Poverty, fear, lack of opportunities, and the absence of positive adult guidance have always been factors at the heart of American gangs. Combines with a feeling of displacement, either because of immigration or an environment of social inequality, these are ingredients for the formation of gangs. Gangs have existed throughout American history, generally deep within cities but always on the outskirts of mainstream, or typical society. They have grown during certain periods of history, while at other times, their populations have decreased. Gangs have consisted of members of different ages and ethnicities and have spoken many different languages over the years. They have been blamed for many of society’s problems; they have been publicized, too, as products of those problems. Through it all, gangs have been a constant phenomenon in American history. Some gangs have even gone so far as to claim that they were formed to protect the community. The harsh reality is that gangs have been established to prey on the poorest community members who tend to be the most vulnerable and invisible in our society. Have you ever heard of a gang establishing an after-school tutoring program or a scholarship program from drug proceeds? Terrorism is hard to ignore. Almost every day television news shows, newspapers, magazines, and Websites run and re-run pictures of dramatic and usually bloody act of violence carried out by ferocious-looking terrorists, shadowy militant groups, or others who have infiltrated the American Dream to create chaos, destruction and death. #RandolphHarris 1 of 20

The City of Sacramento used to be very conservative, clean, with beautiful tree lined streets and some of the best-looking houses in California. Because Sacramento has so many beautiful natural resources, relatively low crime rates and nice citizens, many people moved here to raise families. However, for these exact same reasons, Sacramento has been preyed on by immigrants and politicians looking to exploit its nature. Recently, there has been growing corruption, crime, violence, incompetence, fraud and a gang presence. For the citizens of Sacramento, this is very disturbing because many moved to this city for a better quality of life. However, politicians have welcomed dirty money into the city and exploited the taxpayers to create a criminal haven, in exchange for a basketball team and coliseum (which was mostly funded by taxpayers). Because of the investment of private funds, politicians have agreed to let criminals have their reign over and the by protecting the most dangerous criminals, but targets hardworking Americans. Many people are fearing for their lives because they know that politicians have opened up the doors to domestic terrorist, who deal dangerous drugs, kill people, burn down buildings, cause car accidents and physically attack innocent people, as well as poising people. Terrorism refers to tactics and strategies. Even the most honourable and worthwhile causes have, on occasion, been championed by individuals who resort to employing dishonourable and immoral means of attaining their goals. Most citizens work within the system to influence change. They might vote for a candidate who promises to make important political or economic reforms, donate money to charitable organizations that represents the needs of those afflicted with poverty or illness, volunteer to work in a soup kitchen or an elementary school, run for political office, work hard at their jobs to gain raises or promotions, or participate in a nonviolent demonstration or really in support of a particular cause. #RandolphHarris 2 of 20

By contrast, terrorists do not work within the frame work of the law. They also do not wage war on a battlefield. Instead, they target innocent civilians or government officials. Whatever their cause or concern, they are terrorists because their attack is designed to spread fear, anxiety, and terror through a given population. It is this characteristic, fear, that makes terrorism a threat to decent people everywhere. Trojan horse, huge hollow wooden horse constructed by the Greek to gain entrance into Tryo during the Trojan War. Th horse was built by Epeius, a master carpenter and pugilist. The Greeks, pretending to desert the war, sailed to the nearby island of Tenedos, leaving behind Sinon, who persuaded the Trojans that the horse was an offering to Athena (goddess of war) that would make Troy impregnable. Despite the warnings of Laocoon and Cassandra, the house was taken inside the city gates. That night Greek warriors emerged from it and opened the gates to let in the returned Greek army. The Trojan horse was used to carry out terrorism exactly the same way the mainstream media and some politicians are using the open borders, social programs and the first this and that being elected to office to tug at your heart strings, making you forget that we are living in post 911 America and national security should be our biggest concern. A new report confirms what national security leaders have long warned: if Congress fails to reauthorize Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), the U.S.A. stands at the brink of a self-inflicted national security calamity. #RandolphHarris 3 of 20

Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act is crucial to the nation’s security, including to the FBI’s efforts to protect Americans from foreign threats, and it recognizes that the reforms put in place by the FBI have yielded substantial compliance improvements. Section 702 is very important because it is possible that terrorists have already invaded your airwaves and appear on your local news pontificating dangerous propaganda. They may also be inserted in government offices, as well as private firms as well. At this time, border security, legitimate law enforcement, and renewing Section 702 are extremely important. Section 702 is an indispensable tool in the FBI’s efforts to protect against national security threats. It authorizes the targeted collection of foreign intelligence information from non-U.S.A. persons located abroad. Section 702 will expire on December 31, 2023, unless Congress takes action to reauthorize it The FBI is responsible for upholding the Constitution and protecting Americans, including their privacy and civil liberties. Section 702 authorities are crucial to fulfilling our mission, but the FBI acknowledges that noncompliance is unacceptable. Continued improvements to 702 querying standards are vital to maintaining public trust, and the FBI is committed to taking effective measures to ensure compliance. To people many people, it sounds like we are back to the Cold War days. However, many youth are still aloof to how serious national security concerns are because they have had it so easy and have not yet been targeted by domestic terrorists. All money is not good money and everyone needs to be screened before entering America. No one group of people should be given special privileges nor amnesty to break the law. #RandolphHarris 4 of 20

Today we are facing again one of the crucial choices in which the difference between violent versus anticipatory solution may spell the difference between destruction and fertile growth of our civilization. At this time, our World is divided into two blocs confronting each other with suspicion and hate. Both blocs have the capacity to harm each other to a degree the magnitude of which is equalled only by the inexactitude of its measurement. (The estimates of losses the United States of America can expect vary from one-third to practically the whole of its population being wiped out in a nuclear war—and similar estimates are applicable to other major nations.) Two blocs are fully armed and prepared for war. They distrust each other, and each suspects the other of wanting to conquer and destroy it. The present equilibrium of suspicion and threat based on a destructive potential may yet last for a little while. However, in the long run the only alternatives are nuclear war and all its consequences on the one hand, or the ending of the cold war, which implies disarmament and political peace between the two blocs, on the other. The question is, must the United States of America (and her Western allies) and the Soviet Union, and Communist China each pursue it present course to the bitter end, or can both sides anticipate certain changes and arrive at a solution that is historically possible and that, at the same time, offers optimal advantages to each bloc. The question is essentially the same as that which other societies and cultures have been confronted with; namely, whether we are capable of applying historical understanding to political action. #RandolphHarris 5 of 20

What is it that makes a society viable, allowing it to respond to change? There is no simple answer, but clearly the society must above all be able to discriminate its primary values from its secondary values and institutions. This is difficult because secondary systems generate values of their own, which come to appear as essential as the human and social needs which brought them into being. As people’s lives become intertwined with institutions, organizations, life styles, forms of production and consumption, et cetera, men become willing to sacrifice themselves and others for the works of their own hands, to transform their own creations into idols and to worship these idols. Furthermore, institutions generally resist change, and thus men who are fully committed to institutions are not free to anticipate change. The problem, then, for a society such as ours today, is whether men can rediscover the basic human and social values of our civilizations, and withdraw their allegiance, not to say their worship, from those of their institutional (or ideological) values which have become obstructive. There is one great difference between the past and the present that makes this an urgent question. The violent, unanticipated solution in our case will not lead to a bad peace as it did for Germany in 1918 or in 1945; it will not lead to some of our people—or some of the Russian people—being led away to captivity, as happened to the nations defeated by the Roman Empire; it will lead, most likely, to the physical destruction of most Americans and most Russians now living and to a barbaric, dehumanized, dictatorial regime for the survivors. #RandolphHarris 6 of 20

If not its physical, this time the choice between violent-irrational, or anticipatory-rational behaviour is a choice which will affect the human race and its cultural survival. Yet so far, the chances that such rational-anticipatory action will occur are bleak. Not because there is no possibility for such an outcome in the realistic circumstances, but because on both sides there is a thought barrier built of cliches, ritualistic ideologies, and even a good deal of common craziness that prevents people—leaders and led—from seeing sanely and realistically what the facts are, from separating the fact from the fictions and, as a consequence, from recognizing alternative solutions to violence. Such rational anticipatory policy requires in the first place a critical examination of our assumptions about, among other things, the nature of communism, the future of the underdeveloped countries, the value of the deterrent for avoiding war. It requires also a serious examination of our own biases, and of certain semipathological forms of thinking which govern our behaviour. The new freedom which capitalism has brought for the individual added to the effect which the religious freedom of Protestantism already had upon him. The individual became more alone, isolated, became an instrument in the hands of overwhelmingly strong forces outside of himself; he became an “individual,” but a bewildered and insecure individual. There were factors to help him overcome the overt manifestations of this underlying insecurity. In the first place his self was backed up by the possession of property. “He” as a person and the property he owned could not be separated. #RandolphHarris 7 of 20

