply and suddenly gone. However, offenders need to deal with the shattering awareness that abuse is not acceptable and seek professional help to deal with the darkness and uncertainty. #RandolphHarris 9 of 18

We all have to find joy and fulfillment, and create that World on our own. It can be hard to live with this truth, with all the barriers and obstacle that others put before us. In relationships, love is supposed to flower between two individuals. We should be able to cherish one’s music, one’s joking ways, how one enters a room and stands, one’s quickness, one’s putting everything one has into what matters to that individua, and how one has been able to grow through steady persistence. This is what allows a coupe to enjoy what they share. Love should be here all the time. It should enrich one’s life, making sense of the absurdity, bringing light into the darkness, contributing to one’s life as a human being. This love goes with you into that unknown World we face everyday and comforts us with a steady presence when we face the problems and issues of living and it shines like a beacon to light one’s way back home. What is meant by growth of knowledge and growth of being? The growth of knowledge means a transition from the particular to the general, from details to the whole, from the illusory to the real. Ordinary knowledge, or what is called knowledge, is always a knowledge of details without knowledge of the whole, a knowledge of the leaves, or the veins and serrations in the leaves, without a knowledge of the tree. Real knowledge not only shows a given detail, but the place, the function and the meaning of this detail in the whole. In our ordinary knowledge there are times which bring us near to real knowledge. For instance, in the ordinary system of notation any number not only defines the power but shows the place of this power in the series of powers from zero to infinity. All real knowledge is of this nature. #RandolphHarris 10 of 18

Real knowledge comes from higher mind, that is, from the minds of men who have attained the fullest development possible for men. It is called objective knowledge, as distinct from the knowledge of ordinary men, which is called subjective knowledge. Objective knowledge is always school knowledge, that is, knowledge acquire in a school. A man cannot arrive at it with his own mind or get it from books. One of the first ideas of objective knowledge is that a knowledge of the real World is possible, but only on the condition of being able to make use of the principles of relativity and scale and then knowing of the fundamental laws of the Universe, the law of three and the law of seven. The approach to the study of objective knowledge begins with the study of an objective language. The next step is the study of oneself which begins with the understanding of man’s place in the Universe and the study of the human machines. The knowledge of oneself is both an aim and a means. A man who has not had school teaching, that is, a man of a subjective way of thinking, lives surrounded by illusions, first of all about oneself. One thinks that one has will and the possibility of choice every moment of one’s life; one thinks that one can do; one thinks that one has individuality, that is, something permanent and unchangeable; one thinks one has an “I” or an Ego likewise permanent and unchangeable; one considers oneself a conscious being and supposed that one is able to arrange life on Earth by following the indications of reason and logic; one’s usually state of consciousness, in which one lives and acts, one calls clear consciousness when in reality it is sleep. #RandolphHarris 11 of 18

In this sleep, one lives, writes books, invents theories, carries on wars, kills other sleeping people and dies oneself without even suspecting for a moment that one can wake. One does not realize the possibility of development or growth. One ascribes to oneself that which one does not possess. However, one does not know how much it is that one could acquire it. If one is a man of scientific views, one does not admit the possibility of any individual evolution of man beyond the limits of ordinary intellectual development during life. Instead one acknowledges the possibility of the evolution of man as a species and one considers such evolution to be entirely mechanical, that is, not dependent upon anybody’s will. If one is a religious man, one believes in a future life and that one is guided for one’s own good by higher powers with whom one can have intercourse by means of prayer. If one is familiar with theosophy, one believes in the law of Karma and in reincarnation; one considers that one has an astral body, a mental body and a causal body, and that through an inevitable evolution one will attain to the very highest degrees, if not on Earth, then on some other planet. If one has already understood the inadequacy and the illusory nature of scientific, religious and theosophical ideas and realizes the necessity for inner change in man, one does not realize the difficulty of this, one does not realize the necessity for lengthy and systematic efforts which are impossible without a knowledge of the human machine. It seems to one that what can come must come. However, in reality, nothing comes of itself. #RandolphHarris 12 of 18

A person must free oneself from illusions and then work to attain another being. This work requires long and systematic efforts and knowledge. In the post-apostolic period this manifested power of God continued in varying degrees, rising and subsiding. Then the forces of darkness gained, and, wit intermittent intervals and exceptions, the professing Church sank down under their power, until, in the darkest hour, which we call the Middle Ages, sins having their rise through the deceptive workings of the evil spirits of Satan were as ride as in Canaan before its conquest. Moses had written by the command of God: “Thou shalt not learn to do after the abominations of those nations. There shall not be found with thee…one that useth divination, or that practiceth augury, or an enchanter, or a sorcerer, or a charmer, or a consulter with a familiar spirit, or a wizard, or a necromancer” (Deut. 18.9-11). However, even as in Old Testament times, this admonition was again often ignored. Why Christendom in the present century doe not universally recognize the existence and workings of evil supernatural forces can only be attributed to its low condition of spiritual life and power. Even at the present time, when the existence of evil spirits is recognized by the heathen, this is often looked upon by the Western missionary as “superstition” and ignorance. Actually, such ignorance is on the part of the shepherd who is blinded by the prince of the power of the air to the revelation given in the Scriptures concerning these satanic powers. #RandolphHarris 13 of 18

The “ignorance” on the part of the heathen is in their propitiatory attitude to evil spirits. They seek to appease the spirits because of their ignorance of the gospel message of a Deliverer and Saviour sent to “proclaim release to the captives” (Luke 4.18), and who, when He was on Earth, went about healing all who were “oppressed by the devil” (Acts 10.38). He also sent His messengers to open the eyes of the bound ones, that they might “turn from darkness to light, and from the power of Satan unto God” (Acts 26.18). If missionaries to the heathen recognized the existence of evil spirits, and that the darkness in heathen lands was caused by the prince of the power of the air (Eph. 2.2; 4.18; 1 John 5.19; 2 Cor. 4.4), and then proclaimed to the heathen the message of deliverance from the evil hosts they know so well to be real and malignant foes—this in addition to the remission of sins and victory over sin through the atoning sacrifice of Calvary—a vast change would come over the mission field in a few brief years. When it comes to brinkmanship and strikes, before an old contract expires, the union and the firm begin the negotiations for a new labor contract. However, there is n sense of urgency during this period. Work goes on, no output is sacrificed, and there is no apparent advantage to achieving an agreement sooner rather than later. It would seem that each party should wait until the last moment and state its demand just as the old contract is about to experience and a strike looms. That does happen sometimes, but often an agreement is reached much sooner. In fact, delaying agreement can be costly even during the tranquil phase when the old contract still operates. The process of negotiation has its on risk. There can be misperceptions of the other side’s impatience or outside opportunities, tensions, personality clashes, and suspicion that the other side is not bargaining in good faith. The process may break down despite the fact that both parties want it to succeed. #RandolphHarris 14 of 18

Although both sides may want the agreement to succeed, they may have different ideas about what constitutes success. The two parties do not always look forward and see the same end. They may not have the same information or share the same perspective, so they see things different. Each side must make a guess about the other’s costs of waiting. Since a side with a low waiting cost does better, it is to each side’s advantage to claim its cost is low. However, these statements will not be taken at face value; they have to be proven. The way to prove one’s waiting costs are low is to begin incurring the costs and then show you can hold out longer, or to take a greater risk of incurring the costs—lower costs make higher risks acceptable. It is the lack of a common view about where the negotiations will end that leads to the beginning of a strike. The situation is tailor-made for the exercise of brinkmanship. The union could threaten an immediate breakdown of talks followed by a strike, but strikes are very costly to union members as well. While time for continued negotiation remains, such a dire threat lacks credibility. However, a smaller threat can remain credible: tempers and tensions the union does not really want it to. If this bothers the management more than it bothers the union, it is a good strategy from the union’s perspective. The argument works the other way around too; the strategy of brinkmanship is a weapon for the stronger of the two parties—namely, the one that fears a breakdown less. Sometimes wage negotiations go on after the old contract has expired but without a strike, and work continues under the terms of the old contract. #RandolphHarris 15 of 18

This might seem to be a better arrangement, because the machinery and the worker are not idle and output is not lost. However, one of the parties, usually the union, is seeking a revision of the terms of the contract in its favor, and for it the arrangement is singularly disadvantageous. Why should the management concede? Why should it not let the negotiation spin on forever while the old contract remains in force de facto? Again the threat in the situation is the probability that the process may break down and strike may ensue. The union practices brinkmanship, but now it does so after the old contract has expired. Time for routine negotiations is past. Continued work under an expired contract while negotiations go on is widely regarded as a sign of union weakness. There must be some chance of a strike to motivate the firm to meet the union’s demands. When the strike happens, what keeps it going? They key to commitment is to reduce the threat in order to make it credible. Brinkmanship carries the strike along on a day-by-day basis. The threat never to return to work would not be credible, especially if the management comes close to meeting the union’s demands. However, waiting one more day or week is a credible threat. The loses to the workers are small than their potential gains. Provided they believe they will win (and soon), it is worth their while to wait. If the workers are correct in their beliefs, management will find it more affordable to give in and in fact should do so immediately. Hence the workers’ threat would cost them nothing. The problem is that the firm may not perceive the situation the same way. If it believes the workers are about to concede, then losing just one more day’s or week’s profits is worth getting a more favorable contract. In this way, both sides continue to hold out, and the strike continues. #RandolphHarris 16 of 18

Earlier, we talked about the risk of brinkmanship as the chance that both sides would fall together down the slippery slope. As the conflict continues, both sides risk a large loss with a small but increasing probability. It was this increasing exposure to risk that induced one side to back down. Brinkmanship in the form of a strike imposes costs differently, but the effect is the same. Instead of a small chance of  large loss, there is a large chance, even certainty, of a small loss when a strike begins. As the strike continues unresolved, the small loss grows, just as the chance of falling off the brink increases. The way to prove determination is to accept more risk or watch strike losses escalate. Only when one side discovers that the other is truly the stronger does it decide to back down. Strength can take many forms. One side may suffer less from waiting, perhaps because it has valuable alternatives; winning may be very important, perhaps because of negotiations with other unions; losing may be very costly, so that the strike losses look smaller. This application of brinkmanship applies to the bargaining between nations as well as that between firms. When the United State of America tries to get its allies to pay a greater share of the defense costs, it suffers from the weakness of negotiating while working under and expired contract. The old arrangement in which the Americans bear the brunt of the burden continues in the meantime, and the U.S.A. allies are happy to let the negotiations drag on. Can—and should—the United States of America resort to brinkmanship? #RandolphHarris 17 of 18

 Risk and brinkmanship change the process of bargaining in a fundamental way. In the earlier accounts of sequences of offers, the prospect of what  would come later induced the parties to reach an agreement on the very first round. An integral aspect of brinkmanship is that sometimes the parties do go over the brink. Breakdowns and strikes can occur. They may be genuinely regretted by both parties, but may acquire a momentum of their own and last surprisingly long. In China, wall campaigners were a traditional First Wave tool of protest in China. Early in 1989 campaigners began showing up on the walls near Beijing University, asking for more representation so they could be more like the privileged children of the party’s top leaders. Urging for broadened democracy, students thanked Premier Li Peng and others for their leadership and requested to speak with them. By late spring, that other First Wave communications team, the crowd, came into play. Using the memorial service for the late Hu Yaobang, a reformist Communist Party leader, students from Beijing universities politely asked for freedom of expression. The peaceful crowds were assured that the request would be met and thanked the government. They returned to classes. The World was impressed with how civil, kind and peaceful China was and Asian culture became more popular in America, as well as America’s interest in China. Today, the Second Wave mass media still exert enormous influence. As the World speeds deeper into the Powershift Era, the Second Wave tools of mind control, once so overwhelming, will themselves be overheled by the subversive media of tomorrow. #RandolphHarris 18 of 18

Cresleigh Homes

Picture summer at #MillsStation at #CresleighRanch Residence 4. Complete with top-tier design features, in a desirable location, this is the home you have always dreamt of. The stylish kitchen features high quality appliances and quartz countertops.

