Outside the locked doors of the Sistine Chapel, a Swiss Guard stood at attention and let his eyes wander across the marble inlay patterns of the floor of the Sala Regia. The grand hall was empty, and his presence there might have appeared pointless. However, the guards and the conclave masters knew that, despite its reputation for being hermetically sealed, the Vatican was actually quite permeable—sometimes embarrassingly so. Honest to God, take this happy ending away, it is all the same. God will not waste simplicity on possibility. Shaking the foundations. Get me up, wake me up, dreams are filling this trace of blame. The God above God–frozen still I thought I could stop, now who is going to wait. No one is calling for me at the door. And unpredictable will not bother me anymore. And silently gets harder to ignore. Look straight ahead, there is nothing left to see. What is done is done, this life has got it’s hold on me. Just let it go, what now can never be. Now what do I do, can my mind? Did I think things through? Traditional theism has made God a Heavenly, completely perfect person who resides above the World and humankind. #RyanPhillippe 1 of 7

 It was once my life; it was my life at one time. The protest of atheism is correct. How can the church be full of cosmic policemen who sin more than others? A lot of them are former pimps and use the church’s money to buy mansions and luxury vehicles and they live a lifestyle of a superstar. We must now give up belief in God as somebody “out there,” just as Copernican astronomy made people abandon “the old man in the sky.” Most believers are inclined to think of God as a kind of visitor from outer space. Unlike “the old man in the sky” or the “visitor from outer space,” from the perspective of an atheist, God is not another individual entity besides the familiar entities of experience not even the “most powerful” or the “most perfect” one. He is “being-itself.” As such, God is not contingent but necessary, and arguments for his existence are not required. The idea of God, is not thing idea of something or someone who might or might not exist. In making God an object besides other objects, the existence and nature of which are matters of argument, theology supports the escape to atheism. The first step to atheism is always a theology which drags God down to the level of doubtful things. #RyanPhillippe 2 of 7

At times we are told that the antiquated-fashioned believers are mistaken in thinking that God is out there because God is really inside of us—in so far as our lives have depth, insofar as we live agapeistically (Christian love). However, even at times Christian denounce God by calling each other sinners and saying that Earth is the Devil’s World. Where one’s interest lies, one’s proficiency also lies. Where something does not lack significance, there is also no lack of sense or organs. Whatever the heart is open to, is also no mystery ahead. Thus, the reason why humanity in modern times lost the organs for the supersensible World and its mysteries, is that in losing faith in this World it also lost the sense for it; because the essential tendency of the modern World has anti-Christian and anti-theological concepts. People worship material possessions, and enjoy knowingly and willfully putting the lives of others in danger for profit and amusement, and then they turn around and blame their behavior on the Devil, but forget that they have free will and that the blood of Jesus Christ forgave the World of the sin of Adam and Eve, so all suffering is related to human’s free will and not of the Devil. The fact that humans try to blame their behavior on a mythical being, so that they may be grossly mentally incompetent and mentally unwell. #RyanPhilllippe 3 of  7

Why do Christians even denounce God when their behavior radically transcends anything we ever experienced that the picture of these glorified humans cannot possibly do justice to the reality of? In the former context, God must not said to be out there because he is really in here deep down, in the latter context, because he is too removed to be even out there. In the former context, theological sentences become a species of very special psychological statements, and in the latter they are clearly items of transcendent metaphysics. There seems to be a constant oscillation between these two positions, so that at times traditional theology is denounced for not being sufficiently this-Worldly, while at other times it is condemned for being too close to the World. If this is the Devil’s World, then you are implying that God is nothing and a dead thing because God cannot create anything that is bad or imperfect. Basically what you are telling us is that, “too many cares are weighing down on me—the pressure is too great.” Why? Because if people can eliminate any responsibility for their problems and bad behavior, they will success in escaping blame or a guilty conscience. #RyanPhillippe 4 of 7