A man’s clothes or his house were parts of his self just as much as his body. The less he felt he was being somebody the more he needed to have possessions. If the individual had no property or lost it, he was lacking an important part of his “self” and to a certain extent was not considered to be a full-fledged person, either by others or by himself. Other factors backing u the self were prestige and power. They are partly the outcome of the possession of property, partly the direct result of success in the fields of competition. The admiration by others and the power over them, added to the support which property gave, backed up the insecure individual self. For those who had little property and social prestige, the family was a source of individual prestige. There the individual could feel like “somebody.” He was obeyed by wife and children, he was the center of the stage, and he naively accepted his role as his natural right. He might be a nobody in his social relations, but he was a king at home. Aside from the family, the national pride (in Europe frequently class-pride) gave him a sense of importance also. Even if he was nobody personally, he was proud to belong to a group which he could feel was superior to other comparable groups. These factors supporting the weakened self must be distinguished from these factors which we spoke of in the past: the factual economic and political freedom, the opportunity for individual initiative, the growing rational enlightenment. These factors actually strengthened the self and led to the development of individuality, independence, and rationality. #RandolphHarris 8 of 20

The supporting factors, on the other hand, only helped to compensate for insecurity and anxiety. They did not uproot them but covered them up, and thus helped the individual to feel secure consciously; but this feeling was partly only on the surface and lasted only to the extent to which the supporting factors were present. Any detailed analysis of European and American history of the period between the Reformation and our own day could show how the two contradictory trends inherent in the evolution of “freedom to freedom to” run parallel—or rather, are continuously interwoven. At some periods and in certain social groups human freedom in its positive sense—strength and dignity of the self—was the dominant factor; broadly speaking this happened in England, France, America, and Germany when the middle class won its victories, economically and politically, over the representatives of an older order. In this fight for positive freedom the middle class could recur to that side of Protestantism which emphasized human autonomy and dignity; while the Catholic Church allied herself with those groups which had to fight the liberation of man in order to preserve their own privileges. In 1947, Leon Hardt, an astrologer and telepathist, appeared before a sold-out crowd at Munich’s Regina Palast Hotel, warning that the political and economic situation would be “very grave,” if a “spiritual rebirth of humanity” were not realized. “We have in our hands the power to actualize Heaven or Hell,” Mr. Hardt said. Today, we find ourselves in this same situation. #RandolphHarris 9 of 20

Some generations are born to create, others to maintain a civilization. The generations who launched the Second Wave of historic change were compelled, by force of circumstance, to be creators. The Montesquieus, Mills and Madisons invented most of the political forms we still take for granted. Caught between two civilizations, it was their destiny to create. Today in every sphere of social life, in our families, our schools, our businesses and churches, in our energy systems and communications, we face the need to create new Third Wave forms, and millions of people in many countries are already beginning to do so. Nowhere, however, is obsolescence more advanced or more dangerous than in our political life. And in no field today do we find less imagination, less experiment, less willingness to contemplate fundamental change. Even people who are daringly innovative in their own work—in their law offices or laboratories, their kitchens, classrooms, or companies—seem to freeze up at any suggestion that our Constitution or political structures are obsolete and in need of radical overhaul. So frightening is the prospect of deep political change with its attendant risks, that the status quo, however surrealistic and oppressive, suddenly seems like the best of all possible Worlds. Conversely we have in every society a fringe of pseudo-revolutionaries, steeped in obsolete Second Wave assumptions, for whom no proposed change is radical enough: archaeo-marxists, anarcho-romantics, political fanatics, racist and sexist demagogues and religious sea lots, armchair guerrillas and honest-to-God terrorists, dreaming of totalitarian technocracies, medieval utopias or theocratic states. Even as we speed into a new historical zone, they nurse dreams of revolution drawn from the yellowed pages of yesterday’s political tracts. #RandolphHarris 10 of 20

