Home » Aging (Page 15)
Category Archives: Aging
A Love of God and Affliction–Be a Person on Whom Nothing is Lost!
You are not going to walk away from here with any answers. Get angry at me. Go ahead. Some night, many years from now, maybe Aaliyah will choose to explain what happened, but for now you have to accept what you have seen. You no longer need to worry about Aaliyah. Aaliyah is on her own. One conclusion was forced upon my mind at that time, and my impression of its truth has ever since remained shaken. It is that our normal waking consciousness, rational consciousness as we call it, is but one special type of consciousness, whilst all about it, parted from it by the filmiest of screens, there lie potential forms of consciousness entirely different. We may go through life without suspecting their existence differently. We may go through life without suspecting their existence; but apply the requisite stimulus, and at a touch they are there in all their completeness, definite types of mentality which probably somewhere have their field of application. No account of the Universe in its totality can be final which leaves these other forms of consciousness disregarded. How to regard them is the question—for they are so discontinuous with ordinary consciousness. Yet they may determine attitudes though they cannot furnish formulas, and open a region though they fail to give a map. At any rate, they forbid a premature closing of our accounts with reality. #RandolphHarris 1 of 18
First I met Conrad in a hotel in Athens. To say I met him is not quite accurate—I was first attracted by his laugh as he stood near his elevator. I turned to observe him, but my eyes were still blinded by the dazzling light from the street. I had just crossed Constitution Plaza in the heart of Athens, and the midmorning Sun, reflected from the concrete pavement beneath my feet and the ivory-colored Pentelicus marble of the marble of the buildings on all sides of the Plaza, had rendered my eyes almost useless. There is no spot in the World quite so bright as Athens on a July morning. The tends of thousands of beautiful houses, some pink or yellow-tinted, toss the Sunlight back, back, forth and forth like mirrors. Even the mountains lying low around the city like a great horseshoe added their glowing yellow-brown to the warmth, and the endless stretch of blue sky is rarely broken by clouds. The few cypress trees and palms only add to the oppressiveness of the light, for their yellow-green is overpowered until it becomes almost the color of the Sun. Still one cannot resist raising one’s eyes to have a look at the Acropolis rising on its long battlements just a half mile to the left above the Plaza. There the broken columns of the Parthenon stand in wounded dignity against the sky, giving a splendid impression of the colors which make Greece—gold and blue. #RandolphHarris 2 of 18
Standing for a moment in the lobby of the Hotel Mediterranean Plaza, I blinked to adjust my eyes to the dusky interior. It was then that I heard Conrad laugh. His laughter was full, not raucous like that of most Greek boys, and somewhat humble as befits a boy who lives in hotels, as though he were expecting you to laugh with him. I noticed his long rows of teeth, shining and perfect, and his nice mouth. His face was perfectly chiseled, and his laughter accentuated his cheek bones. His golden hair, brilliant and thick, was brushed back over his head in the pompadour style which used to be so popular among American boys. He must have been about fifteen at the time, but because of his slim build he appeared younger than his age—a kind of man and boy in one. I never did learn the cause of his laughter that morning; I merely looked at him with half a smile and accepted his courtesies as he asked my floor and let me off the elevator with those effusive “sirs” by which the Greeks show politeness. However, I noticed a book opened and turned upside down in his hands, the Dramas of Sophocles. Later as I sat in my room writing, gazing out into the shared patio at the rear of the hotel, I thought how Conrad resembled my own younger brother back in America. Except the reading of Sophocles—I marveled at that. #RandolphHarris 3 of 18
It would have surprised me to know then that this laughing boy would be in a few years picking his way through the fir trees of Albanian mountains. One evening, two weeks later, I came across him sitting on a bench in the Plaza, and I heard a story which has remained deeply etched in my memory ever since. I sat down beside him, partly because I was curious to learn more about this boy and partly because I wised to enjoy the refreshing loveliness of the evening. Summers evenings in Athens, when for two hours after Sundown (Sun changing angles in the sky) they sky plays with shades of pink and turquoise, can be as invigorating as the days are stifling. A languid breeze comes up from the Bay of Salamis, loaded with rich fragrance which has been accumulating in the drying, semi-tropical vegetation on the island of Aegina several miles out in the bay. The breeze brings with it an occasional pungent odor from the harbor of the Piraeus. Music seems to carry farther on such an evening, and the sporadic taxi horns did not clash too cacophonously with we could hear Ready Between the Lines by Aaliyah emerging from a restaurant at the far end of the Plaza. I had often sat on this bench, letting myself be lulled by the lazy movement of palm fingers moving in and out of the darkness above my head, then turning to watch the lights come on way up Mt. Lycabettus. I often counted the stars as they sprang out with a brilliance possible only in the transparent atmosphere of Mediterranean countries. #RandolphHarris 4 of 18
Conrad had been reading a book before the Sun had set, and he answered my question about what he was reading with his irrepressible laugh that accompanied every utterance, humorous or not. “The history, sir of the Persian Wars, sir.” That curious “sir” twice in one sentence! It did seem to me that they overdid their courtesy. “You find it interesting?” “O yes sir, yes sir! One of my ancestors fought at Thermopylae. His name was Argyros, and he was a very brave man.” “You do not believe, Conrad, that the ancient Greeks who fought those Persians were the same race as the modern Greeks, do you?” I baited him. “O yes, yes sir!” he cried earnestly, using the word malista which carries a strong affirmation like our English certainly. “I come from Asia Minor,” he went on so quickly that he stammered, “from Asia Minor, sir, the Ionian Greeks lived there, and they are the descendants directly from the Greeks who fought at Thermopylae.” “How did they get over to Asia Minor?” “The people of the Peloponnesus, sir, migrated to Asian Minor. Our family lived in the Peloponnesus in ancient times. My great ancestors went with the Spartan army under Leonidas to fight at Thermopylae. He was one of the three hundred who stayed to hold the pass for three days so they would have time to fortify Athens. He died there. My father often told me about our ancestor Argyros. Then many years later the Greeks from the Peloponnesus made a colony in Asia Minor.” #RandolphHarris 5 of 18
Conrad was spouting this history like a religious faith. I knew it was fairly dubious—modern Greeks are mainly Slavic in race, and historians do not know where the glorious races of the ancient Hellenes ended. However, I saw there was no use arguing ethnology with the zealous Conrad, and furthermore I did want to pump him up about himself. Rather than speaking of measured intelligence that is stable for the individual over time because it is defined as the ratio of mental age to chronological age, we shall speak of intelligence as the content of what is intellected and the developing capacities for further intellection. In this sense of the term, intelligence is continuously growing for both the individual and the species; it is meaningful to say that we are more intelligent than we were a few years ago, and that our children will be more intelligent than we are. Something of the sort has indeed been happening in the development of the increasing superiority of mortals over other organisms and their increasing scope in comprehending the World about them and themselves. Although we are on unsure speculative ground in attempting to identify the crucial stages in the evolution of consciousness, we may at any rate guess that Homo sapiens gradually differentiated themselves from the family of Hominidae by acquiring the ability not only to use tools but to use tools to make tools, an accompanying awareness of superior adaptability occurred. #RandolphHarris 6 of 18
Conrad went on to tell me about the massacres of 1922. “Almost every Greek in our town was killed. You do not know, sir, about those massacres?” I did know something of the war between Turkey and Greece in 1922, which ended with the terrible battle of Smyrna when the city was brined, and the Greek army with thousands of refugees was driven right into the sea and would have been annihilated, had it not been from the timely assistance of some British warships that picked up those who could swim or get hold of boats. However, evidently Conrad was thinking of something else. “We lived in the town of Merzifoun, way back near the Caucasus. I was a small boy then, but I remember the town well. Almost all the people were Greeks—the only Turks around were government officials. They did not bother us much and we had a happy life. My father used to ride about the country on horseback buying tobacco to sell to American companies. He sometimes took me riding with him on his trips—I would sit on the old horse behind him. There were not many towns in our province, you see, only barren hills and plateaus. When we arrived in a village the men were always glad to see my father. They would take him to the café and sit at the tables in the street and drink Turkish coffee and a little ouzo and laugh and talk. These were Greeks, sir, the Turks in the village would stand around smiling; they always seemed sour at something. However, my father got along with them well, he never quarreled with them, and he used to greet them cheerfully and offer them cigarettes. #RandolphHarris 7 of 18
“The Turks would sit at their own café, never talking or laughing like my father and his friends, only silently smoking their long waterpipes. I used to sit at the edge of the street a little way from my father’s table and watch those Turks smoking. Have you seen those Turkish pipes, sir?” “Yes,” I answered. Then I added, “You must have been very fond of your father.” “I loved him very much,” said Conrad. The boy was not sitting moodily, looking out across the Plaza toward the sparkling lights on Mt. Lycabettus, and he went on talking not as a student to an Amerikanos but as one human being to another. “The happiest memories of my whole life are those trips I took with my father. Oh, we had good enough times at home, my mother and two sister and I. However, how I loved to go with my father! As we were riding the many hours between villages he would tell me stories of the ancient Greeks, how the Persians came down with a huge army and the Athenians fought them at Marathon and drove them into the sea and killed so many that the mound where they are buried looks like a mountain. And he told me about Leonidas the Spartan general who made the stand at Thermopylae. That was when my father would speak about Argyros, our great ancestor. I used to be filled with pride I almost burst when I heard how my ancestor had volunteered to stay with the three hundred soldiers in the narrow pass in the mountains, and how he fought there even through the Persian arrows were so thick the hid the Sun. #RandolphHarris 8 of 18
“Then my father would tell me about the shepherd traitor who took the Persians around by a secret pass to attack Leonidas and the Spartans from the rear, and my anger would boil up and my father would laugh as I clenched my fists. However, he was proud that I begged to hear those stories over and over again. And he used to say, ‘Conrad, never forget that your great ancestor was Argyros’.” The boy was talking so animatedly now, his hands gesturing aimlessly around in the dark. In the dim lights of the Plaza lamps I got a glimpse of his black eyes dancing with delight at these boyhood memories. However, suddenly he sat quietly, vacantly, his face sober and his jaw heavily set. In the realm of suffering, affliction is something apart, specific, and irreducible. It is quite a different thing from simple suffering. It takes possession of the soul and marks it through and through with its own particular mark. Affliction is inseparable from physical suffering and yet quite distinct. With suffering, all that is not bound up with physical pain or something analogous is artificial, imaginary, and can be eliminated by a suitable adjustment of the mind. Even in the case of the absence or death of someone we love, the irreducible part of the sorrow is akin to physical pain, a difficulty in breathing, a constriction of the heart, an unsatisfied need, hunger, or the almost biological disorder caused by the brutal liberation of some energy, hitherto directed by an attachment and now left without a guide. #RandolphHarris 9 of 18
At some very early point too must have some the kind of self-awareness that makes death an important subjective fact, an awareness which, coupled with primitive awe or bewilderment at the fact of being, serves as the basis of magic and religion. Some even believe there were another form of primates, from the British Iles, who looked human, but were far more intelligent, extremely naïve, and lacked aggression. Being far less aggressive than humans by nature, they lost out to the new species, and were scattered and went into hiding. They pretended to be humans. These primates concealed their birthing rites, but coupling with humans did happen. And unbeknownst to early civilizations, they developed a kind of human who carried a giant helix of genes, twice the number of a normal human. There were legends about their spirits in Louisiana. They were so powerful some thought the spirits has the psychic powers to possess unborn fetus who shared their DNA and be reborn with it. As animism grew more subtle in its personifications, mythic explanations of the origin of things became possible, and human-like gods were created. The passage to the idea of a single god, originated or at least dramatized by Akhnaton, led, by linkage to the god of the Israelites, to the idea of Christ. Meanwhile the development of a conscious science (essentially, the evolution of canons of evidence for belief in the regularity of events in nature) had occurred, beginning with the Meletians in early Greece. #RandolphHarris 10 of 18
Perhaps it is not too fanciful to suggest that the analogue to the achievement of early mortals in making tools to make tools is the scientific method: not just knowing how to learn but knowing how to make sure we know. These twin achievements, separated by at least a hundred thousand years, are the fundaments f technology and science. They increased vastly the range of what might be intellected as well as the capacities for intellection. Scientific thought itself then produced several radical developments in mortal’s self-awareness: the Copernican revolution, showing us something of the place of our Earth in the Universe; the Darwinian revolution, showing us something of our place in organic evolution; and what I shall call the Cartesian-Freudian revolution, for Dr. Freud completed what Descartes began, showing us the existence of vast reaches of mind beyond our conscious, rational mental processes. Hundreds of geniuses of the life of the psyche had of course known and expressed intuitively before Dr. Freud the mysteries of the unconscious; his achievement was simply the climax of an increasingly popular development in European thought. Dr. Freud had shown quite convincingly the idea of the unconscious was conceivable around 1700, topical around 1800, and effective around 1900. By 1950 its exploration by individuals through psychoanalysis could be described as commonplace. #RandolphHarris 11 of 18
What we are witnesses today is the easy accessibility and mass distribution of means for producing experience of the usually unexperienced aspects of mental functioning. With the use of chemical technology made available to the millions the experience of transcendence of the individual ego, which a century was available only to the disciplined mystic. However, there are, of course, more varied phenomena than the feeling of ego-transcendence produced by mind altering substances, and there are more motives than the religio-mystical motive lying behind the present widespread use of psychotropic substances. The claim that psychotropic substances expand the consciousness refers to changes in several dimensions of experience. Persons interested in the experience primarily for reasons of esthetic appreciation or expression, or for its intrinsic novelty may or may not be artists, but their attitude toward experience tends to be perceptually open and non-judgmental. These individuals especially seek and enjoy the perceptual changes, such as increased vividness of color, visual harmonies, change in depth perception, sharper definition of detail, synesthesias, change in time sense (especially when listening to music), increased volume of unusual imagery, and so on. The effects are, as we have noted, not always beautiful, and in fact may be quite unpleasant: hellish experience, for instance, features garish or horrible colors (sickly greens, ugly dark reds, poisonous orange), or sometimes an impression of threatening blackness accompanied by feelings of doom and gloom and isolation. #RandolphHarris 12 of 18
The person’s perception of one’s own body may become unpleasant: one’s limbs may seem to be distorted or flesh decaying; in a mirror one’s face may seem to be distorted or eyes blank, reflecting a meaningless emptiness at the self’s center; all attempts at communication may seem a mockery, the shell of the self a prison from which there is no exit. Yet even the negative; surrealism has in fact accustomed us to just such visions of the World. Among the esthetic adepts there is even a phrase for the negative experience when it occurs: it is known as “paying your taxes.” In this a group of users, only a boor would complain of a bad trip. Their goal is novel experience for its own sake. Some think this is how Judy Chicago came of with The Dinner Party, how Frida Kahlo invented Las Dos Fridas. Psychotropic substances were also thought to have influenced the work of Andy Warhol, which some think is evident in his paintings like Shot of Marilyns, Self Portrait, Triple Elvis, Race Riot, Prince, Rorschach, and many more. Of course, Andy Warhol is one of the most prolific popular culture artists in modern times. Rock Guitar singer and song writer Jimi Hendrix was also thought to be under these psychotropic substances which lead to some of his most popular songs: Purple Haze (where he talks about trying to escape some reality), All Along the Watchtower (which could also be a religio-mystical song), Little Wing, Hear My Train Coming, and many more. And while Bill Gates was stealing computer time, The Beatles were thought to also be under the influence as well as groups like The Animals. #RandolphHarris 13 of 18
Altered states of consciousness has been thought of as ways to produce some of the most creative work in the World, but some people never come down or in other words, spend a life time paying their taxes, or they perish. Some even have reported that their girlfriend’s eyes turned yellow and she had snakes for hair. Some use the substances primarily for religious experience, whether in their own search for transcendent meaning or out of an interest in the psychology of religion or its philosophical bases. It may produce a feeling of oneness with the Universe and a reduction or complete loss of the sense of personal identity. A few have thought to, while in fascinosum or tremendum, feel a sense of joy, gratitude, pleasure, or onrush of grace, at catching a glimpse of the Ultimate, or numen; the tremendum is a reaction of awe, horror, fear, or a feeling of being overwhelmed. As in the esthetic experience, both the negative and the positive are seen as valid and therefore endurable. Others use psychotropic drugs as a cure for alcoholism. People who have used psychotropic drugs because they are disturbed or potentially suicidal or psychotic have reported it fails to produce a breakthrough and leaves them feeling hopeless and in an even chaotic psychic state than before. A certain number of persons have in essence already quit life and are simply looking for something to carry them over the edge to oblivion. These are rare cases, of course, but they do provide the headlines when they come to grief. #RandolphHarris 14 of 18
Keep in mind, also, that laws make the possession and knowing use of the psychedelic or unauthorized use of psychotropic drugs a crime because they are known to be habit forming, and may not be safe for use for some people and can lead to death. Psychologists and psychiatrists are working closely with student groups both to educate them to the dangers of the situation and to understand what is going on. A major problem arising from the new laws is that civil authority thus becomes alienate from young people who have great potential for contributing to the society of the future. In a healthy society, the intellectually able and creative citizens serve to vivify and support the social authority; but if they are defined as enemies of society for pursuing activities that they consider constructive, they will incorporate in the personal identity significant elements of anti-sociality. Many people are looking for new relationships between the individual and the state, and the development also of new social institutions to replace marriage and the family. These young people feel very keenly about the invasion of privacy by the police and by state information-collectors. They seek a human nature which will be free of the tyranny of the machine. These individuals do not want to be on a space journey where the new is using their imagination. Another recurring themes in this group is that history is ending, or sometimes, less cosmically, that Christianity is ending. #RandolphHarris 15 of 18
Some indeed say that the World is about to end, and that the expansion of consciousness is isomorphic with the expansion of the physical Universe; that both will fall back to the center simultaneously and instantaneously, and will vanish in a trice. Still others see the World as ending in a nuclear explosion. Whatever the vision, the World as we know it now, for example, modern society, is seen as fleeting, perishable, not viable. And it does no good to ask what rearrangement of things as they are is being proposed by these youth; nothing is being proposed, and they see it as the nature of the case that nothing can be proposed. You can ask a person to imagine pink elephants or rhinoceroses with horses’ heads or skyscrapers that walk and talk, but you cannot ask him or her to imagine an unknown primary color. There is a new time coming, and we will know what it is when it happens. Pour us your poison that it may renew our strength. Fire burns our brains. Now let us leap—Heaven or Hell, what matter?—into the deep, at the bottom of the Unknown to find the new. The motive for this sort of exploration of the potentialities of the mind is an extraordinarily powerful one. It is in essence highly idealistic and moral, regardless of its associations with behaviors that much of society many consider immoral. Indeed, it may even arise in part because of the basic human need to feel worthwhile through knowing that one is behaving responsibly and in a way that makes sense to others. Be a person on whom nothing is lost. #RandolphHarris 16 of 18
