Diplomacy is the art of the possible, and we have to keep readjusting our concept of what is possible. In the past, Americans were addressed as people or, in the more distant past, ladies and gentlemen. Now we are consumers. This is symptomatic of a debasement of public speech inseparable from a more general erosion. Proper grammar and respectful forms of address were mandatory not only for people seeking professional jobs, but also for those seeking high office. We have to call for resolution and a spirit of patriotism and sacrifice to encourage people to rise above their everyday selves and to behave as true citizens. To keep telling Americans that they are just consumers is to expect nothing special. The English language is becoming ugly and inaccurate because our thoughts are foolish. The slovenliness of our language makes it easier for us to have foolish thoughts. As it stands, some people never open their mouths without subtracting from the sum of human intelligence. However, few people like to consider themselves enemies of thought and culture. Still, there is a suggestion in society that there is something sinister, even un-American, about intense devotion to ideas, reason, logic, evidence, and precise language is one of them. Anti-intellectualism is turning a treatable, livable condition into a morbid disease affecting the entire community. #RandolphHarris 1 of 28

The media seems to offer ladies and gentlemen an unprecedented variety of choices—television programs on hundreds of channels; movies; news; video games; music; and the Internet versions of these products, available in so many portable electronic packages that it is entirely possible to go through an entire day without being deprived for a second of commercial entertainment. And it is not that the television, or any of its successors in the World of video was designed as an enemy of active intellectual life in American, but the media has restricted their audience’s intellectual parameters by fulling time—a huge amount of time—that used to be occupied by engagement in the written word. However, in the early fifties, many intellectuals had great hops for television as an educational medium and as a general force for good. Television used to be a treat rather than the metronome of everyday life. Medical research does indicate that frequent exposure to any form of video in the early years of life produces older children with shortened attention spans. It does not matter whether the images are produced by a television network, a film studio, or a computer software company: what matters is the amount of time children spend starting at a monitor. The American Academy of Pediatrics has concluded that there is no safe level of viewing for children under age two. #RandolphHarris 2 of 28

Video has a capacity to dull the wits of highly educated professionals as well as innocent babies. However, the way to introduce children to music is by playing good music, uninterrupted by video clowns, at home; the way to introduce poetry is by reciting or reading it at bedtime; and the way to instill an appreciation of beauty is not to bombard a toddler with screen images of Monet’s Giverny but to introduce one to the real sighs and scents of a garden.  Still, only a Luddite would claim that the video culture, whether displayed on television screens or computer monitors, has nothing to contribute to individual intellectual development or the intellectual life of society. Yet, there is little question that the intrusion of video into the psyches of Americans at ever earlier ages is not only making it unnecessary for young children to entertain themselves but is also discouraging them from thinking and fantasizing outside the box, in the most literal as well as a figurative sense. In the nineteenth century, London readers used to get up early and wait in line for the newest installment of a novel by Charles Dickens; in New York, Dickens fans would meet at the boasts known to be carrying copies of the tantalizing chapters. The Web, however, is all about the quickest possible gratification; it may well be that people most disposed to read online are least disposed to wait any length of time for a new chapter of work by their favourite writer. #RandolphHarris 3 of 28

The Internet is the perfect delivery medium for reference books and textbooks, which were never designed to be read from cover to cover. However, a narrow, time-saving focus is inimical not only to the reading for enjoyment but to reading that encourages the retention of knowledge. Memory, which depends on the capacity to absorb ideas and information through exposition and to connect new information to an established edifice of knowledge, is one of the first victims of video culture. Without memory, judgments are made on the unsound basis of the most recent bit of half-digested information. All mass entertainment media, and the expanding body of educational media based on the entertainment model, emphasize “stand alone” programming that does not require a prior body of knowledge. The media provide the yeast, which, when added to others American social forces and institutions, creates a fertile culture for the spread of invincible ignorance throughout the public square. Modern media also overtly and covertly appeals to the emotion rather than reason. To begin with it may happen that an affect or an emotion is perceived but misconstrued. By the repression of its proper presentation it is forced to become connected with another idea, and is now interpreted by consciousness as the expression of this other idea. #RandolphHarris 4 of 28

