It is not only that you cannot go home again; you cannot pretend to be from a place you only visited. While imaginetic centers concentrate on partial images of tomorrow, defining possible futures for a single industry, an organization a city or its subsystems, however, we also need sweeping, visionary ideas about the society as a whole. Multiplying our images of possible futures is important; but these images need to be organized, crystallized into structured form. In the past, utopian literature did this for us. It played a practical, crucial role in ordering human’s dreams about alterative futures. Today we suffer for lack of utopian ideas around which to organize competing images of possible futures. Most traditional utopias picture simple static societies—id est, societies that have nothing in common with super-age of information. B.F. Skinner’s Walden Two,the model for several existing experimental communes, depicts a pre-industrial way of life—small, close to the Earth, built on farming and handcraft. Even those two brilliant anti-utopias, Brave New World and 1984, now seem oversimple. Both describe societies based on high technology and low complexity: the machines are sophisticated but the social and culture relationships are fixed and deliberately simplified. Today we need powerful new utopian and anti-utopian concepts that look forward to super-age of informationism, rather than backward to simpler societies. These concepts, however, can no longer be produced in the old way. #RandolphHarris 1 of 23

First, no book, by itself, is adequate to describe a super-age of information future in emotionally compelling terms. Each conception of a super-age of information utopia or anti-utopia needs to be embodied in many forms—films, plays, noels and works of art-rather than a single work of fiction. Second, it may now be too difficult for any individua writer, no matter how gifted, to described a convincingly complex future. We need, therefore, a revolution in the production of utopias: collaborative utopianism. We need to construct “utopia factories.” One way might be to assemble a small group of top social scientists—an economist, a sociologist, an anthropologist, and so on—asking them to work together, even live together, long enough to hammer out among themselves a set of well-defined values on which they believe a truly super-age of information utopia society might be based. Each member of the team might then attempt to describe in nonfiction form a sector of an imagined society built on these values. What would its family be like? Its economy, laws, religion, pleasures, youth culture, music, art, its sense of time, its degree of differentiation, its psychological problems? By working together and ironing out inconsistencies, where possible, a comprehensive and adequately complex picture might be drawn of a seamless, temporary form of the super-age of information. At this point, with the completion of detailed analysis, the project would move to the fiction stage. Novelists, film-makers, science fiction writers and others, working closely with psychologists, could prepare creative works about the lives of individual characters in the imagined society. #RandolphHarris 2 of 23

Meanwhile, other groups could be at work on counter-utopias. While Utopia A might stress materialist, success-oriented values, Utopia B might base itself on sensual, hedonistic values, C on the primacy of aesthetic values, D on individualism, E on collectivism, and so forth. Ultimately, a stream of books, plays, film, and television programs would flow from this collaboration between art, social science and futurism, thereby educating large numbers of people about the cost and benefits of the various proposed utopias. Finally, if social imagination is in short supply, we are even more lacking in people willing to subject utopian ideas to systematic test. More and more young people, in their dissatisfaction with the age of information, are experimenting with their own lives, forming utopian communities, trying new social arrangements, from group marriage to living-learning communities. Today, as in the past, the weight of established society comes down hard on the visionary who attempts to practice, as well as merely preach. Rather than ostracizing utopians, we should take advantage of their willingness to experiment, encourage them with money, if not respect. Most of today’s “intentional communities” or utopian colonies, however, reveal a powerful preference for the past. These may be of value to the individuals in them, but the society as a whole would be better served by utopian experiments based on super- rather than pre-industrial forms. Instead of a communal farm, why not a computer software company whose program writers live and work all in one residential neighbourhood? #RandolphHarris 3 of 23

Why not an education technology company whose members pool their money and merge their families? Instead of raising radishes or crafting sandals, why not an oceanographic research installation organized along utopian lines? Why not a group medical practice that takes advantage of the latest medical technology but whose members accept modest pay and pool their profits to run a completely new-style medical school? Why not recruit living groups to try out the proposals of the utopia factories? In short, if we base our experiments on the technology and society of tomorrow rather than that of the past, we can use utopianism as a tool rather than an escape. And once done, why not the most rigorous, scientific analysis of the results? The findings could be priceless, were they to save us from mistakes or lead us toward more workable organizational forms for industry, education, family life or politics. Such imaginative explorations of possible futures would deepen and enrich our scientific study of probable futures. They would lay a basis for the radical forward extension of the society’s time horizon. They would help us apply social imagination to the future of futurism itself. Indeed, with these as a background, we must consciously begin to multiply the scientific future-sensing organs of society. Scientific futurist institutes must be spotted like nodes in a loose network throughout the entire governmental structure in the techno-societies, so that in every department, local or national, some staff devotes itself systematically to scanning the probable long-term future in its assigned field. #RandolphHarris 4 of 23