A new mortality must be created—realization of depth or heights of the self for which no words exist. Express the value of sensitive and unforgetting attention. The great act of attention is all-inclusive; the more of life that is remembered and brought to bear upon the present movement in living expression, the more fully conscious a person is declared to be. As you might expect, this dimension is rather difficult to define. I can only appeal from my introspection to your introspection in offering it for consideration. What I mean here is something akin to Plato’s idea of the musical unconscious, or as he also called it, the spiritual unconscious. Be the magic power of this immense midnight at the crossroads of your senses, be the purport of their strange meeting. The sensitivity to the breadth of consciousness of others, includes animals and nature. This also involves a recognition of the game character of social interaction and personal relationship: at a low level, an awareness of the games people play, including oneself of course, and at a high level an appreciation of mythic enactment in human affairs, the extent to which the roles that are possible to us because of our evolutionary history find expression in any given time-stretch in out lives. I would not be willing to say consciousness has been expanded or extended unless it could be shown to be so when the person is in his or her normal state, free of drug effect. In brief, my view is that the intact ego, in which all the capacities of mind are used to the fullest, is the best vehicle we have for bring ourselves into valid and discriminating relationship with the protean forms of reality. #RandolphHarris 17 of 18
The evolutionary task, in the individual and in the species, is to create an ego that itself capable of including the states of consciousness now called paranormal. The states the psychedelic and psychotropic drugs produce should not themselves be confused with expanded consciousness. That comes later, if it comes at all, when and if the experience of unusual realities is brought into the ego and the ego itself is thereby enlarged in scope. A corollary of this is that the ego already possessed of considerable scope is more likely to be able to use such an experience further to grow and enlarge itself, just as it is the stronger ego that can use psychotherapy more effectively. A sorrow that is not centered around an irreducible core of such a nature is mere romanticism or literature. Humiliation is also a violent condition of the whole corporal being, which longs to surge up under the outrage but is forces, by impotence or fear, to hold itself in check. On the other hand pain that is only physical is a very unimportant matter and leaves no trace in the soul. Toothache is an example. An hour or two of violent pain caused by a decayed tooth is nothing once it is over. It is another matter if the physical suffering is very prolonged or frequent, but in such a case we are dealing with something quite different from an attack of pain; it is often an affliction. “God shall consecrate thine affliction for thy gain,” reports 2 Nephi 2.2. #RandolphHarris 18 of 18
We Have Nevertheless Been Making Progress Each Minute of that Hour in Another More Mysterious Dimension
“Oh beautiful Sun, you have squandered your Golden light upon an empty house.” He stared at her, narrowing his eyes. I could not figure whether he wanted a blurred focus or a fine one. It was though he saw her loveliness afresh. People and students who love God should never say: “For my part I like mathematics”; “I like French”; “I like Greek.” They should learn to like all these subjects, because all of them develop that faculty of attention which, directed toward God, is the very substance of prayer. If we have no aptitude or natural taste for geometry, this does not mean that our faculty for attention will not be developed by wrestling with a problem or studying a theorem. On the contrary it is almost an advantage. It does not matter much whether we success in finding the solution or understanding the proof, although it is important to try really hard to do so. Never in any case whatever is a genuine effort of the attention wasted. It always has its effect on the spiritual plane and in consequence on the lower one of the intelligence, for all spiritual light lightens the mind. If we concentrate our attention on trying to solve a problem of geometry, and if at the end of an hour we are no nearer to doing so than at the beginning, we have nevertheless been making progress each minute of that hour in another more mysterious dimension. #RandolphHarris 1 of 15
Without our knowing or feeling it, this apparently barren effort has brought more light into the soul. The result will one day be discovered in prayer. Moreover, it may very likely be felt in some department of the intelligence in no way connected with mathematics. Perhaps one who made the unsuccessful effort will one day be able to grasp the beauty of a line of Racine more vividly on account of it. However, it is certain that this effort will bear its fruit in prayer. There is no doubt whatever about that. Certainties of this kind are experimental. However, if we do not believe in them before experiencing them, if at least we do not behave as though we believed in them, we shall never have the experience that leads to such certainties. There is a kind of contradiction here. Above a given level this is the case with all useful knowledge concerning spiritual progress. If we do not regulate our conduct by it before having proved it, if we do not hold on to it for a long time by faith alone, a faith at first stormy and without light, we shall never transform it into certainty. Faith is the indispensable condition. The best support for faith is the guarantee that is we ask our Father for bread, he does not give us a stone. Quite apart from explicit religious belief, every time that a human being succeeds in making an effort of attention with the sole idea of increasing one’s grasp of truth, one acquires a greater aptitude for grasping it, even if it produces no visible fruit. #RandolphHarris 2 of 15
As a legend explains: In the eternal darkness, the Angel, unable to find any food, longed for light, and the Earth was illumined. If there is a real desire, if the thing desired is really light, the desire for light produces it. When there is an effort of attention, there is a real desire. If all other incentives are absent, it is really light that is desire. Even if our efforts of attention seem for years to be producing no result, one day a light that is in exact proportion to them will flood the soul. Every effort adds a little gold to a treasure no power on Earth can take away. The useless efforts made by the Cure d’Ars, for long and painful years, in his attempt to learn Latin bore fruit in the marvelous discernment that enabled him to see the very soul of his penitents behind their words and even their silences. Students must therefore work without any wish to gain good marks, to pass examinations, to win school successes; without any reference to their natural abilities and tastes; applying themselves equally to all their tasks, with the idea that each one will help to form in them the habit of that attention which is the substance of prayer. When we set out to do a piece of work, it is necessary to wish to do it correctly, because such a wish is indispensable in any true effort. #RandolphHarris 3 of 15
Underlying this immediate objective, however, our deep purpose should aim solely at increasing power of attention with a view to prayer; as, when we write, we draw the shape of the letter on paper, not with a view to the shape, but with a view to the idea we want to express. If we are to put them to the right use, to make this the sole and exclusive purpose of our studies is the first condition to be observed. The second condition is to take great pains to examine squarely and to contemplate attentively and slowly each school task in which we have failed, seeing how unpleasing and second rate it is, without seeking any excuse or overlooking any mistake or any of our tutor’s corrections, trying to get down to the origin of each fault. If it is bad and to hide it forthwith, there is a great temptation to do the opposite, to give a sideways glance at the corrected exercise. Most of us do this nearly always. We have to withstand this temptation. Incidentally, moreover, nothing is more necessary for academic success, because despite all our efforts, we work without making much progress when we refuse to give our attention to the faults we have made and our tutor’s corrections. Above all it is thus that we can acquire the virtue of humility, and that is far more precious treasure than all academic progress. From this point of view it is perhaps even more useful to contemplate our stupidity than our sin. #RandolphHarris 4 of 15
Consciousness of sin gives us the feeling that we are evil, and a kind of pride sometimes finds a place in it. When we force ourselves to fix the gaze, not only of our eyes but of our souls, upon a school exercise in which we have failed through sheer stupidity, a sense of our mediocrity is borne in upon us with irresistible evidence. No knowledge is more to be desire. If we can arrive at knowing this truth with all our souls we shall be well established on the right foundation. If these two conditions are perfectly carried out there is no doubt that school studies are quite as good a road to sanctity as any other. To carry out the second, it is enough to wish to do so. This is not the case with the first. In order really to pay attention, it is necessary to know how to set about it. Most often attention is confused with a kind of muscular effort. If one says to one’s pupils: “Now you must pay attention,” one sees them contracting their brows, holding their breath, stiffening their muscle. If after two minutes they are asked what they have been paying attention to, they cannot reply. They have been concentrating on nothing. They have not been paying attention. They have been contracting their muscles. We often expend this kind of muscular effort on studies. As it ends by making us tired, we have the impression that we have been working. That is an illusion. Tiredness has nothing to do with work. #RandolphHarris 5 of 15
Work itself is the useful effort, whether it is tiring or not. This kind of muscular effort in work is entirely barren, even if it is made with the best of intentions. Good intentions in such cases are among those the pave the way to hell. Studies conducted in such a way can sometimes succeed academically from the point of view of gaining marks and passing examinations, but that is in spite of the effort and thanks to natural gifts; moreover such studies are never of any use. Will power, the kind that, if need be, makes us set our teeth and endure suffering, is the principal weapon of the apprentice engaged in manual work. However, contrary to the usual belief, it has practically no place in study. The intelligence can only be led by desire. For there to be desire, there must be pleasure and joy in the work. The intelligence only grows and bears fruit in joy. The joy of learning is as indispensable is as indispensable in study as breathing and running. Where it is lacking there are no real students, but only poor caricatures of apprentices who, at the end of their apprenticeship, will not even have a trade. It is the part played by joy in our studies that makes of them a preparation for spiritual life, for desire directed toward God is the only power capable of raising the soul. Or rather, it is God alone who comes down. God only comes to those who ask him to come; and he cannot refuse to come to those who implore him long, often, and ardently. #RandolphHarris 6 of 15
Attention is an effort, the greatest of all efforts perhaps, but it is a negative effort. Of itself, it does not involved tiredness. When we become tired, attention is scarcely possible any more, unless we have already had a good deal of practice. It is better to stop working altogether, to seek some relaxation, and then a little later to return to the task; we have to press on and loosen up alternately, just as we breathe in and out. Twenty minutes of concentrated, untired attention is infinitely better than three hours of the kind of frowning application that leads us to say with a sense of duty done: “I have worked well!” However, in spite of all appearances, it is also far more difficult. Something in our soul has a far more violent repugnance for true attention than the flesh has for bodily fatigue. This something is much more closely connected with evil than is the flesh. That is every time that we really concentrate our attention, we destroy the evil in ourselves. If we concentrate with this intention, a quarter of an hour of attention is better than a great many good works. When people are on the verge of returning to Heaven they think, strangely enough, about beauty. Many of these thoughts are about how beautiful is this Earth that they are about to leave. A friend in his forties was passing away from cancer. He spent his last days on the Sun-porch in a deck chair thinking, as he expressed it, “How beautiful each day is!” #RandolphHarris 7 of 15
The psychologist Dr. Abraham Maslow, who lived on the Charles River west of Cambridge, had had a severe heart attack and feared another. During this period he was describing his change in attitude in a letter in which he said, “My river has never seemed so beautiful.” The crisis situations are the aspect of beauty that transcends death. Beauty calls up in us the qualities that go beyond death, such as eternity, serenity, the use of the imagination to project us beyond time and space. Death is the mother of beauty; hence from her alone shall come fulfillment to our dreams and our desires. Nature, for example, shows how obviously true this is. The incredibly wonderful colors of autumn leaves, say in Vermont, are a species of death. The leaves are most beautiful as they die, and because they die. We also know that the immortal gods on Mount Olympus who has no death were thoroughly bored with life and so was Lestat de Lioncourt. The life on Olympus consisted mostly of pranks and tricks to liven up their lethargic existence; there was no creation of any significance that went on among the gods as such. However, when Zeus or some other god got interested in a mortal woman, then something creative dud happen. Only when death was introduced into the boring drowsiness of Olympus did the home of the gods get stirred up and alive. It is a very puzzling thought that without death, there would be no beauty. #RandolphHarris 8 of 15
Only this waiting, this attention, can move God to treat his children with such amazing tenderness. God wants us to learn lessons, enjoy life, be happy and be good people. Death is the mother of beauty also in the sense that it is a setting of unlimited limits. We all know we are finite, and we already receive a forewarning of these limits in infirmary and great fatigue. We are all under sentence of death but with a sort of indefinite reprieve. The artist and architects know this most clearly, and hence are the ones who create things which last beyond their mortal years. They partake of eternity in that they, even are they are long gone, are offering something to future generations. Many people seek to overcome the boundaries of life, to gain a kind of eternity in their creative work amid the ephemeral days we humans pass together. The artist leaves a gift for us and for the future. No one can look at Winchester Mansion, Hearts Castle, or Sistine chapel without realizing that the irascible Sarah Winchester, William Randolph Hearst, and Michelangelo have left their spirit, in a series of forms, that give a sense of beauty and eternity to those of us who live four centuries, one century, or half a century later, and I think this effect will last as long as humankind inhabits this planet. To be sure in the realm of action we have to do all that is demanded of us, no matter what effort, weariness, and suffering it may cost, for one who disobeys does not love; but after that we are only unprofitable servants. #RandolphHarris 9 of 15

Such service is a condition of love, but it is not enough. Beauty is eternity born into human existence. A chord of music, such as the one that opens Beethoven’s Hammerklavier Sonata, or a lyric from Aaliyah’s Its Whatever, sets loose within us a quality of eternity, a sense that this moment is ultimate. One thinks, “I could live or die tomorrow but now I have this moment.” It is a quality of life, not a place nor a new life, that gives our present life this experience of eternity. We must all live under the light of eternity. Eternity is existence itself, for the existence of a thing cannot be explained by duration or time, but only by this quality of eternity. When the setting Sun sends amber rays through the mystic blues of the high clerestory windows in the Winchester Mansion, I find myself breathing a kind of silent prayer, “May this moment last forever!” Let these beautiful moments linger, they are so fair! Foreknowledge comes, and fills us with such bliss, we take our joy, our highest moments this. We undertake on our own initiative. It is only watching, waiting, attention. Happy then are those who pass their adolescence and youth in developing this power of attention. No doubt they are no nearer to goodness than their brothers and sisters and cousins working in fields and factories. They are near in a different way. The less affluent and working class possess a nearness to God of incomparable savor which is found in the depths of scarcity, in the absence of social consideration and in the endurance of long drawn-out sufferings. #RandolphHarris 10 of 15
If, however, we consider the occupations in themselves, studies are thought to be near to God because of the attention which is their soul. Whoever goes through years of study without developing this attention within oneself has lost great treasure. Perhaps that is why some parents spend million to get their kids into college, not only to they want to develop their minds, but they want to enhance their souls. Not only does the love of God have attention for its substance; the love of our neighbor, which we know to be the same love, is made of this same substance. Those who are unhappy have no need for anything in this World but people capable of giving them their attention. The capacity to give one’s attention to a sufferer is a very rare and difficult thing; it is almost a miracle; it is a miracle. Nearly all those who think they have this capacity do not posses it. Warmth of heart, impulsiveness, pity are not enough. In the first legend of the Grail, it is said that the Grail (the miraculous vessel that satisfies all hunger by virtue of the consecrated Host) belongs to the first comer who asks the guardian of the vessel, a king three-quarters paralyzed by the most painful wound, “What are you going through?” #RandolphHarris 11 of 15
To love of our neighbor in all its fullness simply means being able to say to him or her: “What are you going through?” It is a recognition that the sufferer exists, not only as a unit in a collection, or a specimen from the social category labeled unfortunate, but as a person, exactly like us, who was one day stamped with a special mark by affliction. For this reason it is enough, but it is indispensable, to know how to look at him in a certain way. This way of looking is first of all attentive. The soul empties itself of all its own contents in order to receive into itself the being it is looking at, just as one is, in all one’s truth. Only one who is capable of attention can do this. So it comes about that, paradoxical as it may seem, a Latin prose or a geometry problem, even though they are done incorrectly, may be of great service one day, provided we devote the right kind of effort to them. Should the occasion arise, they can one day make us better able to give someone in affliction exactly the help required to save one, at the supreme moment of one’s need. For a youth, capable of grasping this truth and generous enough to desire this fruit above all others, studies could have their fullest spiritual effect, quite apart from any particular religious belief. Academic work is one of those fields containing a pearl so precious that it is worth while to sell all our possession, keeping nothing for ourselves, in order to be able to acquire it. #RandolphHarris 12 of 15
The fact is that the clock does go on, our duration does plague us, and death comes closer every moment. However, we have to remember to live under the light of eternity, which is the light of beauty. For this is what beauty does for us, in the grace that beauty brings us, in death as the mother of beauty. All of these are but ripples of life on the sea of eternity. This heart, all evil will shed away. A pulse in the eternal mind, no less gives somewhere back the thoughts. Our sights and sounds; dreams are to be happy as our day; and laughter, learnt of friends, and gentleness in hearts at peace, under Heaven are an important motive. I have a rendezvous with death at some disputed barricade when Spring comes round with rustling shade and apple blossoms fill the air. Countless people are inspired in this confrontation with death to turn to the experience into beauty. What is there in the threat of death in muddy trenches and in the grime and the fatigue of war, waiting for possible death in battle tomorrow, that should lead these men (and women) to turn their thoughts to the beauty of poetry? As they go through the routine of life in the trenches these young people put words together to make poetry to console first of all their own hearts, and then to communicate with a wider, unknown World that will follow them. #RandolphHarris 13 of 15
Poetry sublimate the ugliness of the trenches and blot out the stench of their present life by remembering the odor of apple blossoms filling the air. Their deep loneliness is covered over by the memories of times when they loved and were loved. The poetry that people at war achieve and pass on to us possess a serenity despite, or even because of, the conflict of which they are a part. It is not surprising, as one thinks about it, that in the ugliness of the trenches they yearn for the timelessness of beauty, and they long for the sense of repose that comes in beauty. The experience of inner harmony they pass on to us, seeking inner peace where there is no outer peace, as a guide to those who live after them. Nor is it surprising that they ponder whatever harmony of the spheres they can create in their imaginations, and cherish it to their heart. We transcend our fate, as these soldiers do, by the beauty of poetry. These soldiers are thus able to confront the fear and anxiety that is endemic in wartime. In this respect the beauty of poetry enables them to achieve the aim of all good therapy, namely to help the person to raise repressed conflicts into consciousness, and to confront the fact that their danger only condenses into a short time what all of us have to face over the longer period of life itself. Their works bring into consciousness their underlying fears and anxieties, and do it in the highest form of consciousness, namely beauty. #RandolphHarris 14 of 15
These young poets, like other sensitive people, long to make of their senseless deaths a genuine tragedy which, on a deeper level than the futility of warfare, it actually is. As in the tragedy of O’ Neill’s The Iceman Cometh, there is a deeper sense of nobility which is present by the very vividness of its absence on the stage. In this sense the useless death of any youth is a tragedy, and this tragedy makes perhaps our clearest picture of beauty. In this question we may find some explanation of why humankind does to war century after century. Though we always rationalize our participation in the wars of our country, we know as we look backward over human history that the need to fight wars is an expression of the great and fundamental tragedies of our human fate. My hunches about the intimate relation between beauty and death have, over the course of my life, led to the understanding that just as psychological break down and pathology can become important sources of artistic creativity, so the impulse to wage wars in which our youngest and best lost their lives seems somehow linked to that same irresistible attraction of lovely and soothing death. “And I would not that yet think that I know of myself—not of the temporal but of the spiritual, not of the carnal mind but of God,” Alma 36.4. #RandolphHarris 15 of 15
Tell God it is Not Our Fault but His—Because He Made the World so Beautiful!