The main living room provides a cozy atmosphere for the whole family, and there is also a loft upstairs. The great room is perfect for bringing the outdoors, inside with the large windows and sliding glass door that opens to an oversized covered porch. 

Don’t wait any longer to make it a reality! Head to our website for more info. https://cresleigh.com/mills-station/residence-4/

#CresleighHomes

The way medicine approaches human suffering has always been determined by the technology available at any given time. Before the Enlightenment aberrations in behavior were ascribed to God, sin, magic, witches, and evil spirits. However, because of the evil people encounter from other human beings, these ascriptions are starting to gain relevance again. Often time, when commenting in a crime, one will hear people say, “I did not think a human being was capable of something so brutal. Gang rape represents a rare but conceptually unique phenomenon. Unlike the vast majority of rapes where a lone male forces himself on a lone female, gang rapes involve multiple offenders in a collective criminal transaction. Moreover, these crimes often occur on college campuses and are committed by groups of male assailants who are well known to the victim. The rapes are often committed by individuals who share a membership to some sort of cohesive formal organization (id est, a fraternity or sports team). Perpetrators often occupy an elevated or privileged status in the university community. The organization in question tend to be known for their partying and objectification of women. Seemingly harmless group interactions can get out of hand. The attacks usually take place in conjunction with coed social events where alcohol or drug use by the victims and offenders almost always seems to be present. In the Spring of 1984, two “gang rape” trials were in progress. One received a great deal of national publicity. Six men were charged with aggravated rape of a woman at Big Dan’s Tavern in New Bedford, Massachusetts. Four were convicted. #RandolphHarris 1 of 21

The other trial received only local attention and sent a different message. Seven college students were tried for third-degree sexual assault of a 17-year-old Michigan State University (MSU) student in a dormitory. After a three-week trial, in the course of which the five defense lawyers each displayed the victim’s jeans and football jersey before the court and asked her why she was not wearing a bra when she went to the midnight dorm party, the students were acquitted. Questioned about the verdict, an MSU senior was quoted in the local paper as saying, “I don’t believe she was raped…I believe they ran a train on her” (Pierson, 1984, p. 1B). A notable similarity between the two trials—and others—was the community support given to the defendants. In New Bedford, over 6,000 citizens gathered outside the City Hall to protest the conviction of out men (Chancer, 1987). In a similar demonstration, when five Kentucky State University students were arrested on charges of raping and sodomizing a fellow student, 200 students held an angry rally in their support. In both instances, the protestors not only defended the men but also attacked the woman, maintaining she should be punished. This pattern of sympathy suggests that such sexual behavior is acceptable for some men. As further evidence tht such behavior is tolerated in some “decent” young men, the character witness for the Michigan State defendants included a minister and a girlfriend who testified that the men were incapable of rape. The defense argument was that the women had consented or had not clearly expressed her objection. #RandolphHarris 2 of 21

Because the defendants in these cases did not deny having sex with the same woman sequentially or simultaneously, the testimony of the character witnesses and community support for the defendants implied that exemplary moral character is consistent with having sex with a young woman in tandem with several buddies. Group sexual assault is considered normal behavior for some groups of young men in our society. However, many want to know, how often it occurs, who does it, to whom, and why. Although considerable attention has been devoted to rape in psychological and sociological literature over the past decade, group rape has rarely been discussed as a distinct phenomenon. While the exiting literature is extremely helpful in understanding the sociocultural context that supports sexual aggression, there may be important differences between single- and multiple-perpetrators of rape, especially in regard to motivation and situational characteristics. Other differences may include offender characteristics and psychological consequences for victims. They primary focus here is on perpetrators rather than victims. To term it “gang rape” when many men have sex with same individual and the men deny coercion, is to prejudice the issue. May of the cases discussed in this series of reports on gang rape were not determined to be rapes in judicial proceedings. Aside from the fact that many rapists and their victims do not recognize the crime that has been committed, difficulties or proving rape charges are compounded when there are multiple perpetrators. #RandolphHarris 3 of 21

Because prosecutions and convictions are so rare, any case in which a woman alleged that her participation in sex with a group of men was involuntary is considered an instance of gang rape for purposes of this discussion. Cases in which we do not know the woman’s view of the incident and there are no allegations of force will be termed “trains,” in the common vernacular of the subcultures in which such sex is practiced. A group is considered here to consist of three or more men. There are two reasons for adopting this criterion. First, although two persons are often considered a group in social psychology, most of the group dynamics relevant to gang rape are not activated unless there are at least three group members. Second, several female college students in my samples reported soliciting sex with two men, preferring it to sex with one man, but none reported voluntarily engaging in or enjoying sexual encounters with more than two men. The mean number of male participants in the cases I have studied is five. Campus gang rapes are emphasized here. That street gangs or motorcycle gangs have sex with a single female ritualistically, for example, as an initiation rite, is known and is typically accounted for by the social deviance of these groups. The group rapes may be a common practice among college students in the basis of the claim that they are normative and of the hypothesis that they are an outgrowth of conventional sex roles. Campus gang rapes are also usually acquaintance rapes, occurring during social get-togethers. #RandolphHarris 4 of 21

Because there have been no systematic attempts to collect data on the incidence and prevalence of gang rapes in particular, estimates of their occurrence must be extrapolated from the rape literature of from anecdotal evidence and media reports. In a study of the national incidence of acquaintance rape among college students, it was found that 15 percent of women (as victims) and 4 percent of the men (as perpetrators) had been involved in forced intercourse. The mean number of rapes reported by these subjects was above two. Five percent of the women who reported having been raped and about 16 percent of the men who reported having raped said that their most serious incident involved more than one offender. Thus, in this sample, nearly 1 percent of the men and women at colleges across the United States of America identified their most serious experience with sexual aggression as involving two or more men and one woman. These data may provide an underestimate of the occurrence of gang rapes because subjects were asked to report the number of men involved in only their single most serious experience. On the other hand, the data my provide an overestimate because cases involving two men are included but do not meet the criterion for gang rape here. Those most likely to rape or be raped, respectively, are men and women 20 to 24 years old; the next most likely group is 16 to 19-year-old. #RandolphHarris 5 of 21

Thus, sexual assault is most commonly committed by college-age men against women of college age. In our study of men convicted of sexual assault, 26 percent of the 646 rapes we identified were perpetrated by three or more men, and 55 percent of the rapist were involved in group rapes. Major of the men convicted were young adults; the mean age of the rapists was 23 and of the victims, 22. Although some researchers contend that the tendency to be sexually aggressive is associated with social deviance and low socioeconomic status (SES), sexual aggression may actually be predicted by conflict between the genders, across class and economic lines. As with other forms of criminal behavior, particularly abuse within relationships (child and spouse abuse), it may be that law SES individuals are more likely to be detected, prosecuted, and convicted than high SES perpetrators. In fact, in parallel to the groupthink phenomenon, membership in a privileged group may protect a perpetrator from doubts about the propriety of one’s behavior, as well as from the perception of criminality by others. Groupthink can explain disastrous decisions by elite groups, such as the decision by Kennedy’s cabinet to invade Cuba. Impressed by each other, members of such high status groups become convinced of the group’s moral superiority, invulnerability, and consensus. Of the 24 documented cases of alleged gang rape by college students in the past ten years that we have researched, 13 were perpetrated by fraternity men, four by groups of basketball players, four by groups of football players, one by lacrosse players, and only two by men unaffiliated with formal organization. #RandolphHarris 6 of 21

Fraternities have houses where they can have unsupervised parties, serve alcohol, and enjoy privacy from nonmembers in their bedrooms and living rooms. College football and basketball players often live in their own dormitory and have motel rooms when on the road (the University of Minnesota basketball players assaulted their victim in a motel). Thus, these groups are mor likely than others on college campuses to have facilities and opportunities for illicit activities. Their living situation may facilitate gang rape, but other evidence suggests that the cohesiveness of these groups is an equally important factor. First, several of the known gang rapes by college athletes and fraternity brothers have take place not in reserved residence but in regular campus housing. Second, other tightly knit groups of men, such as members of a rock band or biker gang, have been implicated in gang rapes. Although only two of the prosecuted campus gang rapes did not involve football or basketball players or fraternity members, a participant in one of these incidents referred to his codefendants as “the other members,” although they did not belong to any known organization. That is, the assault was perpetrated by such a tightly knit group of friends that they saw themselves as “members.” Often, sone of the team members who rape together come from the same hometown and grew up together. Differential association theory is helpful in formulating predictions. This theory postulates that criminal behavior is learned through symbolic interactions within intimate social groups. #RandolphHarris 7 of 21

Which segments of the population of American men aged 16 to 24 are likely to participate in group sexual assaults? The theory suggests that fraternity members and member of athletic teams may participate in group assaults not only because they have the facilities and are already organized, but also because the behavior is learned within these primary groups and is passed down along with other traditions. In some cases, there seems to be a ritualistic aspect to the assaults. Research on campus rape also shows that athletes and fraternity men are more likely to be sexually aggressive individual than other college students. More fraternity men (35 percent) reported having forced intercourse than did members of other organizations, such as student government (9 percent), or men not affiliated with any organization (11 percent). Football and basketball players representing NCAA-affiliated schools were reported to police for sexual assault approximately 38 percent more often than the average male on a campus, as measured by an FBI survey. However, to be objective, these are the same men that are seen as more desirable by the student body because they tend to be more popular, more outgoing, come from families with money and status, have cool cars, nice bodies and tend to be attractive. Nonetheless, men who would not rape alone may become rapists in the company of their sexually aggressive buddies. Of those convicted of group rape in the sample, whom they identified as “followers” rather than instigators, had raped only in groups prior to their conviction. One of the Kentucky States defendants told police that he left the woman alone when he found her partially clothed in his room because she was unwilling to have sex with him. When he returned and found his friends assaulting her, he joined in. #RandolphHarris 8 of 21

However, keep in mind that college aged men are also raped on campus. A total of 6.8 percent of undergraduate men and 2.5 percent of male graduate students reported nonconsensual sexual contact. In fact, college increases the risk of sexual assault for men. Male college students are 78 percent more likely to experience sexual assault than non-students between the ages of 18-24. Rape of men by other men is a widely neglected yet increasingly recognized form of sexual assault. Information on same-sex rape involving men is frequently absent in campus rape education and prevention programming because the general public and popular culture have traditionally viewed rape in a context of violence against women. Available medical and psychological literature indicates the need for expanded prevention, treatment, and research dealing with men who rape other men. A male University of Michigan student claims he was sexually assaulted after he was unknowingly slipped a “benzo” date-rape drug at a party. The victim told campus police he could hardly remember what happened the night of April 11, 2018, when he and his friends were walking and got chatted up by two college-age men around 10 p.m. The pair invited the group to a house party on Fletcher Street in Ann Arbor, where the student was given a soft drink mixed with alcohol. He woke up the next day with a foggy memory—and injuries consistent with being raped. The victim tested positive for benzodiazepine, and apparently been raped by two men. Some of these men who molest boys and rape men are serial offenders, but police often times are unwilling to do anything about it. So they go on to victimize several boys or men and that is dangerous because they could do ree af diseases or viruses. A lot of times, you will not even know the male same sex rapist is gay. You think you are just hanging out with a regular guy, not someone who plans to rape you. #RandolphHarris 9 of 21