If we restore the true connection, we call the original affect “unconscious” although the affect was never unconscious but its ideational presentation had undergone repression. Motive and wish, as aspect of affect, are certainly assumed to be potentially unconscious. Boredom involves an unconscious attempt to convince oneself that one does not want to gratify an instinctual wish that is frightening, and therefore one has no wish to do anything. We must go beyond the organism and the physical environment to account for human emotions. Social factors enter not simply before and after but interactively during the experience of emotion. Let us say that humans become violently angry when insulted. What, in one’s cultural milieu, constitutes an insult? As one’s anger rases, does one recodify the reality to which one responds? Does some feature of the social context assist or inhibit one in this situation? Simultaneous to one’s outburst, does one react with shame or with pride at the anger? Does one express the anger in ways that work it up or ways that bind it? These are the questions of the interactionist. If we conceptualize emotion as instinct, we never pose questions about these points of social entry in the first place. #RandolphHarris 5 of 28

There are an indefinite number of original or instinctive activities which are organized into interests and dispositions according to the situation to which they respond. Thus, fear or anger have no common origin in a constitutional disposition. Rather, each feeling takes its shape, and in a sense becomes itself only in social context. The self, in the process of charting a course of action actively recharts and alters that course while interacting with the situation. When our feelings are vague and inchoate, the reactions of others to our gestures may help define what we really comes to feel. For example, if a girl has been jilted at the alter and is generally upset about it, the responses of her mother may define the girl’s feelings of sadness and great grief, or of indignation and anger. In such cases, our gestures do not necessarily “express” our prior feeling. They make available to others a sign. However, what it is a sign of may be influenced by their reactions to it. We, in turn, may internalize their imputation and thus define our inchoate feelings. The social interaction of gestures may thus not only express our feelings but define them as well. The girl cries. The mother defines the crying as a sign of anger. The girl responds to her mother’s interpretation of her tears. “Yes, anger more than sadness.” And what the crying “is a sign of” is in this way swayed in interaction with the mother. #RandolphHarris 6 of 28

How do other people influence our understanding of what we feel and, more deeply, even change the “object” of our understanding? How does this influence work differently in differently cultural context? Each situation “taxes” the individual, who in return gets protection from unpredictability and membership in something larger. The affective deviant is one who tries to avoid paying these social taxes. Taxes, in turn, come in emotive currency. For example, embarrassment is an individual’s contribution to the group in the singular sense that embarrassment indicates that the individual cares how one seems in company. Not to feel embarrassed in certain situations is to violate the latent rule that one should care about how the group handles or mishandles one’s identity. The problem with this rendition of reality is that there is no structural bridge between all the situations. There are “taxes” here and “taxes” there but no notion of an overarching pattern that would connect the “collections.” Social structure is only our idea of what many situations of a certain sort add up to. From one fractured island of reality to the next, and all the work of making a situation seem real must begin afresh each time. To solve this problem, we should take this development and link it to institutions on the one had and to personality on the other. This would enable us to account for what we predicate from one situation to the next, in both institutions and individuals. #RandolphHarris 7 of 28

You yourself are the eternal energy which appears as the Universe. You did not come into this World. You came out of it, like a wave from the ocean. You are not a stranger here. Every role one assumes is also audience to all the other, and the play is performed so convincingly that the audience takes it “for real.” Independence training in American society begins almost at birth—babies are held and carried less than in most societies and spend more time in complete isolation—and continues, despite occasional parental ambivalence, throughout childhood and adolescence. When a child is admonished to be a “big boy” or “big girl” this usually means doing something alone without help (the rest of the time it involves strangling feelings, but this norm seems to be on the wane). Signs of independence are usually rewarded, and a child who in too obvious a manner calls attention to the fact that human intelligence is based almost entirely on the process of imitation is ridiculed by calling him a copycat or a monkey (after the paradoxical habit humans have of projecting their most uniquely human attributes onto animals). There have been many complaints in recent years that independence training is less rigorous than it once was, but again, as in the case of competitiveness, this is hard to assess. #RandolphHarris 8 of 28