Many atheists believe that it is admittedly impossible to prove the existence of God, but it is equally impossible to disprove this existence; hence, we must either suspend judgment or, if we embrace some position, we must do so on the basis of faith alone. To avoid misleading associations of words “prove” and “disprove,” the same point may be expressed by saying that we have no evidence either for or against God’s existence. Sometimes the reminder is added that the mere failure of the arguments for the existence of God does not show that there is no God. Anybody who supposed this would plainly be guilty of the fallacy of argumentum ad ignorantiam (appeal to ignorance), which is a fallacy that a proposition is true simply on the basis that it has not been proven false or that it is false simply because it has not been proven true. This error in reasoning is often expressed with influential rhetoric. If one argues that God or telepathy, ghosts, or unidentified flying objects (UFOs) do not exist because their existence has not been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt, then this fallacy occurs. On the other hand, if one argues that God, telepathy, and so on do exist because their non-existence has not been proved, then one argues fallaciously as well. #RyanPhillippe 5 of 7

In spite of all the talk, not a single report of an actual God has been authenticated. However, if we assume that there is no such thing as God, this would be typical of ad ignorantiam fallacy. Therefore, many people suspend judgement concerning God. However, these same people do not suspend judgment in relation to the gods of the Greeks or in relation to the devil and witches. However, most educated people suspend judgement concerning the Olympian gods or the Devil or witches. Still, some people who believe in God, reject the belief of Olympian gods, but believe in the Devil and witches. So religion and God is quiet a conundrum. Some people even call God by different names and claim that his name is not God. So, there is not telling what deity people are actually worshipping, and that may be why atheists suspend judgment on God because its name actually has led to people being killed, assaulted, and even wars. Some ministers still believe in the Devil. The Devil is introduced as the only plausible explanatory principle of a great many phenomena. However, you also have people who believe the Devil is a good deity. Nonetheless, humans blame everything bad on the Devil, even when they know it is a direct result of their negligence. #RyanPhillippe 6 of 7

The Devil is a lie is often a phrase used by many Christians to reject a proposition that they do not believe. It is actually true, however, not in the way they mean it. Yes, to believe that the Devil is responsible for every bad action on Earth is a lie. Did the Devil actually make you do something bad or was it your own free will? People often prefer what is rich and beautiful and ennobling and sometimes their choices so commonly makes them do things that are degrading and the speed with which lies and slander spread in all directions, and also the failure of the World’s diplomats is the cause of unethical and unlawful behavior. Could people of education, intelligence, and honest intent gather around a World conference table and fail so completely to understand each other’s needs and goals if their thinking was not being deliberately clouded and corrupted? Some allege that all such failures are the work of the Devil and they show that he is a creature of vastly superior intelligence, a mighty gifted spirit of infinite resourcefulness. The Devil is no bungling creature, but a price of lofty stature, of unlimited craft and cunning, able to take advantage of every opportunity that presents itself. #RyanPhillippe 7 of 7

My personal feeling is that we have lost all trust. I cannot be with you again, do not remind me of all the good times that we had. Learned a lot from us instead, I never want these feelings to ever come again. You will never hear me crying, you will never see e trying, to love you once again your love is so past tense. People do not tell me that you have changed, do not want to hear on how you have lost your evil ways. The one who has changed this time is me, and I do not want to go back to feeling helpless and deceived. To think you have me fooled every now and then. You had me believing that I was the reason that you left, but I will not fall back in love with you again. I do not want to be your friend. Serval factors have become important factors. It has become an embarrassment trying to convince the World that something is good, when they see imagines and hear stories, on the daily bases, that contradict my devotion. The internal balance of power seems to be off kilter, and you have such a tight grip. And while many are alarmed by the developments you tend to minimize the significance. You do not comment on these things nor take action as if they are sub iudice, you understand what I mean. Sub iudice, of course means, “under judicial consideration.” #RyanPhillippe 1 of 9

God, infinitely transcends every finite being. When we say, for example, “God is love,” or “God is Life,” the words “love” and “life” are used symbolically, not literally. They were originally introduced in connection with segments of finite experience, and when applied to God, they cannot have the same meaning that they have in ordinary situations. God is all-powerful, all-loving, infinitely good, perfectly just and so on. When God is referred to as the creator (or ground) of the Universe. The Universe is absolutely depended on God so that it would ease to exist if God were not sustaining it. One will notice as time goes on, and people are taught that there is no such thing as normal, do not go to church, and no longer pray in schools that society is becoming more and more corrupt and the World does seem to be unraveling. People no longer worship God, instead they worship money, status, and material things. “For the love of money is the root of all kinds of evil. And some people, craving money, have wandered from the true faith and pierced themselves with many sorrows,” reports 1 Timothy 6:10. While we need money to live, it should not be something that we worship and love more than honesty and human life. Such a fleshless abstraction cannot be the answer to the cravings of the human heart. Only God can be the loving God to whom we come by the way of love and of suffering. #RyanPhillippe 2 of 9