How can one reassure one that what is happening to them is neither frightening, nor evil, nor sad, nor a denial of what one believes about growth and being, nor a waste of life and energy? It just has to be—it is another life experience. One feels sures that one suffers least of all, being in the midst of it all—being granted a kind of understanding and faith in, even an enthusiasm for death. The formular for living with the idea comes with it. It surprises some individuals that the news is so distressing to others…but one may be deeply touched that it matters so much to others. People often share the misfortunes of life, and sometimes their cheerful countenance is false. Physical attacks may not just be due to inexperience, but may also come out of some maladjustment in one’s own life, but it also may be a manifestation of the suffering of humanity in our time. Being people to it (the tensions and distress of people generally) and being the kind of person in whom emotional disturbance results in physical disorder, one may be sexually assault, though it is not only the individual. Not knowing what would be require of one in the endurance of pain, in making the transition to another kind of existence, or in combatting date rape, an individual may share the news because he or she needs the moral support of those who can give it. Following these feelings may be the right thing to do. If one had died, or if instead a miracle prolonged one’s life until another time, the experience is so rich and basic that one never regrets sharing it. The benefits to all concerned are beneficial. #RandolphHarris 10 of 21

Some may wish there were time to write all of the feelings, ideas, and reactions of other that accompany, or rather follow the “death sentence.” With those who are open, it is only necessary to acknowledge the imminence of death one feels after being raped. This may lead individuals to shed a few tears together over the sorrow of being violated. With others it is necessary to help them to accept the fact that each is vulnerable. With those who cannot accept this vulnerability, they may not take caution to protect themselves. However, they are lucky to have someone care for them after the attack. Some people are all alone and just gradually disappear and become quite eager for departure. It can be one of the saddest experiences. But remember to enjoy the days of leisure and creativity. The sensitivity pays off—sensitivity to what is right, what is true, what is good. At the same time, one is almost in agony because one is equally sensitive to what is ugly, false, superficial, disconnected, irrelevant, wasteful of human life and energy. Most people find they can only endure the reality of what has happened to them in small doses. The problem is not how to accept being assault but how to accept life! In relation to the study of consciousness you must remember what you know about sleep and waking state, the different levels in waking state, and the connection of high centers with higher states of consciousness. You must remember that your aim is to produce higher states of consciousness in yourself and to establish connection with higher centers. #RandolphHarris 11 of 21

You must understand that higher center have many unknown functions which cannot be described in ordinary language. They have much more power, and a deeper penetration into the laws of nature. You must remember that many problems insoluble for our ordinary mind can become soluble for higher centers. And you must always return to the idea of permanent “I” and realize how far you are from it and how many efforts and sacrifices are necessary in order to reach it. In the work on consciousness you must understand first of all, that this work is entirely practical. Theoretical study will not help. Second, you must understand that the work on consciousness can give results only when it becomes permanent or as near to permanent as possible. Spasmodic, accidental, interrupted work cannot give results. So try to find how you can make your work on consciousness continuous. Your mind must guide you in the beginning, constantly reminding you of the necessity for remembering yourself, and helping you to catch the moments of not remembering. However, realize that mind can only prepare you for this work and only guide you for a certain distance. You can go further in the work on consciousness only with the help of will and emotion. Remember also, that consciousness can be measure by the length of periods of consciousness and by the frequency these periods. #RandolphHarris 12 of 21

Efforts to create consciousness in oneself feel almost hopeless in the beginning. However, very soon they will begin to give results. You will notice these results by observing moments of consciousness appearing by themselves without any effort on your part. In reality, they are the results of previous efforts. Since thought, or “belief,” originates either from the God of Truth or the father of lies (John 8.44), there is but one basic principle for testing the source of all doctrines and philosophical beliefs held by believers or doctrines and philosophical beliefs held by believers or unbelievers, id est, the test of the revealed Word of God. All genuine “truth” is in harmony with the only channel of revealed truth in the World—the written Word of God. On the other hand, all teachings originating from deceiving spirits: Weaken the authority from the Scriptures; distort the teaching in the Scriptures; add to the Scriptures the thoughts of men; or put the Scriptures entirely aside. The ultimate object of the forces of falsehood is to hide, distort, misuse, or put aside the revelation of God concerning the cross of Calvary, where Satan was overthrown by the God-Man and where freedom was obtained for all his captives. The test of all religious beliefs therefore is: Its harmony with the written Scriptures in its fully body of truth. Its attitude toward the cross and sin. Be careful of demon doctrines. Countless concepts and beliefs which are opposed to the truth of God are injected into the minds of “Christians” by teaching spirits, rendering them ineffective in the warfare with sin and Satan and subject to the power of evil spirits. #RandolphHarris 13 of 21

All new insights and systems of belief should therefore be tested by the truth of God revealed in the Scripture, not merely by texts or portions of the Word but by the principles of truth revealed in the Word. Since Satan will endorse his teachings by “signs and wonders” (Matt. 24.24; 2 Thess. 2.9; Rev 13.13), “fire from Heaven” and other supernatural “signs” are no proof of a teaching being God; nor is a “beautiful life” to be the infallible test, for even Satan’ ministers can be “ministers of righteousness” (2 Cor. 11.13-15). One of these difficulties is that the manner of a patient classified as “regressed” seems without fail to give us the impression that one is utterly and irrevocably different from ordinary human beings—a feeling, incidentally, that sociologists are familiar with from the studies of castes and social classes. This view is associated with the lay-psychiatric assumption that an appropriate level of animation and situational orientation is the natural human state, and that a catatonic-like stillness must be caused by something specific, or at least constitute something specific that must be explained. Thus when a patient “comes out of it,” as one usually does, there is really no very satisfactory way to integrate our present image of one with the past one. Nor can we explain how it is possible for some patients who seem quite out of contact suddenly to give someone a too-knowing wink or express a feeling that is a little too meaningful to e discounted. These discrepancies might be handled sociologically by assuming that the patient had never “gone into” anything in the first place, and that, therefore, there was nothing for one to come out of. #RandolphHarris 14 of 21

It might be claimed that once an individual releases oneself from respect for social gatherings, for whichever of the multitude of possible reasons, then immobility (or, for that matter, motor excitement) becomes a convenient stance, and that what really needs explaining is our normative level of appropriate animation—even though there are only rare exceptions to its maintenance. Of course we need to know what it is that places an individual outside the claims of a gathering, and certainly such alienation is sometimes a symptom of a deep disturbance in the personality; but our attitudes to the situational proprieties that we ourselves religiously sustain makes us bad students of impropriety. We can agree with the lay-psychiatric approach that the human personality has an organic base and ordinarily cannot be expected to undergo fundamental change very quickly, but then we must look elsewhere for an explanation of sudden changes in the patient’s “condition.” And when we do look elsewhere we find that what can and does change utterly and at a moment’s notice is the propriety of one’s situational conduct and one’s choice of strategies for expressing one’s relation to those about one. Both the latter changes may, of course, come solely, but every normal human being has the capacity at a moment’s notice to dynamite the proprieties in a situation. #RandolphHarris 15 of 21

Gin and vermouth: some prefer them straight, while others only drink them mixed, id est, a martini. We have seen examples of both types of preferences. In election to the Football Hall of Fame, some would be happy with either Elway or Marino, but not both, while in cricket others find only the martini combination of Boycott and Gavaskar palatable. Is the budget approval process all that different? How can it be improved? One suggestion is to give the president the power of a line-item veto. “We ask the Congress, once again: Give us the same tool that 43 governors have, a line-item veto, so we can carve out the boondoggles and pork—those items that would never survive on their one.” Ronald Reagan, State of the Union Address, January 27, 1987. Yet, it is possible that this may be a tool the president is better off without. How could this be? One reason is that without a line-item veto, the president is committed to taking what the Congress gives him; he cannot modify it piecemeal to better suit his preferences. Consequently, compromises made in Congress will be honored without fear that the president will pick and choose what segments to keep. Once Congress predicts they will lose all the parts that would not survive on their own, the process of agreeing on a budget will become much more contentious, and a consensus compromise may not be found. Congress may be much less willing to serve the president a martini if her can remix it before presenting it to the nation. #RandolphHarris 16 of 21

Thus a president with a line-item veto might end up with less power, simply because the Congress is less willing (or able) to put proposals on his desk. A simple example helps illustrate the point. President Reagan, the Republican part did not control the Congress. The Democrats’ approval had to be bought. The budget offered to the Democrats a package of social programs that made the defense spending tolerable. The willingness of the Democrats to approve the budget was contingent on the complete package. If they thought that Reagan could use a line-item veto to cut the social programs (in the name of pork), they would be unwell to give him the Star Wars funds. The debate about the effectiveness of the line-item veto for reducing deficits is best settled by looking at the experience at the state level. Columbia University economist Douglas Holtz-Eakin has examined the historical evidence: Gubernatorial veto power is quite old. The President of the Confederacy had (but did not exercise) item veto power during the Civil War and 28 states (out of a total of 45) adopted a line item veto between 1860 and 1900. By 1930, 41 of the 48 states had a provision for line item veto power. The governors of Iowa and West Virginia acquired line item veto power in 1969. And yet, after looking at all these cases, Professor Holtz-Eakin was unable to see any reduction in the budget deficits of states who governor had the line-item veto. #RandolphHarris 17 of 21

It is clear that the domino-wave of revolutions that swept Eastern Europe in 1989 was a consequence of three convergent forces: the long-term failure of socialism to deliver the economic wealth it promised; the announcement by the Soviet Union that it would no longer prop up communist governments with the treat of military intervention; and the avalanche of information that poured into communist countries despite all the efforts of their censors—information carried by the new means of communication. During the quarter-century dictatorship of Nicolae Ceausescu, Romania imposed the harshest censorship of any communist regime in Eastern Europe, controlling everything that appeared in the press and especially on television. Ceausescu himself was a television fan, and especially liked episodes of Kojak, the American cop-show starting Telly Savalas. However, for all his viewing, Ceausescu failed to understand the World media revolution and paid with his life on Christmas Day, 1989. Had Ceausescu studied the role of the new global media system, for example, in the overthrow of Ferdinand Marcos in the Philippines, he would have known that control of the domestic media is no longer enough to keep a people in ignorance, and that domestic political events are increasingly played out on a global stage. “What happened in the Philippines,” said Professor William Adams, a media expert at George Washington University, “was an epic step toward a new kind of revolution—a revolution via the media and via symbols.” #RandolphHarris 18 of 21

Because of historically close connections between the Philippines and the United States of America and the continuing presence of U.S.A. military bases there, Marcos and his main political opposition courted U.S.A. support. Both sought out foreign journalists to tell their story. As opposition mounted, Marcos reluctantly agreed to hold an election in 1986. The ensuing campaign was given saturation coverage by the American TV cameras, drawn by the drama of Cory Aquino, widow of an assassinated hero, confronting the corrupt old dictator. At first President Reagan supported Marcos. However, as the U.S.A. TV coverage continued, Americas saw the middle-class peaceful demonstrators opposed by Marcos goons, and Reagan’s position began to shift. It did not look good to be allied with this nasty little man on TV. Reagan sent an official team to Manila to monitor the elections for corruption and fraud. Led by Senator Richard Lugar, the team found ample evidence of both and disclosed its conclusions to television audiences even before reporting back officially to the President. Its reports further hurt the Marcos campaign, and what Americans saw on their TV screens instantly seeped back into the Philippines. The TV coverage also influenced the White House, which ultimately backed an anti-Marcos military faction, and with that, the combination of force and information squeezed Marcos out of the office. In the end, faces with the inevitable, Marcos feld the country and was permitted to settle in Hawaii. #RandolphHarris 19 of 21