To be on one’s own in a simple, stable, and familiar environment requires a good deal less internal “independence” than to be on one’s own in a complex, shifting, and strange one. Certainly a child could run about more freely a century ago without coming to harm, and one’s errors and misdeeds had far more trivial consequences than today; but this decline in the child’s freedom of movement says nothing about the degree to which the child is asked to forego the pleasures of depending upon one’s parents for nurturance and support. If the objective need is greater, it may offset a small increase in parental tolerance for dependent behaviour, and cause the child to experience the independence training as more severe rather than less. In any case, American independence training is severe relative to most of the rest of the World, and we might assume this to have emotional consequences. This is not to say that such training is not consonant with the demands of adult society: the two are quite in accord. Sociologists and anthropologists are often content to stop at this point and say that as long as this accord exists there is no problem worth discussing. However, in frustration of any need has its effects (one of them being to increase the society’s vulnerability to social change) and these should be understood. #RandolphHarris 9 of 28

An example might help clarify this issue. Ezra and Suzanne Vogel observe that some Japanese parents encourage dependency as actively as many American parents push independence, and that healthy children and adults in Japan rely heavily on others for emotional support and decisions about their lives. A degree of dependence on the mother which in America would be considered “atypical” prepares the Japanese for a society in which far more dependency is expected and accepted than in ours. The Japanese firm is highly paternalistic and takes a great deal of responsibility for making the individual employee secure and comfortable. The Vogels observe, however, that just as the American mother tends to complain at the success of her effort and feel that her children are too independent, so the Japanese mother tends to feel that her children are too dependent, despite the fact that she has trained them this way. Regardless of the congruence between socialization practices and adult norms, any extreme pattern of training will produce stresses for the individuals involved. And just as the mothers experience discomfort with the effects of these patterns, so do the children, although barred by cultural values from recognizing and naming the nature of their distress, which in our society takes the form of a desire to relinquish responsibility for control and decision-making in one’s daily life. #RandolphHarris 10 of 28

Deeply felt democratic values usually stand in the way of realizing this goal through authoritarian submission, although our attitudes toward democracy are not without ambivalence, as has been suggested elsewhere; but the temptation to abdicate self-direction in more subtle ways is powerful indeed. Perhaps the major problem for Americans is that of choice: Americans are forced into making more choices per day, with fewer “givens,” and more ambiguous criteria, less environmental stability, and less social structural support, then any people in history. Many of the mechanisms through which dependency is counteracted in our society have already been discussed, but a word should be said about the complex problem of internalized controls. In stable societies, as many authors have pointed out, the control of human impulses is usually a collective responsibility. The individual is viewed as not having within oneself the controls required to guarantee that one’s impulses will not break out in ways disapproved by the community. However, this matters very little, since the group is always near at hand to stop one or shame one or punish one should one forget oneself. In more fluid, changing societies we are more apt to find controls that are internalized—that do not depend to so great an extent on control and enforcement by external agents. #RandolphHarris 11 of 28

It has long been characteristic of American society—de Tocqueville observed in 1830 that generally American women were much more independent than European women, freer from chaperonage, and able to appear in what a European would consider “compromising” situations without any sign of involvement in pleasures of the flesh. Chaperonage is in fact the simplest way to illustrate the difference between external and internalized controls. In chaperon cultures—such as traditional Middle-Eastern and Latin societies—it simply did not occur to anyone that a man and a woman could be alone together and not copulate. In American, which represents the opposite extreme, there is almost no situation in which a man and a woman could find themselves in which pleasures of the flesh could not at least be considered problematic (Hollywood comedies have exploited this phenomenon—well past the point of exhaustion and nausea—over the past 35 years). Americans are virtuosi of internalized control of expressions dealing with pleasures of the flesh (the current relaxation of norms involving pleasures of the flesh in no way changes this), and this has caused difficulties whenever the two systems have come into contact. An unchaperoned young lady in a bikini or mini-skirt means one thing in America, another in Baghdad. #RandolphHarris 12 of 28

It is a mistake to consider a chaperon society more prudish—the compliment is likely to be returned when the difference is understood. Even Americans consider some situations inherently to involve pleasures  of the flesh: if a young lady from some mythical culture came to an American’s house, disrobed, and climbed into bed with him, he would assume she was making an overture for pleasures of the flesh and would be rather indignant if he found that she was merely expressing casual friendship according to her native customs. If he were also called prudish, he would be puzzled, and we need not speculate as to what he would call her. However, how are internalized controls created? We know that they are closely tied to what are usually called “love-oriented” techniques of discipline in childhood. These techniques avoid physical punishment and deprivation of privileges and stress reasoning and the withdrawal of parental affection. The basic difference between “love-oriented” and “fear-oriented” techniques (such as physical punishment) is that in the later case the child simply learns to avoid punishment while in the former one tends to incorporate parental values as one’s own in order to avoid losing parental love and approval. #RandolphHarris 13 of 28