Yet what lies ahead as the super struggle intensifies is not a replay of any previous revolutionary drama—no centrally directed overthrow of the ruling elites by some “vanguard party” with masses in tow; no spontaneous, supposedly cathartic, mass uprising triggered by terrorism. The creation of new political structures for a Third Wave civilization will not come in a single climactic upheaval but as a consequence of a thousand innovations and collisions at many levels in many places over a period of decades. This does not rule out the possibility of violence along the way to tomorrow. The transition from First Wave to Second Wave civilizations was one long, blood-drenched drama of wars, revolts, famines, forced migrations, coups d’etat and calamities. Today the stakes are much higher, the time shorter, the acceleration faster, the dangers even greater. Much depends on the flexibility and intelligence of today’s elites, sub-elites, and super-elites. If these groups prove to be as shortsighted, unimaginative and frightened as most ruling groups in the past, they will rigidly resist the Third Wave and thereby escalate the risk of violence and their own destruction. If, by contrast, they flow with the Third Wave, if they recognize the need for a broadened democracy, they in fact can join in the process of creating a Third Wave civilization, just as the most intelligent First Wave elites anticipated the coming of a technologically based industrial society and joined in its creation. Many people lay awake at night, thinking gloomy thoughts, pondering unfathomable things. “The World situation worries me, everything looks disappointing,” a man told a public opinion pollster. #RandolphHarris 11 of 20

Other respondents to the same survey said that, as they lay down to sleep, they thought about their lost homeland (America), dead relative, or those still missing from the war. They worried about money, jobs, health, and lost savings. They worried about strangers and crime. “I am afraid al the time,” one woman said. “But I don’t know what of.” How should anyone know who to trust. “We in American find ourselves living in a time in which most people no longer know what is true and what is a lie,” claimed a mysterious group in San Jose, California calling itself Militant League Against Nihilism, whose letterhead featured an image of Hercules slaying the hydra. When asked in 2020 by pollsters whether more people had good or evil intentions, only one-third chose the former. No wonder people still scan the Heavens for signs. Many Americans believe that they are being expelled from their own country and being made to feel like outsiders. Arriving in enormous numbers, from countries torn apart by war and scarcity, several say they are being treated with great unkindness by new immigrants, and being labeled as parasites, thieves, and “foreigners,” when they are natural born Americans, law abiding, hard working, and some veterans, military or law enforcement. Some of these Americans, who have lost even more than most Americans, asked unnerving questions. “Why did we lose everything—not just our homes, or our families, and farms, but even our homelands? Why did pay the bill for the democrats?” Betrayal and confusion were accompanied by implicit questions of blame. “Am I imagining it all?” a former soldier muttered to his psychiatrist after returning from Afghanistan. “Why all the sacrifices and losses? All for nothing.” #RandolphHarris 12 of 20

Circumstances differ from country to country, but never in history have there been so many reasonable educated people collectively armed with so incredible a range of knowledge. Never have so many enjoyed so high a level of affluence, precarious perhaps, yet ample enough to allow them time and energy for civic concern and action. Never have so many been able to travel, to communicate and to learn so much from other cultures. Above all, never have so many had so much to gain by guaranteeing that the necessary changes, though profound, be made peacefully. Elites, no matter how enlightened, cannot by themselves make a new civilization. The energies of whole peoples will be required. However, those energies are available, waiting to be tapped. Indeed if we, particularly in the high-technology countries, took as our explicit goal for the next generation the creation of wholly new institutions and constitutions, we could release something far more powerful even than energy: the collective imagination. The sooner we begin to design alternative political institutions based on the three principles described above—minority power, semidirect democracy and decision division—the better our chances for a peaceful transition. It is the attempt to block such changes, not the changes themselves, that raises the level of risk. It is the blind attempt to defend obsolescence that creates the danger of bloodshed. This means that to avoid violent upheaval we must begin now to focus on the problem of structural, political obsolescence around the World. #RandolphHarris 13 of 20

And we must take this issue not merely to the experts, the constitutionalists, lawyers and politicians, but to the public itself—to civic organizations, trade unions, churches, to women’s groups, to ethnic and racial minorities, to scientists and housewives and businessmen. No one knows in detail what the future holds or what will work best in a Third Wave society. For this reason we should think not of a single massive reorganization or of a single revolutionary, cataclysmic change imposed from the top, but of thousands of conscious, decentralized experiments that permit us to test new models of political decision-making at local and regional levels in advance of their application to the national and transnational levels. Today’s widespread disillusionment, anger, and bitterness against the World’s Second Wave governments can either be whipped into fanatic frenzy by demagogues calling for authoritarian leadership, or it can be mobilized for the process of democratic reconstruction. By launching a vast process of social learning—an experiment in anticipatory democracy in many nations at once—we can head off the totalitarian thrust. We can prepare millions for the dislocations and dangerous crises that lie before us. And we can place strategic pressure on existing political systems to accelerate the necessary changes. Without this tremendous pressure from below, we should not expect many of today’s nominal leaders—presidents and politicians, senators and central committee members—to challenge the very institutions that, no matter how obsolete, give them prestige, money and the illusion, if not the reality, of power. #RandolphHarris 14 of 20

