Peace is perfection, a gift from God, a beneficial, dynamic, and healthy state within the soul. Human beings have feeling and emotions, awareness and sensitivity of our environment. However, without order, our attention is divided, distracted, confused, unreliable, and ineffective. We must take responsibility for our actions to receive true peace. One of the greatest secrets in life is the ability to navigate your emotions in a ways that helps you win influence. Emotional intelligence makes it possible to navigate the course of your life without feeling burnt out or frustrated. Depending only on your emotional or rational thinking abilities will only make your life distorted or imbalanced. The automatic or impulsive reaction does not allow you to properly process your thoughts and emotions before taking actions. However, once you can understand how your emotions work, then you can bridge the gap between reaction and adequate response. Remember, no one is responsible for how you are feeling, but you. Just because you are having a bad day does not mean you can lash out at another person for being themselves. If things are not going your way, and you are not feeling like tolerating the public, it may be an excellent idea to take a day off work, stay home, stay inside and get yourself in order before having contact with the outside World. There is a right and wrong way to do everything. A person who has self-control, has strength to see situations clearly. Judge them for what they are. It depends upon the attitude of your mind. Negative attitude disturbs and positive attitude provides peace to the mind. #RandolphHarris 1 of 22

The structure of society and the personality of man changed in the late Middle Ages. The unity and centralization of medieval society became weaker. Capital, individual economic initiative and competition grew in importance; a new moneyed class developed. A growing individualism was noticeable in all social classes and affected all spheres of human activity, taste, fashion, art, philosophy, and theology. This whole process had a different meaning for the small group of wealth and prosperous capitalists on the one hand, and on the other hand for the masses of peasants and especially for the urban middle class for which this new development meant to some extent wealth and chances for individual initiative, but essentially a threat to its traditional way of life. It is important to bear this difference in mind from the outset because the psychological and ideological reactions of these various groups were determined by this very difference. The new economic and cultural development took place in Italy more intensely and with more distinct repercussions on philosophy, art, and on the whole style of life than in Western and Central Europe. In Italy, for the first time, the individual emerged from feudal society and broke the ties which had been giving one the security and narrowing one at one and the same time. The Italian of the Renaissance became the first-born among the sons of Modern Europe, the first individual. There were a number of economic and political factors which were responsible for the breakdown of medieval society earlier in Italy than in Central and Western Europe. #RandolphHarris 2 of 22

Among them were the geographical position of Italy and the commercial advantages resulting from it, in a period when the fight between Pope and emperor resulting in the existence of a great number of independent political units; the nearness to Asia, as consequence of which certain skills which were important for the development of industries, as for instance the silk industry, were brought to Italy long before they came to other parts of Europe. Resulting from these and other conditions, was the rise in Italy of a powerful moneyed class the members of which were filled with a spirit of initiative, power, ambition. Feudal class stratifications became less important. From the twelfth century onwards nobles and burghers lived together within the walls of the cities. Social intercourse began to ignore distinctions of caste. Birth and origin were of less importance than wealth. On the other hands, the traditional social stratification among the masses was shaken too. Instead of it, we find urban masses of exploited and politically suppressed workers. As early as 1231, Frederick II’s political measures were aimed at the complete destruction of the feudal state, at the transformation of the people into a multitude destitute of will and of the means of resistance, but profitable in the utmost degree to the exchequer. The result of this progressive destruction of the medieval social structure was the emergence of the individual in the modern sense. In Italy this veil (of faith, illusion, and childish prepossession) first melted into air; an objective treatment and consideration of the state and of all the things of this World became possible. #RandolphHarris 3 of 22