Futurists should be attached to every political party, university, corporation, professional association, trade union and student organization. We need to train thousands of young people in the perspectives and techniques of scientific futurism, inviting them to share in the exciting venture of mapping probable futures. We also need national agencies to provide technical assistance to local communities in creating their own futurist groups. And we need a similar center, perhaps jointly funded by American and European foundations, to help incipient futurist centers in Asia, Africa, and Latin America. We are in a race between rising levels of uncertainty produced by the acceleration of change, and the need for reasonably accurate images of what at any instant is the most probable future. The generation of reliable images of the most probable future thus becomes a matter of the highest national, indeed, international urgency. As the globe is itself dotted with future-sensors, we might consider creating a great international institute, a World futures data bank. Such an institute, staffed with top caliber men and women from all the sciences and social sciences, would take as its purpose the collection and systematic integration of predictive reports generated by scholars and imaginative thinkers in all the intellectual disciplines all over the World. Of course, those working in such an institute would know that they could never create a single, static diagram of the future. Instead, the product of their effort would be constantly changing geography of the future, a continually re-created overarching image based on the best predictive work available. #RandolphHarris 5 of 23

The men and women engaged in this work would know that they must work with inadequate data; they would appreciate the difficulties inherent in exploring the uncharted territories of tomorrow. However, humans already know more about the future than they have ever tried to formulate and integrate in any systematic and scientific way. Attempts to bring this knowledge together would constitute one of the crowing intellectual efforts in history—and one of the most worthwhile. Only when decision-makers are armed with better forecasts of future events, when by successive approximation we increase the accuracy of forecast, will our attempts to manage change improve perceptibly. For reasonably accurate assumptions about the future are a precondition for understanding the potential consequence of our own actions. And without such understanding, the management of change is impossible. If the humanization of the planner is the first stage in the strategy of social futurism, therefore, the forward extension of our time horizon is the second. To transcend technocracy, we need not only to reach beyond our economic philistinism, but to open our minds to more distant futures, both probable and possible. One consequence of trying to be objective, of attempting to frame our moral conceptions and judgments from a shared point of view, is that we are more likely to reach agreement. Indeed, ceteris paribus (other things equal), the preferred description of the initial situation is that which introduces the greatest convergence of opinion. It is partly for this reason that we accept the constraints of a common standpoint, since we cannot reasonably expect our views to fall into line when they are affected by the contingencies of our different circumstances. #RandolphHarris 6 of 23

However, of course our judgments will not coincide on all questions, and in fact many is not most social issues may still be insoluble, especially if viewed in their full complexity. This is why the numerous simplifications of justice as fairness are acknowledged. We have only to recall the reasons for such notions as the veil of ignorance, pure procedural justice (as opposed to allocative justice), lexical ordering, the division of the basic structure into two parts, and so on. Taken all together the parties hope that these and other devices will simplify political and social questions so that the resulting balance of justice, made possible by the greater consensus, outweighs what may have been lost by ignoring certain potentially relevant aspects of moral situations. The complexity of problems of justice is up to the persons in the original position to decide. Although ethical differences are bound to remain, seeing the social World from the original position does permit essential understandings to be reached. The acceptance of the principles of right and justice forges the bonds of civic friendship and establishes the basis of comity amidst the disparities that persist. Citizens are able to recognize one another’s good faith and desire for justice even though agreement may occasionally break down on constitutional questions and most certainly on many issues of policy. However, unless there existed a common perspective, the assumption of which narrowed differences of opinion, reasoning and argument would be pointless and we would have no rational grounds for believing in the soundness of our convictions. #RandolphHarris 7 of 23