When fear-oriented techniques prevail, the child is in the position of inhabitants of an occupied country, who obey to avoid getting hurt but disobey whenever they think they can get away with it. Like them, the child does not have any emotional commitment to one’s rulers—one does not fear losing their love. Love-oriented techniques require by definition that love and discipline emanate from the same source. When this happens it is not merely a question of avoiding the punisher: the child wishes to anticipate the displeasure of the loved and loving parent, wants to be like the parent, and takes into oneself as a part of oneself the values and attitudes of the parent. One wants to please, not placate, and because one has taken the parent’s attitudes as one’s own, pleasing the parents comes to mean making one feel good about oneself. Thus while individuals raised with fear-oriented techniques tend to direct anger outward under stress, those raised with love-oriented techniques tends to direct it inward in the form of guilt—a distinction that has important physiological correlates. Under stable conditions external controls work perfectly well. Everyone knows one’s own place and one’s neighbour’s, and deviations from expected behaviour will be quickly met from all sides. #RandolphHarris 14 of 28

When social conditions fluctuate, social norms change, and people move frequently from one social setting to another and are often among strangers, this will no longer do. An individual cannot take one’s whole community with one wherever one goes, and in any case the rules differ from place to place. The mobile individual must travel light, and internalized controls are portable and transistorized, as it were. Anger directed inward is also made from mobile conditions. In a stable community two youths who start to get into a fight will be held back by their friends—they depend upon this restraint and can abandon themselves to their passion, knowing that it will not produce harmful consequences. However, where one moves among strangers it becomes increasingly important to have other mechanisms for handling aggression. In situations of high mobility and flux the individual must have a built-in readiness to feel oneself responsible when things go wrong. Most modern societies are a confused mixture of both systems, a fact that enables conservative spokes persons to attribute rising crime rates to permissive child-rearing techniques. The overwhelmingly majority of ordinary crimes, however, are committed by individuals who have not been reared with love-oriented techniques, but, insofar as the parents or parents have been able to rear them at all, by the haphazard use of fear-oriented discipline. #RandolphHarris 15 of 28

Love-oriented child-rearing techniques are a luxury that some less affluent parents, for example, can seldom afford, not only for financial reasons, but for social reasons also. Furthermore, it is rather misleading to refer to the heavily guilt-inducing socialization techniques of middle-class parents as “permissive.” Misbehaviour in less affluent children is more often greeted with a cuff, possibly accompanied by some non-informative response such as “stop that!” However, it may not be at all clear to the child which of the many motions one is now performing “that” is’ and indeed, “that” may be punished only when the parent is feeling irritable. A child would have to have achieved an enormously high intelligence level (which, of course, it has not, for his very reason) to be able to form a moral concept out of a hundred irritable stop-that’s. What one usually forms is merely a crude sense of when the “old man” or the “old lady” is to be avoided. The self-conscious, highly verbal, middle-class parent is at the opposite extreme. One feels that discipline should relate to the children’s act, not the parent’s own emotional state, and is very careful to emphasize verbally the principle involved in the misbehaviour (“it is bad to hit people” or “we have to share with guests”). Concept-formation is made very easy for the middle-class child, and one tends to think of moral questions in terms of principles. #RandolphHarris 16 of 28

As one grows older this tendency is reinforced by one’s encounter with different groups with different norms. In a mobile society, one cannot simply accept the absolute validity of any rule because one’s experiences competing moral codes. As a result the middle-class child tends to evolve a system of meta-rules, that is, rules for assessing the relative validity of these codes. The meta-rules tend to be based upon the earliest and most general principles expressed by the parents; such as prohibitions on violence against others, egalitarianism, mutuality, and so on. This ability to treat rules in a highly secular fashion while maintaining a strong moral position is baffling to those whose control mechanisms are more primitive, but it presupposes a powerful and articulate conscience. Such an individual can expose oneself to physical harm and to violence-arousing situations without losing control and while maintaining a moral position. This may seem inconceivable to an uneducated working-class authoritarian whose own impulses are barely held in line by a jerry-built structure of poorly articulated and mutually contradictory moral absolutes. Hence one tends to misinterpret radical middle-class behaviour as a hypocritical mask for mere delinquency. #RandolphHarris 17 of 28