The subjective side at the same time asserted itself with corresponding emphasis; man became a spiritual individual, and recognized himself as such. In the same way the Greek had once distinguished himself from the barbarian, the Arabian had felt himself an individual at a time when other Asiatics knew themselves only as members of a race. Man discovers himself and others as individuals, as separate entities; he discovers nature as something apart from himself in two aspects: as an object of theoretical and practical mastery, and in its beauty, as an object of pleasure. He discovers the World, practically be discovering new continents and spiritually by developing a cosmopolitan spirit, a spirit in which Dante cant say: “My country is the whole World.” The Renaissance was the culture of a wealth and powerful upper class, on the crest of the wave which was whipped up by the storm of new economic forces. The masses who did not share the wealth and power of the ruling group had lost the security of their former states and had become a shapeless mass, to be flattered or to be threatened—but always to be manipulated and exploited by those in power. A new despotism arose side by side with the new individualism. Freedom and tyranny, individuality and disorder, were inextricably interwoven. The Renaissance was not a culture of small shopkeepers and petty bourgeois but wealthy nobles and burghers. Their economic activity and their wealth gave them a feeling of freedom and a sense of individuality. However, at the same time, these same people had lost something: the security and feeling of belonging with the medieval social structure had offered. #RandolphHarris 4 of 22

They were more free, but they were also more alone. They used their power and wealth to squeeze the last ounce of pleasure out of life; but in doing so, they had to use ruthlessly every means, from physical torture to psychological manipulation, to rule over the masses and to check their competitors within their own class. All human relationships were poisoned by this fierce life-and-death struggle for the maintenance of power and wealth. Solidarity with one’s fellow men—or at least with the members of one’s own class—was replaced by a cynical detached attitude; other individuals were looked upon as “objects” to be used and manipulated, or they were ruthlessly destroyed if it suited one’s own ends. The individual was absorbed by a passionate egocentricity, and insatiable greed for power and wealth. As a result of all this, the successful individual’s relation to his own self, his sense of security and confidence were poisoned too. His own self became as much an object of manipulation to him as other persons had become. We have reasons to doubt whether the powerful masters of Renaissance capitalism were as happy and as secure as they are often pictured. It seems that the new freedom brought two things to them: an increased feeling of strength and at the same time an increased isolation, doubt, scepticism, and—resulting from all these—anxiety. It is the same contradiction that we find in the philosophic writings of the humanists. Side by side with their emphasis on human dignity, individuality, and strength, they exhibited insecurity and despair in their philosophy. #RandolphHarris 5 of 22

This underlying insecurity resulting from the position of an isolated individual in a hostie World tends to explain the genesis of a character trait the became noticeable in the individual of the Renaissance and not present, at least in the same intensity, in the member of the medieval social structure: his passionate craving for fame. If the meaning of life has become doubtful, if one’s relations to other and to oneself do not offer security, then fame is one means to silence one’s doubts. It has a function to be compared with that of the Egyptian pyramids or the Christian faith in immortality: it elevates one’s individual life from it limitations and instability to the plane of indestructibility; if one’s name is known to one’s contemporaries, and if one can hope that it will last for centuries, then one’s life has meaning and significance by this very reflection of it in the judgments of others. It is obvious that this solution of individual insecurity was only possible for a social group whose members possessed the actual means of gaining fame. It was not a solution which was possible for the powerless masses in that same culture nor one which we shall find in the urban middle class that was the backbone of the Reformation. The Renaissance was the period which we saw the beginning of modern individualism and also because the work done by historians of the period throw some light on the very factor which are significant for the main process which this study analyzes, namely the emergence of man from a preindividualistic existence to one in which he has full awareness of himself as a separate entity. #RandolphHarris 6 of 22

However, in spite of the fact that the ideas of the Renaissance were not without influence on the further development of European thinking, the essential root of modern capitalism, its economic structure and its spirit, are not to be found in the Italian culture of the late Middle Ages, but in the economic and social situations of Central and Western Europe and in the doctrines of Mr. Luther and Mr. Calvin. The main difference between the two cultures is this: the Renaissance period represented a comparatively high development of commercial and industrial capitalism; it was a society in which a small group of wealth and powerful individuals ruled and formed the social basis for the philosophers and artists who expressed the spirit of this culture The Reformation, on the other hand, was essentially a religion of the urban middle and lower classes, and of the peasants. Germany, too, had its wealthy businessmen, like the Fuggers, but they were not the ones to whom the new religious doctrines appealed, nor were they the main basis from which modern capitalism developed. As Max Weber has shown, it was the urban middle class which became the backbone of modern capitalistic development in the Western World. According to the entirely different social background of both movements we must expect the spirit of the Renaissance and that of the Reformation to be different. In discussing the theology of Mr. Luther and Mr. Calvin some of the differences will become clear by implication. #RandolphHarris 7 of 22