It is clear that this interpretation of autonomy and objectivity depends upon the theory of justice. The idea of the original position is used to give a consistent rendering of both notions. Of course, if it is believed that the principles of justice would not be chosen, the content of these conceptions would have to be suitably altered. One who holds that the principle of utility would be consented to thinks that our autonomy is expressed by following this criterion. Nevertheless, the general will be the same, and both autonomy and objectivity are still explicated by reference to the initial situation. However, some have characterized autonomy and objectivity in an entirely different way. They have suggested that autonomy is the complete freedom to form our moral opinions and that the conscientious judgment of every moral agent ought absolutely to be respected. Objectivity is then attributed to those judgments which satisfy all the standards that the agent oneself has in one’s liberty decided are relevant. These standards may or may not have anything to do with taking up a common point of view that others might reasonably be expected to share; nor of course is the corresponding idea of autonomy connected with such a perspective. I mention these other interpretations only to indicate by contrast the nature of the contract doctrine. From the standpoint of justice as fairness it is not true that the conscientious judgements of each person ought absolutely to be respected; not is it true that individuals are completely free from their moral convictions. #RandolphHarris 8 of 23

If they mean that, having arrived at our moral opinions conscientiously (as we believe), we always have a claim to be allowed to act on them, these contentions are mistaken. The problem here is that of our deciding how one is to answer those who strive to act as their erring conscience directs them. How do we ascertain that their conscience and not ours is mistaken, and under what circumstances can they be compelled to desist? Now the answer to these questions is found by ascending to the original position: when one seeks to impose on us conditions that violate the principles to which we would each consent in that situation, a person’s conscience is misguided. And when the conflict is viewed from that perspective, we can resist one’s plans in those ways that would be authorized. We are not literally to respect the conscience of an individual. Rather we are to respect one as a person and we do this by limiting one’s actions, when this proves necessary, only as the principles we would both acknowledge permit. In the original position the parties agree to be held responsible for the conception of justice that is chosen. There is no violation of our autonomy so long as is principles are properly followed. Moreover, these principles stipulate that on many occasions we cannot shift the responsibility for what we do on to others. Those in authority are accountable for the policies they pursue and the instructions they lay down. And those who acquiesce in carrying out unjust commands or in abetting evil deigns cannot in general plead that they did not know better or that the fault rests solely with those in higher positions. #RandolphHarris 9 of 23

The details concerning these matters belong to partial compliance theory. The essential point here is that the principles that best conform to our nature as free and equal rational beings themselves establish our accountability. Otherwise autonomy is likely to lead to a mere collision of self-righteous wills, and objectivity to the adherence to a consistent yet idiosyncratic system. God has told us through His prophets that we are free to choose between good and evil. We may choose liberty and eternal life by following Jesus Christ. We are also free to choose captivity and death by following Satan. “Wherefore, humans are free according to the flesh; and all things are given them which are expedient unto humans. And they are free to choose liberty and eternal life, through the great Mediator of all humans, or to choose captivity and death, according to the captivity and power of the devil; for he seeketh that all humans might be miserable like unto himself,” reports 2 Nephi 2.27. In our premortal life we have moral agency. One purpose of Earth life is to show what choices we will make. “And to bring about his eternal purposes in the end of humans, after he had created our first parents, and the beast of the field and the fowls of the air, and in fine, all things which are created, it must needs be that there was an opposition; even the forbidden fruit in opposition to the tree of life; the one being sweet and the other bitter. Wherefore, the Lord God gave unto humans that they should act for themselves. Wherefore humans could not act for oneself save it should be that ne was enticed by the one,” reports 2 Nephi 2.15-16. #RandolphHarris 10 of 23

If we are forced to choose the right, we would not be able to show what we would choose for ourselves. Also, we are happier doing things when we have made our own choices. Agency was one of the principal issues to arise in the premotal Council in Heaven. It was one of the main causes of the conflict between the followers of Christ and the followers of Satan. Satan said, “Behold, here am I, send me, I will by thy son, and I will redeem all humankind, that one soul shall not be lost, and surely I will do it; wherefore give me thine honour,” reports Moses 4.1. In saying this, he “rebelled against God and sought to destroy the agency of human.” Reports Moses 4.3. His offer was rejected, and he was cast out of Heaven with his followers. “And it came to pass that Adam, being tempted of the devil—for, behold, the devil was before Adam, for he rebelled against me, saying, “Give me thine honour, which is my power; and also a third part of the hosts of Heaven turned he away from me because of the agency; and they were thrust down, and this came the devil and his angels,” reports Doctrine and Covenants 29.36-37. Agency makes our life on Earth a period of testing. When planning the mortal creation of His children, God said, “We will prove [test] them herewith, to see if they will do all things whatsoever the Lord their God shall command them,” reports Abraham 3.25. Without the gift of agency, we would have been unable to show our Heavenly Father whether we would do all that He commanded us. Because we are able to choose, we are responsible for our actions. #RandolphHarris 11 of 23