At one time being an atheist was viewed as walking down a path of decay and disaster, it was seen as a hideous position to adopt by depraved people, and a horrible catastrophe that might spread over the human race. Atheist were seen as people who could not be a true friend, an affectionate relation, or a loyal subject. They were seen as weak, staggering, and special theists and that their philosophy would bring with it hopeless national ruin. An atheist is a person who maintains that there is no God, that is, that the sentence “God exists” expresses a false proposition. The terms atheist and godless are still frequently used as terms of abuse. Nevertheless, there are relatively few people nowadays in whom the thought of atheism and atheists arouses unspeakable horror. It seems oaths and promises are no less trustworthy than those of other people, and in most civilized lands atheists have the same or nearly the same rights as everyone else. Some of the World’s foremost philosophers, scientists, and artists have been avowed atheists and the increase in atheism has been very closely connected as part of the same process. Even spokesmen of the most conservative religious groups have in recent years conceded that atheism may well be a philosophical position that is adopted for the noblest of reasons. #RyanPhillippe 3 of 9

Some people believe that since prayer has been removed from school, American has plummeted from righteous living, prosperity, and success. As you might have already noticed, America’s moral decline rapidly accelerated following the U.S. Supreme Court’s removal of prayer from our nation’s schools on 25 June 1962, as over 32 million students were forbidden to call on the name of the Lord. American’s have been praying to God since the founding of our nation. In fact, America was thought to be a government implemented by God. However, people still believe that life without God need not be bestial, unintelligent, or immoral, and that atheism can be serene and deeply human. And that we should have dialogue with atheists that is truly human and mutually respectful. Yet, one cannot ignore that fact that since God has been removed from government buildings, and schools, society has gotten more violent. There have been 196 school shootings since 2013. There were 372 mass shootings in the United States of America in 2015, killing 475 people, and wounding 1,870. #RyanPhillippe 4 of 9

 It is not to say that atheists are doing these shootings necessarily, but many people believe having kids pray to God in school made them believe in a higher power and understand that there would be moral consequences for their behavior, and since prayer has been removed from school, there is no fear. School is mandatory, but church was not, so this was a center to indoctrinate children and without this indoctrinate, they have been led astray and no longer believe in a higher power. Pope Paul VI, in his encyclical Ecclesiam Suam, observed that some atheists were undoubtedly inspired by “greathearted dreams of justice and progress” as well as by “impatience with the mediocrity and self-seeking of so many contemporary social setting.” Atheists may not have needed religion in school, but it seems it may have been a great way of controlling the masses. In France, until the Revolution (1789-1799), and in most other countries until some time later, it was illegal to publish works in defense of atheism, and in fact real or alleged atheists were subject to dire persecution throughout the times of Christian domination. #RyanPhillippe 5 of 9

Some of the World’s greatest philosophers were among those who advocated and in some instances actively promoted the persecution of atheists. The story antedates Christianity, and persecution of atheists was already advocated in Plato’s Laws. Plato divided atheists into several groups, all of which must be punished; but whereas members of some groups required no more than admonition and imprisonment, those belonging to others deserved punishment exceeding one death or two. And many believed the people who did not believe in God should be shut off from the World by death. Some argued that such a course is justified since it surely is a much more serious matter to corrupt faith, though which comes the soul’s life, than it is to forge money, through which temporal life is afforded. If, as is just, forgers of money and other male factors are straightway put to death, it is all the more just that heretics be not only excommunicated but also put to death. “I’m still alive but I’m barely breathing. Just prayed to a God that I don’t believe in. ‘Cause I got time while she got freedom. ‘Cause when the heart breaks, no, it don’t break even,” (Breakeven by The Script). #RyanPhillippe 6 of 9