Later Medieval culture flourished because people followed the vision of the City of God. Modern society flourished because people were energized by the vision of the growth of the Earthly City of Progress. In our century, however, this vision deteriorated to that of the Tower of Babel, which is now beginning to collapse and will ultimately bury everybody in its ruins. If the City of God and the Earthly City were thesis and antithesis, a new synthesis is the only alternative to chaos: the synthesis between the spiritual core of the Late Medieval World and the development of rational thought and science since the Renaissance. This synthesis is The City of Being. The reason we do not see truth is not that we have not read enough books, or do not have enough academic degrees, but what we do not have enough courage. By truth we do not mean scientific facts alone, or even chiefly. The problem with facts is to be accurate. If you recall the last dozen questions which troubled you—on which, that is, you had to ponder and chew to find out what you could believe is true—you will discover that very few if any of them had to do with matters that could be proven by scientific facts. Even in discovering scientific truth before it is reduced to accepted formulae, such as Columbus’ venture to prove the Earth was round or Dr. Freud’s early explorations, the finding of the truth hinges greatly on the investigator’s inner qualities of probity and courage. #RandolphHarris 1 of 16
We hear the songs of the Angels in the Angelus, we bow a moment to communicate with the infinite, and thank him for our humanity and blessings. The key to Christian conception of studies is the realization that prayer consist of attention. It is the orientation of all the attention of which the soul is capable toward God. The quality of attention counts for much in the quality in prayer. Warmth of the heart cannot make up for it. The highest part of the attention only makes contact with God, when prayer is intense and pure enough for such a contact to be established; but the whole attention is turned toward God. Once the living human being is reduced to a number, the true bureaucrats can commit acts of utter cruelty, not because they are driven by cruelty of a magnitude commensurate to their deeds, but because they feel no human bond to their subjects. While less vile than the sadists, the bureaucrats are more dangerous, because in them there is not even a conflict between conscience and duty: their conscience is doing their duty; human beings as objects of empathy and compassion do not exist for many of them. The hypnoid methods used in advertising and political propaganda are a serious danger to mental health, specifically to clear and critical thinking and emotional independence. #RandolphHarris 2 of 16
The assault on reason and the sense of reality pursues the individual everywhere and daily at any time: during many hours of watching television, or when driving on a highway, or in the political propaganda of candidates, and so on. The particular effect of these suggestive methods is that they create an atmosphere of being half-awake, of believing and not believing, of losing one’s sense of reality. Caring means caring not only for our fellow beings on Earth but also for our descendants. With the exception of a few great newspapers, even the factual information on political, economic, and social data is extremely limited. The so-called great newspapers inform better, but they also misinform better: by not publishing all the news impartially; by slanting headlines, in addition to writing headlines that often do not conform with their accompanying text; by being partisan in their editorials, written under the cover of seemingly reasonable and moralizing language. In fact, the newspapers, the magazines, television, and radio produce a commodity: news, from the raw material of events. Only news is salable, and the news media determine which events are news, which are not. At the very best, information is ready-made, concerns only the surface of events, and barely gives the citizens an opportunity to penetrate through the surface and recognize the deeper cause of the events. #RandolphHarris 3 of 16
As long as the sale of news is a business, newspapers and magazines can hardly be prevented from printing what sells (in various degrees of unscrupulousness) their publications and does not antagonize the advertisers. If the informed opinion and decision are to be possible, the information problem must be solved in a different way. Life is neither a game of chance nor a business deal, and we must seek elsewhere for an appreciation of the real possibilities for salvation: in the healing art of medicine, for example. If a sick person has even the barest chance for survival, no responsible physician will say, “Let us give up the effort,” or will use only palliatives. On the contrary, everything conceivable is done to save the sick person’s life. Certainly, a sick society cannot expect anything less. Otherwise, dehumanized mortals will become so mad that they will not be able to sustain a viable society in the long run, and in the short run will not be able to refrain from being dangerous. A growing number of people feel la malaise du siècle: they sense their depression; they are conscious of it, in spite of all kinds of efforts to repress it. They feel the unhappiness of their isolation and the emptiness of their togetherness; they feel all this very clearly and consciously; others feel it less clearly, but are fully aware of it when someone else puts it into words. #RandolphHarris 4 of 16
So far in World history a life of empty pleasure was possible for only a small elite, and they remained essentially sane because they knew they had power and that they had to think and to act in order not to lose their power. Today, the empty life of consumption is that of the whole middle class, which economically and politically has no power and little personal responsibility. The major part of the Western World knows the benefits of the consumer type of happiness, and growing numbers of those who benefit from it are finding it wanting. They are beginning to discover that having much does not create well-being; traditional ethical teaching has been put to the test—and is being confirmed by experience. The greed to have and to hoard has been modified by the tendency to merely function well, to exchange oneself as a commodity who is—nothing. It is easier for the alienated, marketing character to change than it is for the hoarding character, which is frantically holding onto possession, and particularly narcissism. However, people today are yearning for human beings who have wisdom and convictions and the courage to act according to their own convictions. Given even these hopeful factors, however, the chances for necessary human and social changes are still a challenge. Our only hope is possessed in the energizing attraction of a new vision. #RandolphHarris 5 of 16
The utopian goal is more realistic than the realism of today’s leaders. Only if the old motivations of profit, power, and intellect are replaced by new ones: being, sharing, understanding, the realization of the new society and new mortal is possible. If the marketing character is replaced by the productive, loving character, we will succeed in making humanity more Godly. As I reflect, I call to mind the sensitive persons, especially writers, who have turned to God as modern-day pilgrims to awaken their hearts, to find answers to fundamental questions, to re-kindle some inner spiritual reality. During the whole of this pilgrimage our hearts have been tormented by many intricate questions. There is such a stark contrast there among medievalism, natural beauty and modernity, that every visitor’s life is brought up against the stark reality of beauty’s closeness to death. And is beauty an answer, a way of making that choice to live and create without cringing, without hiding one’s self from the soul? For beauty confronts and absorbs the soul into the whole, absorbs the shadow into the light, brings holiness into what would otherwise be a meaningless, destructive void. I am certain that it was the beauty of nature along the pathways which led from spiritual path to divine journey which gave me my own glimpse into eternity. #RandolphHarris 6 of 16
I felt some replenishment, some re-kindling of my own spirit. The serenity of deed ready for the experience of the divine. The serenity of those moments was worth my preserving forever. Therefore, I am still a lover of the meadows and the woods and mountains. And I too am still a lover of the orange blossoms and the pine groves and the bubbling streams. I knew that the flowers and the spring verdure were not in themselves Gd. However, are we not given a glimpse of the beauty of God by these happy trumpetings of brilliant pink if the flowering Judas trees, and by the lemon blossoms with their magical odor and by the heavily scented lavender of the wisteria hanging from every branch? Beauty is not God, but it is the resplendent gown of God and of our spiritual life. Beauty is truth, truth beauty—that is all ye know on Earth, and all ye need to know. Yes. However, there are still thing I yearned to know. Is beauty at least our pathway to the spirit? Is beauty the gateway to spiritual enhancement and to the serenity of eternity? Is beauty related to the eternity of death? Then I stand before my own soul, like an inexorable judge before a prisoner lying on the rack, and make it answer until there is nothing left to ask. Almost all the errors and unutterable follies of which doctrines and philosophies are so full seem to me to spring from a lack of this probity. #RandolphHarris 7 of 16
The truth was not found, not because it was unsought, but because the intention always was to find again instead some preconceived opinion or other, or at least not to wound some favorite idea, and with this aim in view subterfuges had to be employed against both other people and the thinker oneself. It is the courage of making a clean heart of it in the face of every question that makes the philosopher. The philosopher [must] interrogate oneself without mercy. This philosophical courage, however, does not arise from reflection, cannot be wrung from resolutions, but is an inborn trend of the mind. If one is to see truth, and it does not come from the intellect as such but is a part of the inborn capacity for self-awareness, such probity is necessary. Probity is an ethical attitude, involving courage and other aspects of one’s relation to one’s self; if a person is to fulfill oneself as a human being, it not only can be developed to an extent but must be developed. When people have profound inner conflict, they self-blind themselves to the truth. They blind themselves so that they are closed off in greater or less degree from the reality around them. After learning how they have been living a delusion, we may take it as an act symbolizing the tragic difficulty, the finiteness and blindness of mortals in seeing the truth about themselves and their origin. #RandolphHarris 8 of 16
Drama gives some people an age-old but ever new picture of the inner pain and conflict in finding out the truth about themselves. For to seek truth is always to run the risk of discovering what one would hate to see. It requires that kind of relationship to one’s self, and that confidence in ultimate values, that one can dare to risk the possibility of being uprooted from the beliefs and day-to-day values by which one has lived. It is not surprising, then, that a genuine love of wisdom is a relatively rare thing in human life. To see truth, like the other unique characteristics of mortals, depends on mortal’s ability to be conscious of oneself. One thus can transcend the immediate situation, and in imagination one can try to see life steadily and see it whole. By one’s self-consciousness one can also search within oneself, and there find the wisdom which speaks in greater or lesser degree to every mortal who has ears to hear. The ancient Greeks, as Plato reports, believed that we discover truth reminiscence, that is by remembering, by intuitively searching into our own experience. In the famous demonstration of this, Socrates gets an uneducated enslaved-boy, Meno, to prove the whole Pythagorean theorem simply by asking him questions. We do not need to accept Plato’s mythological explanation—that each of us carries Haven, and knowledge is a recollecting of these ideas—to agree that the phenomenon itself is a very common experience. #RandolphHarris 9 of 16
Each of us has been observing, experiencing, learning a great deal more throughout our lives—probably especially in the early years—than we are aware, and we have had to lock it away in the closet of so-called unconsciousness because of the necessity of getting along with parents, teachers, and social conventions. “Children and crazy people tell the truth” goes the adage—and unfortunately children soon learn not to. This forgotten store of wisdom is available to us as we become sufficiently clarified, sensitive, courageous and vigilant to tap it. The popular idea that people cannot see truth because their selves get in the way is therefore false. It is not the self which makes us see through a glass darkly and distort what we see: it is rather the neurotic needs, repressions and conflicts. These lead us to transfer some prejudice or expectation of our own to other people and the World around us. Thus, it is precisely the lack of self-awareness which leads us to call error truth. The more a person lacks self-awareness, the more one is prey to the anxiety and irrational anger and resentment: and while anger generally blocks us from using our more subtle intuitive means of sensing truth, anxiety always blocks us. Also, if a person tries to rule out the self in seeing truth, if, that is, one pretends that one comes to one’s conclusions like a disembodied judge surveying everything from Mount Olympus, one is victim of greater delusion. #RandolphHarris 10 of 16
Since one assumes one’s truth is absolute and uninfluenced by one’s personal interests rather than simply one’s most honest approximation to truth, one may become a dangerous person who adheres to rigid doctrines. Only technical issues can be true in abstraction from the immediate needs, desires and struggles of the human beings involved. In fact, one of the most common ways of avoiding seeing truth—the particular form of resistance generally used by intellectuals in psychotherapy—is to make an abstract or logical principle out of the problem, and generally by enough cleaver intellectualizing one can arrive at a fine-looking solution which is so fascinating. However, lo and behold, we later discover that all the brilliant intellectualizing did not solve the problem in reality at all, and in fact was precisely a way of avoiding the problem. Seeing truth is a function not of the separate intellect, but of the whole mortal: one experiences truth in moving ahead as a thinking-feeling-acting unity. We love not intellect the less, but the person more in this approach to truth. I have been a learner all my life, but I make truth, which is universal, my own from within, through the exercise of my freedom, and my knowledge of truth is my own relation to truth. #RandolphHarris 11 of 16
As one becomes free from unhealthy ties, one also become freer from the prejudices of life, freer from the tendency of each mortal to see one’s own image in others’ eyes in the World around him or her. To be able to see truth thus goes along with emotional and ethical maturity. When one is able to see truth in this way, one gains confidence in what one days. One has become convinced of one’s beliefs on one’s own pulse and in one’s own experience, rather than through abstract principles or through being told. And one also gains humility, for one knows that since previous things one saw were partially distorted, what one now sees will also have its element of imperfection. This kind of humility does not weaken the strength of one’s stand for one’s own beliefs, but keeps the door open for new learning and the discover of new truth on the morrow. A man does not need to be a bully either physically or psychologically. He does not have to dominate those around him or have his way all the time. Those who exhibit such needs are basically insecure about their masculinity, constantly trying to convince themselves and others that they are “real men.” A man is self-affirming and independent. He can express his feelings directly and fight for himself when need be. His independence also makes it possible for him to see others’ viewpoints and change his mind when it seems appropriate to do so. #RandolphHarris 12 of 16
A man can afford to be gentle, for his self-confidence is deeply based and not dependent on maintaining some manly pose. The advertising slogan “tough, but oh, so gentle” may describe him well. He is not too frightened to share his feelings of love, hurt, discouragement, and desire for love. A woman has opinions of her own and is an individual in her own right, not a pale shadow of her husband. She can express her ideas and fight for them when need be. A woman does not need to be a driving competitor to her husband. She does what she does because she enjoys it and find fulfillment, not because she had to prove her worth; for she already has confidence in that. A woman can be loving, cuddly, and soft without being a whimpering, spineless, dependent creature who uses her helplessness to control people around her and get what she wants from them. Like a man, she is not too frightened to share her feelings of love, hurt, discouragement, and need for love. Perhaps more than ever before in history our society has opened the door to the kind of relationship between men and women that is envisioned here. We have the opportunity of genuine intimacy between those who have been educationally prepared to talk the same language and share many of the same concerns. To become the kind of men and women who can achieve this is a difficult task that we will never perfectly achieve. However, the adventure of moving in that direction is an exciting one! #RandolphHarris 13 of 16
After many years of being all but ignored, the importance of body-functioning to emotional states is becoming recognized more widely and applied to growth-producing situations. A particularly fascinating discovery is the fruitfulness of certain language which, in describing emotional and behavioral states, translates almost literally into terms used to describe bodily states and functions. This translation has a profound impact on methods of dealing effectively with emotional states. A method for helping a person act out and deal with the sense of being immobilized by others, for example, is to put one in a tight circle of people and ask one to try to break out, physically. The method is based on the transformation of one’s emotional feeling of immobilization into the experience of being physically immobilized, to allow one the opportunity to break what one feels are unbreakable bonds…however, this is getting ahead of our story. Implicit general recognition of the close connection between the emotional and the physical is evident in the verbal idioms that have developed in social interaction. Feelings and behavior are expressed in terms of all parts of the body, of body-movement, and of bodily functions. We have heard terms like: lost your head, save face, no guts, cheeky, and you have never just to name a few. #RandolphHarris 14 of 16
Supporting the recognition in everyday life of the close connection between bodily and emotional and mental states, there is a growing volume of theoretical work describing these connections and the way they develop and manifest themselves. Psychosomatic medicine has made a strong case for the fact that emotional states affect the body. More recently, the opposite view has also been developed—that body-organization and physiology affect the feelings—a view called somatopsychic. Psychological attitudes affect body-posture and functioning, and this body-formation then has a strong influence on subsequent feelings. An individual experiencing temporary fear, grief, or anger, all too often carries one’s body in an attitude which the World recognizes as the outward manifestation of that particular emotion. If one persists in this dramatization or consistently re-established it, thus forming what is ordinary referred to as a habit pattern, the muscular arrangement becomes set. Materially speaking some muscles shorten and thicken, others are invaded by connective tissues, still others become immobilized by consolidation of the tissue involved. Once this has happened the physical attitude is invariable; it is involuntary; it can no longer be changed basically by taking thought or even by mental suggestions. Such setting of a physical response also establishes an emotional pattern. #RandolphHarris 15 of 16
Since it is not possible to establish a free flow through the physical flesh, the subjective emotional tone becomes progressively more limited and tends to remain in a restricted closely defined area. Now what the individual feels is no longer an emotion, a response to an immediate situation, henceforth one lives, moves and has one’s being in an attitude. Life is not good or bad; it is just hard. Interpersonal obstacles occur so often because so much of our day-to-day activity involves interaction (real, potential, or imagined) with other people. As long as there are other people, we are going to experience some interpersonal obstacles and, thus, frustration. People have biases, prejudices, and pet likes and dislikes. Some people are just mean and ornery; others are ignorant, and their ignorance causes them to act mean and ornery, though they would be shocked to know we think of them as such. Each of us, then, having a conscious self, an ego, which we try to cultivate and nurture, also has unconscious selves, aspects of ourselves of which we do not even know about. Whenever a conflict among any of the various portions of the psyche occurs, there may be a tendency to dissociate our conscious identity from those unwanted, ugly, or immoral parts of ourselves. “For behold, again I say unto you that if ye will enter in by the way, and receive the Holy Ghost, it will show unto you all things what ye should do,” 2 Nephi 32.5. #RandolphHarris 16 of 16

When a Soul has Attained a Love Filling the Whole Universe Indiscriminately, this Love Becomes the Angel with Golden Wings
I give you the vision of Creation and Eternity here. The dim awareness of this difficulty is probably one of the main reasons that so little effort is made to make the necessary changes. Many think: “Why strive for the impossible? Let us rather act as if the course we are steering will lead us to the place of safety and happiness that our maps indicate.” Those who unconsciously despair yet put on the mask of optimism are not necessarily wise. However, only if they are hardheaded realists, shed all illusions, and fully appreciate the difficulties, those who have not given up hope can succeed. This sobriety marks the distinction between awake and dreaming utopians. If, by an absurd hypothesis, I were to die without ever having committed any serious faults and yet all the same I were to fall to the bottom of Hell, I should nevertheless owe God an infinite debt of gratitude for his infinite mercy, on account of my Earthly life, and notwithstanding the fact that I am such a poor unsatisfactory creature. Even in this hypothesis I should think all the same that I had received all my share of the riches of divine mercy. For already here below we receive the capacity for loving God and for representing him to ourselves with complete certainty as having the substance of real, eternal, perfect, and infinite joy. Through our fleshly veils we receive from above presages of eternity which are enough to efface all doubts on this subject. #RandolphHarris 1 of 11
The human Utopia of the Messianic Time—a united new humankind living in solidarity and peace, free from economic strife and from war and class struggle—can be achieved, provided we spend the same energy, intelligence, and enthusiasm on the realization of the human Utopia as we have spent on the realization of our technical Utopias. Whether such a change from the supremacy of natural science to a new social science will take place, nobody can tell. If it does, we might still have a chance for survival, but whether it will depends on one factor: how many brilliant, learned, disciplined, and caring men and women are attracted by the new challenge to the human mind, and by the fact that this time the goal is not control over nature but control over technique and over irrational social forces and institutions that threaten the survival of Western society, if not the human race. The problem is the will and the humanist spirit of those who work on them; besides, when people can see a vision and simultaneously recognize what can be done step by step in a concrete way to achieve it, the will begin to feel encouragement and enthusiasm instead of fright. Human beings shall neither live in inhuman poverty, nor simply be consumers. So great is the confusion about love in our day that it is even difficult to find agreed upon definitions of what love is. We define love as a delight in the presence of the other person and an affirming of one’s value and development as much as one’s own. Thus there are always two elements to love—that of the worth and good of the other person, and that of one’s own joy and happiness in relation with one. #RandolphHarris 2 of 11
The capacity to love presupposes self-awareness, because love requires the ability to have empathy wit the other person, to appreciate and affirm one’s potentialities. Love also presupposes freedom; certainly love which is not freely given is not love. TO love someone because you are not free to love someone else, or because you happen by the accident of birth to be in some family relation to the individual, is not to love. Furthermore, if one loves because one cannot do without the other, love is not given by choice; for one could not choose not to love. The hallmark of such unfree love is that it does not discriminate: it does not distinguish the loved person’s qualities or one’s being from the next person’s. In such a relation you are not really seen by the one who purports to love you—you might just as well be someone else. Neither the one who loves nor the loved one acts as persons in such relationships; the former is not a subject operating with some freedom, and the latter is significant chiefly as an object to be clung to. There are kinds of dependence which in our society—having so many anxious, lonely and empty persons in it—masquerade as love. They vary from different forms of mutual assistance or reciprocal satisfaction of desires (which may be quite sound if called by their right names), through the various business forms of personal relationships to clear parasitical masochism. #RandolphHarris 3 of 11