However, internalization is a mixed blessing. It may enable one to get one’s head smashed in a good cause, but the capacity to give oneself up completely to an emotion is almost altogether lost in the process. Where internalization is high there is often a feeling that the controls themselves are out of control—that emotion cannot be expressed when the individual would like to express it. Life is muted, experience filtered, emotion anesthetized, affective discharge incomplete. Efforts to shake free from this hypertrophied control system include not only drugs, and sensation-retrieval techniques such as those developed at the Esalen Institute in California, but also confused attempts to reestablish external systems of direction and control—the vogue currently enjoyed by astrology is an expression of this. The simplest technique, of course, would be the establishment of a more authoritarian social structure, which would relieve the individual of the great burden of examining and moderating one’s own responses. One could become as a child, lighthearted, spontaneous, and passionate, secure in the knowledge that others would prevent one’s impulses from causing one harm. Realization of this goal is prevented by democratic values and the social conditions that foster them (complexity, fluidity, change). #RandolphHarris 18 of 28

However, the desire plays a significant part in conventional reactions to radical underrepresented groups, who are all felt to be seeking the abandonment of self-restraints of one kind or another and at the same time demanding more responsible behavior from the establishment. This is both infuriating and contagious to dominant affluent adults, who would like very much to do the same, and their call for “law and order” (that is, more external control) is an expression of that desire as well as an attempt to smother it. This conflict over dependency and internalization also helps explain why official American anticommunism always lays so much stress on the authoritarian (rather than the socialistic) aspects of Communist states. “And now it came to pass that in the commencement of the thirtieth year of the reign of the judges, on the second day in the first month, Moroni received an epistle from Helaman, stating the affairs of the people in that quarter of the land. And these are the words which he wrote, saying: My dearly beloved brother, Moroni, as well in the Lord as in the tribulations of our warfare; behold, my beloved brother, I have somewhat to tell you concerning our warfare in this part of the land. Behold, two thousand of the sons of those men who Ammon brought down out of the land of Nephi—now ye have known that these were descendants of Laman, who was the eldest son of our father Lehi. #RandolphHarris 19 of 28

“Now I need not rehearse unto you concerning their traditions or their unbelief, for thou knowest concerning all these things. Therefore it sufficeth me that I tell you that two thousand of these young men have taken their weapons of war, and would that I should be their leader; and we have come forth to defend our country. And now ye also know concerning the covenants which their fathers made, that they would not take up their weapons of war against their brethren to shed blood. However, in the twenty and sixth year, when they saw our afflictions our tribulations for them, they were about to break the covenant which they had made and take up their weapons of war in our defence. However, I would not suffer them that they should break this covenant which they had made, supposing that God would strengthen us, insomuch that we should not suffer more because of the fulfilling the oath which they had taken. However, behold, here is one thing in which we may have great joy. For behold, in the twenty and sixth year, I, Helaman, did march at the head of these two thousand young men to the city of Judea, to assist Antipus, whom ye had appointed a leader over the people of that part of the land. And I did join my two thousand sons, (for they are worthy to be called sons) to the army of Antipus, in which strength Antipus did rejoice exceedingly; for behold, his army had been reduced by the Lamanites because their forces had slain a vast number of our men, for which cause we have to mourn. #RandolphHarris 20 of 28

Nevertheless, we may console ourselves in this point, that they have died in the cause of their country and of their God, yea, and they are happy. And the Lamanites had also retained many prisoners, all of whom are chief captains, for none other have they spared alive. And we suppose that they are now at this time in the land of Nephi; it is also if they are not slain. And now these are the cities of which the Lamanites have obtained possession by shedding of the blood of so many of our valiant men: the land of Manti, or the city of Manti, and the city of Zeezrom, and the city of Cumeni, and the city of Antiparah. And these are the cities which they possessed when I arrived at the city of Judea; and I found Antipus and his men toiling with their might to fortify the city. Yea, and they were depressed in body as well as in spirit, for they had fought valiantly by day and toiled by night to maintain their cities; and thus they had suffered great afflictions of every kind. And now they were determined to conquer in this place of die; therefore you may well suppose that this little force which I brought with me, yea, those sons of mine, gave them great hopes and much joy. And now it came to pass that when the Lamanites saw that Antipus had received a greater strength to his army, hey were compelled by the orders of Ammoron to not come against the city of Judea, or against us, to battle. #RandolphHarris 21 of 28