When we choose to live according to God’s plan for us, our agency is strengthened. Right actions increase our power to make more right choices. “And now remember, remember, my brethren, that whosoever perisheth, perisheth unto oneself; and whosoever doeth iniquity, doeth it unto oneself; for behold, ye are free; ye are permitted to act for yourselves; for behold, God hath given unto you a knowledge and he hath made you free. He hath given unto you that ye might know good from evil, and he hath given unto you that ye might choose life or death; and ye can do good and be restored,” reports Helaman 14.30-31. As we obey each of our Father’s commandments, we grow in wisdom and strength of character. Our faith increases. We find it easier to make right choices. We began to make choices as spirit children in our Heavenly Father’s presence. Our choices there made us worthy to come to Earth. Our Heavenly Father wants us to grow in faith, power, knowledge, wisdom, and all other good things. If we keep His commandments and make right choices, we will learn and understand. We will become like Him. “One that keepeth his commandments receiveth truth and light, until he is glorified in truth and knoweth all things,” reports Doctrine and Covenants 93.28. In times of social doubt and loss of faith in long established values, there is a tendency to fall back on the virtues of integrity: truthfulness and sincerity, lucidity and commitment, or, as some say, authenticity. If no one knows what is true, at least we can make our beliefs our own way and not adopt them as handed to us by others. #RandolphHarris 12 of 23

If the traditional moral rules are no longer relevant and we cannot agree which ones should take their place, we can in any event decide with a clear head how we mean to act and stop pretending that somehow or other it is already decided for us and we must accept this or that authority. Now of course the virtues of integrity are virtues, and among the excellences of free persons. Yet while necessary, they are not sufficient; for their definition allows for mist any content: a tyrant might display these attributes to a high degree, and by doing so exhibit a certain charm, not deceiving oneself by political pretenses and excuses of fortune. It is impossible to construct a moral view from these virtues alone; being virtues of form they are in a sense secondary. However, joined to the appropriate conception of justice, one that follows for autonomy and objectivity correctly understood, they come into their own. The idea of the original position, and the principles chosen there, show how this is achieved. A well-ordered society affirms that autonomy of persons and encourages the objectivity of their considered judgments of justice. Any doubts that its members may entertain about the soundness of their moral sentiments when they reflect upon how these dispositions were acquired may be dispelled by seeing that their convictions match the principles which would be chosen in the original position or, if they do not, by revising their judgments so that they do. However, Christians should not unwarily plunge into the political marshlands, thinking they will drain the swamp. #RandolphHarris 13 of 23

There are traps. Political classics use strategies to curry the favour of disparate special-interest groups, one by one, assembling voting blocs into a surprise majority. They often write off the marginalized groups like people of certain ethnic groups or status, like the disabled and/or senior citizens, but reach out to popular causes or traditional supporters in business and political party; they ignore people who do not have much of a voice, but exploit whatever allies that will allow themselves to be cultivated. Then key leaders are invited to the White House, following a scenario staged for maximum benefit. They are allowed to dine with politicians in the executive dining room located in the basement of the West Wing. Guest are escorted past saluting guards, down a long corridor lined with dramatic photographs of the president in action, then pause at the door of the dining room, where the situation room is pointed out. Everyone knows of the legendary super-secret national-security nerve center. The very words conjure up images of map covered walls, whirring computers, and a bevy of generals studying the movements of other nations. (Actually, it is nothing more than a large, crowded office with some communications equipment and old charts on the wall; the real command centers have been moved to the Pentagon after World War II.) The executive dining room is paneled in rich, hand-rubbed mahogany, lined with a waiting row of red-jacket Navy stewards. Seated at the dozen tables, huddled in conversation, are most of the cabinet and senior staff. #RandolphHarris 14 of 23