In not infrequently happens that two persons, feeling solitary and empty by themselves, relate to each other in a kind of unspoken bargain to keep each other from suffering loneliness. Self-affirmation in human relationships is much more likely to leave people feeling close to each other than the alternative of trying to guess what the other person wants and then attempting to please one. On causal inspection it might appear very desirable in a marriage, for example, for both the man and the woman to be dedicated to pleasing the partner. It almost sounds like the Golden Rule of doing unto others as we would have then do on to us, does it not? These are two hitches. In the first place, if one does not tell us, how can we be sure what the other person really wants? It is not unusual at all for couple to do something that neither of them wants to do, because they have only guessed—never really known—what the other wanted done and because each has been so considerate of the other person’s feelings that they have not made their own wishes clearly know. The second hitch is that is we acceded to another person’s wished (or what we think they want) we are likely to have more resentment about the matter than we are fully aware of. And we are almost sure to express that resentment in some way, however subtle. If the Golden Rule is indeed to be applied it would be: I am going to let those I care for know how I feel and what I desire, because this is the way I would like them to relate to me. #RandolphHarris 4 of 11
If I do not agree with what they say, I am perfectly capable of standing up for myself. And I have sufficiency confidence in them to assume that they can fight for themselves if and when necessary. In the home, it appears that the most emotionally satisfying arrangement for both men and women is one where there is free-floating leadership. In other words, when a decision is to be made there is no assurance in advance whose judgment will be followed. In this arrangement both the man and the woman (and the children, too) are free to express their feelings and ideas. This makes for some lively discussion, even passionate discussions, at times! However, as a matter of fact democracies are always considerably more discussion prone then authoritarian governments. And how much love and emotional closeness can be experienced between a man and a woman if a man is convinced of his superiority and a woman is afraid to open her mouth for fear of displeasing the master? Besides, is a book not more exciting and more fun if you do not know for certain in advance how it is going to end? Even if we only consider the plane of purely human relations, the gratitude we own those we love is infinite. Our human relationships perpetually enshrine the light of God and should raise gratitude to a still higher degree. #RandolphHarris 5 of 11
It might seem that God is sending you this truth through the pen I am holding. It is more suitable for some thoughts to come by direct inspiration; it is more suitable for other thoughts to be transmitted through some creature. God uses either way with his friends. However, when love is engaged in for the purposes of vanquishing loneliness, it accomplishes its purpose only at the price of increased emptiness for both persons. Love, is generally confused with dependence: but in point of fact, you can only love to proportion to your capacity for independence. The creative relationship between men and women that is being suggested here calls for relatively mature and self-reliant individuals. It is important to bond with the Heavenly country and live in an atmosphere of human warmth. This is the native city to which we owe our love. Our love should stretch as widely across all space, and should be as equally distributed in every portion of it, as is the very light of the Sun. Christ has bidden us to attain to the perfection of our Heavenly Father by imitating his indiscriminate bestowal of light. Our intelligence too should have the same complete impartiality. Every existing thing is equally upheld in its existence by God’s creative love. The friends of God should love him to the point of merging their love his with regard to all things here below. When a soul has attained a love filling the whole Universe indiscriminately, this love becomes the Angel with golden wings that pierces an opening in the celestial sphere of the World. #RandolphHarris 6 of 11
After that, such a soul loves the Universe, not from within but from without; from the dwelling place of the Wisdom of God, our first-born brother. Such a love does not love beings and things in God, but from the abode of God. Being close to God it views all beings and things from there, and its gaze is merged in the gaze of God. It is true that Christ said to his disciples: “Love one another.” However, I think that there is a question of friendship, a personal friendship between two beings, by which God’s friends should be bound each to each. Friendship is the one legitimate exception to the duty of only loving universally. Moreover, to my way of thinking, it is not really pure unless it is so to speak surrounded on all sides by a compact envelope of indifference which preserves a distance. We are living in times that have no precedent, and in our present situation universality, which could formerly be implicit, has to be fully explicit. It has to permeate our language and the whole of our way of life. Today it is not nearly enough to be a saint, but we must have the saintliness demanded by the present moment, a new saintliness, itself also without precedent. A new type pf sanctity is indeed a fresh spring, an invention. If all is kept in proportion and if the order of each things is preserved, it is almost equivalent to a new revelation of the Universe and of human destiny. It is the exposure of a large portion of truth and beauty hitherto concealed under a thick layer of dust. More genius is needed than was needed by Archimedes to invent machines and physics. A new saintliness is a still more marvelous invention. #RandolphHarris 7 of 11
Only a kind of perversity can oblige God’s friends to deprive themselves of having genius, since to receive it in superabundance they only need to ask their Father for it in Christ’s name. Such a petition is legitimate, today at any rate, because it is necessary. I think that under this or any equivalent form it is the first thing we have to ask for now; we have to ask for it daily, hourly, as a famished child constantly asks for bread. The World needs saints who have genius, just as a plague-stricken town needs doctors. Where there is a need there is also an obligation. By a strange twist, the thought of God’s anger only arouses love in me. God’s favor and mercy makes tears at my heart. We receive love from others not in proportion to our demands or sacrifices or needs, but roughly in proportion to our own capacity to love. And our capacity to love depends, in turn, upon our prior capacity to be persons in our own right. To love means, essentially, to give; and to give requires a maturity of self-feeling. A truly living God does not involve a demand for love in return. To produce art requires that the artist be able to love—that is to give without thought of being rewarded. We are not talking about love as a giving up or self-abnegation. One gives only if one as something to give, only if one has a basis of strength within oneself from which to give. #RandolphHarris 8 of 11
It is most unfortunate that on our society that we have had to try to purify love from aggression and competitive triumph by identifying it with weakness. Indeed, this inoculation has been so much of a success that the common prejudice is that the weaker people are, the more they love; and that the strong person odes not need to love! No wonder tenderness, that yeast without which love is as soggy and heavy as unrisen bread, has been generally scorned, and often separated out of the love experience. What was forgotten was that tenderness goes along with strength: one can be gentle as one is strong; otherwise tenderness and gentleness are masquerades for clinging. The Latin origin of our words is nearer the truth—”virtue,” of which love is certainly one, comes from the root vir, man (here in the sense of masculine strength), from which the word “virility is also derived. Some may be questioning, “But does one not lose oneself in love?” To be sure, in love as in creative consciousness, it is true that one is merged with the other. However, should not be called losing one’s self; again like creative consciousness, it is the highest level of fulfillment of one’s self. When pleasures of the flesh is an expression of love, for example, the emotion experienced at the moment of climax is not hostility or triumph, but union with the other person. The poets are not lying to us when they sing of the ecstasy of love. #RandolphHarris 9 of 11
As in creative ecstasy, it is that moment of self-realization when one temporarily overleaps the barrier between one identity and another. It is a giving of one’s self and a finding of one’s self at once. Such ecstasy represents the fullest interdependence in human relations; and the same paradox applies as in creative consciousness- one can merge one’s self in ecstasy only as one has gained the prior capacity to stand alone, to be a person in one’s own right. We do not man this discussion to be a counsel of perfection. Nor is it meant to rule out or depreciate all of the other kinds of beneficial relationships, such as friendship (which may also be an important aspect of parent-child relations), various degrees of interchange of human warmth and understanding, the sharing of pleasures of the flesh and passion, and so on. Let us not tall into the error so common in our society of making love in its ideal sense all-important, so that one has only the alternatives of admitting one has never found the pearl of great price or resorting to hypocrisy in trying to persuade oneself that all of the emotions one does feel are love. We can only repeat: we propose calling the emotions by their right names. Learning to love will proceed most soundly if we cease trying to persuade ourselves that to love is easy, and if we are realistic enough to abandon the illusory masquerades for love in a society which is always talking about love but has so little of it. #RandolphHarris 10 of 11
Our greatest sense of fulfillment and satisfaction comes in being in meaningful relationships with other people (not necessarily in marriage) whom we love and who love us. We never outgrown our need for love, human understanding, and communication. If we can achieve a relatively high degree of personal independence, then we will be free to satisfy these needs in mutually fulfilling relationships with others. If we have confidence in our abilities to be relatively free and able to disentangle ourselves if we feel others are attempting to manipulate and control us, it will be less frightening to us to say in the many ways that it can be said openly and clearly, “I love you, and I need and want your love.” By participating in the community, people find life becomes more interesting and stimulating. Intelligence is continuously growing for both the individual and the species; it I meaningful to say that we are more intelligent than we were a few years, ago and that our children will be more intelligent than we are. There is no other armor so strong as truth, none other that will turn aside the shafts of envy, hatred, malice, and al the rest of that great horde of iniquities, as will the simple unadorned truth. We believe in being honest. May God help us to practice what we believe. Our challenge is to avoid bondage of any kind, help the Lord gather his elect, and sacrifice for the rising generation. #RandolphHarris 11 of 11
Human Imagination Soars Among the Planets in the Heavens but at the Same Time Our We Live on the Blessed Earth
Running, running happily, laughing breathlessly, down a long road, something under my arm, a small red object without any definite shape, more a shade of a color. Suddenly, a large deserted mansion loomed up in front of me. I hurried quickly inside and climbed, climbed blocky, heavy steps. A long time. However, at the top a closet, open. The red shade had grown to gigantic proportions, almost the size of a trunk. I pushed it in the closet, but not really pushed—despite its size it was very light and almost dropped into the closet. I started gathering things from the red trunk, some strange objects. Suddenly the door slammed hard against its frame, and frightened I rushed down the stairs. As I walked down, I seemed to change clothes, or rather new things seemed to replace the old. I was richly clothed by the time I reached the bottom. However, then a great sense of fright fell about me and I began to run—quickly through a meadow. Someone chased me—a stout figure with long, flowing hair. Soon, more stout figures pursued. Back in the mansion I hurried up the stairs, but there were few this time. The closet door was open and there was nothing there, only space. I could hear rumbling of voices, pounding, pounding, louder and louder. And then a mass of grey or rather haze rushed at me and I started back hurriedly into the closet—back, back. And then space, falling, falling, falling. #RandolphHarris 1 of 16
Even from this one example it is apparent that the technique is a powerful one for studying the nature of symbol formation. Social conversion and everyday concerns are designed to conceal this variation and to increase the comfortable feeling that we are all more or less alike. That is why the sudden breakdown or the unexpected divorce or the inexplicable crime surprises or startles us. There is a widespread tacit pact not to reveal oneself, not to speak of the extremes of emotion, or terror, anger, pride, death-wish or glory-wish, or even the great joy, also known as the moment of illumination when the vast expanse of life and time, and the arrays of the dead, and passing moments, are suddenly realized and one’s own passing life is self-blessed. If I am sad, it comes primarily from the permanent sadness that destiny has imprinted forever upon my emotions, where the greatest and purest joys can only be superimposed and that at the price of a great effort of attention. It comes also from my miserable and continual sins; and from all the calamities of our time and of all those of all the past centuries. Otherwise a barrier of incomprehension will remain between us, whether the error is on my part or on yours. This would grieve me from the point of view of my friendship for you, because in that case the result of all these efforts and desires, called forth by your charity toward me, would be a disappointment for you. #RandolphHarris 2 of 16
Moreover, although it is not my fault, I should not be able to help feeling guilty of ingratitude. For, I repeat, my debt to you is beyond all measures, my Lord. The Incarnation of Christianity implies a harmonious solution of the problem of the relations between the individual and the collective. Harmony in the Pythagorean sense; the just balance of contraries. This solution is precisely what mortals are thirsting for today. The position of the intelligence is the key to this harmony, because the intelligence is a specifically and rigorously individual thing. This harmony exists wherever the intelligence, remaining in its place, can be exercised without hindrance and can reach the complete fulfillment of its function. That is what Saint Thomas says admirably of all the parts of the soul of Christ, with reference to his sensitiveness to pain during the crucifixion. The special function of the intelligence requires total liberty, implying the right to deny everything, and allowing of no domination. Wherever it usurps control there is an excess of individualism. Wherever it is hampered or uneasy there is an oppressive collectivism, or several of them. Since he willed them from all eternity, God respects the laws of nature, and there are two languages that are quite distinct although made up of the same words; there is the collective language and there is the individual one. #RandolphHarris 3 of 16
The Comforter whom Christ sends us, the Spirit of truth, speaks one or other of these languages, whichever circumstances demand, and by a necessity of their nature there is not agreement between them. When genuine friends of God repeat words they have heard in secret amidst the silence of the union of love, and these words are in disagreement with the teaching of the Church, it is simply that the language of the marketplace is not that of the nuptial chamber. Everybody knows that really intimate conversation is only possible between two or three. As soon as there are six or seven, collective language begins to dominate. That is why it is a complete misinterpretation to apply to the Church the words “Wheresoever two or three are gathered together in my name, there am I in the midst of them.” Christ did not say two hundred, or fifty, or ten. He said two or three. He said precisely that he always forms the third in the intimacy of the tete-a-tete. Christ made promises to the Church, but none of these promises has the force of the expression, “They Father who seeth in secret.” The word of God is the secret word. One who has not heard this word, even if one adheres to all the doctrines and covenants taught by the Church, has no contact with the truth. The function of the Church as the collective keeper of the doctrines and covenants is indispensable. She has the right and the duty to punish those who make a clear attack upon her within the specific range of this function, by depriving them of the sacraments. #RandolphHarris 4 of 16
However, when she (the Church) claims to force love and intelligence to model their language upon her own, she is guilty of an abuse of power. This abuse of power is not of God. It comes from the natural tendency of every form of collectivism, without exception, to abuse power. In the first place it should be noted that love is actually a relatively rare phenomenon in our society. As everyone knows, there are a million and one kinds of relationships which are called love: we do not need to list all the confusions of love with sentimental impulses and every kind of oedipal and back to mother’s arms motifs as they appear in the romantic songs like God’s Plan by Drake and the movies. No word is used with more meanings than this term, most of the meanings being dishonest in that they cover up the real underlying motives in the relationship. However, there are many other quite sound and honest relationships called loved—such as parental care for children and vice versa, or pleasures of the flesh, or the sharing of loneliness; and again the startling reality often discovered when one looks underneath the surface of individual’s lives in our lonely and conformist society, is how little the component of love is actually involved even in these relationships. Most human relationships, of course, spring from a mixture of motives and include a combination of different feelings. #RandolphHarris 5 of 16
Pleasures of the flesh are love in a mature form between a man and a woman and are generally a blend of two emotions. One is part of the soul’s desire which is part of the individual’s need to fulfill oneself. It is the drive of each individual to unite with the complement of oneself—the drive to find the other half of the original being. The other element in mature love between man and woman is the affirmation of the value and worth of the other person, which we include in our definition of romantic love. However, granted the blending of motives and emotions, and granted that love is not a simple topic, the most important thing at the outset is to call our emotions by their right names. And the most constructive place to begin learning how to love is to see how we fail to love. We shall have made a start, at least, when we recognize our situation as that of one of anxiety. So, learning to love, at length one is taught to know one does not. The function of the new society is to encourage the emergence of a new mortal, beings whose character structure will exhibit the following qualities: Willingness to give up all forms of having, by placing God first and foremost, in order to fully be. Security, sense of identity, and confidence based on faith in what one is, on one’s need for relatedness, interest, love, solidarity with the Word around one, instead of one one’s desire to have, to possess, to control the World, and thus become a slave to one’s possessions. #RandolphHarris 6 of 16
The human being’s radical disunity can temporarily achieve a unity by virtue of beauty. We have to learn acceptance of the fact that nobody and nothing outside oneself give meaning to life, but that this radical independence and no-thingness can become the condition for the fullest activity devoted to caring and sharing. Enslaved as we are to our money-minded culture, we suppress our hungry for beauty and lose the chance to experience unity. The genuine if temporary release from this dilemma lies in beauty. It is the Universal language which gives solace and serenity. It provides the sense of unity within ourselves which transcends, however temporarily, the grim paradoxes of life. Being fully present where one is creates a joy that comes from giving and sharing, not from hoarding and exploiting. Only the unity of reality with the form, of the accidental with the necessary, of the passive state with freedom, that completes the conception of humanity will allow love and respect for life in all its manifestations. It grants the knowledge that not things, power, all that has passed away, but life and everything that pertains to its growth are sacred. As soon as reason issues the mandate a humanity shall exist, at the same time the law, and there shall be a beauty. This will compel us to reduce greed, hate, and illusions as much as one is capable. #RandolphHarris 7 of 16
To those who try to flee from the realization of the dual nature of humankind, nothing is more unwarrantable and contradictory than such a conception, because the aversion of matter form, the passive and the active feeling and thought is eternal and cannot be mediated in anyway. Living without worshipping idols and without illusions is somethings that God actually compels us to do and it is possible because one can reach a state that does not require illusions. Beauty is our way of meeting—not erasing—this dilemma. It brings its great boon precisely by virtue of its dealing with the nature of subjectivity and objectivity. For the beautiful ought to temper while uniformly exciting the two natures, and it ought also to excite while uniformly moderating them. Developing one’s capacity for love, together with one’s capacity for critical, unsentimental thought is an avenue to shedding one’s narcissism and accepting the tragic limitations inherent in human existence. We try to avoid the paradox by being whole-heartedly the one or the other—the spiritual person who has the delusion that one has escaped from the senses, and the sensual person who has sacrificed the spirit. Making full growth of oneself and of one’s fellow beings is the supreme of goal of life. #RandolphHarris 8 of 16
Many would rebuke our sensuous culture, as we must look to form, to our spirit and become inspired by the richness of our thinking. To reach this goal, discipline and respect for reality is necessary. Spiritual people may want to remember the richness of the World of the senses where it all begins. Knowing, also, that no growth is healthy that does not occur in a structure, but knowing, too, the difference between structure as an attribute of life and order as an attribute of no-life of the dead for beauty is our second creator. Nor is this inconsistent with the fact that she (beauty) only makes it possible for us to attain and realize humanity. For in this she acts in common with our original creator, nature, which has imparted to us nothing further than this capacity for humanity, but leaves the use of it to our own determination of will. Developing one’s imagination, not as an escape from intolerable circumstances but as the anticipation of real possibilities, as a means to do away with intolerable circumstances is a central idea and inspiration. It is that beauty that is born in play. It may seem like a frivolous idea; but recall that we speak of Mozart and Beethoven playing the piano, the very opposite of superficiality. And we refer to Shakespeare’s plays; and it is clear that such playing describes the most profound and humanizing of all human activities. #RandolphHarris 9 of 16
Not deceiving others, but also not being deceived by others; one may be called innocent, but not naïve. Play unite the inner World of our personal reverie with the outer World of people and nature. The object of the play instinct, represented in a general statement, may therefore bear the name of living form, a term that serves to describe all aesthetic qualities of phenomena, and what people style, in the widest sense, beauty. Knowing oneself, not only the self one knows, but also the self one does not know—even though one has a slumbering knowledge of what does not know is a way that we sense one’s oneness with life; hence giving up the aim of conquering nature, subduing it, exploiting it, exploring it, dissecting it, but trying, rather to understand and cooperate with nature. A marble block, though it is and remains lifeless, can nevertheless become a living form by the architect and sculptor; a mortal, though one lives and has a form is far from being a living form on that account. For this to be the case, it is necessary that one’s form should be life, and that one’s life should be a form. As long as we only thing of one’s form, it is lifeless, a mere abstraction. It is only when one’s form lives in our feelings, and one’s life in our understanding, that one is the living form, and this will everywhere be the case where we judge one to be beautiful. #RandolphHarris 10 of 16
Freedom that is not arbitrariness but the possibility to be oneself, not as a bundle of greedy desires, but as a delicately balanced structure that at any moment is confronted with the alternative of grown or decay, life or death allows us to understand how the idea play is an accurate description of the psychologically healthy person. The goal of psychotherapy is to help the patient learn to create and teaches us that evil and destructiveness are necessary consequences of failure to grow. The neurotic type of person is the artist who cannot create any art. All people are struggling to be creative in some way, and the artist is the one who has succeeded in this task of life. Thus creativity brings together two purposes in life: to love and to work. Both of these, love and work, are aspects of creativity. We Know that only few have reached perfection in all these qualities, but being without the ambition to reach the goal, in the knowledge that such ambition is only another form of greed, of having. The idea that beauty is the product of play, brings together the objective and subjective aspects of life. The outward and inward mortal are at one. Happiness in the process of ever-growing aliveness, whatever the further point is that fate permits one to reach is the description of the goal of psychotherapy for living as fully as one can is so satisfactory that the concern for what one might or might not attain has little chance to develop. #RandolphHarris 11 of 16