However, before we go any further, let us cover a few things in more modern times. In 1984, when Gary Hart campaigned for the Democratic Party presidential nomination and won the New Hampshire primary by calling for “new thinking,” the old Second Wave barons in the Democratic Party united to stop him and nominated solid, safe, Second Wave thinker Walter Mondale instead. It is why, more recently, Second Wave Naderites and Second Wave Buchananites found common cause against NAFTA. It is why, when Congress passed an infra-structure bill in 1991, $150 billion was allocated to roads, highways, bridges and potholes—providing profits to Second Wave companies and jobs for Second Wave—unions, while a ere $1 billion was allocated to help build the much-touted electronic superhighway. Necessary as they may be, roads and highways are part of the Second Wave infrastructure; digital networks are the heart of the Third Wave infrastructure. The point here is not whether or not the government should subsidize the digital network, but the imbalance of Second and Third Wave forces in Washington. This imbalance is why Vice President Gore—with one toe wet in the Third Wave—has been unable, despite his efforts, to “reinvent” the government along Third Wave lines. Centralized bureaucracy is the quintessential form of organization in Second Wave societies. Even as advanced corporations, driven by competition, are desperately trying to dismantle their bureaucracies and invent new Third Wave forms of management, government agencies, blocked by Second Wave civil service unions, have managed to stay largely unreformed, unreengineered, unreinvented. They retain, in short, their Second Wave structures. #RandolphHarris 8 of 22

Second Wave elites fight to retain or reinstate an unsustainable past because they gained wealth and power from applying Second Wave principles, and the shift to a new way of life challenges that wealth and power. However, it is not only the elite. Millions of middle-class and poor Americans also resist the transition to the Third Wave because of an often justified fear that they will be left behind, will lost their jobs and slide further down the economic and social slope. To understand the vast inertial power of Second Wave forces in America, however, we need to look beyond the old muscle-based industries and their workers and unions. The Second Wave sector is backed by those elements of Wall Street that service it. It is further supported by intellectuals and academics, often tenured, who live off grants from foundations, trace associations and lobbies that serve it. Their task is to collect supportive data and hammer out the ideological arguments and slogans used by Second Wave forces: for example, the idea that the information-intensive service industries are “unproductive,” or that service workers are doomed to work in low wage jobs or that the economy must revolve around manufacturing. With all this firepower continually battering them, it is hardly surprising that both political parties reflect Second Wave thinking. The Democrats’ reflexive reliance on bureaucratic and centralist solutions to problems like the health insurance crisis is drawn straight from Second Wave theories of efficiency. Despite an occasional politician like Vice President Gore, who recognizes the importance of high technology and who once served as cochair of the Congressional Clearinghouse on the Future, the Democrats remain so heavily indebted to their Second Wave backers in industry, the unions and civil service, that as a party, they remain largely paralyzed in the face of the twenty-first century. #RandolphHarris 9 of 22

From Hart in the ‘80s to Gore in the ‘90s, the party’s core constituencies make it impossible for the Democratic Party to follow its most forward thinking leaders. The party thus finds itself still trapped by its blue-collar image of reality. The failure of the Democrats to make themselves the party of the future (as indeed they once were and have become again in the first quarter of the twenty-first century) had thrown the door wide open for their adversaries. The Republicans are less rooted in the old industrial Northeast, and thus have an opportunity to position themselves as the party of the Third Wave—although their recent Presidents have signally failed to seize this opportunity. And the Republicans, too, rely on knee-jerk Second Wave rhetoric. Republicans are basically right when they call for a broad scale deregulation because businesses now need all the flexibility possible to survive global competition. Republicans are basically right in calling for privatization of government operations because governments, lacking competition, do not generally run things well. Republicans are basically right when they urge us to take maximum advantage of dynamism and creativity that market economies make possible. However, they, too, remain prisoners of Second Wave economics. For example, even the free-market economists on whom Republicans rely have failed, as yet, to come to terms with the new role and inexhaustibility of knowledge. Republicans also are still beholden to some of the corporate dinosaurs of the Second Wave past and to their trade associations, lobbies and policy formulating “round tables.” #RandolphHarris 10 of 22