I personally have never met an atheist and I find that I pray to God more and more and mention God more frequently than in the past because it has been proven, by the law of attractions, that what one focuses on tends to manifest in their reality, and God is supposed to be an all God being that will rewards us for living a good life and make our soul immortal. However, in the past Baron d’Holbach’s The System of Nature was falsely a attributed in its first edition to Mirabuad, a former secretary of the French Academy who had been dead for ten years. Very shortly after its publication in 1770, it was condemned to be burned by public hangman after a trial in which the public prosecutor expressed his regret that he could not lay his hands on the unknown real author, adding that the corruptions of moral evident in almost all sections of society was probably due to the spread of ideas like those contained in the condemned book. When the poet Percy Bysshe Shelley was an undergraduate at Oxford, he published a short and very temperate pamphlet entitled The Necessity of Atheism. This at once aroused a violent protest which resulted in the burning of all undistributed copies and in the expulsion of Percy Shelly and his friend Thomas Hogg from the university. #RyanPhillippe 7 of 9

Some years later, Percy Shelly was judicially deprived of the custody of his children on the ground that he was likely to inculcate the same [atheistic] principles upon them. As late as 1877, Annie Besant, the noted social reformer, was judged to be unfit to take care of her children on the same ground, although the judge admitted that she has been a care and affectionate mother. Until the passing of the Evidence Amendment Act of 1869, unbelievers in Great Britain were considered incompetent to give evidence in a court of law. Atheists were thus in effect unable to sue when they were victims of fraud or slander. However, some people believe those within the church tend to be corrupt. The process had already started happening when the doctrinal congregation was systematically processing sex abuse cases. Pope John Paul, in a crucial but unpublicized document, had defined sexual abuse of minors as one of the graviora delicta (more serious crimes), and had been given the doctrinal office authority over all such accusations around the World. Among these cases now was Father Maciel’s. Ironically, the turning point came shortly after the gala celebration of Father Maciel’s sixtieth anniversary as priest. There were cases of abuse dating back as many as thirty years, and the sex abuse cases were especially egregious. #RyanPhillippe 8 of 9

Reporters sometimes joked about the cloned good looks of Legionary priest and the fact that they tended to show up in pairs when invited anywhere outside their religious headquarters (they could police each other is temptation arose). However, imagine how much worse some of these people in the church would be if they did not have God in their lives. The voice at the other end of the phone was gaining speed, straining my note-taking skills, and the speaker’s heavy accent did not make things any easier. However, what he was telling me had me spellbound. He believed that there was a place for God in civil society. All the believers in question have characterized God as a supreme personal being who is the creator or the ground of the Universe and who, whatever his other attributes may be, is at the very least immensely powerful, highly intelligent and very good, loving, and just. People frequently adopt an attitude of rejection toward apposition for reasons other than that it is a false proposition. The atheist does not say, “there is no God,” but one says, “I know not what you mean by God; I am without idea of God; the word ‘God’ is to me a sound conveying no clear or distinct affirmation. The Bible God I deny; the Christian God I disbelieve in; but I am not rash enough to say there is no God as long as you tell me you are unprepared to define God to me.” #RyanPhillippe 9 of 9

The plight of a flock of pigeons—the weakest perhaps, and the worst pigeon of the flock controls and wastes all the grain as he pleases. Moral philosophy, Morality, Ethics, Casuistry, Natural Law, mean all the same thing; namely, that science which teaches all humans their duty and the reasons of it.  The nature of the human frame implies that it is God’s will for us to be happy in this life as well as in the next. Virtue is doing good to mankind, in obedience to the will of God and for the sake of everlasting happiness. Allegiance to God’s will and a desire for everlasting happiness are sufficient grounds of moral obligation after finding that such obligation made persuasive by the prospect of reward. We should carry out those actions which promote the general happiness and avoid those which diminish it. Promoting general happiness requires paying attention to the general consequences of our actions. The general consequence of any action may be estimated by asking what would be the consequence if the same sort of actions were generally permitted. #RyaPhillippe 1 of 10