What we seek to do is to help each patient become unified in him or herself, so that they can live out their lives with some integrity, some wholeness, some beauty. Through the description of beauty, the goal is to help one explore and understand and manifest the picture of the psychologically integrated human being. The neurotic is the one who cannot achieve this; healthy persons are the ones who can do it in their work and their love, whether they are painters or teachers or whatever they may be. The person who is integrated is thus one who has learned to play in the proper sense. After all, if you love what you do it is like playing and can be very productive. The psychologically healthy person is the one who overcomes the dilemma of life by creating, by doing—whether the doing involves sketching Greek poppies on a hillside, cooking your favorite cuisines, being an architect, or a designer, or working at your favorite store. This is what people mean when they say that beauty has kept them alive. We have seen that modern society has tended to abandon the pattern of living in which men dominated women in their various relationships. One probably reason this movement has taken place is that there has been an increasing awareness that the former was not only unfair but also tended to deprive both men and women of the experience of emotional intimacy, one of our most basic desires and needs. #RandolphHarris 12 of 16
We have also seen, however, that the changes have often resulted in a competitive relationship between the genders that has been no more successful in satisfying the need for love. This is not to say, of course, that marriages based on either the dominance-submission or the competitive pattern are doomed to failure. In fact they are often very successful when judged in terms of permanence or even in terms of the relative satisfaction for the individuals involved in them, and it would not be desirable to suggest that such relationships should be terminated. What is being said here is that many persons will feel that neither of these alternatives is sufficiently satisfying for them. They long for some more creative approach to man-woman relationships. For these men and women it would seem desirable to look further. The key to this search is to be found in self-affirmation. When a person is able to be himself and express one’s feelings directly and clearly to another one has opened the door to the possibility of a creative encounter with that individual. And if that person is not too frightened by this direct approach and can respond with similar candor and self-affirmation both are likely to feel that their confrontation has been a fulfilling experience. And this feeling of fulfillment does not necessarily depend on the two people reaching an agreement. #RandolphHarris 13 of 16
Often when different viewpoints are involved, such an encounter can take place without changing the minds of either party. And yet, each person can have the satisfied feeling that one has been turn to oneself and that one has a deepened respect and caring for the other, who has been equally true to oneself. A certain couple, Sarah and Neal, had been having difficulties in their marriage and sought the help of a marriage counselor. Conferences were set up so that each of them saw the counselor once a week without the other present. Each one had many complaints about the other. Sarah’s main point of contention was the Neal always seemed half-hearted in this attitude toward her. When he wanted to enjoy pleasures of the flesh with her, Neal would approach her very tentatively as though he feared or even expected that she would reject his advances. And often Sarah did repulse him, probably in part because his efforts did little to convince her that he really cared for her and desired her intimately. Neal and Sarah’s emotional impasse had various effects on their relationship. When pleasures of the flesh was agreed upon Neal could not always become sufficiently interested to engage. This temporary impotency was probably related to his fear of intimacy, his doubts of his adequacy, and to Sarah’s failure to respond more enthusiastically to his hesitant advances. #RandolphHarris 14 of 16
Sarah, on the other hand, experiences times when she felt acute desires for pleasures of the flesh and frustration that she seemed unable to communicate directly to Neal. If she had been able to interconnect her wishes, this might have helped Neal to feel more comfortable and better able to relate to her. Sometimes couples are just out of sync because of life matters, career goals, or something could be troubling them, it is not necessarily a sign of rejection between two married people. As a result of her frustration she often felt very depressed and became sarcastic and nagging toward him. One morning when Sarah came to see the counselor it was quickly apparent that she was filled with anger about life in general and toward her husband in particular and she spent most of the hour describing her complaints about him. When she was not speaking of Neal, Sarah talked about how sad and blue she was, how empty life seemed, and how she sometimes wished she could die. As she left the office, still in a state of distress, she vowed she was not going to let that guy near her that night. For one thing, it was a Saturday, and on Saturdays he usually like to have passionate intimacy with his wife, and she made it absolutely clear that she did not appreciate such scheduling of romance…what next, was he going to leave a tip on the nightstand a creep away in the middle of the night? #RandolphHarris 15 of 16
During Neal’s appointment the next week no information was volunteered about this particular subject, so the counselor waited until Sarah’s appointment the following Saturday to hear the next saga. Sarah reported that when she had left the office the previous week she had gone directly home, marches into the house and through it immediately into the bathroom, glancing neither to the left nor the right! Neal, with that amazing sensitivity that men occasionally display, became aware somehow that all was not well! And he stormed into the bathroom right behind her, slammed the door, and locked it. With his own temper flaring like a coronal mass ejection he said something like this: “I can tell you are extremely upset, and I will be darned if I am going to live in this house all day with you like this. We are going to stay right here until we find out what is going on!” And they did. They stayed there and has a calm discussion for more than an hour. When Sarah had finished telling all of this, the counselor looked at her and asked, “Well, how did you like that kind of treatment from your husband?” Sarah said, “I am happy he finally understood where I was coming from and we got to discuss the issues. It is nice when Neal shows his sensitivity side.” And actually, the question had been unnecessary, for she had a bounce and a sparkle about her that morning, which no one had ever seen. #RandolphHarris 16 of 16
To Accept One’s Finiteness is the Basic Courage Every Mortal Must Have
Beauty is truth, truth beauty—that is all you know on Earth, and all you need to know. Beauty is the eternal splendor of the One showing through the Many. That is, in the many different forms in our Universe, the One shines through and gives splendor and meaning to all. This holds good as far as many are concerned at any rate, for most never hesitate in their choice of attitude; it leads people to adopt the Christian attitude as the only possible one. Several people are born, grow up, and always remain within the Christian inspiration. When considering the great trilogy of Beauty, Truth and Goodness, we often place Beauty at the top because Beauty is harmony, and whether Truth or Goodness are harmonious is the test of their integrity. Goodness gives a person self-respect, Truth gives gratification, but Beauty gives peace and joy simultaneously. Goodness, or ethics, consists of acting in a way that is harmonious with our fellow human beings, and this makes the action testable by its beauty. Much confusion exists today about the roles of men and women. We tend to be uncertain about what it means to be a man or a woman, and this uncertainty adds to the fears that keep us from knowing, accepting, and affirming ourselves. #RandolphHarris 1 of 14
At one time in our history little confusion existed concerning these roles, for there was a rather clear social expectation. The man was expected to be the head of the home. When a final decision was to be made concerning important matters affecting the family, it was his responsibility to make that decision. If he chose to consult his wife for her opinion that was fine and gentlemanly of him, but he was not required by social custom to do so. Now, even in those days—some might say “good old days”!—women probably were the real rulers in the home more often than the men would have cared to admit. However, at any rate there was a social standard that man should have dominion over woman. However, times have changed and we now even have Internal Women’s Day to honor the achievements of women. Our society granted women the right to vote. Increasingly it gave them additional legal rights. In times of national emergency it encouraged them to work, and they made themselves so indispensable that many of them continued to work when the emergency was over. Gradually, virtually all professions were opened up to them. Equal educational opportunities became available to them and they increasingly took advantage of them. With all these changed taking place it was inevitable that the woman’s role, and man’s too, within the home and in relationship to each other would change. #RandolphHarris 2 of 14
However, in what ways? As so often occurs in times of social transition, the old ways tended to be abandoned without a clear definition as to what the new would be. As others have pointed out, certain periods of history are characterized by particular forms of neurotic behavior. A good case can be made for believing that our basic neurosis, our fear of love, has been expressed in many of our reactions to the shifting roles of men and women that occurred in the rush to fill the vacuum created by the changing times. Although the changes unquestionably opened the door to the possibility of new and exiting opportunities for emotional closeness between men and women never widely experienced before, we have frequently avoided this dangerous intimacy. Some of us reacted in extreme ways against the former roles. Others avoided the hopeful possibilities with more or less desperate attempts to cling to the old ways in male-female interaction while the World moved on. When women overact against the old system, it often means turning to a strongly competitive role in relation to men, sometimes subtly, sometimes openly, expressed. #RandolphHarris 3 of 14
The woman often appears to make a fetish, suggesting a deep insecurity about herself, of proving to the World, and probably most of all to herself, that she is not only the equal of any man but also superior to most. She may even attempt to dominate men as men dominated women in the past. This approach to life often leads to a de-feminization, which creates a veneer of hardness that seems to defy any man to attempt genuine intimacy with the woman. She may not shy away from physical closeness, for part of her platform of equal rights may well include a revolt against the double standard and a frenzied effort to prove that she is as free as any male. However, her fear of domination, her mistrust of herself and of her partner, may make it impossible for her to allow herself to experience genuine warmth and affection for a man. Strong reactions against feelings of dependency are often involved. All of us—men as well as women—have desires to be take care of, protected, and sheltered by another loving person. However, the woman who is afraid she may not be able to avoid domination is very threatened by such feelings. She may go to great lengths to suppress and even deny to herself these feelings of need for another woman. Some women feel that by enjoying a relationship with a man that they are giving up some of their independence to him, and it can cause them great anguish to have to release some of their power they worked so hard to achieve. #RandolphHarris 4 of 14
In some cases, women actually deny their desires for a man and these struggles are so serious that they can cause her emotional and physical harm, as she may take the issues out on herself. This is why some women are cold, or seem unemotional. For men, overreaction against the old ways often leads to a near abdication of any meaningful role in the home. Convinced that one dare not dominate the home, he may abandon all leadership and leave the administration of home, household finances, and the discipline, education, and open expression of love of his children to his wife as her exclusive sphere of activity. Of course other factors, such as modern industrialization and our commuting ways, which often make the man’s workaday World a vastly different existence far separated from the home, both physically and psychologically, have encouraged this trend. The result is that, in the home, where the man might hope for emotional intimacy with a wife and children, he often seems, and may even adopt the role of, an inferior, bumbling, ineffectual creature who is a nonentity at best and at worst someone who disrupts the efficient routine that his wife has in operation when he is not around. He may feel like an outsider. While this may appear to be a caricature of American males today, there are many who fit the picture and many more who tend in that direction—men who appear to be afraid to be genuine persons in relation to their wives and children. #RandolphHarris 5 of 14
Furthermore, our society appears likely to proceed further in that direction since a snowballing effect can be observed. Since family life is increasingly centered around women, it spears that girls are likely to emulate their mothers. Boy, on the other hand, confronted with a dominant mother image and a largely absent and apparently weak father, are likely to identify with the dominant mother and become increasingly feminized, and yet at the same time be frightened of women, who for them seem all-powerful. As one man put it, “I have never won an argument with a woman in my life! They are so good at repartee.” Another man, speaking of his wife, said, “When we fight, she has the supreme court behind her and I have new Lawyer from New York Law who just passed the bar exam.” This changing role of men is likely to lead to many symptoms of emotional disturbance. The man may express his fear of women and his (perhaps largely unconscious) rage by becoming impotent. He may turn toward homosexuality, as he seeks to satisfy his need for some kind of intimacy with follow males, who pose less threat to his damaged sense of personal identity. He may make conquests of pleasures of the flesh with women, in his workaday World, that involve little genuine intimacy. He may even adopt any one of many distancing devices, since the fear of love is magnified by his perspective of women. #RandolphHarris 6 of 14
The woman, of course, is in a similar bind. For as the man tends in various ways to withdraw from her, her, own protective devices come into play. Without quite knowing what is going on, she feels frustrated, hurt, and abandoned. The risks of expressing love and understanding seems too great, so she goes on her way, substituting control and irritable nagging for the love she longs to give and receive, but which she fears. Vanity and narcissism—the compulsive needs to be admired and praised—undermine one’s courage, for one of them fights on someone else’s conviction rather than one’s own. When one act to gain someone else’s praise, furthermore the act itself is a living reminder of the feeling of weakness and worthlessness: otherwise there would be no need to haughtily display one’s attitude. This often leads to the cowardly feeling which is the most bitter humiliation of all—the humiliation of having co-operated knowingly in one’s own vanquishment. It is not so bad to be defeated because the enemy is stronger, or even to be defeated because one did not fight; but to know one was a coward because one chose to sell out one’s strength to get along with the victor—this betrayal of one’s self is the bitterest pill of all. There are also specific reasons in our culture why acting to please others undermines courage. For such acting, at least for men, often means playing the role of one who is unassertive, unaggressive, gentlemanly, and how can one develop power, including sexual potency, when one is supposed to be unassertive? #RandolphHarris 7 of 14
With women, too, these ways of gaining admiration militate against the development of their indigenous potentialities, for their potentialities are never exercised or even brought into the picture. The hallmark of courage in our age of conformity is the capacity to stand on one’s own convictions—not obstinately or defiantly (these are expressions of defensiveness not courage) nor as a gesture of retaliation, but simply because these are what one believes. It is as though one were saying through one’s actions, “This is myself, my being.” Courage is the affirmative choice, not a choice because “I can do no other”; for if one can do no other, what courage is involved? To be sure, at times one has simply to cling with dogged determination to a position one has won through courage. Such times are frequent in therapy when a person has achieved some new growth and must then withstand the counterattack of anxious reaction within oneself as well as the attacks of friends and family members who would be more comfortable if he had remained the way he was. There will be plenty of defensive actions at best; but if one has conquered something worth defending, then one defends it not negatively but with joy. When in a person’s development courage begins to emerge—that is, when the person begins to break out from the pattern of devoting one’s life to getting others to admire him or her—an intermediate step generally occurs. #RandolphHarris 8 of 14
The person in this intermediate stage takes independent stands, to be sure, but they defend their actions at the court in which the laws are written by the very authorities they have been trying to please. It is as though they demanded the right to be free, but, like the American colonists before the Revolution, they have to argue their case on the basis of laws written by those from whom they demanded their rights. People in therapy in this stage often dream literally of trying to persuade their parents of the justice of their case, of the right to be themselves. It may well be that this stage is the farthest that many people reach in their development toward freedom and responsibility. However, in the final analysis this halfway station leaves the person in a hopeless dilemma: for in granting one’s parents or parental substitutes the right to draft the laws, and in arguing before their court, one has already tacitly admitted their sovereignty. This implies one’s lack of freedom, and one’s guilt if one asserts one’s freedom. The hardest step of all, requiring the greatest courage, is to deny those under whose expectations one has lived the right to make the laws. And this is the most frightening step. It means accepting responsibility for one’s own standards and judgments, even though one knows how limited and imperfect they are. This is what we mean by the courage to accept one’s finiteness—which is the basic courage every human must have. #RandolphHarris 9 of 14
Accepting our finiteness is the courage to be and trust one’s self despite the fact that one is finite; it means acting, loving, thinking, creating, even though one knows one does not have the final answers, and one may well be wrong. However, it is only from a courageous acceptance of finitude, and a responsible acting thereon, that one develops the powers that one does possess—far from absolute though they may be. To do this presupposes the many sides of the development of consciousness of self which we have discussed, including self-discipline, the power to do the valuing, the creative conscience, and the creative relation to the wisdom of the past. Obviously this step requires a considerable degree of integration, and the courage it requires is the courage of maturity. For those who live as they should, passing away is the instant when, for an infinitesimal fraction of time, pure truth, unassisted, certain, and eternal, enters the soul. Life leading to this good is not only defined by a code of morals common to all, but also consists of a succession of acts and events strictly personal to one, and is essential to one who leaves them on one side never reaching the goal. Even when people are faced with inward darkness, one must have the everlasting conviction that any human being, even though practically devoid of natural faculties, can penetrate to the kingdom of truth reserved for genius, as long as one longs for truth and perpetually concentrates all one’s attention upon it attainment. One thus becomes a genius too. #RandolphHarris 10 of 14
Under the name of truth, we also include beauty, virtue, and every kind of goodness, as it is a conception of the relationship between grace and desire. The Christian idea of love for one’s neighbor is a form of justice and it is so beautiful. The duty of acceptance in all that concerns the will of God, whatever it may be, is impressed on the minds of many, as it is a duty we cannot fail in without dishonoring ourselves. This experience enables us to get a better understanding of the possibility of loving divine love. It is a beautiful love that one can experience with all of one’s soul and bear witness to the tenderness it enshrines. It is as if Christ comes down and takes possession of one. It allows for in the midst of suffering to feel the presence of a love, like that which one can read in the smile on a beloved face. Christ likes us to prefer truth to him because, before being Christ, he is truth. If one turns aside from him to go toward the truth, one will not go far before falling into his arms. Give beauty in the inward mortal, and may the outward and inward mortal be at one. The timelessness of beauty saves us from worshipping at the shrine of progress, or kneeling at the altar to pray that tomorrow we will make more money than today, and the future will be better than the past, until we are caught up in the sordid merry-go-round that makes it impossible for us to appreciate the delicious calm of a moment of timelessness. #RandolphHarris 11 of 14
Beauty has nothing to do with progress. Who will be so rash as to proclaim that our present buildings are more beautiful than the Parthenon? Or our present churches more beautiful than Chartres? Or our present dishware more beautiful than Greek vases? Or modern music better than Mozart and Bach? Beauty is beyond the confines of progress. Progress must not be identified with evolution, a very different thing. Even evolution does not guarantee that our species and our World are getting better and better; many species have been dropped out, and why should we be evolutions darling? The one thing we can be sure about is the timelessness of beauty. Let us, as Walter Pater entreats us, seek the desire for beauty, the experience of poetic passion, the love of art, the highest quality of each moment for its own sake. The great explosion of creativity which occurred in Fifth Century Greece has bequeathed to us an endlessly rich mine of beauty in which to spend precious hours and days in the company of great spirits. The Greeks were willing to live and die for beauty. It is fascinating to note how the scientists have kept alive the sense of beauty since Grecian times. The astronomer Kepler believed his discoveries were in direct line with Pythagoras, and that the revolution of the planets around the Sun was beautiful in the same sense as the vibrations of a violin string are beautiful. No wonder he spoke of the harmony of sphere, and broke out in a cry of joy, “I thank thee, Lord God our Creator, that thou allowest me to see the beauty in thy work of creation.” #RandolphHarris 12 of 14
Kepler also wrote, “Mathematics is the archetype of the beauty of the World.” Researchers of physics recognize truth by the splendor of its beauty. After this I came to feel that Plato was a mystic, that all the Iliad is bathed in Christian light, and that Dionysus and Osiris are in a certain sense Christ himself; and my low was thereby redoubled. We mistaken assume that beauty is passive, which is no doubt the influence of our culture which does not have time to listen to the active powers of beauty. However, listening is an active process. Every since Plato, beauty has been experienced by the sensitive persons as an active agent: it is the sign of the splendor of truth, and it speaks out through this splendor to the mathematicians, physicists, and all those who listen patiently. The effect of this practice is extraordinary and surprises me every time, for, although I experience it each day, it exceeds my expectation at each repetition. At times the very first words tear my thoughts from my body and transport it to a place outside space where there is neither perspective nor point of view. The infinity of the ordinary expanses of perception is replaced by an infinity to the second or some third degree. At the same time, filling every part of this infinity of infinity, there is silence, a silence which is not an absence of sound but which is the object of a positive sensation, more positive than that of sound. Noises, if there are any, only reach me after crossing this silence. #RandolphHarris 13 of 14
The stars in the Heavens sing a music if we only had ears to hear. The useful combinations are precisely the most beautiful, I mean those best able to charm this special sensibility that all mathematicians know. Sometimes, also, during this reflection or at other moments, Christ is present with me in person, but his presence is infinitely more real, more moving, more clear than on that first occasion when he took possession of me. It sometimes seems to me that when I am treated in so merciful a way, every sin on my part must be a mortal sin. And I am constantly committing them. However, for as to the spiritual direction of my soul, I think that God himself has taken it in hand from the start and still looks after it. What a lovely World we could live in if we would listen more frequently to this splendor! Beauty alone confers happiness on all, and under its influence every being forgets that one is limited. However, the sense of limitations is crucial to our creating beauty. We actually create beauty out of the endeavor to come to terms with the paradox on one hand of freedom and on the other of destiny. Our limits come from being both nature and spirit, finite and infinite, objective and subjective. No one knows this struggle better than the artists, be they painters or musicians or sculptors or dancers or any other figures in the arts. Sculptures or paintings or a piece of music is genuine beauty, a gift to the World. #RandolphHarris 14 of 14
The Purple Hues With the Rolling Green Hills Behind them…it is the Most Beautiful Time of the Day!