Moreover, Republicans tend to play down potentially immense social dislocations that are likely to flow from any change as profound as the Third Wave. For example, as skills become obsolete overnight, large numbers of the middle class, including highly trained people, may well find themselves thrown out of work. California defense scientists and engineers are a chastening case in point. Free-marketism and trickle-downism twisted into rigid theological dogma are inadequate responses to the Third Wave. For example, as skills become obsolete overnight, large numbers of the middle class, including highly trained people, may well find themselves thrown out of work. California defense scientists and engineers are a chastening case in point. Free-marketism and trickle-downism twisted into rigid theological dogma are inadequate responses to the Third Wave. A party facing the future should be warning of problems to come and suggesting preventative change. For example, today’s media revolution will bring enormous benefits to the emerging Third Wave economy. However, TV shopping and other electronic services might well slash the number of entry-level jobs in the traditional retail sector, precisely the place some people can find work, and some can get their starts. If free markets and democracy are to survive the great and turbulent transitions to come, politics must become anticipatory and preventive. Yet asking our political parties to think beyond the next election is hard and thankless work. Instead, both parties are busy mainlining nostalgia into their constituents’ veins. #RandolphHarris 11 of 22

The Democrats, for example, until recent years, spoke of “reindustrializing” or “restoring” American industry to its period of greatness in the 1950s. The Republicans, meanwhile, appeal to nostalgia in their rhetoric about culture and values, as though one could return to the values and morality of the 1950s—a time before universal television, before the birth-control pill, before commercial jet aviation, satellites and home computers—without also returning to the mass industrial society of the Second Wave. One side still dreams of River Rogue, the other dreams of Ozzie and Harriet. The religion-based wing of the Republican Party, seeking a return to “traditional” verities, blames liberals, humanist, and Democrats for the “collapse of morality.” It fails to grasp that this crisis in our value system reflects the more general crisis of Second Wave civilization as a whole, and that this upheaval is not limited to America. Rather than asking how to bring about decent, moral, and democratic Third Wave America, most of its leaders merely urge a return to an idealized past. Instead of asking how to make a de-massified society moral and fair, many give the impression that they really want to re-massify America. The difference between the parties, however, is that while the Second Wave “nostalgia pushers” in the Democratic Party are concentrated in its core constituencies, their counterparts in the Republican Party tend to be found on its frenetic fringe. This leaves room for the center of the party, if it is inclusive and open to change, to seize the future—lock, stock and barrel. This is the message that Newt Gingrich, the Republican Speaker of the House of Representatives, has been trying, but o far with only limited success, to deliver to his own party. If Mr. Gingrich succeeds, and the Democrats remain chained to their pre-computer ideology, they could, for good or ill, be trampled in the political dust. #RandolphHarris 12 of 22

In 1980, Lee Atwater was a top political advisor to President Regan. Later he became President Bush’s jogging companion and campaign manager. Not long after Mr. Regan was elected, Mr. Atwater said that neither party, has a positive image of the future, “and that’s why the campaigning is so negative.” All of America is poorer for our bipartisan myopia. China, in some ways is like no other country in the World. China has positioned its state-owned companies as major cross-border acquirers. Also, most of the major Chinese acquisitions (even by non-state-owned firms) are feared to be state-backed. In the end it often turns out that, in fact, it is the Chinese state that is acquiring Western private companies one after another, albeit indirectly. On the contrary, almost all Western acquirers are purely private firms. As a rule, Chinese acquirers get the foreign currency they need to carry out the transaction not through the foreign exchange market but in a nontransparent way, directly from a state-owned bank—eventually from the state. If the Chinese government considers a particular transaction strategically important to access mineral resources, technologies, and brands, or to boost its geopolitical clout in general, it can allocate much greater funds than those affordable for a private company sticking to the market rationale. Again, China drastically changes the rules of the game in the global business arena. This West has no choice but to put every Chinese acquisition under scrutiny. On the other hand, at this point not only Chinese, but Western governments have not clearly articulated their basic policy concept on the acquisitions pursued by foreign state-owned or government-linked companies. As long as it is not done, their responses will remain spontaneous. #RandolphHarris 13 of 22