The dramatic effect overwhelms even the staunchest adversary. Some people who have never been to the White House before will be so impressed that during their first lunch they will declare their allegiance to help in your campaign. When you properly seduce people, they will willingly sign up to get played. Most people want to be razzle dazzled and made to feel special, even if they know it is temporary and not authentic. And of course, if the does not sell them, then the crowd is walked upstairs to the Oval Office to mee the president. The president is the master at the game. He will always give his dazzled visitor gold-plated cuff links with the presidential seal. The person will be so overwhelmed as the president leaves almost bowing, not more than sixty seconds later. It is not easy to resist the allure of the Oval Office. All kind of groups are taken to see the president, from friendly cattlemen to sophisticated educators enraged over budget cuts or the pandemic. It is always the same. In the reception room they rehearse their angry lines and reassure one another, “I’ll tell him what’s going on. He’s got to do something.” When the assistant comes to escort the group in, they set their jaws and march toward the door. However, once it swings open, the assistant announcing, “The president will see you,” it is as if they have suddenly sniffed some intoxicating fragrance. Most people become as self-conscious as Adam and Eve in the garden of Eden after eating the forbidden fruit about even stepping on the blue carpet on which is sculpted the Great Seal of the United State of America. And the president’s voice and presence fills the room. #RandolphHarris 15 of 23

Invariably, the lions of the waiting room become the lambs of the Oval Office. No one ever shows outward hostility. Most, except the labour leaders, forget their best-rehearsed lines. They nod when the president speaks, and in those rare instances when they disagree, they do so apologetically, assuring the president that they personally respect his opinion. And that is why the fake news media is used to spread propaganda. People do not realize how powerful the president is until they meet him. They have no idea how blessed they will feel in the ornate White House, it is like their minds have been erased and they are under a spell. Ironically, none are more complaint than the religious leaders. Of all people, they should be the most aware of the sinful nature of humans and the least overwhelmed by pomp and protocol. However, theological knowledge sometimes wilts in the face of Worldly power. That is why meetings for evangelical groups, denominational councils, and individual religious leaders are frequently scheduled. The weekly church services scheduled most Sundays for the East Room provide great opportunities as well. To select the preacher, it is determined who will give the White House the greatest impact—politically, that is, not spiritually. Many people in the White House are nominal Christians at best and have no way to judge the spiritual. And there are always two hundred or more seats to be filled, the tickets are like keys to the political kingdom. #RandolphHarris 16 of 23

Then there are invitations to social functions and state dinners. The quota for this event is filled with the support from people the White House covets the most. It is difficult to resist the allure of the most regal of events, the state dinner, held in honour of visiting World leaders. Each of the twelve tables seat ten of the most influential people in America—Supreme Court justices, senators, ambassadors, film stars, cabinet members—and targets for political support. For instance, if the White House needs several electoral-rich Northeastern and Midwestern states to win an election, one may call a prominent Christian leader whose influence is particularly great in that region and invite one for a private dinner cruise with the president. As they arrive at the Washington Navy Yard, sailors in white dress uniforms line the gangway at attention and salute as the crew boards the presidential yacht, Sequoia. Its mahogany sides and brass fitting make it sparkle like the most grand Victorian mansion as it eases away from the dock. The Washington skyline fades into the distance, and the president escorts the guests to dinner in the main salon. White House china, silver, and crystal appoint the starched white tablecloth; stewards scurry back, back, forth and forth serving chateaubriand and the vintage La Fete Rothschild. The dinner discussion is as impressive as the food. When the guest musters the courage to raise points of concern to the religious community, the president shows an amazing grasp of even the intricate details of those issues (being briefed thoroughly by a dutiful assistant that afternoon). Every now and then, the president will stop and say to his assistant, “I want this done. This man is right. You order the attorney general to take care of that tomorrow morning.” Then he will resume the conversation. #RandolphHarris 17 of 23