We need to make life on this World a little better. The gentlemen had risen to see me off. I murmured my superficial farewells, and only then did the secret grip release me. I walked slowly into the formal garden beyond the pool, and would have gone up into the roaring clouds, to be as far away from the Earth as I could be. However, I discovered a new quality of life which had begun with the poppies and spread out to an awareness of the colorful and adventurous aspect of life—the aspect of beauty—which had been there all the time but which I had never noticed. I seemed released from my old compulsions: I felt empowered, freed for all kinds of activities. I brushed up on my French and found, to my initial surprise, that there was a great deal of musical and cultural life in Rocklin, that friends of different nationalities were waiting, so to speak, for me to join them. These experiences were embodied in my life, and I could live out, imprint upon my psyche, the new ways of life learned psychologically; it crystallized my new understanding of beauty. Human beings can be saved from the danger of being transformed into things. The only wat to salvation lay in going forward and creating a new society that will free people from alienation, from submission to the machine, from the fate of being dehumanized. #RandolphHarris 1 of 12
Beauty is the experience that gives us a sense of joy and a sense of peace simultaneously. Other happenings gives us joy and afterwards peace, but in beauty these are the same experience. Understandings beauty is a way to liberate human beings from selfishness and greed, it is a way to be free to devote ourselves to the law of God and its wisdom, with no one to oppress or disturb it, and this will make us worthy of life in the World to come. In the era of God there will be neither famine nor war, neither jealousy nor strife. Earthly goods will be abundant, comforts within the reach of all. The one preoccupation of the whole World will be to know the Lord. Hence, it is beautiful that we will be very wise, we will know the things that are now concealed and will attain an understanding of our creator to the utmost capacity of the human mind. “For the Earth shall be full of the knowledge of the Lord, as the water cover the sea,” reports Isaiah 11.9. The goal of history is to enable human beings to devote themselves entirely to the study of wisdom and the knowledge of God; not solely power and luxury. The Messianic Time is one of Universal peace, absence of envy, and material abundance. Beauty is serene and at the same time exhilarating; it increases one’s sense of being alive. #RandolphHarris 2 of 12
The realm of freedom does not commence until the point is passed where labor under the compulsion of necessity and of external utility is required. In the very nature of things it lies beyond the sphere of material production in the strict meaning of the term. Just as people of the past had to wrestle with nature, in order to satisfy one’s wants, in order to maintain one’s life and reproduce it, so civilized mortals have to do it, and one must do it in all forms of society and under all possible modes of production. With one’s development the realm of natural necessity expands, because one’s wants increase; but at the same time the forces of production in this field cannot consist of anything else but of the fact that socialized mortals, the associated producers, regulate their interchange with nature rationally, bring it under their common control, instead of being ruled by it as by some blind power; that they accomplish their task with the least expenditure of energy and under conditions most adequate to their human nature and most worthy of it. However, it always remains a realm of necessity. Beyond it begins that development of human power which is its own end, the true realm of freedom, which, however, can flourish only upon that realm of necessity as its basis. The increase of beauty is its fundamental premise. #RandolphHarris 3 of 12
Beauty gives us not only a feeling of wonder; it imparts to us at the same moment a timelessness, a repose—which is why we speak of beauty as being eternal. Salvation does not postulate a final eschatological solution; the discrepancy between mortals and nature remains, but the realm of necessity is brought under human control as much as possible, but always remains a realm of necessity. The goal is that development of human power which is its own end, the true realm of freedom. When the whole World is preoccupied with knowing the Lord, this is the development of human power as its own end, as it will allow us to give birth to our inner wealth. Beauty is the mystery which enchants us. Like all higher experiences of being human, beauty is dynamic; its sense of repose, paradoxically, is never dead, and if it seems to be dead, it is no longer beauty. When cannot allow everything the economist takes away from us in the way of life and humanity to be restored to us in the form of money and material wealth. The goal is not luxury and wealth, nor is it poverty; in fact, both luxury and poverty can be looked upon as a vice. However, absolute poverty, as well as being wealthy, can be conditions that give birth to or have given birth to one’s inner wealth. #RandolphHarris 4 of 12
What is this act of giving birth? Well, you do not need a uterus, it is not a physical birth and something both men and women can experience. It is the active, unalienated expression of our faculty toward the corresponding objects. All human relations to the World—seeing, feeling, desiring, acting loving—in short all the organs of one’s individuality…are in their objective action [their action in relation to the object] the appropriation of this object, the appropriation of human reality. This is not the form of appropriation in the mode of being, not in the mode of having. Let us assume that mortals to be mortals, and their relation to the World to be a human one. Then love can only be exchanged for love, trust for trust, and so forth. If you wish to enjoy art, you must be an artistically cultivated person: if you wish to influence other people, you must be a person who really has a stimulating and encouraging effect upon others. Every one of your relations to mortals and to nature must be a specific expression, corresponding to the object of your will, of your real individual life. If you love without evoking love in return, for instance, if you are not able, by the manifestation of yourself as a loving person, to make yourself a beloved person, then your love is impotent and a misfortune. #RandolphHarris 5 of 12
Most people in our culture suppress their reactions to beauty; it is too soul-baring. A session with a patient in therapy may illustrate our general cultural shyness in talking on this topic. I had been seeing tis particular client, a woman, once a week for a year; always she talked about some practical problem, generally about the difficulties of getting along with her husband. Though I liked her and she was a highly intelligent person who was also mild, optimistic, pleasant, quiet, and unselfish, but she was a bit too bland and unwarlike, all things considered, and her quarrels with her husband had become boring to me. It appears that her intelligence represented the operation of the reality in principle in behavior, and was responsible for characteristics as the appropriate delay of impulse-expression and the effective organization of instinctual energy necessary for the attainment of goals in the World as it is. Easy accessibility of both primary process and secondary process indicated that she is a person who is both original and intelligent. This how she began by saying she was very weary, they had had visitors for a week, she was “punch drunk” and did not have much to say. #RandolphHarris 6 of 12
So I suggested, since she was so fatigued, that she try free association, simply letting whatever popped into her mind come forth. I explained Dr. Freud’s idea of free association: it is like looking out the window of a speeding train. Each view seems separated from the one before, but when you look down on the whole, as though from above, one can see it makes a meaningful landscape. She somewhat reluctantly agreed though she did not believe it would do any good. Following in a summary of the hour: The first thing that comes to me, I stopped my car on the way here to look at the twilight. It was just beautiful, the purple hues with the green hills behind them…it is the most beautiful time of the day…I believe in God, and when I see such beauty, I know there is a Divine Creator. The poets in the country I come from speak of this time of day when they are writing the most important things—when they write of love and so on. In the twilight I used to go to the beach all alone, it was lovely. This time of day would be a good time to die, a good time to be alone…I should have been a poet [smiling]…This time at twilight does not last long. It seems to say something about true love—it cannot be actualized. [Silence] #RandolphHarris 7 of 12
I would like to die at this time…It is so peaceful here in your office…I keep noticing the beauty outside the window…My mother called from [another country]…called all the way to tell me she has a cold…That ruins the beauty…My mother always wanted me to notice the beauty…to enjoy the World. The bay is so beautiful…I stop each time I drive toward the bridge…San Francisco seems unreal, like a fata morgana…I am part of it…it feels so good, I want to melt into it. People come up to me, want me to take their picture with their camera, they stand right in front so they block out all the picture [she laughs]. Maybe I think other people ruin the scene. When I was in the army [in another country], I would go swimming in the ocean at twilight, alone. It was wonderful. Then the waves drove me out—they seemed like monsters coming after me. The mountains behind the ocean are great in twilight, but they become monsters—big and dark—when night falls. [End of summary] At the conclusion of the hour I asked her how she felt. “Somewhat relaxed…like when I go to a good movie. My friends want to talk about it, but not I…This scene here [looking out my windows] is pure beauty.” She then expressed her fear that she had said nothing today, maybe it was all superficial talk. I assured her that no topics could be more important than beauty, God, death. I added that I thought it was the most profound hour we had ever had. #RandolphHarris 8 of 12
This person is like the majority of people in our Western culture: we are shy about them, they are too persona. We talk about the view, anything to avoid the personal statement. And if we do let out such feelings we apologize for them, as this woman did in saying she was afraid it was all superficial talk. It is fascinating how much beauty preoccupied this young woman, and yet she had never mentioned it before. Each of us can give as examples of beauty only those experiences which have impressed us. Beauty is, to me, listening to Aaliyah’s self-titled album or Arimin van Buuren’s A State of Trance, or Murray Perahia play a Mozart concerto. Beauty is standing under the grape arbor among lilacs in May when the air is heavy with their fragrance, faint for a moment and then filling the air suddenly again as though to intoxicate us. My own experience of beauty has generally been of the simple things—a walk through the pine forests beside the lake, snow in Winter weighing down the limbs of spruce trees till they touch the ground. When the limpid sky turns to pink and the pink to orange and then a fiery red as the Sun rises over the mountains like a God to change the whole face of the Earth, that is what I consider beautiful. The greatest block to a person’s development of courage is one’s having to take on a way of life which is not rooted in one’s own powers. #RandolphHarris 9 of 12
Early in the morning in Summers in Rocklin Trails I walk out of my house on the far edge of the meadow as the morning mist hangs in the air. The Sun rises and its yellow rays rest on the mist. There is no human sound, only the song of thrushes in the bushes. On every blade of grass in the meadow there is a pearl-drop of dew, and as I pick a blade and look more closely I see on each pearl-drop its spectrum of color reflecting the Sun, creating a meadow filled with trillions of tiny sparkling rainbows. However, in our culture, in our discursive language, we cannot talk too much of beauty. Thus a person is unable to know what one believes, let alone stand up for it, or what one’s own powers are, if one has had all along to live up to some role of oneself in one’s parents’ eyes—an image one carries on and perpetuates with oneself. One’s courage is a vacuum before one very begins to act, since it has no real basis within the individual. True, in poetry or in painting or in music we can communicate the experience. However, beauty is a subjective vision at the same moment as it is an objective datum, and we need to respect this wholeness, this union of experience. This is why, when we are before an image of beauty, we instinctively remain silent. We look and we listen. When we talk too much about beauty, we are objectifying it, putting it outside ourselves, destroying the inner vision and reducing it to objective chatter. #RandolphHarris 10 of 12
We must preserve the capacity for wonder—which is the awareness that we can never fully explain the inner experience of beauty. There is also a cultural reason why we do not talk much about beauty. Our culture worships change. We become bored instead of serene; and how then can we appreciate the sense of eternity, the timelessness of this experience? In our age time is money; we construct great buildings only to tear them down in seventy-five years. We erect the tallest edifice in the World, which destroy the previously lacelike loveliness of the skyline of New York, which was one of the wonders of the World. Our age is not one in which beauty has a firm place at the Board of Directors’ meeting. We must nevertheless, being human, communicate by words as much as we can. Normally when a child can take each step in differentiation from one’s parents, each step in becoming oneself, without unbearable anxiety. Just as one learns to climb the steps despite the pain and frustration of falling back time and again, and eventually succeeds with a laugh of joy, so one normally feels out one’s own psychological independence step by step. Aware of one’s parents’ love, and aware of a security present in proportion to one’s degree of immaturity, one can take the occasional crises with parents and such crises as going to school, and one’s growing courage is not overwhelmed. One is not required to stand alone to a greater degree than one is prepared to do. #RandolphHarris 11 of 12
However, if the parents need, like the mother above, to force the child out of their own anxiety, one’s task is made that much more difficult. Parents who have inner, often unconscious, doubts about their own strength tend to demand that their children be especially courageous, independent and aggressive; they may buy the son boxing gloves, push him into competitive groups at an early age, and in other ways insist that the child be the man they inwardly feel they are not. Generally parents who push the child, like those who overprotect one, are showing in actions which speak louder than words their own lack of confidence in him. However, just as no child will develop courage by being overprotected, so no child will develop it by being pushed. One may develop obstinacy or bullying tendencies. However, one’s courage grows only as an outcome of one’s confidence, generally unverbalized, in one’s own powers and one’s indigenous qualities as a human being. This confidence gets its base from one’s parents’ love for the individual and their belief in one’s potentialities. What one needs is neither overprotection nor pushing, but help to utilize and develop one’s own power, and most of all to feel that one’s parents see one as a person in one’s own right and love one for one’s own particular capacities and values. #RandolphHarris 12 of 12
No Integrity is Perfect, Out of the Heart are the Issues of Life–Let Us See More Concretely How Humans Make Ethical Choices!
And so down the long centuries it comes down to this. Was it you, you traitor to everything the believed? It had to be, did it not? You petty deserter. May God forgive you that you made peace with your enemy. Did you lead them here by the hand yourself? You made are people as hard as ice, that is what you did. Frozen solid. If there is a soul left in them, I cannot feel it. But what do I know? Humans really should be called the valuator. No people could live without first valuing; if a people will maintain itself, however, it must not value as its neighbor valueth. The existence of a very general attitude toward experience, of a sort that disposes toward complexity of outlook, independence of judgment, and originality, has been suggested by the result of the studies. Valuing is created; hear it, ye creating ones! Valuation itself is the treasure and jewel of the valued things. Through valuation only is there value; and without valuation the soul of existence would be hollow. Hear it, ye creating ones! Individuals who refuse to yield to strong pressure from their peers to concur in a false group opinion described themselves, on an adjective check-list, as original and artistic much more frequently than do subjects who yielded to such group pressure. In addition, the independent (nonyielding) subjects show a definite preference for complex and asymmetrical line drawings, as opposed to simple and symmetrical drawings. #RandolphHarris 1 of 19
This preference for the complex and asymmetrical has been show previously to be highly correlated both with the choice of art as a vocation and with rated artistic ability among art students. Furthermore, in a sample of Ph.D. candidates in the sciences, preferences for the complex and asymmetrical figures proved to be significantly related to rated originality in graduate work. This relationship was found among graduating medical school seniors who were rated for originality be the medical school faculty. Other evidence indicated that the opposed preferences, for complexity or for simplicity, were related to a generalized experiential disposition: the preference for complexity is associated with a perceptual attitude that seeks to allow into the perceptual system the greatest possible richness of experience, even though discord and disorder result, while the preference for simplicity is associated with a perceptual attitude that allows into the system only as much as can be integrated without great discomfort and disorder, even though this means excluding some aspects of reality. From all these considerations, certain hypotheses as to the characteristics of original persons were derived and put to the test in the present study. Hypothesis one is that original persons prefer complexity and some degree of apparent imbalance in phenomena. The second hypothesis is that original persons are more complex psychodynamically and have greater personal scope. #RandolphHarris 2 of 19
The third hypothesis is that original persons are more independent in their judgments, and the fourth hypothesis is that original persons are more self-assertive and dominant. The fifth hypothesis is that original persons reject suppression as a mechanism for the control of impulse. This would imply that they forbid themselves fewer thoughts, that they dislike to police themselves or others, that they are disposed to entertain impulses and ideas that are commonly taboo, and in general that they express in their person the sort of indiscipline that psychoanalytic theory would ascribe to a libidinal organization in which derivatives of the early anal rather than of the late anal stage in which psychosexual development predominate. What is common to both rational and irrational authority is that it is overt authority. You know who orders and forbids; the father, the teacher, the boss, the king, the officer, the priest, God, the law, the moral conscience. The demands or prohibitions may be reasonable or not, strict or lenient, I may obey or rebel; I always know that there is an authority, who it is, what it wants, and what results from my compliance or my rebellion. Thus the ability to respond in an unusual or original manner will be greatest when freedom is great. Now freedom is related in a very special manner to degree and kind of organization. #RandolphHarris 3 of 19
In general, organization in company with complexity generates freedom; the more complex the level of integration, the greater is the repertoire of adaptive responses. However, the tendency toward organization may operate in such a fashion as to maintain a maladaptive simplicity. We are familiar in the political sphere with totalitarian stats which depend upon suppression to achieve unity; such states are psychodynamically similar to the neurotic individual who suppresses one’s own impulses and emotions in order to maintain a semblance of stability. There are at hand enough case histories of both such organizations, political and private, to make it clear that the sort of unity and balance that depends upon total suppression of the claims of minority affects opinions is maladaptive in the long run. Suppression is a common way of achieving unity, however, because in the short run it often seems to work. Increasing complexity puts a strain upon an organism’s ability to integrate phenomena. One solution of the difficulty is to inhibit development of the greater level of complexity and thus to avoid the temporary disintegration that would otherwise have resulted. Originality, then flourishes where suppression is at a minimum and where some measure of disintegration is tolerable in the interests of a higher level of integration which may yet be reached. #RandolphHarris 4 of 19
If we consider the case of a human being who develops strongly the disposition toward originality, we must posit certain personal characteristics and personal history which facilitated the development of such a disposition. In our hypotheses, the term dominance was used to describe one trait of the regularly original individual. Dominance may be translated as a strong need for personal mastery, not merely over other persons, but over all experience. It initially involves self-centeredness (which in its socialized form may come to be known as self-realization). One aspect of it is the insistence on a high degree of self-regulation, and a rejection of regulation by others. For such a person, the most crucial development crisis in relation to control of impulse comes, if we accept the psychoanalytic formulation of stages of psychosexual development, at the anal stage of socialization. At this level one learns independence is important and necessary, as well as toilet training and to keep one’s clothes clean. What our hypotheses have suggested is that there is a beneficial rebellion against the prohibition of unregulated anal production, and a carrying of the derivatives of anal indiscipline into adult life. The original person, in adulthood, thus often likes things messy, at least at first. The tendency is toward a final order, but the necessary preliminary is as bis a mess as possible. #RandolphHarris 5 of 19
Viewed developmentally, the rejection of externally imposed control at the anal stage is later generalized to all external control of impulse, with the tendency toward socially unlicensed phallic activity, or phallic exhibitionism in its more derivative forms, being simply another expression of the general rejection of regulation of impulse by others, in favor of regulation of impulse by oneself. The disposition toward originality may thus be seen as a highly organized mode of responding to experience, including other persons, society, and oneself. The socially disrated traits that may go along with it include rebelliousness, disorderliness, and exhibitionism, while the socially valued traits which accompany it include independence of judgment, freedom of expression, and novelty of construction and insight. Every act has an infinite number of deterministic elements in it, to be sure, but at the moment of personal decision something occurs which is not just the product of these conditioning forces. A man, for example, is confronted with a picket line as he arrives to board a steamer for a trip to fill a speaking engagement. The strike, say, is one which the issue of justice is far from simple, as in the recent disputes in the New York harbor between two stevedore unions. The man is confronted with what for him, let us assume, is a strong ethical issue—shall he cross the picket line? #RandolphHarris 6 of 19
The man may endeavor by countless means to determine the justice of the strike, to weigh his own needs to take the trip, or alternate means of transportation. However, the point of decision to board the ship or not, he draws himself together and assumes the risk in his decision. This risk will be present no matter which way he decides. The action, like a dive into water, is done by the person as a whole or not at all. To be sure we are speaking in somewhat ideal terms; many persons would tend to act by a rule—I never cross picket lines,” or “The hell with strikers”—and to rationalize out of the responsibility this way or that. However, to the extent that the person is able to fulfill his human capacities in any action—that is, to choose in self-awareness—he makes the decision as a relative unity. This element of unity does not arise merely out of the integration of his personality—though the more mature he is, the more will he be able to act in this way. Rather, it arises from the fact that any action chosen in self-awareness is a placing of oneself on the line as it were; it involves a commitment, to a greater or lesser extent a leap. It is as though one were saying, “To the best of my lights at the moment this is what I choose to do, even thought I may know more and choose differently tomorrow.” The person’s act of choosing itself throws a new element into the picture. The configuration is changed, if ever so slightly; someone has thrown his weight on one side or the others. This is the creative and the dynamic element in decision. #RandolphHarris 7 of 19