No special faculty is required to enable us to have moral knowledge. However, some do have a moral sense or an intuitive perception of right and wrong, and other innate and instinctive capacities. Nonetheless, all that is required for the foundation of morality is that each human have the wit to see that certain actions are beneficial to themselves. Then the sentiment of approbation that naturally arises when these actions benefit one will continue to accompany one’s perception of these actions when they benefit someone else. This the custom of approving certain action is begun, and children, who learn everything by imitating their elders, carry it on. Some people believe that God distained (certain to me a particular fate) his human creation for a future state and that he acquainted human beings with their destiny. If these possibilities are granted, then the need for miracles is clear, for they are the certification of revelation. The credibility of the revelation hangs, therefore, on the issue of whether miracles are genuine. #RyanPhillippe 2 of 10

Intuition is immediate apprehension. Apprehension is used to cover such disparate states as sensation, knowledge, and mystical rapport. Immediate has as many senses as there are kinds of mediation: It may be used to signify the absence of inference, the absence of causes, the absence of the ability to define a term, the absence of justification, the absence of symbols, or the absence of thought. Given this range of uses, nothing can be said about intuition in general. Instead, it is necessary to pick out those principal meanings of the term which have played the most important roles in philosophical controversy and to discuss each individually. Four principal meanings of intuition may be disguised: Intuition as unjustified true belief not preceded by inference; in this (the commonest) sense an intuition means a “hunch.” The existence of hunches is uncontroversial and not of philosophical interest. Intuition as immediate knowledge of truth a proposition, where immediate means not preceded by inference. This is a philosophically important sense, since philosophers have found it puzzling that one can have knowledge, and thus justified belief, without having made oneself aware through the process of inference of any justification for this belief. #RyanPhillippe 3 of 10

In psychology, we try to return from psychologism to principle of polarity. Psychologism tends to use the term “mental,” and it has a negative connotation. The source of error is to mistake what is mental for what is merely vital (and, in the spirit of “polarity,” what is natal for what is merely mental). There is a distinguished difference between mechanical and vital processes on consciousness. The mechanical is publicly observable, and the vital indirectly observable, but consciousness escapes observation by the methods applicable to the other processes: consciousness “punctuates” the vital process and is discontinuous. Our knowledge depends on the speed of these punctuations. God is the limiting case who grasps the whole time process instantaneously; for him all punctuations are one. As that, our knowledge catches eternity in the fleeting moment, which is both temporal and eternal. At the base of this theory of perception is the notion of imagined movement. Touching being the basic sense, all perception depends on our ability to trace the object in the imagination. Our theoretical physics, in which our main interest is our perception of space and time (space time being a unity in polarity), can best be understood if approached through this theory of perception. #RyanPhillippe 4 of 10

Intuition as immediate knowledge of a concept here roughly, knowledge which does not entail ability to define the concept. Intuition as nonpropositional knowledge of an entity—knowledge that may be a necessary condition for, but not identical with, intuitive knowledge of the truth of propositions about the entity. Miracles must be exceptions to Universal experience or they would not be miracles. The real issue is whether there is a test for the reliability of witness who report an event that necessarily only they could have experienced. We adduce evidences of the existence of God. The bones and muscles of human beings, animals, and their insect equivalents, are of special interest, for the fitting together of joints and the adaptation of muscles are mechanisms which imply most forcefully a designing intelligence. The chemical aide of physiology does not interest some much, for chemical action does not usually suggest the work of a divine mechanic. The eye, in its various parts and the combination of these parts and their adaptation to function as an instrument of sight is a natural mechanism, and the eye alone, should suffice to convince us of the existence of the divine intelligence that designed it. #RyanPhillippe 5 of 10

The evidence drawn from nature, in addition to establishing the existence of God, permits us to infer certain of his characteristics. Because God has a man, he must be a person. That there is a single intelligence at work is shown by the uniformity of the divine plan, as it is applied to all the parts of the World. Furthermore, God’s goodness is shown both by the fact that most contrivances are beneficial and by the fact that pleasure has been made an animal sensation. The distinguishing mark of a human being is self-consciousness, and the moral aim of life is development. The driving force behind this development is the individual’s sense of limitation. An important mode of moral action is self-sacrifice, as a genuine diminishing of one’s possessions or powers. The spirit has manifested in the conscious direction of one’s impulses, which represents moral maturity. We display a negative consciousness, in which nature and spirit are reconciled, in the sense that our consciousness has successfully turned impulses into moral habits, thus freeing itself for higher moral tasks. #RyanPhillippe 6 of 10