If he had been one of the twentieth century’s great tyrants, he would have kicked out the media and opened up with machine guns. Yet the reverse might well have been true for Ceausescu. Had he allowed the media in and not opened up with machine guns, he might conceivably have survived. The initial overthrow of communists regimes in other Eastern European countries in the dramatic winter of 1989 was peaceful. Only in Romania did the machine guns stutter. One of the dictator’s last acts was to order the massacre of protestors in the city of Timisoara. As Romanians swarmed into the streets of Bucharest after that, fighting broke out between the military and Ceausescu’s feared security forces, the Securitate. The strife continued for days, the Securitate battling on even after Ceausescu and his wife were given a drumhead trial and shot by a firing squad. By now the revolution was centered in Studio 4 of “Free Romanian Television.” Even as snipers and commandos tried to retake the studio from them, leaders of the revolution, in control of their airwaves, played and replayed pictures of the corpses of the dictator and his wife. Only after that did the bloodshed cease. His dictatorship has been replaced by a “videocracy.” Following the overthrow of communist regimes all across Eastern Europe, the Financial Times exulted: “The medium which George Orwell saw as the tool of enslavement has proved the liberator; not even a Ceausescu could blindfold his people.” #RandolphHarris 20 of 21

Yet overfocusing on television, many observers miss the larger story. For it is not just television that is revolutionary, but the combined interplay of many different technologies. Millions of computer, mobile phones, fax machines, printers and copying machines, DVD players, DVDs, VCRs, videocassettes, advanced telephones, along with cable and satellite technologies, now interact with one another and cannot be understood in isolation. Television is only a part of this much larger system, which links up at points with the intelligent electronic networks that business and finance use to exchange computerized data. This new overarching media system is a cause of (and a reaction to) the rise of the new, knowledge-based economy, and it represents a quantum jump in the way the human race uses symbols and images. No part of this vast web is entirely cut off from the rest. And that, in turn, is what makes it potentially subversive—not just for the remaining Ceausecus of the World but for all power-holders. The new media system is a powershift accelerator. Along with the media system powershift is the changing power balance between the emerging superpower China and the old developed economies of the West: mainly the USA, Europe, and Japan. People complain that China is taking over the World, however, the United States of America is speeding up this powershift by borrowing money from China, outsourcing jobs not only to China, but also other countries, which allows them to gain access to our financial, medical, and economic information. A radically changing economic environment requires new government policies and business strategies, but is the United States of America willing to put America first? #RandolphHarris 21 of 21

Cresleigh Homes

Game night at our place! With a designated space for eating and another for prepping the snacks, 🧀 🥖 there’s room for everyone.

Check out our floor plans; we love showing newcomers around! 💞https://cresleigh.com/cresleigh-ranch/

#CresleighHomes

It is difficult to form a correct estimate of the significance of contemporary events, and the danger that our judgment will remain caught in subjectivity is great. Among gang rapists, most of whom were in their late teens or early twenties when convicted, rape represented recreation and adventure, another form of delinquent activity. Part of rape’s appeal was the sense of male camaraderie engendered by participating collectively in a dangerous activity. To prove one’s self capable of “performing” under these circumstances was a substantial challenge and also a source of reward. One gang rapist articulated this feeling very clearly. “We felt powerful, we were in control. I wanted sex and there was peer pressure. She wasn’t like a person, no personality, just domination on my part. Just to show I could do it—you know, macho.” Our research revealed several forms of gang rape. A common pattern was hitchlike-abduction rape. In these cases, the gang, cruising an area, “Looking for girls,” picked up a female hitchhiker for the purpose of having sex. Though the intent was rape, a number of men did not view it as such because they were convinced that women hitchedhiked primarily to signal sexual availability and only secondarily as a form of transportation. In these cases, the unsuspecting victim was driven to a deserted area, raped, and in the majority of cases physically injured. Sometime, the victim was not hitchhiking; she was abducted at knife or gun point from the street usually at night. Some of these men did not view his type of attack as rape either because they believed a woman walking alone at night to be a prostitute. In addition, they were often convinced “she enjoyed it.” #RandolphHarris 1 of 22

“Gang date” rape was another popular variation. In this pattern, one member of the gang would make a date with the victim. Then, without her knowledge or consent, she would be drive to a predetermined location and forcibly raped by each member of the group. One young man revealed this practice was so much a part of his group’s recreational routine, they had rented a house for the purpose. From hi perspective, the rape was seen by the deviant group as justified because “usually the girl had a bad reputation, or we knew it was what he liked.” Solitary rapist also used terms like “exciting,” “a challenge,” “an adventure,” to describe their feelings about rape. Like the gang rapists, these men found the element of danger made rape all the more exciting for them. Typifying this attitude was one man who described his rape as intentional. He reported: “It was exciting to get away with it (rape), just being able to beat the system, not women. It was like doing something illegal and getting away with it.” Another rapist confided that for him “rape was just more exciting and compelling” than a normal sexual encounter because it involved forcing a stranger. A multiple rapist asserted, “it was the excitement and fear and the drama that made rape a big kick.” At the time of their interviews, many of the rapists expressed regret for their crimes and had empirically low self-esteem ratings. The experience of being convicted, sentenced, and incarcerated for rape undoubtedly produced many, if not most, of these feelings. What is clear is that, in contrast to the well-documented severity of the immediate impact, and in some cases, the long-term trauma experience by the victims of sexual violence, the immediate emotional impact on the rapist is slight. #RandolphHarris 2 of 22

When the men were asked to recall their feelings immediately following the rape, only eight percent indicted that guilt or feeling bas was part of their emotional response. The majority said they felt good, relieved or simply nothing at all. Some indicated they had been afraid of being caught or felt sorry for the victim. Feeling good or nothing at all about raping women is not an aberration limited to some men in prison. In our study we found undetected rapist—rapists outside of prison—found that raping women had no impact on their lives nor did it have a negative effect on their self-image. Significantly a number of men volunteered the information that raping had a positive impact on their feeling. For some the satisfaction was in revenge. For example, the man who had raped and murdered five women: “It seems like so much bitterness and tension had built up and this released it. I felt like I had just climbed a mountain and now I could look back.” Another offender characterized rapes as habit forming: “Rape is like smoking. You can’t stop once you start.” Finally one man expressed the sentiments of man rapists when he stated, “After rape, I always felt like I had just conquered something, like I had just ridden the bull at Gilley’s.” So far, we have explored rape from the perspective of a group of convicted, incarcerated rapist to discover how these men viewed sexual violence and what they gained from their behavior. We found that rape was frequently a means of revenge and punishment. Implicit in revenge-rapes was the notion that women were collectively liable for the rapists’ problems. #RandolphHarris 3 of 22

In some cases, victims were substitutes for significant women who the men desire to take revenge on. In other cases, victims were thought to represent all women, and rape was used to punish, humiliate, and “put them in their place.” In both cases women were seen as a class, a category, not as individuals. For some men, rape was almost an after-thought, a bonus added to burglary or robbery. Other men gained access to sexually unavailable or unwilling women through rape. For this group of men, rape was a fantasy come true, a particularly exciting form of impersonal sex which enabled them to dominate and control women, by exercising a singularly male form of power. These rapists talked of the pleasures of raping—how for them it was a challenge, an adventure, a dangerous and “ultimate” experience. Rape made them feel good and, in some cases, even elevated their self-image. The pleasure these men derived from raping reveals the extreme to which they objectified women. Women were seen as sexual commodities to be used or conquered rather than as human beings with right and feelings. One young man expressed the extreme of the contemptful example of women when he confided to the female researcher. “Rape is a man’s right. If a woman doesn’t want to give it, the man should take it. Women have no right to say no. Women are made to have sex. It’s all they are good for. Some women would rather take a beating, but they always give in; it’s what they are for.” #RandolphHarris 4 of 22

This man murdered his victim because she would not “give in.” Undoubtedly, some rapes, like some of all crimes, are idiopathic. However, it is not necessary to resort to pathological motives to account for all rape or other acts of sexual violence. Indeed, we find that men who rape have something to teach us about the cultural roots of sexual aggression. They force us to acknowledge that rape is more than an idiosyncratic act committed by a few “sick” men. Rather, rape can be viewed as the end point in a continuum of sexually aggressive behaviors that reward men and victimize women. In the way that the motives for committing any criminal act can be rationally determined, reasons for rape can also be determined. Our data demonstrate that some men rape because they have learned that in this culture sexual violence is rewarding. Significantly, the overwhelming majority of these rapists indicated they never thought they would go to prison for what they did. Some did not fer imprisonment because they did not define their behavior as rape. Others knew that women frequently do not report rape and of those cases that are reported, conviction rates are low, and therefore they felt secure. These men perceived rape as a rewarding, low risk act. Understanding that otherwise normal men can and do rape is critical to the development of strategies for prevention. #RandolphHarris 5 of 22

The ”teachings” of deceiving spirits now being promulgated by them are too many in number to enumerate in a small compass. They are generally recognized only in “false religions,” but the teaching spirits with their “doctrines” or religious ideas suggested to the minds of men are ceaselessly at work in every clime, seeking to play upon the religious instinct in men and give a substitute for truth. Therefore, truth alone dispels the deceptive doctrines of the teaching spirits of Satan—the truth of God, not merely “views of truth”: truth concerning all the principles and laws of the God of Truth. “Doctrines of demons” simply consist of that which a man “thinks” and “believes” as the outcome of suggestions made to his mind by deceiving spirits. All “thought” and “belief” belongs to one of two realms: the realm of truth, or the realm of falsehood—each having its source in God or Satan. All truth comes from God, and all that is contrary to truth is from Satan. Even the “thoughts” that apparently originate in a man’s own mind come from one of these two sources, for the mind itself is either darkened by Satan (2 Cor. 4.4) and therefore fertile soil for his “teachings,” or is renewed by God (Eph. 4.23) and hence clarified from the veil of Satan and made open to the reception and transmission of truth. In many cases, our greatest loneliness comes not from other, it comes from within—a cry from the deepest part of an individual, and it cries up the loudest that one moment you ceased to listen to it. It hurts so to be apart from others, lovely because they hear you not. However, what can ever come close to the pain, the brokenness inside one that was created when one who once listened…once heard…once understood, chose not to hear—and stopped listening? #RandolphHarris 6 of 22

Try to remember and keep in your mind constantly all the lines on which you have to work. You have to work on mind, on consciousness, on emotions and on will. Try to understand that each line of work needs special attention, special methods and special understanding. After some time all four will begin to help one another and later they will merge into one, but in the beginning the four lines must go separately. Try to understand the work on mind. To do this work you must constantly revise all ideas of the system referring to man and the Universe, and particularly those referring to psychology, the study of emotions, many “I”s, the division of man, false personality, permanent “I”, esotericism, schools and methods of school work. Keep your mind on these ideas or at least return to them as often as possible. You mind must never be idle. At every possible moment you must reflect on one or another idea, on one or another aspect of the system and methods. Try to understand the necessity for introducing the methods and principles of the work in your personal life and first of all the necessity for right thinking on all personal question and their possible relation to your work. Without this, you will never reach unity. You cannot allow one part of yourself to think wrongly and hope that another part will think rightly. Understanding of principles, rules and methods of school work is one of the most important parts of the work on mind. Mind must be trained not to hesitate in its choice between right and wrong, must understand perfectly right relations to me, to other people in the work and to the people outside. #RandolphHarris 7 of 22