The responsibility for change lies with the American people. We must begin with ourselves, teaching ourselves not to close our minds prematurely to the novel, the surprising, the seemingly radical. This means fighting off the idea-assassins who rush forward to kill any new suggestion on grounds of its impracticality, while defending whatever now exists as practical, no matter how absurd, oppressive, or unworkable it may be. Even if heretical, it means fighting for freedom of expression—the right of people to voice their ideas. Above all it means starting this process of reconstruction now, before the further disintegration of existing political systems sends the forces of tyranny jackbooting through the streets, and makes impossible a peaceful transition to twenty-first-century democracy. If we begin now, we and our children can take part in the exciting reconstitution not merely of our obsolete political structures but of civilization itself. Like the generation of the revolutionary dead, we have a destiny to create. Therefore, stop inviting the local news into your home to pollute your mind with gossip, rumors, and crimes stories, which have less credibility than the National Enquirer. Many of you are spending over $400 a month paying for nearly 200 channels, equipment rentals, the physical television and electricity to allow the new to stop you in for tracks at 5pm, 10pm, or 11pm to so they can program and lie to you. Instead, spend that time with your family, or researching upcoming bills and candidates. Stop paying people, through your time and ratings, who may be funded by terrorists. Whatever time they come on, one thing is for sure, it is a waste of your time. Where there is a difference of status, superiors will have no success in asking inferiors to join in a discussion. Without rough equality, there can only be unilateral command, persuasion, or ostracism. #RandolphHarris 15 of 20

Discussion may occur between, let us say, officers and enlisted men, but only on those subjects where they talk as equals. Similarly, among apparent equals, say among enlisted men, a genuine discussion is likewise disrupted and transformed into dual monologues as soon as any party lays claims to any special access to the truth or special authority to determine policy. It is thus very important to distinguish experts and authorities from leaders in the process of opinion formation. Th board member, for example, might be a leader among the citizens of his district, trusted as a representative rather than looked up to as an authority. In such an event, he is very likely to be an alert and attentive listener to what the people of the district have to say, entering into the discussion in such ways as to contribute to the clarification of the problem and the formulation of unified opinion. He would thus stand most definitely as recognized inside leader rather than as an outside authority. Usually there are not only a fund of values held in common, built up through common past experience, but various forms of functional interdependence and co-operation. It is the fact that the parties will “have to live with each other” in the future that makes it desirable and even urgent for them to work out agreement. Other values are as a rule at stake besides those immediately involved in discussion, and these add to the importance of the discussion. Should discussion break down and conflict ensue, much else might be lost besides the point at issues. Otherwise the discussion may either be academic or irresolvable, since the only constraint toward agreement would be some gain to each, as in a business transaction. #RandolphHarris 16 of 20

Not the least of the values usually held in common is the language of the group itself, which makes communication, understanding, and co-operation possible. This is acknowledged by the popular phrase, “He speaks my language,” to express the fact that people are in agreement on fundamentals. A common vocabulary is encouraged by enlarging the flow of communication within the public concerned, through meetings, periodicals, correspondence, visits, parties, education, ceremonies, and celebrations. However, the observation that a large measure of consensus on values and vocabulary improves the prospects of discussion, should not be taken to mean that discussion in any way presupposes unanimity. Just a birth means to leave the enveloping protection of the womb, growing up means to leave the protective orbit of the mother. Yet, even in the mature adult, the longing for this situation as it once existed never ceases completely, in spite of the fact that there is, indeed, a great difference between the adult and the child. The adult has means to stand on his own feet, to take care of himself and even for others, whereas the child is not yet capable of doing all this. However, considering the increased perplexities of life, the fragmentary nature of knowledge, the accidentalness of adult existence, the unavoidable errors we make, the situation of the adult is by no means as different from that of the child as it is generally assumed. #RandolphHarris 17 of 20