This sense of intuition is exemplified by a sense of perceptions, considered as products of a cognitive faculty distinct from the faculty of forming judgments concerning the entity sensed; sometimes, it is best not to tell people that you love them because they will get scared and think that you have designs on them or you want something from them. Frankly, some people are afraid and suspicious of love; therefore, you love such people without telling them. Intuition of universals, or of such insensible particulars as time and space—intuitions that are necessary conditions of our intuitive knowledge of priori truths is a way of being that transforms everything around you because of the radiation of that energy. It happens of its own. We do not have to do anything, and we do not have to call it anything. Love is the energy that silently transfigures every situation. The mystical or inexpressible intuition that, unlike sense perceptions and intuitions of universals, do not make possible knowledge of the truth propositions about the entities intuited—such intuitions are the mystic’s intuition of God. In the energy field of love, we are surrounded with love, and that bring gratitude. We are thankful for our life and for all the miracles of life. #RyanPhillippe 7 of 10

Intuitive understanding progressively unfolds and we have the ability to perceive the thoughts and feelings of others on a non-verbal level. Nonverbal communication with others becomes possible and commonplace. We may assume that, although these different sources furnish contributions in all individuals, they are not all equally strong in all persons. Sensory intuitions are not really cases of knowledge at all, and they are not really mental events, but merely physical one. Sense perceptions is in principal nonessential to attaining complete knowledge, although it is mysteriously necessary in practice. If a child, by virtue of his faculty of sensory intuition, can see that a physical object O has sensory quality Q by simple, uncaused act, prior to acquiring the ability to express this fact in language, then why cannot the same child see with his mind’s eye that every event has a cause and, on the basis of this prelinguistic intuitive knowledge, check the correctness of conventions cornering the words “cause” and “effect”? The influence of sense perception is a special, unanalyzable mental act correlated with certain modifications of sense organs, makes it difficult to question this presupposition. Sense perceptions is a clear example of our ability to know facts without having the ability to express them. #RyanPhillippe 8 of 10

To know what one is saying, in certain cases, to know what one says is true is a possession of intuitive knowledge that dispenses with the notion of intuitive faculties. In the case of sensory intuition, the process of acquiring intuitive knowledge is simply the occurrence of certain sensations in a person who knows a language that contains expression whose utterance speakers of the language that contains ways of describing these sensations (that is, contains expressions whose utterance speakers of the language are conditioned to correlate with occurrences of these sensations). Although I cannot, of course, express (or communicate or put into words) the experience that I had, and hence cannot supply you with reasons for believing the p, I am nevertheless entitled to believe that p solely on the strength of that experience. Again, God’s perfect simplicity—his identity with his own attributes—is held to make it impossible truly to apply any predicate to him, and thus to know any true propositions about him. However, aside from the general difficulties in the notion of private language, private criteria of justification is an intrinsically paradoxical notion. #RyanPhillippe 9 of 10

 One can no more have private rules for justifying beliefs than one can have private rules for justifying actions. A criminal has no greater claim on our sympathy if he proclaims that his private ethical code differs from ours, and a believer in untestable beliefs has no greater claim on our attention when he says that his epistemological code is not ours. The only men and women our Lord will use in His building enterprises are those who love Him personally, passionately, and with great devotion—those who have a love for Him that goes far beyond any of the closet relationships on Earth. When God inspects us with His searching and refining fire, will He detect that we have built enterprises of our own on the foundation of Jesus? Since you have not seen a flying saucer, you have no reason to believe that there are flying saucers; but I have seen one, and so I do believe in them. Here we seem to be justifying a belief solely on the basis of private experience. (If I saw a flying saucer, then there are flying saucers to be seen.)  Even though you cannot see God right now and cannot understand what He is doing, you know Him. #RyanPhillippe 10 of 10