Mind must understand that in the very beginning of serious work on oneself one gives up one’s freedom. Certainly it is an illusionary freedom, but when one puts oneself under the laws of the work, one is naturally under more laws than someone outside the work. Try to understand the meaning of silence in the work, the meaning of sincerity and the meaning of truth. If one cannot keep silence when it is not necessary to speak for the sake of the work, one can never expect to get anything from the work. People generally talk too much, talk for their own gratification, from self-pride, from vanity, from desire to live again through pleasant or painful experiences; they talk because they cannot resist identification with talking or because they do not realize that they should not talk in this particular way or on this particular subject. Very often the special attraction of talking, for them, is in the fact that they know that they should not talk. I do not even mean talking to people outside the work. That must have been dealt with long before any possibility of serious work on oneself arises. What I mean is that one must be very guarded even in speaking to one’s friends in the work, unless one is told by me to speak. Also, one cannot expect anything if one cannot be sincere with oneself and with me. With other people in the work one can have a mutual arrangement regarding sincerity about everything or about particular subjects, but this can only be done with my approval and with my complete knowledge of what is said. #RandolphHarris 8 of 22

Further, if one is afraid or reluctant to speak the truth to me even without being told to do so, one cannot expect to get anything from the work. You must understand that nobody who wishes to remain in the work can ask another person in the work to keep something secret from me, and nobody can give the promise to keep anything secret. This is a very important point. One must always be ready to tell me anything about oneself any anything one may learn about another person. And one must do so by oneself without being reminded, and do it with full understanding that this is an essential part of the work. You must understand that you cannot accept part of the rules and reject or forget another part. You must understand the importance of discipline in the work. You must understand the meaning of the words: sacrifice your suffering, and the right moments, right methods and the aim and possible results of such sacrifice. You must understand the necessity for being careful when saying “I.” You can say “I” when speaking about yourself only when you are sure that you speak about work or ideas or rules and principles of the work, or in accordance with all rules and principles. In all other cases you must try to understand which part of you is speaking or thinking, and name it accordingly. This idea must not be exaggerated. You can say without harm: I am going to buy some premium cranberry juice. However, you cannot say: I dislike this man. You must find which part of you dislikes him and why, and not ascribe this dislike to all of you. #RandolphHarris 9 of 22

You must clearly understand the necessity of self-observation for self-study. You must understand the difference between functions and consciousness. Thinking of functions, you must always be able to distinguish the intellectual, emotional, moving and instinctive functions; positive and negative parts of centers in the intellectual and instinctive centers; moving, emotional and intellectual parts in all centers. You must study attention and understand how, by the study of attention, you can distinguish parts of centers. Yes, we live in perilous times, but as we stay on the covenant path, we need not fear. We fear failure, rejection, disappointment, and the unknown. We fear hurricanes, earthquakes, and fires that ravage the land and out lives. We fear not being chosen, and on the flip side, we fear being chose. We fear not being good enough; we fear that the Lord has no blessings for us. We fear change, and our fears can escalate to terror. We may or may not have chariots of fire sent to dispel our fears and conquer our demons, but the lesson is clear. The Lord is with us, mindful of us and blessing us in ways only He can do. Prayer can call down the strength and the revelation that we need to center our thoughts of Jesus Christ and His atoning sacrifice. The Lord knew that at times we should feel fear. I have been there and so have you. Our love of God and His gospel dispels fear. #RandolphHarris 10 of 22

Our desire to always have His Spirit with us will push fear aside for a more eternal view of our mortal lives. In coming days, it will not be possible to survive spiritually without the guiding, directing, comforting, and constant influence of the Holy Ghost. When we stand in holy places—our righteous homes, our dedicated chapels, the consecrated temples—we feel the Spirit of the Lord with us. We find answers to questions that trouble us or the peace to simply set them aside. That is the Spirit in actions. These sacred places in the kingdom of God on Earth call for our reverence, our respect for others, our best selves in living the gospel, and our hopes to lay aside our fears and seek the healing power of Jesus Christ through His Atonement. There is no room for fear in these holy places of God or in the hearts of His children. Why? Because of love. God love us—always—and we love Him. Our love of God counters all fears, and His love abounds in holy places. Think about it. When we are tentative in our commitments to the Lord, when we stray from His path leading to life eternal, when we question or doubt our significance in His divine design, when we allow fear to open the door to all its companions—discouragement, anger, frustration, disappointment—the Spirit leaves us, and we are without the Lord. If you know what that is like, you know it is not a good place to be. In contrast, when we stand in holy places, we can feel God’s love and “perfect love casteth out all fear.” The next promise is “Be not troubled.” No matter how much wickedness and chaos fill the Earth, we are promised by our daily faithfulness in Jesus Christ the “peace of God, which passeth all understanding.” And when Christ comes in all power and glory, evil, rebellion, and injustice will end. #RandolphHarris 11 of 22

The basic position of layman and psychiatrist are still sound: it can be argued that the important thing about some improprieties is not that the rules have been broken, but that the offender elected, or had cause, to do so odd a thing as to break these particular rules. There is concerned when an individual responds to an unpleasant event by falling into a catatonic stupor, but obviously our concern (it is claimed) is and should be for what has happened to the mind of the offender, not for what has happened to the gathering in which the stupor occurs. It can also be claimed that the more grievously the individual offends the prevailing rulings, the more profoundly is one’s underling personality damaged and the more profoundly is one sick, although this claim is more the operating assumption of administrative and office psychiatry than it is the avowed doctrine of Freudian psychodynamics. A good example here is the person with Huntington’s chorea, whose gradual social deterioration is claimed to reflect an irreversible gradual loss in basic organic capacity for being a human being. No doubt there is much truth in this position, but none the less a supplementary, if not alternative, sociological argument should be introduced alongside it. A particular gathering, as a gathering, may have hardly any significance at all. (The several individuals who make up the gathering will, of course, have human significance in their own right.) Take together, however, gatherings have great significance, for it is though these comings together that much of our social life is organized. #RandolphHarris 12 of 22

Additional concern for the rules governing behavior in social situations derives from the fact that infractions may be taken as a sign that the offender cannot be trusted to refrain from exploiting one’s position in the situation for purposes of assault, interference, or accosting, even though the original infraction itself may be felt to be harmless. Hence, those who practice a particular involvement idiom are likely to sense that their rules for participating in gatherings are crucial for society’s well-being—that these rules are natural, inviolable, and fundamentally right. And these persons will need some means of defending themselves against the doubt that are cast on these rules by persons who break them. The greater the infringement, the greater will be the need for this compensative defense. One way of correcting situational offenses is to look upon the offender as someone who is unnatural, who is not quite a human being, for then the offense becomes a reflection on one and not on what one has offended. To the degree that the broken rule is important for the organization of gathering, to that extent and in that measure there will be a need to treat its infraction as a profound indictment of the self or being of the offender. Current psychiatric diagnosis and treatment—in practice, although not according to some psychological theories—offer this way out, although the offender is accused of psychological sickness, not of witlessness or possession by the devil. Here, apparently, the relatively small number of organic cases that in fact support this view can be used as the basis of a not too conscious model. #RandolphHarris 13 of 22

Psychiatrists seem little to suspect that they assume and support a kind of prearranged harmony that is almost too good to be true. For what can be more pleasing to one’s sense that all is right with the World than to be given a scientific evidence that the kind of bad behaviour we cannot explain by our other methods is simply due to the sickness of the person who so behaves, and that, naturally, those worse he behaves, the sicker he is? Whatever psychiatry does, then, for the offender—and this varies greatly—it functions additionally to protect the sanctity of the social occasions and the sentiments of the participants. This is an important service. We need to think that situational offenders are sick; sometimes, of course, it may be demonstrable that they really are sick, but even then this demonstrability may not be the reason for our thinking them so. If the position is take that many nonorganic “functional” forms of mental disorder are not forms of sickness at all, but a class of situational offenses that is punished and neutralized by the imputation of illness, then certain difficulties in the laypsychiatric perspective can be resolved. Incentive to distort one’s preferences appear in other situations, too. One instance occurs when you can move first and use this opportunity to influence others. Take for example the case of charitable contributions by foundations. Suppose there are two foundations, each with a budget of $250,000. They are presented with three great applications: one from an organization helping the homeless, one from the University of Michigan, and one from Yale. #RandolphHarris 14 of 22

The first is then left with no alternative but to provide $200,000 to the homeless, leaving only $50,000 for Michigan. If the two foundations have split the grant to the homeless, then Michigan would have received $150,000, as would Yale. Thus the second foundation has engineered a transfer of $100,000 from Michigan to Yale through the homeless. In a sense, the foundation has distorted its preferences—it has not given anything to its top charity priority. However, the strategic commitment does serve its true interests. In fact, this type of funding game is quite common. (One explicit example is the strategic game played between the Marshall and Rhodes Scholarships. The Marshall Fund’s objective is to have the maximum influence over who is given a scholarship to study in England. If someone has the potential to win both a Marshall and a Rhodes, the Marshall Fund prefers to have the person study as a Rhodes Scholar; that brings the person to England at no cost to the Marshall Fund and thus allows the Marshall Scholarship to select one more person. Hence the Marshall Fund waits until the Rhodes scholarships have been announced before making its final selections.) By acting first, small foundations exercise more influence over which secondary priorities get funded. Large foundations and especially the federal government are then left to fund the most pressing needs. This strategic rearranging of priorities has a direct parallel with voting. Before the 1974 Budget Act, Congress employed many of the same tricks. Unimportant expenditures were voted on and approved first. Later on, when the crunch appeared, the remaining expenditures were too important to be denied. To solve this problem, Congress now votes first on budget totals and then works within them. #RandolphHarris 15 of 22

When you can rely on others to save you later, you have an incentive to distort your priorities by exaggerating your claim and taking advantage of the others’ preferences. You might be willing to gain at the expense of putting something you want at risk, if you can count on someone else bearing the cost of the rescues. The principle of forcing others to save you can turn the outcome all the way around, from your worst to your best alternative. Here we show how this is doing using the votes of a corporate board of trustees facing a hostile takeover. Their immediate problem is how to respond. Four options have been proposed, each with its own champion. The founding president is looking for a way to keep the company intact. His first preference is to initiate a poison-pill provision into the company charter. The poison pill would be deigned to prevent any outside party from attaining controls without board approval. The two young members of the board feel the situation is more desperate. They believe that a takeover is inevitable and are concentrating on finding a way to make the present transaction more acceptable. Their preferred action is to look for a white knight, a buyer who is acceptable to management and the board. The management representation on the board suggests a third possibility. The present managers would like the opportunity to but the company through a management buyout, an MBO. The fifth member of the board is an outside director. He is cautiously optimistic about the present raider and argues that there is time to see how the offer develops. #RandolphHarris 16 of 22

After these four options have been discussed, everyone ends up with a clear picture of where the others stand (or sit) on the four proposals. For example, the founder is a man of action; his worst outcome is the Wait & See position. The two young board members agree with the fifth that the MBO options is unattractive; whenever management compete with an outside bidder it opens the door to conflict of interest and insider trading, for managers are the ultimate insiders. The complete set of preferences is: Founder’s Ranking: 1^st Poison Pill, 2^nd MBO, 3^rd White Knight, 4^th Wait & See. Two Young Directors’ Rankings: 1^st White Knight, 2^nd MBO, 3^rd White Knight, 4^th Wait & See. Management’s Ranking: 1^st MBO, 2^nd Poison Pill, 3^rd Wait & See, 4^th MBO. Management’s Ranking: 1^st MBO, 2^nd Poison Pill, 3^rd Wait & See, 4^th White Knight. Outside Director’s Ranking: 1^st Wait & See, 2^nd White Knight, 3^rd Poison Pill, 4^th MBO. Faced with these options, the board must make a decision. Everyone recognizes that the voting procedure may well influence the outcome. Even so, they decide there is a natural order to the decision-making process: begin by comparing the active courses of action and then decide whether the best one is worth doing. They first compare an MBO with a White Knight, and the more preferred alternative is then compared with the Poison Pill option. Having found the best active response, they decide whether this is worthy doing by comparing it with Wait & See. #RandolphHarris 17 of 22