As everyone knows, a person is influenced in a multitude of ways by unconscious forces. However, it is often overlooked that conscious decisions, if they are soundly and not precipitately or defiantly made, can change the direction in which unconscious forces push. This is illustrated most fascinatingly in drams in therapeutic sessions when a person as been struggling for months to make the decision, let us say, to leave home and get a job on one’s own. During these months one’s dreams have been roughly equally on the pro and con side of the issue, some dreams warning one to stay home, others saying it is better to go. One finally makes the decision to leave and one’s dreams suddenly become strongly on the optimistic side, as if the conscious decision releases some unconscious power likewise. It seems that there are potentialities within us for healthy which are not released until we make a conscious decision. Allegorically, the individual’s decision is like that of the Israelites in their battle against the army of Sisera: “the stars in their courses fought Sisera,” but not until the Israelites decided to fight, too. #RandolphHarris 8 of 19
An ethical act, then, must be an action chosen and affirmed by the person doing it, and act which is an expression of one’s inward motives and attitudes. It is honest and genuine in that it would be affirmed in one’s dreams as well as one’s waking thoughts. Thus an ethical mortal does not act on the conscious levels as though one loves someone when on unconscious levels one hates the individual. To be sure, no integrity is perfect; all human actions have some ambivalence, and no motives are entirely pure. An ethical action does not mean one must act as a completely unified person—with no doubts at all—or one would never act. One will always have struggle, doubt, conflict. It means only that one has endeavored to act as nearly as possible from the center of oneself, that one admits and is aware of the fact that one’s motives are not completely clear and assumes responsibility for making them clearer as one learns in the future. In this emphasis on inner motives in ethical acts, the findings of modern psychotherapy and the ethical teachings of Jesus have their clearest parallel. For the essential point in Jesus’ ethics was his shifting the emphasis from the external rules of the Ten Commandments to inward motives. Out of the heart are the issues of life. The ethical issues of life, he held, are not simply “thou shalt not kill,” but rather are inward attitudes toward other persons—anger, resentment, exploitative lust in the heart, railings, jealousies, and so on. #RandolphHarris 9 of 19
The wholeness of the mortal whose external actions are at one with one’s inner motives is what is meant by the expression in beatitudes, the pure in heart. Purify your hearts, ye double-minded! Some persons will be frightened by the freedom in such an ethics of inwardness, and made anxious by the responsibility which this places on each mortal’s decisions. They may yearn for the rules, the absolutes, the rigid ancient law, which relieves us of this fearful burden of free choice. And in the longing for a rule, one might protest, your ethics of inward motives and personal decision lead to anarchy—everyone can then act as one wishes! However, freedom cannot be avoided by such an argument. For what is honest and true for a given person is not totally dissimilar from what is true for others. Dr. Tillich has stated that “the principles which constitute the Universe must be sought in mortals,” and the converse is true, that what is found in mortal’s experience is to some extent a reflection of what is true in the Universe. This can be clearly illustrated in art. A picture is never beautiful if it is not honest, and to the extent that it is honest, that is, represents the immediate, deep and original perceptions and experience of the artist, it will have at least the beginnings of beauty. This is why the art work of children, when it is an expression of their simple and honest feelings, is almost always beautiful: any line one make as a free, spontaneous person will have it in the beginning of grace and rhythm. #RandolphHarris 10 of 19
The harmony, balance and rhythm which are principles of the Universe, present in the movement of stars as well as atoms, and underlying our concepts of beauty, are likewise present in the harmony of rhythm and balance of the body as well as other aspects of the self. However, at the moment the child begins to copy, or to draw to get praise from adults, or to draw by rules, the lines become rigid, constricted, and the grace vanishes. The truth in the inner light tradition in religious history is that one must always begin with oneself. No one has known God who has not known oneself—fly to the soul, the secret place of the Most High. Relating this truth, each individual is one’s own center, and the entire World centers in one, because one’s self-knowledge is a knowledge of God. This is not the whole story of ethics and the good life, but certainly if we do not start there we will get no place. The religious and philosophical development after the end of the Middle Ages is too complex to be treated within the present volume. It can be characterized by the struggle between two principles: the Christian, spiritual tradition in theological or philosophical forms and the pagan tradition of idolatry and inhumanity that assumed many forms in the development of what might be called the religious of industrialism and the cybernetic era. #RandolphHarris 11 of 19
Following the tradition of the Late Middle Ages, the humanism of the Renaissance was the first great flowering of the religious spirit after the end of the Middle Ages. The ideas of human dignity, of the unity found in it an unencumbered expression. The seventeenth—and eighteenth-century Enlightenment expressed another great flowering of humanism. If we examine the foundation of this faith, we find that at every turn the Philosophers betrayed their debt to medieval thought without being aware of it. The French Revolution, to which Enlightenment philosophy had given birth, was more than a political revolution. It was a political revolution which functioned in the manner and which took on in some sense the aspect of a religious revolution. Like Islamism and the Protestant revolt it overflowed the frontiers of countries and nations and was extended by preaching and propaganda. Radical humanism in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries is descried later on, in my discussion of the humanist protest against the paganism of the industrial age. However, to provide a base for that discussion we must now look at the new paganism that has developed side by side with humanism, threatening at the present moment of history to destroy us. The change that prepared the first basis for the development of the industrial religion was the elimination, by Martin Luther, of the motherly element in the church. #RandolphHarris 12 of 19
Although it may appear an unnecessary detour, I must dwell on this problem for a while, because it is important to our understanding of the development of the new religion and the new social character. Societies have been organized according to two principles: patricentric (or patriarchal) and matricentric (or matriarchal). The matricentric principle is centered in the figure of the loving mother. The motherly principle is that of unconditional love; the mother loves her children not because they please her, but because they are her (or another woman’s) children. For this reason the mother’s love cannot be acquired by good behavior, nor can it be lost by sinning. Motherly love is mercy and compassion (in Hebrew rachamim, the root of which is rechem, the womb”). Fatherly love, on the contrary, is conditional; it depends on the achievements and good behavior of the child; father loves that child most who is like him, for instance, whom he wishes to inherit his property. Father’s love can be lost, but it can also be regained by repentance and renewed submission. Father’s love is justice. The two principles, the feminine-motherly and the masculine-fatherly, correspond not only to the presence of a masculine and feminine side in any human being but specifically to the need for mercy and justice in every man and woman. #RandolphHarris 13 of 19
The deepest yearning of human beings seems to be a constellation in which the two poles (motherliness and fatherliness, female and male, mercy and justice, feeling and thought, nature and intellect) are united in a synthesis, in which both sides of the polarity lose their antagonism and, instead, color each other. While such a synthesis cannot be fully reached in a patriarchal society, it existed to some extent in the Roman Church. The Virgin, the church as the all-loving mother, the pope and the priest as motherly figures represented motherly, unconditional, all-forgiving love, side by side with the fatherly elements of a strict, patriarchal bureaucracy with the pope at the top ruling by power. Corresponding to these motherly elements in the religious system was the relationship toward nature in the process of production: the work of the peasant as well as of the artesian was not a hostile exploitative attack against nature. It was cooperation with nature: not destructive but transforming nature according to its own laws. Martin Luther established a purely patriarchal form of Christianity in Northern European that was based on the urban middle class and the secular princes. The essence of this new social character is submission under patriarchal authority, with work as the only way to obtain love and approval. #RandolphHarris 14 of 19
Behind the Christian façade arose a new secret religion, industrial religion, that is rooted in the character structure of modern society, but is not recognized as religion. The industrial religion is completely incompatible with genuine Christianity. It reduces people to servants of the economy and of the machinery that their own hands build. The industrial religion had its basis in a new social character. Its center was fear of and submission to powerful male authorities, cultivation of the sense of guilt for disobedience, dissolution of the bonds of human solidarity by the supremacy of self-interest and mutual antagonism. The sacred in industrial religion was work, property, profit, power, even though it furthered individualism and freedom within the limits of its general principles. By transforming Christianity into a strictly patriarchal religion it was still possible to express the industrial religion in Christian terminology. How do we learn to mistrust our anger and pass this mistrust on from one generation to another? After all, the idea that anger has a legitimate and inevitable place in life has been stated many times before. Yet the suppression of anger remains an actual, though sometimes disavowed, ideal for most of us. Our mistrust of our anger is learned, of course. And we learn it because it is taught to us. And the teaching begins early. Even small babies are frequently punished for angry behavior and rewarded for behavior that is more pleasing to the parents. #RandolphHarris 15 of 19
As the child grows older, the training becomes more specific and explicit. The child is told not to express anger toward parents, or brothers and sisters, or others. He is taught that anger is bad and that it is bad because it is the opposite of love. Most parents are too sophisticated these days to say, “If you get angry with me, it means you do not love me.” Or: “If you get mad at me, I will not love you any more.” Or: “If you do something, and I get angry with you, it means I do not love you.” However, despite our intellectual sophistication about these matters, we still give them because we are not so sure that they are not true. This is probably the most important way in which the ideal of the suppression of anger is maintained in our culture. A perpetual cycle is set up. We, as parents, having been subtly indoctrinated as children, cannot accept within ourselves the anger that we all experience. Our inclination is to avoid admitting our anger and dealing directly with our guilt about it. It is much easier for us to recognize and condemn the anger we see in our children. So when our children express anger toward us, we react quickly to their talking back or smarting off. The anger we express under these circumstances is, of course, justified because we are doing it for the good of the child and to teach one a lesson. In other words, we have been righteously indignant. #RandolphHarris 16 of 19
Our children, then, through many of these experiences, come to feel guilty about their anger when they feel it and more so when they express it. In order to please us and society they may try to suppress entirely this evil side of their nature. Unless the continuing cycle is interrupted, they, too, will eventually become parents well prepared to teach their children to mistrust their feelings of anger. Another reason we learn to mistrust our anger is that we often have little opportunity to learn as children that we can be very angry without being dangerous. Often the only message the child hears is that if he or she becomes angry the outcome is likely to be disastrous. He is apt, for example, to understand that if one becomes angry with the boy next door one is liable to be in danger of being harmed. Under these circumstances one has little opportunity to learn that one can express anger directly and openly without the necessity of resorting to harmful violence. One frightening reality is that there is indeed danger when a person has been encouraged to view oneself along these extreme lines, so that one says of oneself, “If I do not keep my anger suppressed, I am likely to hurt someone.” When the emotional overload of anger eventually piles up beyond the point where is can be suppressed, such a person is not prepared to act any way but violently, with the flood of backed-up emotion suddenly released. #RandolphHarris 17 of 19
Children also learn to mistrust their feelings of anger because their parents make it apparent that they are afraid of their own anger. Some parents go to great lengths to avoid letting the children see them fight. They feel so frightened and guilty about their anger that they assume it would be very frightening and emotionally damaging to their children for them to witness their parents in a heated argument. What the children often witness are sullen silences between their parents that are probably frightening to the child because one has no idea what they are about and yet sense the anger. The child often interprets these silences as much more serious breaches between the parents than they actually are. And when the child does happen to overhear a fight between the parents (perhaps without their knowledge), it may seem as though the family is disintegrating, since one has been taught by word and implication that anger is a cataclysmic and catastrophic occurrence in human relationships. However, even if the parents were successful in hiding all their disagreements, the results would probably still be harmful; for the child would be likely to feel even more guilty and frightened about one’s own anger when one has no opportunity to observe similar feelings in one’s parents’ dealings with each other. #RandolphHarris 18 of 19
On the other hand, when parents make little or no attempt to hide their anger from their children, but have not learned to fight creatively, it is certain to be frightening to the children. Such fights lead nowhere. Perhaps when the argument begins, dad stomps out of the hose or mother withdraws behind a bitter wall of silence. Or perhaps the fighting degenerates into an incessant bickering back and forth that fails to clarify the real issues. The fears that keep the parents from dealing creatively with their anger are almost certain to infect the child under such circumstances. For the child has been denied the opportunity to see those one loves dealing openly and realistically with anger. One as not been able to witness one’s parents in a natural ebb and flow of anger openly and directly expressed, resulting in relief of tension, clearing of the air, and the good feeling of having been oneself, followed by the reassertion of their deep affection also being expressed openly and directly. “But behold, my limbs did receive their strength again, and I stood upon my feet, and did manifest unto the people that I had been born of God,” reports Alma 36.23. #RandolphHarris 19 of 19
Her expression remained placid, though she looked away, her inner focus gathering. The situation is not encouraging when men and women attempt to cling to old patters of male dominated relationships. For the woman this often means that she takes great pride in being feminine and, perhaps, protests too much that she enjoys being just a housewife who devotes her life to home and children and is dependent on her husband for economic support, direction, and decision-making. Very often, particularly in a World where the position of women has changed, the woman has more hostility about this subordinate role than she admits, even to herself. Frequently this rage expresses itself in a helpless role played by the woman, which in reality gives her a powerful tool for controlling those around here. One such woman seemed helpless in many ways. She was frightened of driving into the nearby metropolitan area from the suburbs in which she lived. So whenever she needed to go it was up to her husband to take her. Her housework and shopping often seemed like overwhelming tasks, so her husband had to out. She depended heavily on him to take over with the children. Then, in the throes of marital difficulties, the husband moved out. However, she found to her surprise that se could function perfectly well without him. When she needed to go to the city, she drove without a qualm. She organized her housework and shopping around a job schedule and had things running more smoothly than they had ever been when he husband was around to help. #RandolphHarris 1 of 11
After a few weeks of separation, the husband moved back home to give it another try. Immediately she slipped back into the helpless role. She suddenly was unable to do what she had been doing so nicely. Finally she was able to see that she had been playing this dependent role hoping thereby to hold on to her husband because she needed him so much and could not get along without him, although in reality the role made her seem an incompetent nag toward whom the husband reacted with irritability and criticism. The man who maintains a dominant role in the home and reserves important decision-making to himself may, if he is a benevolent dictator and his wife does not mind, have a relatively successful and happy relationship. Nevertheless, the role of superiority always creates some emotional distance. You cannot have it both ways, a superior-subordinate relationship and a full partnership. And probably only in the latter can the fullest intimacy be achieved. Little needs to be said, of course, about those situations in which men attempt to maintain a dominant position in the home by physical or psychological brutality. Emotional intimacy is absent, and if the relationship continues indefinitely the woman who tolerates it must either be too weak to institute a change or have a need for punishment. Perhaps the central characteristic of the relations that have been described is that each of them involves a denial and suppression of parts of the self. The person may have some awareness of this, or it may occur with little or no conscious thought. #RandolphHarris 2 of 11
This denial of the self is the symptom of distrust and hate of one’s self. The individual not only does not accept as a legitimate part of himself that which he denies and suppresses; he also assumes it will not be accepted by those whose love he most desires. Furthermore, he lacks confidence in his ability to handle the situation if he were to express all of his feelings and then encounter the hurt he fears. Thus, although one woman may never see what she is doing clearly enough to admit it even to herself, her relationship to her husband may be summed up as follows: “Even though I long to be loved and protected, I dare not let him see that I am warm and soft and full of need for him. Even if he responds at the moment, he would see my vulnerability and weakness and would inevitably hurt me and use me more than I could bear. I would be in his power.” On another woman’s life may suggest that she is saying: “I have to tiptoe carefully through life and not let my husband see I have a mind of my own. I have good ideas about what should be done in our home and family life, but if I let him know directly about these things he will think I am trying to ruin his life. There are ways I have of getting things I want out of him, but I could never discuss them with him directly. If I did not keep him thinking I am pretty helpless and that he is the he-man around there, he would probably leave.” #RandolphHarris 3 of 11
And one man’s life may sounds something like this: “I have all kinds of feelings, but I cannot afford to let her see many of them. Sometimes I feel lonely and frightened—like I did often as a kid. And maybe I would like to put my head on her lap and cry a little and be confronted. However, I would not let myself do that—let her see my little-oy feelings. I would seem weak to her, and she would despise me even though she might make a show of comforting me at the time. In fact it is even hard for me to show my tenderness and love for her most of the time, for I just feel in my bones that she would get around to taking advantage of my weakness.” The tone of another man’s life may be: “I would like to be more significant to my wife and family than I am. And sometimes I feel angry both at myself and at her because I am not. I have some pretty definite ideas, too, about how things should be run around here, but often they seem to run counter to what she wants. However, I guess it makes sense to let her do things her way. If I did not there would probably be everlasting bickering and the marriage might not survive. I guess it is just better to get most of my satisfactions outside of the home.” Involved in all of these lives is an almost paradoxical relationship between independence and dependence. None of the persons described is truly independent; that is, they lack self-acceptance and confidence in their ability to stand alone if need be. There is, therefore, a deep-rooted insecurity about relationships and a fear that they will be abandoned by those who are important to them. #RandolphHarris 4 of 11
Without full awareness of what is happening they dedicate their lives to the proposition that half a loaf is better than none. In other words, they settle for a partial relationship rather than risk no relationship at all. Since they do not feel truly independent, they cannot risk letting others see their dependency—their need for love. Or they feign a dependency that in reality is simply a new means of controlling the other person and seducing him to staying around. What it comes to is that our fear of manhood or womanhood is, above all else, a fear of being ourselves. For society today, if we only could grasp it, has probably opened the door more widely than ever before to the possibility of creative relationships between men and women. The answer lies in the direction of the disarmingly simple but very complex matter of being our total selves in relationship with the opposite gender. Concerning the general relationship of emotional conflict to creativity, much more needs to be said. To get some perspective on the dynamics involved, we must consider the problem in some of its formal aspects. To begin with, conflict, taken in the most general sense, describes a state of affairs in which one force, or a complex of forces acting in relative unity, meets another force or complex of forces similarly organized. Forces in the stars and forces in the atom are prototypical physical examples in which conflict may produce explosion and enormous destruction. #RandolphHarris 5 of 11
Conflict is one aspect of all natural phenomena; it is an indispensable part of life, of change, of the development of new forms. Forces change one another, just as people, who are forces, do; and we are changed by what we change. Conflict would cease only if the Universe itself in its totality came to a state of perfect equilibrium, in which case it would be dead. Like itself, in this interpretation, is a vehicle for the maintenance of disequilibrium. Life is a stone thrown uphill against the downward rush of matter. A bit cheerlessly, I thought, and inaccurately, life is a detour on the road to death. The physical theory that the material Universe is tending toward a state in which there will be no motion and no conflict. In this view, life itself is a force that offers challenge to the inanimate. Conflict is thus a Universal in all of nature and is in some sense disembodied; genuine emotional conflicts can be lively things and often we can thank our lucky stars when we get a good one to grapple with. They can have in them the makings of something better. Conflict is in many instances generative of new solutions rather than a disabling form of stasis. The real question is this: can an internal dialogue take place between conflicting forces in such a fashion that the speakers do not simply repeat themselves but that occasionally something new gets said? #RandolphHarris 6 of 11
Let us consider for a moment the more common case, in which the dialogue is forever repeated and opposing forces in the conflict, quite undeterred by tedium, reassert their position over and over again in an intrapsychic equivalent of cold war. Dr. Freud gave the name “repetition compulsion” to the universal human tendency to get into the same jam time after time. Usually the situation that is repeated is one which it its most primitive form occurred in early childhood. As the brain develops, however, and the capacity for complex symbolization increases, the situations tend to get fancier and fancier so far as content is concerned, so that in extreme cases, such as the delusional system of a paranoid schizophrenic, the entire cosmos becomes involved, complete with people from outer space armed with ray guns, and private conversations with divine personages and the celebrated dead. A well-worked-out psychoneurosis may be equally elegant, however, and I think it not too much to suggest that many events of great importance in World history had their beginnings in infantile disasters or conquests which individuals of unusual personal force caused to find re-enactment, with the World itself as stage. Whether the re-enactment is momentous for others or hardly noticed at all by them, the point is that these repetitions are essentially static in character and have the smell of death about them. Forces in the unconscious are blind, they are locked in upon themselves, they do not change one another because essentially there is never a mutual confrontation. #RandolphHarris 7 of 11