When dealing with perspective on family-serving agencies, the arts come into play. It is apparent that the arts recapitulate the range of human activity, just as other forms of recreation are re-creations of workday task. Thus dancing can be seen as an abstraction and idealization of sports; the applied arts, as representations of crafts; storytelling and drama, of sociability; graphic and plastic arts, of intellectual interests; poetry, of reverie (poetry is emotion recollected in tranquillity). Music is the most distilled of all the arts, an evoker of all the forms and feelings of experience, of images suggestive of all the sense, a medium falling not short of words but transcending poetry in its power of abstraction. In pure music, the spirit is free of every toilsome entanglement; music is thus the apotheosis of play, the singer, the paragon of all players. While the practice of artistry may be either by individuals or groups (orchestra, chorus, dramatic companies), and there is some development of artistic contests, there are no games consisting of artistry. Other types of recreation acquire spectators and auditors, but none invite them to quite the degree that artistry does. The way in which the element of chance enters into the artistic situation is largely in terms of the size and composition of the audience it draws. #RandolphHarris 14 of 22

Audience reception is vital to most artists, suggesting that in this type of recreation something occurs between artist and public which is uniquely social. What that something is—the expansion of experience or its unification, the affirmation of human brotherhood or the criticism of life—must still be left to philosophers to ponder, but that such a relation exists seems as true for the amateur milliner as for the professional painter. The phenomenon of style as localized in time, space, and segments of society also testifies to the intensely social aspects of artistry, to the sharing of artistic experience, and its intensification by sharing. The elusive phenomenon of taste is at once a most individual and most social experience; critics testify to the unceasing dialectic of expression and communication in artistic production; art historians, to the efforts of publics to discriminate the ephemeral from the eternal. Like other forms of recreation, it is unquestionable that artistry adds new elements and dimension to experience; at the same time, art always bears a definite and necessary relation to the realities which it represents, it is an idealization or selection of the actual; decoration is always decoration of something; this something is not the design itself but a feature of existence which would be necessary with or without decoration. It is this subtle relationship to the more strictly purposeful and obligatory that puts art and artistry into the realm of play, however intense the seriousness with which they may be themselves pursued. #RandolphHarris 15 of 22

Now what has all this to do with families? Why should recreational agencies be considered as family agencies? If the family is viewed only in traditional terms, as an institution to be preserved, the connection adduced between family welfare and contemporary recreation must appear trifling, or even inimical. If, on the other hand, the measure of a family is taken as its effect in developing competent personalities among its members, the provision of recreational opportunity assumes an importance compounded of functions performed by all the other types of family agencies. It is evident that sports contribute to the development of physical health; crafts, to purposeful choice of vocational identity, and the acquisition of manipulative understanding; sociability, to practice in empathy; reverie, to the integration of self-conceptions; intellectual interests, to the stimulation of intelligence and the improvement of judgement; and the arts, to creativity. Furthermore, beyond these direct contributions to competence lie all the overlapping, complementing, and mutually reinforcing contributions of each type of recreation to the other aspects of competence, as for example, when experience on a baseball team brings out leadership ability, which is then usable in a government job. The evolution of recreational agencies to the present has occurred in less time than the invention of the concrete forms of recreation. It should therefore not be surprising that the current procedures of recreational agencies only faintly foreshadow the shape of their future responsibilities toward the family, and the changes of method which will be necessary to discharge them. Fortunately a number of contemporary thinkers are working on these problems. #RandolphHarris 16 of 22