The tree above should remind you of a tennis tournament in which some players are seeded. We are seeding “Wait & See” all the way into the finals, “Poison Pill” into the semifinals, and giving no seed to “MBO” and “White Knight.” Boxing and chess both work this way, too. There is a series of challenges that you must win in order to go against the presiding World champion. The U.S. presidential election process also works this way. When there is an incumbent president, that person is typically a shoo-in for his or her party’s nomination. The opposing party runs a primary to decide who will go against the incumbent in the final elections. The primary process, the ensuing party nomination, and the presidential election can be thought of as a series of elimination elections. However, back to the boardroom. We suppose that the five board members have enough foresight to realize the consequences of their actions in successive rounds, and vote according to their true preferences. Backward reasoning makes this problem easy to solve. You can work out the solution and see that the White Knight option wins (or you can jump to the next paragraph), but that is not the point of this story. We are interested in showing how the founder can improve the outcome from one’s perspective by making a commitment to distorted preferences. How is it that the White Knight option wins under foresighted voting? The last election must be Wait & See versus something. In this final election everyone has an incentive to vote honestly, sense this will determine the actual outcome. Three possibilities are easy to calculate: Wait & See vs. Poison Pill, Poison Pill wins 4-1. Wait & See vs. MBO, Wait & See wins 3-2. Wait & See vs. White Knight, White Knight wins 3-2. #RandolphHarris 18 of 22

Now we go back one previous round. The contest will be either Poison Pill vs. White Knight or Poison Pill vs. MBO. In the first case, both Poison Pill and White Knight are preferred to Wait & See. So whatever wins the second round will be implemented. The board members prefer White Knight to Poison Pill, 3-2. In the second case, a vote for MBO is in reality a vote for Wait & See. Board members can anticipate that if MBO beats Poison Pill for the active course, it will lose out in the next comparison with Wait & See. So when deciding between Poison Pill and MBO, board members will act as if deciding between Poison Pill and Wait & See, with the result that Poison Pill wins 4-1. Thus the first-found comparison is truly between Poison Pill and White Knight. White Knight is chosen by a 3-2 margin and is then selected in each of the subsequent comparisons. Once the founder recognizes what will happen, there is a strategy one can employ to get one’s preferred option, the Poison Pill. Look what happens if the founder “adopts” the preferences of the outside board member. Of course it is essential that this change of preferences is credible and is made know to all the other voters. Supposed the founder simply gives one’s vote to the outside director and leaves the meeting. At first glance this seems nothing short of crazy; the adopted preferences are almost the opposite of one’s true ones. However, look at the effect. The votes will now go as follows: Wait & See vs. Poison Pill, Poison Pill wins 3-2. Wait & See vs. MBO, Wait & See wins 4-1. Wait & See vs. White Knight, Wait & See wins 3-2. #RandolphHarris 19 of 22

The only active option that can beat Wait & See is Poison Pill. Right from the start the board members should predict that is Poison Pill ever loses, the outcome will be Wait & See. Yet both MBO and White Knight supporters prefer Poison Pill to Wait & See. They are forced to vote for Poison Pill as it is their only viable alternative; thus Poison Pill wins. By transferring his support to the opposition, the founder is able to make a credible threat that it is either Poison Pill or Wait & See. As a result, all but the die-hard Wait & See supports dump the White Knight option (which can no longer beat Wait & See) in favor of the Poison Pill. Superficially, this transfer of a vote doubles the strength of the Wait & See supporters. Actually, it leads to an outcome that is worse from their viewpoint—Poison Pill rather than White Knight. In voting, strength can be weakness. Of course, if the outside director sees through the game, one should refuse to accept the founder’s proxy. If you regard this story as farfetched, something quite like it did occur in the 1988 Wisconsin presidential primary. The Republican governor of the state said that of the Democratic candidates, Jesse Jackson was the most interesting. Many commentators though this was a Machiavellian attempt to get Republicans to cross over and vote for Jackson in the Democratic primary, thereby helping produce a more easily beatable opponent for Bush in the November election. Apparently, Michael Dukakis was sufficiently easy for George Bush to beat, even without this help. #RandolphHarris 20 of 22

On June 30, 1988, in Victorville, California, near Los Angeles, the Sheriff’s Department received a complaint. Five Mexican me were blasting loud music, drinking beer, and urinating on the lawn in a party that lasted over twelve hours. When six sheriff’s deputies came to investigate and tried to quiet the men down, fists and night sticks began to fly. For the sheriff’s men, it was hardly a unique event. Except for one thing. Unknown to them, as they struggled to subdue the five, using night sticks and choke holds, a next-door neighbour pointed a videocamera out the window. Public outrage against alleged police brutality erupted instantly after the four-minute tape was shown to the town’s Latino community. Civil rights protests followed, then a lawsuit against the deputies, charging them with the use of excessive force. Said Armando Navarro, executive director of the Institute for Social Justice, a local civil rights organization, “I’ve dealt for twenty-one years in community activism, but I’ve never had something so classic, showing the violence in living color.” Lawyers for the deputies, on the other hand, contended that the tape did not tell the truth because it did not show what happened before the camera was turned on—when, the deputies say, violence was used against them. (That is why I say self-defense is difficult to prove and you may still end up in jail and have to plead your case before a judge, even if you have witnesses. And even if you did use self-defense, you could still end up being charged with a crime based on what the jury determines. It is best to avoid altercations.) #RandolphHarris 21 of 22

Nonetheless, the case took on larger dimension when the people who shot the tape disappeared and when a representative of Mexico’s consulate in Los Angeles began showing up in the courtroom to monitor the trial, evidencing concerns about anti-Mexican discrimination in the United States of America. In the end, a federal court ruled against the sheriff’s men and awarded the Mexicans $1 million. It is unlikely that the revolutionaries who overthrew the communist government in Czechoslovakia in 1989 ever heard of the “Victorville Five.” However, in the streets of Prague, students set up TV monitors on street corners and played video rapes showing the brutality of Czech authorities trying to suppress antigovernment street rallies. The students also played tapes of speeches by dramatist Vaclav Havel, who went from being a political prisoner to the presidency. Elsewhere, in Taiwan, too, the political opposition has used videocameras and monitors to expose what they called government violence. All across the World, new communication media, or new ways of using old ones, are being exploited to challenge—and sometimes overthrown—the power of the state. In the words of Solidarity founder Lech Walesa, describing the political upheavals in Eastern Europe, “These reforms are a result of civilization—of computers, satellite TV [and other innovations] that present alternative solutions. #RandolphHarris 22 of 22

Cresleigh Homes

Meet the largest of the single story homes offered at #MagnoliaStation! Residence 3 offers 2,827 square feet of well-appointed space including four bedrooms, two and one half bathrooms, and a three car garage. 🏡

The location of the Owner’s Suite makes it feel like a separate wing from the rest of the home allowing for maximum privacy and retreat. Plus you can even utilize the den as your own private office, or convert it into a fifth bedroom if needed. 🙌

Best of all, each Cresleigh home comes fully equipped with an All Ready connected home! 📲 Visit our website to learn what’s included and get in touch today. Our models are open and we’re now selling at Magnolia Station in Rancho Cordova! https://cresleigh.com/magnolia-station/residence-3/

#CresleighRanch

Our work takes on narcissistic qualities when it does not server well as a reflection of self. When that inherent reflection is lost, we become more concerned instead with how our work reflects on our reputations. We seek to repair our painful narcissism in the glow of achievement, and so we become distracted from the soul of the work for its sake. We are tempted to find satisfaction in secondary rewards, such as much, prestige, and the trappings of success. It is obvious that climbing the ladder of success can easily lead to a loss of a soul and lead people to commit criminal acts to feel powerful and obtain more assets. Burglary and robbery commonly accompany rape. Among our sample, 39 percent of rapists had also been convicted of one or the other of these crimes committed in connection with rape. In some cases, the original intent was rape and robbery was an after-thought. However, a number of the men indicated that the reverse was true in their situation. That is, the decision to rape was made subsequent to their original intent which was burglary or robbery. This was the case with a young offender who stated that he originally intended only to rob the store in which the victim happened to be working. He explained that when he found the victim alone, “I decided to rape her to prove I had guts. She was just there. It would have been anybody.” Similarly, another offender indicated that he initially broke into his victim’s home to burglarize it. When he discovered the victim asleep, he decided to seize the opportunity “to satisfy an urge to go to bed with a white woman, to see if it was different.” #RandolphHarris 1 of 22

Indeed, a number of men indicated that the decision to rape had been made after they realized they were in control of the situation. The attitude of these men toward rape was similar to their attitude toward burglary and robbery. Quite simply, if the situation is right, “why not.” From the perspective of these rapists, rape was just another part of the crime—an added bonus. In an effort to change public attitudes that are damaging to the victims of rape and to reform laws seemingly premised on the assumption that women both ask for and enjoy rape, many writers emphasized the violent and aggressive character in the crime. The data clearly indicate that from the rapists’ point of view rape is in part sexually motivated. Indeed, it is the sexual aspect of rape that distinguishes it from other forms of assault. The psychodynamic function of sex in rape is that rapists’ aggressive needs are expressed through sexuality. In other words, rape is a means to an end. We argue, however, that rapists view the act as an end in itself and that sexual access most obviously demonstrates the link between sex and rape. Rape as a means of sexual access also shows the deliberate nature of this crime. When a woman is unwilling or seems unavailable for sex, the rapist can seize what is not volunteered. In discussing his decision to rape, one man made this clear. “All the guys wanted to f*ck her…a real fox, beautiful shape. She was a beautiful woman and I wanted to see what she had.” #RandolphHarris 2 of 22

The attitude that sex is a male entitlement suggests that when a woman says “no,” rape is suitable method of conquering the “offending” object. If, for example, a woman is picked up at a party or in a bar or whole hitchhiking (behavior which a number of the rapists saw as a signal of sexual availability), and the women later resists sexual advances, rape is presumed to be justified. The same justification operates in what is popularly called “date rape.” The belief that sex was their just compensation compelled a number of rapists to insist they had not raped. Such was the case of an offender who raped and seriously beat his victim when, on their second date, she refused his sexual advances. “I think I was really pissed off at her because it did not go as planned. I could have been with someone else. She led me on but wouldn’t deliver…I have a male ego that must be fed.” The purpose of such rapes was conquest, to seize what was not offered. Despite the cultural belief that young women are the most sexually desirable, several rapes involved the deliberate choice of a victim relatively older than the assailant. Since the rapists were themselves rather young (26 to 30 years of age on the average), they were expressing a preference for sexually experienced, rather than elderly, women. Men who choose victims older than themselves often said they did so because they believed that sexually experienced women were more desirable partners. They raped because they also believed that these women would not be sexually attracted to them. #RandolphHarris 3 of 22

Finally, sexual access emerged as a factor in the accounts of men who consciously chose to rape women of another race. The majority of rapes in the United States of America today are intraracial. However, for the past 50 years, interracial rape has become a trend. Indeed, we may be experiencing a historical anomaly. The current structure of interracial rape, however, reflects contemporary racism and race relations in several ways. Segregation and other factors continue to militate against interracial coupling. Thus, the desire for sexual access to higher status, unavailable women, an important function in interracial rape, does not motivate men to rape women of another race. Equally important, demographic and geographic barriers interact to lower the incidence of interracial rape. Segregation as well as the poverty expected in some neighborhoods undoubtedly discourages many people who are not from those areas from choosing such areas as a target for house-breaking or robbery. Thus, the number of rapes that would occur in conjunction with these crimes is reduced. Reflecting in part the standards of sexual desirability set by the dominant society, a number of rapists indicated they had been curious about women in the dominant society. Blocked by racial barriers from legitimate sexual relations white these women of another race, they raped to gain access to them. They described raping women from the dominant race as “the ultimate experience” and “high status among my friends. It gave me a feeling of status, power, macho.” For another man, raping a woman of the dominate culture has a special appeal to some because it violates a “known taboo,” making it more dangerous and, thus more exciting, to him than raping a woman of his own race. #RandolphHarris 4 of 22