It is all sham, of course. The president means what he is saying, and the people present even think some of the things will be accomplished. However, whatever else happens, that religious leader is convinced that the president is on his side. You can attract more bees with flowers, than force and daggers. Before arriving at Mount Vernon, the president will then lead the crew to the foredeck and stand at attention as the colours are retired, his hand over his heart. The guest will do the same. When the bugle has faded, the ship will be docked; a waiting Marine helicopter takes their new friend back to the airport, and other returns the president and assistant back to the White House lawn. It is wrong to suggest that the leader is unduly influenced; but even such a wise, honourable, and religious man cannot help but be impressed by the trappings of power. He gets what he wants—the president’s ear on certain key issues. And they get what they want. The president’s prominent public friendship with this leader sends a powerful sign to millions of voters. And in the fall, it can allow one to carry more than 58 percent of the vote in many Northeastern and Midwestern precincts that have never before voted for a Republican. This is not to suggest that the White House is engaged in a sinister conspiracy to corrupt the church It is simply the way political systems work. People in power use power to keep themselves in power. Even if they are genuinely interested in a special-interest group’s agenda—or naturally disposed to their position—they will work that relationship for everything they can get out of it. #RandolphHarris 18 of 23

In totalitarian regimes some officials are so unscrupulous as to feign religious interest simply to ensnare Christians. In Nicaragua, President Daniel Ortega maintains two offices. When he is receiving church people or American visitors, he sits in a Bible-laden office adored with crucifixes. When he meets with government officials or visitors from socialist nations, he occupies an office displaying Marxist slogans and pictures of such revolutionary heroes as Marx, Engels, and Lenin. I am not advocating that religious groups of leaders boycott the White House or the palaces and parliaments of the World. That is where the political action is and Christian need to influence policies for justice and righteousness. That is in the best biblical tradition of Jeremiah, Amos, Micah, Daniel, and a host of others—though many prophets clearly preferred the desert to the palace. However, Christians (and others as well) need to do so with eyes open, aware of the snares. The demon inherent in every [political] part is at all times ready enough to disguise oneself as the Holy Ghost. Governments, to have a rational foundation for the control of the masses, are obliged to pretend that they are professing the highest religious teaching known to humans Consider several of the most dangerous pitfalls awaiting the unwary. The church is not and must never allow itself to become another special-interest group lined up at the public trough. For in doing so, it would sacrifice its claim to objective ethical concern which [is the church’s] chief political as well as moral resource. #RandolphHarris 19 of 23

If the church were to become a mere interest group, it would then be measured and honoured according to political and not moral criteria. The great strength of the American church is that it is not linked to a partisan cause. By way of contrast, European people reject the clergy less because they are representatives of God than because they are friends of authority. A second danger is the politics can be like the tabloid girlfriend, or the lead model for a popular brand who forgets they are merely playing a role and no more than a public servant. Christian leaders who are courted by political forces may soon begin to overestimate their own importance. The head of one large international relief agency mistakenly came to believe that heads of state welcomed him because of who he was rater than what he represented. It was not delusions of power. He left his family and was eventually removed from his position—after doing great harm to the cause he had served for much of his life. A side effect of this delusion is that rather than lose their access to political influence, some church leaders have surrendered their independence. “If I speak out against this policy, they reason, “I will not get invited to dinner and my chances to become minister will be cut off.” While such rationalizing is understandable, the result is exactly the opposite; they keep their place but lose their voice and thus any possibility of holding government to moral account. In this way the gospel becomes hostage to the political fortunes of a particular movement. This is the third and perhaps most dangerous snare. Both liberals and conservatives have made this mistake of aligning their spiritual goals with a particular political agenda. #RandolphHarris 20 of 23

People of faith must never be made to feel that if they disagree with the pastor’s partisan politics, that they are not people of faith. Several years ago, a prominent leader of a large Christian mission visited a developing nation ruled by an authoritarian leader. Th leader was friendly to the United States of America and held a regal dinner party at the palace honouring the mission executive. The awestruck visitor publicly and effusively praised the head of state. Months later when that head of state was deposed, the Christian’s mission work in that country was deposed right along with him. Inevitably, this kind of political alignment compromises the gospel. All successful Christian social theory in the immediate future must be based on this truth: the religion be not made an instrument of political ideology. Because it tempts one to water down the truth of the gospel, ideological alignment, whether on the left or right, accelerates the church’s secularization. When the church aligns itself politically, it gives priority to the compromises and temporal successes of the political World rather than its Christian confession of eternal truth. And when the church gives up its rightful place as the conscience of the culture, the consequences for a society can be horrific. As we have seen, many German churches in the 1930s allied themselves with the new nationalistic movement. One churchman even described the Nazis as a “gift and miracle of God.” It was the confessing church, not the politically-minded church, which retained its orthodoxy and thus resisted the perceived evils of Mr. Hitler’s state. #RandolphHarris 21 of 23