The World is a huge and beautiful place. There are over 7 billion people on this Earth and in my neighborhood there are people who I really enjoy seeing and can go months without seeing and when they come around it makes me happy. Common sense would seem to hold that is some properties were taken away from it, relationship would no longer be the same thing.  The positions associated with idealism (objects of knowledge are held to be in some way dependent on the activity of mind) and monism (the doctrine that only one supreme being exists), for reasons which will emerge as we proceed. It holds that the connections between a relationship’s properties are so close that the deprivation of a single property would force us to say that, in a nontrivial sense, the relationship is no longer what it was. Although certain properties of a relationship are such that a given description could no longer be correctly applied to it were these properties absent, the notion that the thing would no longer be the same is thee properties were absent is either trivial or misleading. For, in the weaker sense of “same,” the absence of any of its properties would make the thing no longer the same. #RyanPhillippe 1 of 5

Omniscience sees the Universe as a seamless web (and, perhaps, as one single individual thing—the Absolute). Relationships do have intrinsic natures, but these can be known only sub specie aeternitatis (in a Universal perspective) some people take for granted that the distinction between physical necessity and logical necessity. If a person is not getting what they need out of a relationship and has just been sticking by your side to support you, they may totally be over a relationship, especially if you are not kind, have been using them, and are not even spending time with that individual. Given the laws of nature and the past history of the Universe, that a given particle, an emotion, may be located at a given point in space at a given time, and there may still be remnants of it left behind, and the sense in which it is not necessary, simpliciter (not comparable). The en passant (a special pawn capture, that can only occur immediately after a pawn moves two ranks forward from its starting position and an enemy pawn could have captured it has the pawn moved only one square forward) nature of a relationship were someone sticks by your side because they are concerned about your mental well-being, while you make a deal and use them is clearly the treatment of causality. #RyanPhillippe 2 of 5

It is possible to exhaust your relationship until a person does not care about you or what happens to you. They may have once looked at you as a great person, an esteemed leader, but now think of you are a coward and an arrogant fool who has done nothing, but brought problems into their life. The boundaries to the individual have been drawn and these decisions have been motivated by considerations of practical utility. The effectiveness of the letting go mechanism in problem solving is often quite astonishing. Understanding the process involved here is very important, because it is quite different than the World’s usual methods. The approach that brings fast and easy results is the following: Do not look for answer; instead, let go of the feelings behind the questions. I was once in a situation that was so bad, were a person just totally did the most abusive and exploitive things that I was in more pain that I had ever experienced in my life, and at times felt like I was dying. And this individual knew I wanted nothing to do with them and would hovering around me with other people and try to flaunt them in my face, and it would upset me because I wanted to move on and was sick of seeing them. #RyanPhillippe 3 of 5

And every time this individual saw I was doing better and feeling happy, knowing that I was stuck in my situation and could not move, they would call me and leave threatening messages and then show up where they knew I would be, then quickly run off thinking I was want to confront them and chase them, but I would not and they kept on doing the same plots over and over. It was an evil game for them and they really enjoyed it. I stopped asking myself why this person was doing this because I knew why and I let go of any feelings. Then when I saw other people I realized that I did want to get to know someone new, but this person and their friends would start sending my friends threatening letters, or showing up when they thought I was on a date to bother the person I was with. And they would even call my mother and leave her threatening messages. It is an ongoing and horrible situation, and I cannot bring anyone new into something like this. Clearly that individual and their friends are extremely mentally unwell. And it has at times made my life somewhat of a nightmare, but I still love myself and am happy to be alive. #RyanPhillippe 4 of 5

And although I am in a lot of pain and constantly stressed out behind a situation and a person I no longer want anything to do with, I was talking to my mother yesterday, and she says, “I do not know why we have to come here and live in these bodies.” I replied, “I love my body, I am happy I have the parents I do and look the way I do. I want to keep my body and wish I could be young forever. I would never want to kill myself because I look at some of these other people and would never want to come back as one of them.” She laughed and that made her feel better. And when I see other people and how happy they are, I realize that I can have a healthy relationship. The individual I was dealing with has a lot of bad energy and always looks angry, sad, hostile and ready to fight. One delightful discovery we will make is that our capacity for love is far beyond what we have ever dreamed. The more we let go, the more loving we will become. It is so sad when a person does you so wrong that you feel like you are going to fall to the ground and your soul is going to fall out of your body. No matter who a person is, or what they say they will do, do not stick around for someone who is just going to abuse you and feed off of you. At times I thought that I was unlovable and this was my only choice. #RyanPhillippe 5 of 5