The idea that rape is an impersonal rather than an intimate or mutual experience appealed to a number of rapists, some of whom suggested it was their preferred form of sex. The fact that rape allowed them to control rather than care encouraged some to act on this preference. For example, one man explained, “Rape gave me the power to do what I wanted to do without feeling I had to please a partner or respond to a partner. I felt in control, dominant. Rape was the ability to have sex without caring about the woman’s response. I was totally dominant. Another rapist commented: “Seeing them laying there helpless gave me the confidence that I could do it…With rape, I felt totally in charge. I’m bashful, timid. When a woman wanted to give in normal sex, I was intimidated. In the rapes, I was totally in command, she totally submissive.” Perhaps we should note here that the appeal of impersonal sex is not limited to convicted rapists. The amount of male sexual activity that occurs in homosexual meeting places as well as the widespread use of prostitutes suggests that avoidance of intimacy appeals to a large segment of the male population. Through rape men can experience power and avoid the emotions related to intimacy and tenderness. Further, the popularity of violent pornography suggests that a wide variety of men in this culture have learned to be aroused by sex fused with violence. #RandolphHarris 5 of 22

Consistent with this observation, recent experimental research demonstrates that some men are aroused by images that depict women as orgasmic under conditions of violence and pain. They found that for many female students, arousal was high when the victim experienced an orgasm and no pain, whereas male students were highly aroused where the victim experience an orgasm and pain. On the basis of the results, it is suggested that forcing a woman to climax despite her pain and abhorrence of the assailant makes the rapist feel powerful, he has gained control over the only source of power historically associated with women, their bodies. In the final analysis, dominance was the objective of most rapists. Life leaves many people suffering the inevitable. It is a thing one cannot escape from unless one hides from life. Some wonder that if when others see human sorrow, should that make them want to take the easy road? Many says that they ask nothing better than to be allowed the very high privilege of living with they have passion for, and they only ask that they may suffer for the things that are high and brave and lovely and that they may not be weak when suffering comes. For the end success, failure, ruin or achievement matters to some so little. The stuff of life that matters to many successful people is experience. All that some people ask is that they may be permitted to love much, to serve to the utmost limit of their capacity and to keep faith with that high vision which they call God. Most important to many people is that they never stop caring. #RandolphHarris 6 of 22

Often times, it takes a loved one being on their death bed, dying for others to confess their love for the individual, to embrace that person; and yet, deep inside they have wanted to for so many years but always felt restrained by the mores of our country. It is at this point where people are most freely able to express that all of their experiences together can never be taken away and how their meanings are only between those two individuals. In the end, waiting so long leaves so many people weeping unashamed because that is what they feel. There can be an effect on the conscience of the teachings by evil spirits. How teaching spirits teach, we find described by Paul, for he says they speak lies in hypocrisy, that is, speak lies as if they were truth. And the effect of their working is said to “cauterize” the conscience; id est, if a man accepts the teachings of evil spirits as divine, because they come to one “supernaturally,” and one obeys and follows those teachings, conscience is unused, so that it practically becomes dulled and passive—or seared. And a man will do things under the influence of supernatural “revelation” which an actively awakened conscience would keenly rebuke and condemn. Such people “give heed” to these spirits, by listening to them, and then by obeying them; for they are deceived by accepting wrong thoughts about God’s presence, and about divine love, and unknowingly give themselves up to the power of lying spirits. Working in the line of “teaching,” deceiving spirits will insert their lies spoken in hypocrisy into “holiness” teaching and deceive believers about sin, themselves, and all other truths connected with the spiritual life. #RandolphHarris 7 of 22

Scripture is generally used as the basis of these teachings and is skillfully woven together like a spider’s web, so that the listeners are caught in the snare. Single text are wrenched from their context, and from their place in the perspective of truth; sentences are taken from their correlative sentences, or texts are aptly picked out from over a wide field and so netted together as to appear to give a full revelation of the mind of God—but the intervening passages, giving historical setting, actions and circumstances connected with the speaking of words, and other elements which give light on each separate text, are skillfully dropped out. A wide net is thus made for the unwary or the untaught in the principles of Scripture exegesis, and many a life is sidetracked and troubled by this false use of the Word of God. Because the experience of most professing Christians in regard to the devil is limited to knowing him as a tempter, or as an accuser, they have no concept of the depths of his wickedness and of the wickedness of evil spirits, and are under the impression that they will not quite Scripture, whereas they will quote the whole Book if the can but deceive one soul. Think very seriously before you decide to work on yourself with the idea of changing yourself, id est, to work with the definite aim of becoming conscious and of developing connection with higher centers. This work admits of no compromise and it requires a great amount of self-discipline and readiness to obey all rules and particularly, direct instructions. #RandolphHarris 8 of 22

Think very seriously: are you really ready and willing to obey, and do you fully understand the necessity for it? There is no going back. If you agree and then go back, you will lose everything that you have acquired up to that time, and you will lose more really, because all that you acquired will turn into something wrong in you. There is no remedy against this. Understanding of the necessity for obeying rules and direct instructions must be based on the realization of your mechanicalness and your helplessness. If this realization is not strong enough, you had better wait and occupy yourself with ordinary work; study of the system, work in groups, et cetera. If you do this work sincerely and remember all the rules, it will bring you to the realization of your state and your needs. However, you must not delay too long. If you want to come to real work you must hurry. You must understand that the opportunity that exists today may not come your way again. You may lose all your chances by hesitating and waiting too long. If you decide to work and accept all that comes in the work, you must learn to think quickly. If you are offered a task you must answer at one that you accept it. If you hesitate or take time to answer, the offer of the task will be withdrawn and it will not be repeated. You may be given time before actually doing what you were told to do, but you must accept the task at once. An attempt to talk things over, an ironical, suspicious or negative attitude, fear, or lack of confidence, these will make the task impossible at once. #RandolphHarris 9 of 22

If you feel hesitation about the task offered to you, think about your mechanicalness, think about your negativeness, about your self-will—but think quickly. You can do nothing against your weak sides by yourself. The tasks offered to you have the aim of helping you. If you hesitate or refuse them, you refuse help. This must be quite clear in your mind. The realization of your helplessness and your deep sleep must be permanent in you. You can strengthen it by constantly reminding yourself of your nothingness, of your meanness, of your weakness of all possible sorts. You have absolutely nothing to be proud of. You have nothing to base your judgement on. You can see, if you re sincere with yourself, all the blunders and all the mistakes which you made when you tried to act by yourself. You cannot think rightly. You cannot feel rightly. You need constant help, and you can have it. However, you must pay for it—at least, by not arguing. You have to do gigantic work if you want to become different. How can you ever hope to get anything if you hesitate and argue on the first steps, or do not even realize the necessity for help, or become suspicious and negative? If you want to work seriously you have to conquer many things in yourself. You cannot carry with yourself your prejudices, your fixed opinions, your personal identifications or animosities. #RandolphHarris 10 of 22

However, at the same time try to understand that personal is not always wrong. If it is not cleared by the struggle with identification and by the realization of your mechanicalness and your weakness, personal can even help in the work but personal can be very dangerous too. Trying to understand the necessity for deliberate suffering and conscious effort. These are the only two things that can change you and bring you to your aim. Deliberate suffering does not mean necessary suffering inflicted on you by yourself. It means attitude towards suffering. Suffering may come as a result of your feelings, thoughts, and actions connected with your task; it may come by itself as a result of your own faults or as a result of other people’s actions, attitudes or feelings. However, what is important is your attitude toward it. If you do not rebel against it, if you do not try to avoid it, if you do not accuse anybody, if you accept it as a necessary part of your work at the moment, and as a means for attaining your aim, it becomes deliberate. Conscious effort is the effort based on understanding; understand of its necessity first of all, and understanding of causes which make it necessary. The chief cause for conscious effort is your need for breaking the walls of the mechanicalness, of self-will and of lack of self-remembering which constitute your being at present. In order to understand better the necessity for accepting tasks given to you without hesitation, the necessity for deliberate suffering and conscious effort, think about the ideas which brought you to the work, think about the first realization of your mechanicalness and the first realization that you know nothing. #RandolphHarris 11 of 22

In the beginning you realized this and you came for help, but now you doubt whether you must really do as you are told. And you try to find ways to evade it, to stand on your own judgement and on your own understanding. You understood clearly once, that your judgment and your understanding are false and weak, but now you try to keep them again. You do not want to give them up. Well, you can keep them, but you must understand that with them you will keep all that is false and weak in yourself. There are no half measures. You must decide. Do you want the work or not? At present, the psychiatrist who carries an appreciable load of diagnostic and commitment work in an office or hospital tends to give weight to one’s own spontaneous response to the conduct of the individual to whom one is giving a diagnostic interview, and it is largely in terms of this response that the psychiatrist decides whether the behavior of the subject is appropriate or inappropriate in the situation. If the behavior is inappropriate, one decides whether it is to be placed in one of the nonsymptomatic classes of situational impropriety, or whether it betokens mental illness. Some of the grounds already suggested for nonsymptomatic impropriety are: accidents (defining these as inappropriate behavior which the actor could and would have avoided had one known in advance that one was to act thusly); temporary emotional states involving tiredness, nervousness, inebriation, and the like; understandable preoccupation, as when an expectant father cannot submerge himself properly in a situation; organic but not mental conditions, as when a deaf person cannot orient oneself properly in a situation; or circumstantial conditions, as when an individual is unfamiliar with the ritual idiom of the persons one finds oneself amongst. #RandolphHarris 12 of 22

In this course, of course, one is acting somewhat like a layman, however expert in one’s analysis of the psychodynamic implications of a particular impropriety, because while everyone in the society also makes these distinctions, there is no great consensus, especially in regard to the milder offenses, as to how the distinctions should be applied. It can be argued that the distinctions between symptomatic and nonsymptomatic impropriety is a thoroughly ingrained mode of thinking in our society, leading us to divide up any set of improprieties in this twofold way regardless of the goodness of the fit or even its relevance. This dichotomizing tendency is, of course, heavily reinforced by our institutional arrangements, for, after all, an individual who conducts oneself improperly must either be placed in a mental hospital or not placed in a mental hospital, and in either case an appropriate rationale must be provided, since the differential consequences for the offender and one’s kin are very great. Like everyone else, the psychiatrist is apt to interpret some conduct as improper merely because one is not familiar with the involvement idiom and the involvement rulings of the culture of the group from which the patient comes. It is possible to observe, for example, a male, lower-middle-class, middle-aged, refugee psychiatrist make confident detailed judgments about the symptomatic significance of the affective tone of a female, lower-class, adolescent patient—an interesting achievement, since there are not many engagements in which both of these persons could find the immediate presence or the conduct of the other a natural, easeful thing. #RandolphHarris 13 of 22

Similarly, those who know a mental patient slightly, and see one only during fleeting encounters, are likely to interpret one set of acts as symptomatic of one’s mental disorder, while those who have lived with one are likely to pass by these acts and focus upon others. So, also, acts that appear to be signs of mental disorder to an outsider, such as the sight of a mental patient lying on the floor or taking food from a neighbor’s plate, can become normatively natural when, having become familiar with the behavior setting, one learns that the floor is used because the benches are hard or of insufficient number, and that, since no one owns the food, and there is sometimes enough of it, one might as well pick it from the neighbors’ plates as stand in line for more. And from psychiatrist themselves once learns that most regressive “primitive” kind of act can sometimes eventually be “understood” in which a way that its bizarre “meaningless” quality recedes and its pathetic human quality becomes evident. Strange how, with the quiet peace of being alone so many are always aware of the pain of separation. Even stranger is that with an intimate partner, the aloneness turns to loneliness and one becomes one with the separateness. Of all those one has ever known, an intimate partner can be the only one who hears you crying through the laughter, see your tears as you smile. Only this person can come and touch you by saying: “It is lonely, is it not?”…understanding all you feel within you…and they can give you that gift of flight—the method, not the ability, and with it comes the realization of how very lonely…how heavy deep inside one feels, when one is free. #RandolphHarris 14 of 22