Moreover, the histrionic in which they involve the individual and those with whom one one’s self is involved in the external World are generally grade B or C melodramas. If viewed from the outside and if viewed without sympathy, they are like nothing so much as the kind of television film that is regularly re-run. Psychoneurosis in this view is the most tedious thing under the Sun, and banality is its essence. What depth psychotherapy attempts to do is to alter the deadly stasis of unconscious conflict by bringing the conflicting forces into consciousness, where they will have a chance to look at one another and hear what the other has to say. The hard necessity in depth therapy is to permit regression to occur, a little bit at a time, concurrently with efforts at increasing the strength of the ego, so that the patient may allow to come back into consciousness some painful feeling or severely tabooed impulse which had earlier been repressed. When this happens, the conflict can come out into the open, elements in it can be discriminated and criticized, and genuine confrontation with consequent decision may ensure. This sort of constructive meeting of opposing forces may occur without psychotherapy, of course. People were working hard at know themselves long before Dr. Freud cast into the form of a theoretical system and a technique of therapy hos own particular way of getting to know himself. Socrates long ago took self-knowledge as his goal, and judging from the Platonic dialogues he seems to have progressed well. Many of the philosophers and artists of the World have exemplified in their person the same process. #RandolphHarris 8 of 11
The artist transforms material from the unconscious into a social communication; he gives it reality involving discrimination, selection, technique, purpose, and understanding both of the material itself and of its potential audience. In saying this, let me make it plain, I am not saying that the artist is usually neurotic or that his neurosis is being expressed in his art. Artists indeed seem to have more than their share of troubles, at least troubles of a certain sort, but we certainly need not say that because a person is troubled he has a psychoneurosis. Could it not be that individuals of unusual sensibility and symbolic scope are at once more prone to despair, disgust, forlornness, and rage at the tragedy, to use Yeats’ vivid expression, of consciousness harnessed to a dying animal and yet at the same time ore capable of transcending these universal human bonds through metaphor and through identification with natural processes? Fear, anger, guilt, and despair are perfectly natural and appropriate emotions for all of us at times, and people who experience life most intensely are likely to feel such emotions most extremely (as well, let it be said, as joy, love, and freedom of spirit). So, if they are artists, they will seek to express their image of life and their relation to it in the cultural language of which they have most command, and thus invite others to test the reality of their perceptions and, in a sense, to join them. #RandolphHarris 9 of 11
Whatever is neurotic in them then becomes a part of the content, symbolically expressed, of their creative activity, and not simply a part of themselves that inhibits construction. Many creative people offer to psychoanalysis when it is proferred them a fundamental objection which for them is perhaps right. Although by not accepting it they may thus be left with their woes, there is yet the chance that as they struggles with their problems they may out of their distress make a testament to their belief in the ultimate intelligibility and significance of not only their own lives, but the lives of others. And for this, of course, there are great rewards. However, one need not be an artist or philosopher or even just a singularly valiant person to do the work of getting a conflict out in the open. An individual who decides to enter upon a psychoanalysis formally, for instance, with benefit of couch and analyst (or, to put it another way, makes a systematic practice of going to bed twice, and at least once by himself, on certain days) has usually already begun the work himself. Moreover, when the analysis is, as they say, terminated, he almost invariably continues it by himself, using the techniques he has learned. #RandolphHarris 10 of 11
These consist usually in paying attention to small signs in himself that something is going on within him that he does not quite does not quite know about his feelings and ideas come out even when they do not seem sensible, and paying attention to his dreams and reveries. It certainly is not easy, but it can be done. I might add, however, that psychoneurosis, in addition to being essentially stereotyped, is also rather shiftless and usually avoids work whenever possible, so that it is not a bad idea to have a schedule of appointments and some monetary inducement for keeping them. Some are always ready to obey any order, whatever it may be. However, one must know what righteousness is. Should one joyfully obey the order to go to the very center of hell and to remain there eternally. I do not have a preference for orders of this nature. I am not perverse like that. So many things are outside Christianity, so many things that I love and do not want to give up, so many things that God loves, otherwise they would not be in existence. In all the history now known there has never been a period in which souls have in such peril as they are today in every part of the globe. The bronze serpent must be lifted up again so that whoever raises his or her eyes to it may be saved. The heart has to be transported, forever, I hope, into the Blessed Sacrament exposed on the altar. You see that I think most people are very far from the thoughts of hell, with the best of intentions, attributed to society. #RandolphHarris 11 of 11
Be assured of my love, and the love of those here. The World as it is, the reality principle, adamantine sanity, these reassuringly solid phrases may furnish just the firm ground one needs to embark on a consideration of the role of the unconscious, that realm of chaos and shadows, in creative activity. To see things as they are when they are not as we would like them to be is the sternest task to which as rational beings we are called. In the service of this stern necessity, conscious thought and reflection, discrimination, memory, judgment, logic, and experiment. To be able to doubt methodically while suspending judgment, to explore alternative explanations in the light of certain canons of evidence and criticism, is the essence of scientific attitude. Pristine common sense is the everyday form of this attitude; the physical sciences and mathematics are its most rigorous and pure embodiment. It is no news that many scientists, and especially the very best, are odd people. As we have suggested elsewhere, they are in the very forefront of the direction in which evolution is taking us, and as such they exemplify in their works such qualities as dryness of judgment, meticulous attention to details, distinctions and small differences, radical questioning of common assumptions, a distrust of the unfortified senses, and a preference for the abstract and the qualitative, and the immediately natural. #RandolphHarris 1 of 14
We are all children of Adam, however, if I may so show my hand, and even the most scientific of scientists usually has a streak of irrationality a yard wide up one’s back, which makes one’s oddness complete. The distinguished historian of science, A.C. Crombie, has given us in his monumental presentation of the history of the science revolution literally hundreds of accounts of how superstitions, whims, bizarre images or convictions lead finally to scientific advances and important break-throughs. The point of all this is that Necessity may be as stern as she wishes, and when we are called to the task we must go, but we rarely go quietly. There is something in the human mind that does not like things as they are, something that will make up its own little World in whatever way seems to that individual piece of mind to be an improvement. All things transitory but as symbols are sent; Earth’s insufficiency here grows to event. The symbol presents a reality transcended. It is the medium trough which superior vision of reality is attained; it amplifies the less affluent real World through the act of imagination. Life, it seems, is but a dream, and even dream are dreams. Players and painted stage took all my love and not the things that they were emblems of. Symbols, dreams, play, light-heartedness—these are the stuff of a part of mind that gives little service to syllogism, evidence, judgment, classification, prediction, law, and stern necessity. #RandolphHarris 2 of 14
However, stern necessity calls: let us consider the way in which unconscious and preconscious forces may influence the mental apparatus, which might just as well be called the mind, both topographically and dynamically. The topography does not, of course, have anything to do with the central nervous system, but is concerned solely with hypothetical spatial arrangements in formal theoretical system, irrespective of their possible situation or neurological correlates in the body. The mental apparatus, then, like all Gaul, is divided into three parts: the unconscious, the preconscious, and the conscious. Unconsciousness is a regular and inevitable phase in the process constituting our mental activity; every mental act begins as an unconscious one, and it may either remain so or go on developing into consciousness, according as it meets with resistance or not. Between the unconscious and the preconscious there occurs a kind of testing process, which is called the censorship. The mental act in the unconscious has two alternative fates open to it: upon being scrutinized by censorship it may be rejected, not allowed to pass into the second phase, in which event is said to be repressed and must remain unconscious. #RandolphHarris 3 of 14
If, however, it passes this scrutiny it enters upon the second phase, the preconscious, and becomes capable of entering consciousness. The rigorous censorship exercises its office at the point of transition from the unconscious to the preconscious. Once in the preconscious, the thought my now, without any special resistance and given certain conditions, become the object of consciousness. The core of the unconscious consists of instinct-presentations having the sole aim of discharging the energy with which they are invested. In other words, they are the mental representation of impulses, or drives, or physiologically-based excitations which seek discharge. A tension or imbalance exists, and the tendency of the organism is to regain balance and stability by a discharge of energy. These ideational representations of drives that—because of the nature of the external World as well as of the organization of consciousness—are denied discharge become related to one another by laws quite different from those that govern logical thought. For one thing, they are exempt from mutual contradiction; quite opposite feelings about the same object may exist simultaneously in the unconscious. Time, place, and custom have no effect upon them. Moreover, they are continually seeking short-cuts to discharges of their energy, and this they achieve by such mechanism as displacement, condensation, substitution, and symbolization. These mechanisms are exhibited most clearly in dreams. #RandolphHarris 4 of 14
Several persons whom the dreamer knows in one’s waking state may be condensed into a single dream personage; one person may be substituted for another, and feelings displaced from the original object of them to another object; situations that trouble the dreamer in one’s waking life may undergo a symbolic transformation which serves to make them almost unrecognizable. Our studies of the psychology of literary creation persuade us that ideas from the unconscious play a large part in furnishing the material out of which the work of art is made. Art differs from dreams and neurosis, however, in that its elaboration requires conscious effort, criticism, judgment, and a sense of form that is quite alien to the chaos of the unconscious. What appears to happen is this: the censorship momentarily suspends its function and an unconscious idea passes into the preconscious. This idea at first seems vague and appears to have no relationship to other conscious content. Often it finds its first fleeting representation simply as a momentary visual or verbal image. In then somehow begins to pull along with it various associated ideas, feelings, and symbols from the unconscious, which then enter into relationship to one another in the preconscious, as well as with other ideas already in the preconscious. The complex of ideas thus elaborated may finally come to conscious expression almost fully formed, or, more commonly, they come in fragments, and it is the task of conscious thought to relate them to one another. #RandolphHarris 5 of 14
The real work, of course, comes in making out of this material a communication, for instance, giving it a social reality, which involves discrimination, selection, technique, purpose, and understanding both of the material itself and of an audience of at least one other person who can appreciate it. Most fictions, including many that are published in book form, are not works of art and do not possess social reality in the sense of which I have spoke of it. The World of the psychotic, and to a lesser degree of the neurotic, is a private World, and the creator of it is bond to feel alone in it. Probably the feeling of isolation is the most poignant aspect of neurotic suffering, rather than the effects that we designate as symptoms. It is obvious to everybody that we are in a process of cultural self-destruction. What is left is also not secure any more. It still stands because it was not exposed to the destructive pressure to which the rest has already succumbed. However, it too is built on gravel. The next landslide can take it along. The cultural capacity of modern mortals is diminished because the circumstances which surround them diminish them and damage them physically. The industrial being is unfree, unconcentrated, incomplete, and in danger of losing their humanity because society with its developed organization exercises a hitherto unknow power over mortals, mortal’s dependency on it has grown to a degree that one almost has ceased to live a mental existence of one’s own. #RandolphHarris 6 of 14
Thus we have entered a new Middle Ages. By a general act of will freedom of thought has been put out of function, because many give up thinking as free individuals, and are guided by the collective to which they belong. With the sacrifice of independence of thought we have—and how could it be otherwise—lost faith in truth. Our intellectual-emotional life is disorganized. The overorganization of public affairs culminates in the organization of thoughtlessness. The industrial society is characterized not only by a lack of freedom but also by overeffort. For two or three centuries many individuals have lived only as working begins and not as human beings. The human substance is stunted and in the upbringing of children by such stunted parents, an essential factor for their human development is lacking. The overoccupation the adult person succumbs to leads more and more to the need for superficial distraction. Absolute passivity, diverting attention from and forgetting of oneself are a physical need for modern humans. As a result, people need to make the most of the resources, make them last longer, and focus on the spiritual so they have more time to develop and grown. However, mortals are not to retire into an atmosphere of spiritual egotism, remote from the affairs of the World, but to lead an active life in which one tired to contribute to the spiritual perfection of society. #RandolphHarris 7 of 14
If among modern individuals there are so few whose human and ethical sentiments are intact, not the least reason is the fact that they sacrifice constantly their personal morality on the altar of the fatherland, instead of being in constant living interchange with the collective and giving it the power which drives the collective to its perfection. The present cultural and social structure drives toward a catastrophe, from which only a new Renaissance, much greater than the old one, will arise; we must renew ourselves in a new belief and attitude, unless we want to perish. Essential in this Renaissance will be the principle of activity, which rational thinking gives into our hands, the only rational and pragmatic principle of historical development produced by mortals. If we decide to become thinking human beings, I have confidence in my faith that this revolution will occur. We must have a reverence for life. As the basis of ethics, people have generally ignored that the decay of human society and the World is being brought about through the practice of industrialized life; at the beginning of this century we already saw the weakness and dependency of the people, the destructive effect of obsessional work, the need for spiritual development and less consumption. #RandolphHarris 8 of 14
The necessity for a Renaissance of collective life will be organized by the spirit of solidarity and reverence for life. If one takes the World as it is, it is impossible to endow it with meaning in which the aims and goals of mortals and of humankind make sense. The only meaningful way of life is activity in the World; not activity in general but the activity of giving and caring for fellow creatures. There must be a demand for giving up the having orientation, and for more of a social activity in the spirit of care and human solidarity. A radical inner human change is the only alternative to economic catastrophe. There must be a New World consciousness, a new ethic in the use of material resources, a new attitude toward nature, based on harmony rather than on conquest, and a sense of identification with future generations. For the first time in mortal’s life on Earth, they are being asked to refrain from doing what one can do; they are being asked to restrain their economic and technological advancement, or at least to direct it differently from before; humans are being asked by all future generations of the Earth to share their good fortune with the unfortunate—not in a spirit of charity but in a spirit of necessity. Humans are being asked to concentrate now on the organic growth of the total World system. Can mortals, in a good conscience, say no? Without these fundamental human changes, Homo sapiens are as good as doomed. #RandolphHarris 9 of 14
It is to be hoped that the Club of Rome comes to grips with the problem of those social and political changes that are the preconditions for attaining the general goals. It is time for an ethical World change, not as a consequence of ethical beliefs but as the rational consequence of economic analysis. Material increase of consumption does not necessarily mean increase in well-being; a characterological and spiritual change must go together wit the necessary social changes; unless we stop wasting our natural resources and destroying the ecological conditions for human survival, catastrophe within a hundred years if foreseeable. Our failures are the result of our success, and our techniques must be subordinated to our real human needs. Economy as a content of life is a deadly illness because infinite growth does not fit into a finite World. Economy should not be the content of life, and that fact that it cannot be is evident today. If one wants to describe the deadly illness in more detail, one can say that it is similar to an addiction like alcoholism or drug addiction. It does not matter too much whether this addiction appears in a more egotistical or more altruistic form, whether it seeks its satisfaction only in a crude materialistic way or also in an artistically, culturally, or scientifically refined way. Poison is poison, even if wrapped in sliver paper. If spiritual culture, the culture of the inner mortal, is neglected, then selfishness remains the dominating power in a mortal and a selfishness fits this orientation better than a system of love for one’s fellow beings. #RandolphHarris 10 of 14
Considering present technology and patterns of behavior our planet is grossly overpopulated now. The large absolute number of people and the rate of population growth are major hindrances to solving human problems. We are seeing climate change, not only because it is natural, but because there are more people on the planet. The limits of human capability to produce food by conventional means have very nearly been reached. Problems of supply and distribution already have resulted in roughly half of humanity being undernourished or malnourished. Some 20-30 million people are starving to death annually now. Attempts to increase food production further will tend to accelerate the deterioration of our environment, which will eventually reduce the capacity of the Earth to produce food. It is not clear whether environmental decay has now gone as far as to be essentially irreversible; it is possible that the capacity of the planet to support human life has been permanently impaired. Such technological success as automobiles, pesticides, and inorganic nitrogen fertilizers are major causes of environmental deterioration. There is reason to believe that population growth increases the probability of a lethal Worldwide plague and of a thermonuclear war. Either could provide an undesirable death rate solution to the population problem; each is potentially capable of destroying civilization and even driving Homo sapiens to extinction. #RandolphHarris 11 of 14
There is no technological panacea for the complex of problems composing the population-food-environment crisis, although technology properly applied in such areas as pollution abatement, communications, and fertility control can provide massive assistance. The basic solutions involve dramatic and rapid changes in human attitudes, especially those relating to reproductive behavior, economic growth, technology, the environment, and conflict resolution. The real problem for people in our day is preparatory to love itself, namely to become able to love. To be capable of giving and receiving mature love is as sound a criterion as we have for the fulfilled personality. However, by that very token it is a goal gained only in proportion to how much one has fulfilled the prior condition of becoming a person in one’s own right. Assuming the premise is right—that only a fundamental change in human character from a preponderance of the having mode to a predominantly being mode of existence can save us from a psychological and economic catastrophe—the question arises: Is large-scale characterological change possible, and if so, how can it be brought about? I suggest that human character can change if these conditions exist: We are suffering and are aware that we are, we recognize the origin of our ill-being, we recognize that there is a way of overcoming our ill-being, and we accept that in order to overcome our ill-being we must follow certain norms for living and change our present practice of life. #RandolphHarris 12 of 14
There needs to be a historical development that will liberate human beings from those socioeconomic and political conditions that make people inhuman—prisoners of things, machines, and their own greed. When patients consult a doctor, it is because they have suffered and they are aware that they have suffered. However, they are not usually aware of what they suffered from. The goal is to help the patient become aware of what causes their ill-being. As a consequence of such knowledge, patients can arrive at the next step: the insight that their ill-being can be cured, provided its causes are done away with. However, I do not believe anything lasting can be achieved by persons who suffer from a general ill-being and form whom a change in character is necessary, unless they change their practice of life in according with the change in character they want to achieve. For instance, one can analyze the dependency of individuals until doomsday, but all the insights gained will accomplish nothing while they stay in the same practical situations they were living in before arriving at these insights. To give an example: a woman whose suffering is rooted in her dependency on her father, even though she has insight into deeper causes of the dependency, will not really change unless she changes her practice of life, for instance separates from her father, does not accept his favors, takes the risk and pain that these practical steps toward independence imply. #RandolphHarris 13 of 14
Insight separated from practice remains ineffective. Be very careful, because if you should pass over something important through your own fault it would be a pity. This should make one see intellectual honesty in a new light. It is not opposed to faith, but in some people there are obstacles to the faith, impure obstacles, such as prejudices, and habits. One must face the whole question of faith, doctrines and covenants, and the sacraments, this will oblige them to consider them closely and at length with the fullest possible attention, making once see them as thing which they have obligations to discern and perform. And there is a great blessing of another order when one gains friendship by charity, as it will provide one with a source of the most compelling and pure inspiration that is to be found among human things. For nothing among human things has such power to keep our gaze fixed ever more intensely upon God, than friendship for the friends of God. Nothing will better enable an individual to measure the breadth of a true friend’s charity than the fact that they bore one for so long and with such gentleness. It may seem like a joke, but that is not the case. A friend may not have the same motives as self, but you will know that their patience can only spring from a supernatural generosity. “Learn wisdom in thy youth; yea, learn in thy youth to keep the commandments of God,” reports Alma 37.35. #RandolphHarris 14 of 14