Americans have resorted to recreation as an escape for the boredom of enforced leisure before they have ceased to think of play as an escape from the drudgery of work. While writings about recreation are scarce, there is some literature on leisure, and it seems significant that much of this was produced during the depression of the nineteen thirties, when so much of traditional social philosophy was being reassessed. As employment resumed, leisure came to be talked of less as a problem and more as a positive value to be pursued. Neither family agencies nor anyone ese has yet devised community-wide, positive programs to fill the vacuum of leisure with recreation. Since play ceases to be play when it is not undertaken for its own sake, an insistence on wholesomeness frequently destroys the appeal of a play program. Yet the family agency which exists simply to promote recreation is rare; so far the agencies which have sought to provide recreation to families have justified their actions by reference to some ulterior, utilitarian purpose. Recreation unquestionably has all the values attributed to it, but these must be trusted to accrue spontaneously; they cannot be forced or directly seized. Only programs which accord recreation a raison d’etre of its own can truly be called positive; only agencies set up to create the optimum conditions for its growth among the whole community have grasped its relevance for the whole society as well as for the whole of culture. #RandolphHarris 17 of 22

Now, when it comes to religious aspects of life, believers may unknowingly develop mediumistic conditions, of which deceiving offenders are not slow to take advantage. They are careful not to frighten the believer by doing anything which will open one’s eyes, so they keep within the range of what one will receive without question. They will portray the Lord Jesus Christ in the particular way which will most appeal to the person, exempli gratia, to some as Bridegroom; to other as King on a throne, and coming in great glory. They will also impersonate the dead to those who grieve after their loved ones, and as they have watched them during life and known all about them, they will give ample “proofs” to confirm the deceived ones in their deception. Visions may come from one of thee sources: the divine, from God; the human, such as hallucinations and illusions because of the disease; and the psychopathological, giving purposely false portrayals. Visions given by psychological offenders can describe anything supernatural presented to and seen by the mind or imagination from outside, such as terrible pictures of the “future,” the flashing of texts as if they were lit up, visions of wide-spreading “movements”—sometimes almost paralleling either a true vision of the Holy Spirit given to the “eye of the understanding” or a normal and healthy action of the imagination. The Church is thus often made a whirlpool of division through pool of division through believers relying upon “text” for guiding their decisions instead of depending on the principles of right and wrong set forth in God’s Word. #RandolphHarris 18 of 22

“The Fall” as a symbol for the transition from essence to existence is broader in scope than the Fall depicted in Genesis, although the latter is its classic expression. Mr. Plato’s myth of “the Fall of the souls” conveys the same notion of the tragic passage from potentiality to actuality. The Fall has universal anthropological significance. To speak of its transition from essence to existence is demythologizing, but only to a limited extent, for in dealing with this question the philosopher commits himself in a matter of ultimate concern and so cannot avoid using myth and symbol. Yet a certain amount of demythologizing is necessary, since the theologian must employ philosophical ideas to explain the Fall. The philosopher cannot avoid existential decisions, and the theologian cannot avoid ontological concepts. Genesis in the Christian Bible, chapters one to three, are the profoundest and richest expression of man’s awareness of his existential estrangement. There are four elements in the transit from essence to existence: the possibility of the Fall, its motives, the event itself, and its implications. The possibility of the Fall lies in the fact that man alone possesses finite freedom. He can contradict his essential nature and destroy his own humanity. Yet man’s freedom is not absolute; it operates within the context of universal destiny. The Fall, although always presented as the Fall of man, is a cosmic event. However, return to the words of Genesis, the Fall is possible because man is made in the image of God, that is, he had freedom of destiny. #RandolphHarris 19 of 22