“And thus were we favoured of the Lord; for had they come upon us in this our weakness they might have perhaps destroyed our little army; but thus were we preserved. They were commanded by Ammoron to maintain those cities which they had taken. And thus ended the twenty and sixth year. And in the commencement of the twenty and seventh year we had prepared our city and ourselves for defence. Now we were desirous that the Lamanites should come upon us; for we were not desirous to make an attack upon them in their strongholds. And it came to pass that we kept spies out round about, to watch the movements of the Lamanites, that they might not pass us by night nor by day to make an attack upon our other cities which were on the northward. For we knew in those cities they were not sufficiently strong to meet them; therefore we were desirous, if they should pass by us, to fall upon them in their rear, and thus bring them up in the rear at the same time they were met in the front. We supposed that we could overpower them; but behold, we were disappointed in this our desire. They durst not pass by us with their whole army, neither durst they with a part, lest they should not be sufficiently strong and they should fall. Neither durst they marched down against the city of Zarahemla; neither durst they cross the head of Sidon, over to the city of Nephihah. #RandolphHarris 22 of 28

“And thus, with their forces, they were determined to maintain those cities which they had taken. And now it came to pass in the second month of this year, there was brought unto us many provisions from the fathers of those my two thousand sons. And also there were sent two thousand men unto us from the land of Zarahemla. And thus we were prepared with ten thousand men, and provisions for them, and also for their wives and their children. And the Lamanites, thus seeing our forces increase daily, and provisions arrive for our support, they began to be fearful, and began to sally forth, if it were possible to put an end to our receiving provisions and strength. Now when we saw that the Lamanites began to grow uneasy on this wise, we were desirous to bring a stratagem into effect upon them; therefore Antipus ordered that I should march forth with my little sons to a neighbouring city, as if we were carrying provisions to a neighbouring city. And we were to march near the city of Antiparah, as if we were going to the city beyond, in the borders by the seashore. And it came to pass that we did march forth, as if with our provisions, to go to the city. And it came to pass that Antipus did march forth with a part of his army, leaving the remainder to maintain the city. However, he did not march forth until I had gone forth with my little army, and came near the city Antiparah. #RandolphHarris 23 of 28

“And now, in the city Antiparah were stationed the strongest army of the Lamanites; yea, the most numerous. And it came to pass that we did flee before them, northward. And thus we did lead away the most powerful army of the Lamanites; yea, even to a considerable distance, insomuch that when they saw the army of Antipus pursuing them, with their might, they did not turn to the right nor to the left, but pursued their march in a straight course after us; and, as we suppose, it was their intent to slay us before Antipus should overtake them, and this that they might not be surrounded by our people. And now Antipus, beholding our danger, did speed the march of his army. However, behold, it was night; therefore they did not overtake us, neither did Antipus overtake them; therefore we did camp for the night. And it came to pass that before the dawn of the morning, behold, the Lamanites were pursuing us. Now we were not sufficiently strong to contend with them; yea, I would not suffer that my little sons should fall into their hands; therefore we did continue our march, and we took our march into the wilderness. Now they durst not turn to the right nor to the left lest they should be surrounded; neither would I turn to the right nor to the lest they should overtake me, and we could not stand against them, but be slain, and they would make their escape; and thus we did flee all that day into the wilderness, even until it was dark. #RandolphHarris 24 of 28

“And it came to pass that again, when the light of the morning came we saw the Lamanites upon us, and we did flee before them. However, it came to pass that they did not pursue us far before they halted; and it was in the morning of the third day of the seventh month. And now, whether they were overtaken by Antipus we knew not, but I said unto my men: Behold, we know not but they have halted for the purpose that we should come against them, that they might catch us in their snare; therefore what say ye, my sons, will ye go against them to battle? And now I say unto you, my beloved brother Moroni, that never had I seen so great courage, nay, not amongst all the Nephites. For as I had ever called them my sons (for they were all of them very young) even so they said unto me: Father, behold our God is with us, and he will not suffer that we should fall; then let us go forth; we would not slay our own brethren if they would let us alone; therefore let us go, lest they should overpower the army of Antipus. Now they never had fought, yet they did not fear death; and they did think more upon the liberty of their fathers than they did upon their lives; yea, they had been taught by their mothers, that if they did not doubt, God would deliver them. And they rehearsed unto me the words of their mothers, saying: We do not doubt our mothers knew it. #RandolphHarris 25 of 28