Every adult is in need of help, warmth, protection, in many ways differing and yet in many ways similar to the needs of the child. Is it surprising to find in the average adult a deep longing for the security and rootedness which the relationship to his mother once gave him? Is it not to be expected that he cannot give up this intense longing unless he finds other ways of being rooted? In psychopathology we find ample evidence for this phenomenon of the refusal to leave the all-enveloping orbit of the mother. In the most extreme form, we find the craving to return to the womb or family home. A person obsessed by this desire may offer the picture of schizophrenia. He feels and acts like the fetus in the mother’s womb, incapable of assuming even the most elementary functions of a small child. In many of the more severe neuroses we find the same craving, but as a repressed desired, manifested only in dreams, symptoms, and neurotic behaviour, which results from the conflict between the deep desire to stay in the mother’s womb and the adult part of the personality which tends to live a normal life. In dreams this craving appears in such symbols as being in a dark cave, in a one-man submarine, diving into deep water, et cetera. In the behaviour of such a person, we find a fear of life and a deep fascination for death (death, in fantasy, being the return to the womb, to mother Earth). The less severe form of the fixation to mother is to be found in those cases where a person has permitted himself to be born, as it were, but where he is afraid to take the next step of birth, to be weaned from the mother’s breasts. #RandolphHarris 18 of 20

People have a deep craving to be mothered, nursed, protected by a motherly figure; they are the eternally dependent ones, who are frightened and insecure when motherly protection is withdrawn but optimistic and active when a loving mother or mother substitute is provided, either realistically or in fantasy. It is essential, and indispensable for full deliverance from deception by psychopathological offenders, that the self-actualized knows the standard of one’s normal condition, for which this gauge before him he can judge his degree of deliverance—physically, intellectually and spiritually—so as to fight through with steady volition and faith until every faculty is free, and he stands as an unshackled man in the liberty wherewith Christ has made him free. As he judges himself by this criterion he may say, “Things are not the same as they were”; so he then fights through by prayer to his normal condition. The deceiving spirits will suggest all kinds of excuses to stop the man’s advance to freedom: exempli gratia, if he twenty years of age, they will suggest that “the mind cannot be as vigorous as it was at ten”; or “overwork is the cause of your being below what you should be.” However, he must not accept reasons which appear to be “natural.” Some practical ways of keeping the mind in its normal working condition may be briefly suggested as follows: ONE’S ATTITUDE TOWARD THE PAST. There should be no regrets, or brooding over things done or undone. Evaluation is an ordinary operation of the mind when thinking over the past, but it can be entangled into an evil kind of thinking which is generally described as “brooding.” #RandolphHarris 19 of 20

If he is simply “thinking” or is being drawn into a state of regretting or brooding, the self-actualized must learn to discern for himself. For victory in one’s life there must be victory in regard to the past, with all its failures. The good events of the past cause no trouble to the mind, only those involving real or supposed psychopathology. They should be dealt with by coming to God on the ground of 1 John 1.19, and thus the believer will be delivered. ONE’S ATTITUDE TOWARD THE FUTURE. The same may be said about the action of the mind with regard to the future. It is lawful to think of the past and think of the future, so long as the evil state of “brooding,” brought about by conduct disorder, or the ultimate negative, is not yielded to. ONE’S ATTITUDE TOWARD PYSCHOPATHOLOGICAL OFFENDERS. They must not be permitted to interfere; the self-actualized should see to it that no new ground is given to them for deception. ONE’S ATTITUDE TOWARD THE PRESENT MEMOMENT. There should be a steady concentration of mind upon the duties of the moment, keeping it in active readiness for use as occasion requires. This does not mean ceaseless activity, of course. Activity of the mind so that it is never at rest can be a symptom of deception. Each, according to one’s deeds, will the divine spirit rest. Since every man is the creature of God, every human being is made in His image. The righteous among all nations have a share in the World to come. We must support the poor of all people with the poor of America, visit the sick with the sick of America, and give honourable burial to their dead as to the dead of America, for that will lead to peace. We must practice justice at all times, whether it be for our profit or for our loss, and toward all men, American and non-American alike. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic, for which it stands, one nation, under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for all. #RandolphHarris 20 of 20

MAGNOLIA STATION AT CRESLEIGH RANCH

Rancho Cordova, CA | low $600s

Now Selling!

Models now open at Magnolia Station! Located at the corner of Rancho Cordova Parkway and Douglas Road, residents of Cresleigh Ranch will benefit from a brand new neighborhood with convenient access to the new Raley’s Shopping Center, Sunrise Boulevard, and much more!

Magnolia Station will  include 81 homesites  and five distinct plans ranging from 2,200 – 3,700 square feet; including three single story plans! Each plan has been thoughtfully designed to include features such as: Generations Suite, Optional Offices/Dens, Extended Great Rooms, and more! https://cresleigh.com/magnolia-station/

#CresleighHomes