The motive for the Fall involves a discussion of essential being, of Adam before the Fall. It is a psychological state of dreaming of innocence. A dream anticipates actuality, and, although reality differs from it, still there is a certain correspondence between the two. Innocence is the state of nonactualized potentiality characterized by the absence of experience, responsibility, and guilt, but which, if actualized, puts an end to innocence. The growth of awareness of pleasures of the flesh is a good example of innocence and its loss. The symbol Adam before the Fall must understood as the dreaming innocence of undecided potentialities. In the state of dreaming innocence, freedom and destiny lie within each other, distinct but not separate, intension but not in conflict. They are held in polar unity by the ground of being in which they are rooted. The motives for the Fall are seen in the anxiety which besieges man from without and from withing. From without, the command not to eat the forbidden fruit testifies both to mans aroused freedom, his desire to actualize himself, and to his instinct for self-preservation by obeying the divine prohibition. From within, man is torn by the same anxiety to actualize the freedom of which he is aware and to preserve his innocence by not realizing his potentialities. In either case, under the pressure but not the compulsion of anxiety, man decides for self-actualization. In what sense is the Fall an event? It certainly is not an historical event that happened “once upon a time.” It is a fact, the original fact, in that it is an ontological condition that recedes but touches all of creation. #RandolphHarris 20 of 22

It means that the transition from essence to existence is a universal quality of finite being. The Genesis story stresses the moral element of this quality by highlighting the ethical act of Adam. However, the tragic element which involve the whole cosmos is not absent: The serpent represents the dynamic trends of nature; there is the magical character of the two trees, the rise of sexual consciousness, the curse over the heredity of Adam, the body of the woman, the animals and the land. These symbols point to a cosmic myth which teaches that the individual act of freedom is embedded in a universal destiny. The polarity of freedom-destiny is asserted. Existence is rooted both in ethical freedom and in tragic destiny. The cosmic implications of the Fall introduce the problem of how universal existence is related to man’s existence. These implications are distilled into two questions: How is nature related to fallen man? What is the relationship between creation and the Fall? The Fall rules out a before and after, a change in the structure of nature due to the divine curse laid upon the land. The transition from essence to existence is not an event in time; Adam before the Fall and nature before the curse are man and the World now exist, and it was never otherwise. A simple solution would be to separate innocent nature and guilty man, to speak no more of a fallen World. However, to do so neglects the tragic element of destiny. For within man himself nature is implicated in the Fall. First, in the course of human evolution, there is no absolute discontinuity between animal bondage and human freedom. #RandolphHarris 21 of 22

Secondly, in the development of the human individual, who can say where and when responsibility beings and ends? Thirdly, the discovery of the unconscious reveals a hidden but determining power that influences man’s decision. And, lastly, the social dimension of the “collective unconscious” contributes to the limitation imposed by destiny. In a word, biological, psychological, and sociological factors affect the individual’s decision. However, freedom is the possibility of a total and centered act of the personality, an act in which all the drives and influences which constitute the destiny of man are brought into the centered unity of a decision. None of these drives compels the decision in isolation. Yet, they are effective, and in this way nature represents destiny and participates in the act of freedom. It is possible, in fact necessary, to speak of a fallen World. The tragedy of nature is bound to the tragedy of man, as the salvation of nature is dependent on the salvation of man…for man is in nature and nature is in man. Nature, also, mourns for a lost good. There is no point in time and space in which created goodness was actualized and had existence. There was no paradise just as there will be no utopia. Actualized creation and estranged existence are identical. For example, the newly created infant falls into the state of existential estrangement. Creation and Fall coincide, but not logically, for, when the child matures, it affirms its existential good, but its self-actualization through freedom and destiny results in sin. However, this sin is not a structural necessity; the transition from essence to existence is a leap. Existence can never be derived from essence. #RandolphHarris 22 of 22

MAGNOLIA STATION AT CRESLEIGH RANCH

Rancho Cordova, CA | low $600s

Now Selling!

Models now open at Magnolia Station! Located at the corner of Rancho Cordova Parkway and Douglas Road, residents of Cresleigh Ranch will benefit from a brand new neighborhood with convenient access to the new Raley’s Shopping Center, Sunrise Boulevard, and much more!

Magnolia Station will  include 81 homesites  and five distinct plans ranging from 2,200 – 3,700 square feet; including three single story plans! Each plan has been thoughtfully designed to include features such as: Generations Suite, Optional Offices/Dens, Extended Great Rooms, and more! https://cresleigh.com/magnolia-station/

#CresleighHomes