After the White Hose, election to Cooperstown may be the next most coveted national honor. Membership in the Baseball Hall of Fame is determined by an election. There is a group of eligible candidates—for example, a player with ten years of experience becomes eligible five years after retirement. However, if the player has been on the ballot for fifteen years and failed to get elected, then eligibility is lost. For otherwise ineligible players, there is an alternative route to election. An Old Timers’ committee considers special cases and sometimes elects one or two candidates a year. The electors are the members of the Baseball Writers Association. Each voter may vote for up to tend candidates. All candidates capturing votes from more than 75 percent of the total number of ballots returned are elected. One problem with this system is that the electors do not have the right incentives to vote for their true preferences. The rule that limits each voter to tend choices forces the voter to consider electability as well as merit. Some sportswriters may believe a candidate is deserving, but do not want to throw away the vote if the player is unlikely to make the cutoff. This same issue arose from voting in presidential primaries, and it appears in any election in which each voter is given a fixed number of votes to distribute among the candidates. #RandolphHarris 15 of 22

Two experts in game theory propose an alternative way to run elections. Steven Brams and Peter Fishburn, one a political scientist and the other an economist, argue that “approval voting” allows voters to express their true preferences without concern for electability. Under approval voting, each voter may vote for as many candidates as one wishes. Voting for one person does not exclude voting for any number of others. This there is no harm in voting for a candidate who has no hope of winning. Of course, if people can vote for as many candidates as they wish, who gets elected? Like the Cooperstown rule, the electoral rule could specify in advance a percentage of the vote needed to win. Or it could pre-specify the number of winning candidates, and then the positions are filled by those who gather the most votes. Approval voting has begun to catch on, and is used by many professional societies. How would it work for the Baseball Hall of Fame? Would Congress do better if it used approval voting when deciding which expenditure projects should be included in the annual budget? We look at the strategic issues associated with approval voting when a cutoff percentage determines the winners. Imagine that election to the different sports halls of fame was decided by approval voting, in which all candidates capturing above a fixed percentage of the votes are elected. At first glance, the voters have no incentive to misstate their preferences. The candidates are not in competition with one another, but only with an absolute standard of quality implicit in the rule that specifies the required percentage of approval. #RandolphHarris 16 of 22

If I think Ricky Henderson should be in the Baseball Hall of Fame, I can only reduce his chances by withholding my approval, and if I think he does not belong there, I can only make his admission more likely by voting contrary to my view. However, candidates may compete against one another in the voters’ minds, even though nothing in the rules mandates it. This will usually happen because voters have preferences concerning the size or the structure of the membership. Suppose Dan Marino and John Elway come up for election to the Football Hall of Fame. I think Mr. Marion is better quarterback, although I will admit that Mr. Elway also meets the standard for a Hall of Fame berth. However, I think it overridingly important that two quarterbacks not be elected in the same year. My guess is that the rest of the electorate regards Mr. Elway more highly and he would get in no matter how I vote, but that Mr. Marino’s case will be a very close call, and my approval is likely to tip him over. Voting truthfully means naming Mr. Marino, which is likely to lead to the outcome in which both are admitted. Therefore I have the incentive to misstate my preferences and vote for Mr. Elway. Two players may complement each other, rather than compete, in the voters’ minds. I think neither Geoff Boycott nor Sunil Gavaskar belongs in the Cricket Hall of Fame, but it would be a gross injustice to have one and not the other. If in my judgment the rest of the electorate would choose Mr. Boycott even if I do not vote for him, while my vote may be crucial in deciding Mr. Gavaskar’s selection, then I have an incentive to misstate my preference and vote for Mr. Gavaskar. #RandolphHarris 17 of 22

In contrast, a quota rule explicitly places candidates in competition with one another. Supposed the Baseball Hall of Fame limits admission to only two new people each year. Let each voter be given two votes; he can divide them between two candidates or give both to the same candidate. The candidates’ votes are totaled, and the top two are admitted. Now supposed there are three candidates—Joe DiMaggio, Marv Throneberry, and Bob Uecker. (Marv Throneberry played first base for the ’62 Mets, possibly the worst team in the history of baseball. His performance was instrumental to the team’s reputation. Bob Uecker is much better known for his performance in Miller Lite commercials than for his play on the baseball field.) Everyone rates Mr. DiMaggio at the top, but the electors are split equally between the other two. I know that Mr. DiMaggio is sure to get in, so as a Marv Throneberry fan I give my two votes to him to increase his chances over Bob Uecker. Of course everyone else is equally subtle. The result: Mr. Throneberry and Mr. Uecker are elected and Mr. DiMaggio gets no votes. Government expenditure projects naturally compete with one another so long as the total budget is limited, or congressmen and senators have strong preferences over the side of the budget. We will leave you to think which, if any, is the DiMaggio project, and which ones are the Throneberrys and Ueckers of federal spending. #RandolphHarris 18 of 22

Shifts of financial power over the media always spark hot controversy. Today the sheer size of the media empires provokes anxiety. Established networks and other media are threatened. Moreover, the concentration of financial control in the hands of the Murdochs and Berlusconis conjures up memories of the great press lords of the past, such as William Randolph Hearst in the United States of America or Lor Northcliffe in Britain, men whose political influence was enormous and by no means universally admired. The first and most common criticism heard today is that the new global media will homogenize the World. The failure of the “global marketing” theory, however, suggests this fear is overdrawn. The mass media had their strongest homogenizing effects when there were only a few channels, few different media, and hence little audience choice. In the future, the reverse situation will prevail. While the content of each individual program may be good or bad, the most important new “content” of all is the existence of diversity itself. The shift from a low-choice to a high choice media environment holds no only cultural but political implications. High-tech governments face a future in which multiple, conflicting, custom-tailored commercial, cultural, and political messages will bombard their people, rather than a single message repeated in unison by a few giant media outlets. The old “politics of mass mobilization” and the “engineering of consent” both become far more difficult in the new media environment. Expanded media choice is itself inherently democratic. It makes life difficult for politicians who offer their followers a choiceless environment. #RandolphHarris 19 of 22

A second set of complaints about the new media barons relates to their personal political views. Mr. Murdoch is charged with being too conservative. Mr. Maxwell is too close to the British Labour Party. Mr. Turner is an unpredictable maverick. This one has sold his soul to French President Mitterand, while that one is in bed with someone else. If all these charges were true, they would soon cancel one another out. Far more important than their personal political views, and alliances are the interests they hold in common. Of course, all are capitalists operating in a capitalist framework. As such, we can assume that, in general, the bottom line interest them more than any political line. What matters most about these media lords is not whether they favor left-wing or right-policies and politicians. Far more significant is their support, through their actions more than their words, of the ideology of globalism. Globalism, or at least supranationalism, is a natural expression of the new economy, which must operate across national boundaries, and it is in the self-interest of the new media moguls to spread this ideology. This self-interest, however, collides with another. For if their television and radio stations, their newspapers and magazines are to succeed financially, they will have to de-massify—which means they will have to search for niches, carry specialized material, and appeal to very local audiences interest. The familiar slogan “Think global, act local” perfectly describes the new media imperatives. The very existence, however, of powerful media communication capable of spanning continents will shift power as between national political leaders and the global community. Thus, without necessarily intending it, the new media barons are drastically changing the role of “global opinion” in the World. #RandolphHarris 20 of 22

Just as in the past century national leaders were compelled to justify their actions before the court of national “public opinion,” tomorrow’s national leaders will confront a much-enhanced “global opinion.” And just as the work of Benjamin Day or Henry Hetherington of Emile de Girardin brought the poorer classes into the political life of nation, the activities of today’s media lords will bring new millions into the global decision-making process. Today, nations flout global opinion without worrying over much about the consequences. World opinion did not save the victims of Auschwitz, the people of Cambodia, or, more recently, the boat people fleeing hunger and oppression in Asia. Nor did it prevent the homeless crisis in California. Nevertheless, global opinion has sometimes stayed the hand of killer regimes. The history of human rights is filled with cases in which global protests have prevented the torture or murder of  domestic political prisoner. It is unlikely that Anatoly Shcharansky would have survived his encounter with Soviet prison camps had the outside World not put pressure on Moscow to release him. Andrei Sakharvo’s chances for survival were improved when he won the Nobel Prize and became a household word because of the constant media attention around the World. The global media system will not make nations behave like Boy Scouts. However, it raises the costs of defying World opinion. In the World being constructed by the media barons, what outsiders say about a nation will carry more weight inside than it ever did before. #RandolphHarris 21 of 22

Governments will no doubt invent more sophisticated lies with which to rationalize their self-serving actions and manipulate the increasingly systemic media. They will also step up propaganda efforts to improve their global image. However, if such efforts fail, they could suffer significant economic penalties for behavior frowned on by the rest of the World. South Africa may deny that sanctions hurt its economy or that its pariah image also damaged the country economically. However, its senior officials know better. Global opinion sets the stage for global action. Even if an outraged World does not impose formal trade sanctions on a rogue regime, international agencies like the World Bank may reject their pleas for multibillion loans. Private banks may shy away, foreign investors and tourists go elsewhere. Worse yet, companies and countries still willing to do business with a pariah nation are in a position to drive a harder bargain than might have been the case otherwise. Power in the negotiations shifts as a result of global imagery. What is more, as the importance of global opinion grows in parallel with the spread of the systemic media, shrewd power-players will wield it as an unconventional weapon. It will be used not only to save some political prisoners, or to direct instant relief to disaster zones, but to spare us from some, at least, of the ecological ravages that might otherwise be inflicted on a bleeding planet. When Armenians are attacked by Azeris in Baku, Armenians in Los Angeles know it instantly and begin mobilizing political actions. When Jesuits are murdered by death squad in El Salvador, the entire World knows it. When a trade unionist is jailed in South Africa, the words get out. The new global media are basically in business to make a profit. However, they are inadvertently raising the level of cross-national political action by a dazzling diversity of activist groups. Without even intending it, Mr. Murdoch and Mr. Maxwell, Mr. Turner and Mr. Mohn, Mr. Berlusconi and other new media magnates are creating a powerful new tool and placing it in the hands of the global community. However, that hardly scratches the surface of what is happening. The new global media system has, in fact, become the prime tool of revolution in today’s fast-changing World, but that does not mean it is keeping the World informed. #RandolphHarris 22 of 22

Cresleigh Homes

We see that glint in your eye…you’re already planning your decor scheme, aren’t you?! 😉 When you’ve got all the spacious layout of Residence 4 at #MillsStation to work with, you’ll have a chance to explore all your wildest dreams! Contact us ASAP – we’ve got homesite #105 ready for new owners!

Plus we’re showing off another move-in ready home this weekend! Stop by our Open House from 10am-6pm this Saturday 4/1 and Sunday 4/2 to experience Homesite 111 – a gorgeous Residence 3 plan that boasts 2,394 square feet and an ideal location across from the community park! It also comes complete with three bedrooms, two and a half bathrooms, and a two car garage plus workshop, for starters… 😉

Come see it for yourself this weekend! Have questions? Get in touch with our sales center at 916-333-1919.

#CresleighRanch
#CresleighHomes