“And it came to pass that I did return with my two thousand against these Lamanites who has pursued us. And now behold, the armies of Antipus has overtaken them, and a terrible battle had commenced. The army of Antipus being weary, because of their long march in so short a space of time, were about to fall into the hands of the Lamanites; and had I not returned with my two thousand they would have obtained their purpose. For Antipus has fallen by the sword, and many of his leaders, because of their weariness, which was occasioned by the speed of their march—therefore the men of Antipus, being confused because of the fall of their leaders, began to give way before the Lamanites. And it came to pass that the Lamanites took courage, and began to pursue them; and thus were the great Lamanites pursuing them with great vigour when Helaman came upon their rear with his two thousand, and began to slay them exceedingly, insomuch that the whole army of the Lamanites halted and turned upon Helaman. Now when the people of Antipus saw that the Lamanites had turned them about, they gathered together their men and came again upon the rear of the Lamanites. And now it came to pass that we, the people of Nephi, the people of Antipus, and I with my two thousand, did surround the Lamanites, and did slay them; yea, insomuch that they were compelled to deliver up their weapons of war and also themselves as prisoners of war. #RandolphHarris 26 of 28

“And now it came to pass that when they had surrendered themselves up unto us, behold, I numbered those young men who had fought with me, fearing lest there were many of them slain. However, behold, to my great joy, there had not one soul of hem fallen to the Earth; yea, and they had fought as if with the strength; and with such mighty power did they fall upon frighten them; and for this cause did the Lamanites deliver themselves up as prisoners of war. And as we have no place for our prisoners, that we could guard them to keep them from the armies of the Lamanites, therefore we sent them to the land of Zarahemla, and a part of those men who were not slain of Antipus, with them; and the remainder I took and joined them to my stripling Ammonites, and took our march back to the city of Judea,” reports Alma 56.1-57. Space was born from you in the time before time, and time itself, and death. The Son of God was born leaping fully armed from the womb, rising up to bring miracles to the World and set an example of Godliness. The water poured out, to be placed in their proper locations, and solid ground was born, to support their weight, to be the cup of heir encircling border. The directions were placed, each where it belonged. And life itself was born, the unpredictable, always yet going where it belongs. #RandolphHarris 27 of 28

“And now I wish to praise the Mother, who made these things to be, the source of existence, granter of life. You to whom we all belong, you who knows the way we should go, I praise you with my words, I hold you in my heart. The righteous shall flourish like the palm tree, and grow mighty like a cedar in Lebanon. Planted in the house of the Lord, they shall flourish in the courts of our God. Even in old age they shall being forth fruit, they shall be full of vigour and strength, declaring that the Lord is just, my Rock in whom there is no unrighteousness. The Lord reigneth; He is robed in majesty; the Lord is robed, He hath girded Himself with strength. Now is the Earthy firmly established; it shall not be moved. Thy throne is established of old; Thou art from everlasting. The waters lift up their voices, O Lord, the waters life up their roaring; yet above the voices of many waters, the mighty waters, breakers of the sea, Thou, O Lord, art might on high. Thy law is true and unfailing; holiness is becoming to Thy house, O Lord, forevermore. Praised be the Lord who is blessed for all eternity. Praised be Thou, O Lord our God, Ruler of the Universe, who with Thy word bringest on the evening twilight, and with Thy wisdom openest the gates of the Heavens. With understanding Thou dost order the cycles of time and variest the seasons, setting the stars in their courses in the sky, according to Thy will. #RandolphHarris 28 of 28

Cresleigh Homes

We know that your kiddos will not let your master bedroom stay this pristine for long, but at least the green paneled accent wall will detract from the twisted up covers.

Head over to the link in our bio to see why living at #PlumasRanch is different from any other community. Explore floor plans, features, and schedule a tour. See ya there! 👋

#CresleighHomes