Today’s liberation theologians have fallen into this trap, putting ideology ahead of orthodoxy. It began, as did many Christian political movements, with noble intentions. Righteously outraged at injustices to the poor in so-called Christian cultures, priests and church workers began to organize communities for actions. So far, so good. However, as those organizations failed to solve problems, frustrations grew; attacks on structures became more strident. When Christians put economic issues ahead of spiritual salvation, they are embracing economic determinism; it is then but a short step to revolutionary politics, Marxism, and the fatal mistake of believing the Kingdom of God can be ushered in by political means, as Father Ernesto Cardenal, a Nicaraguan government official, well illustrates: “A World of perfect communism is the Kingdom of God on Earth.” Does all this mean that Christian cannot work with political groups? Certainly not. In fact, often Christians must work with coalitions of like-minded people who have different motivations. However, in order to maintain their Christian identity, they must inwardly detach themselves from the motivations and ultimate goals of their ideological colleagues. In World War II, for example, a devout Christian might have fought to stop the ethnical cleansing of Nazism and the Holocaust because one believed God commanded that the state is to restrain evil. Next to one in the same position might have been a soldier fighting solely for national pride or honour. Both would have been shooting at the same enemy, but for different reasons. Today Christians may find themselves suspect—I have experienced this myself—to the very people on whose side they are fighting.  #RandolphHarris 22 of 23

However, this is the price they must pay to preserve their independence and not be beholden to any political ideological alignment. Only a church free of any outside domination can be the conscience of society and hold government morally accountable before God to live up to its own claims. And as the church faithfully fulfills this role, even the most determined of tyrants topple. Justice without mercy is tyranny, and mercy without justice is weakness. Justice without love is pure socialism, and love without justice is baloney. “And when the day of Pentecost was fully come, they were all with one accord in one place. And suddenly there came a sound from Heaven as of a rushing mighty wind, and it filled all the house they were sitting,” reports Acts 2.12. Receive the power of Pentecost for increase, multiplication, and miracles. If you have been asking God for a supernatural turnaround in your life, healing, deliverance, or a financial breakthrough know that Miracles are coming! Increase is coming! Multiplication is coming! The great sea has set me in motion. Set me adrift, and I move as a fish in the river. The arch of sky and mightiness of storms encompasses me, and I am left trembling with joy. The eyes of all look hopefully to Thee, God, and Thou givest them their food in due season. Thou openest Thy hand, and satisfies every living thing with favour. The Lord is righteous in all His ways, and gracious in al His works. The Lord is near unto all who call upon Him, to all who call upon Him in truth. He will fulfill the desire of them that revere Him; He will also hear their cry, and will save them. The Lord preserveth all them that love Him; but all the wicked will He bring low. My mouth shall speak the praise of the Lord; let all humans bless His holy name for ever and ever. We will bless the Lord from this time forth, and forevermore. Hallelujah. #RandolphHarris 23 of 23

MILLS STATION AT CRESLEIGH RANCH

Rancho Cordova, CA |

Now Selling!

Mills Station at Cresleigh Ranch is Rancho Cordova’s newest home community! This charming neighborhood offers an array of home types with eye catching architecture styles such as Mission, Mid-Century Modern, California Modern, and Contemporary Farmhouse.

Located off Douglas Road and Rancho Cordova Parkway, the residents of Cresleigh Ranch will enjoy, being just minutes from shopping, dining, and entertainment, and quick access to Highway 50 and Grant Line Road providing a direct route into Folsom. Residents here also benefit from no HOA fees, two community parks and the benefits of being a part of the highly-rated Elk Grove Unified School District.

You love your life, but at Cresleigh Ranch, it gets even better! With an array of beautifully designed two story homes and spacious, ranch-style cottage homes, this is the peaceful community you have been looking for!

Rancho Cordova is a prominent suburb of the Sacramento Metropolitan Statistical Area and a Home Rule Municipality located in Sacramento County, California, United States of America.

#CresleighHomes

#CresleighRanch