The separation of a completely individualized being is itself complete in a materialistic World. However, love reunites that which is self-centered and individual. It is the fulfilment and triumph of love that is able to reunite the most radically separated beings, namely individual persons. When persons are mutually present and no involved together in conversation or other focused interaction, it is possible for one person to stare openly and fixedly at others, gleaning what one can about them while frankly expressing on one’s face one’s response to what one sees—for example, the “hate stare” that some may give to people of marginalized groups walking past them. It is also possible for one person to treat others as if they were not there at all, as objects not worthy of a glance, let alone close scrutiny. Moreover, it is possible for the individual, by one’s staring or one’s “not seeing,” to alter one’s own appearance hardly at all in consequence of the presence of the others. Here we have “nonperson” treatment; it may be been in our society in the way we sometimes treat children, servants, marginalized groups of people, and those with disabilities. Currently, in our society, this kind of treatment is to be contrasted with the kind generally felt to be more proper in most situations, which will here be called “civil inattention.” What seems to be involved is that one gives to another enough visual notice to demonstrate that one appreciates that the other is present (and that one admits openly to having seen one), while at the next moment withdrawing one’s attention from one as to express that one does not constitute a target of special curiosity or design. #RandolphHarris 1 of 21

In performing this courtesy the eyes of the looker may pass over the eyes of the other, but no “recognition” is typically allowed. Where the courtesy is performed between two person passing on the street, civil inattention may take the special form of eyeing the other up to approximately eight feet, during which time sides of the street are apportioned by gesture, and then casting the eyes down as the other passes—a kind of dimming of lights. In any case, we have here what is perhaps the slightest of interpersonal rituals, yet one that constantly regulates the social intercourse of persons in our society. By according civil inattention, the individual implies that one has no reason to suspect the intentions of the others present and no reason to fear the others, be hostile to them, or wish to avoid them. (At the same time, in extending this courtesy one automatically opens oneself up to a like treatment from others present.) This demonstrates that one has nothing to fear or avoid in being seen and being seen seeing, and that one is not ashamed of oneself or of the place of the company in which one finds oneself. It will therefore be necessary for one to have a certain “directness” of eye expression. As one student suggests, the individual’s gaze ought not to be guarded or averted or absent or defensively dramatic, as if “something were going on.” Indeed, the exhibition of such deflected eye expressions may be taken as a symptom of some kind of mental disturbance. #RandolphHarris 2 of 21

Civil inattention is so delicate an adjustment that we may expect constant evasion of the rules regarding it. Dark glasses, for example, allow the wearer to stare at another person without that other being sure that one is being stared at. One person can look at another out of the corner of one’s eyes. The fan and parasol once served as similar assistants in stealing glances, and in polite Western society the decline in the use of these instruments in the last one hundred years has lessened the elasticity of communication arrangements. It should be added, too, that the closer the onlookers are to the individual who interests them, the more exposed one’s position (and theirs), and the more obligation they will feel to ensure one civil inattention. The further they are from one, the more license they will feel to stare at one a little. In addition to these evasions of rules we also may expect frequent infractions of them. Here, of course, social class subculture and ethnic subculture introduce differences in patterns, and differences, too, in the age at which patterns are first employed. The morale of a group in regard to this minimal courtesy of civil inattention—a courtesy that tends to treat those present merely as participants in the gathering and not in terms of the other social characteristics—is tested whenever someone of very divergent social status or very divergent physical appearance is present. English middle-class society, for example, prides itself in giving famous and infamous persons the privilege of being civilly disattended in public, as when the Royal children manage to walk through a park with few persons turning around to stare. #RandolphHarris 3 of 21

And in our own American society, currently, we know that one of the great trials of the physically disabled is that in public places they will be openly stared at, thereby having their privacy invaded, while at the same time, the invasion exposes their undesirable attributes. The act of staring is a thing which one does not ordinarily do to another human being; it seems to put the object stared at in a class apart. One does not talk to a monkey in a zoo, or to a performer in a sideshow—one only stares. An injury, as characteristic and inseparable part of the body, may be felt to be a personal matter which the man would like to keep private. However, the fact of its visibility makes it known to anyone whom the injured human meets, including the stranger. A visible injury differs from most other personal matters in that anyone can stare at the injury or ask questions about it, and in both cases communicate to and impose upon the injured person one’s feelings and evaluations. Once’s action is then felt as an intrusion into privacy. It is the visibility of the injury which makes intrusion into privacy so easy. The people are likely to feel that they have to meet again and again people who will question and stare, and to feel powerless because they cannot change the general state of affairs. Perhaps the clearest illustration both of civil inattention and of the infraction of this ruling occurs when a person takes advantage of another’s not looking to one, and then finds that the object of one’s gaze has suddenly turned and caught the illicit looker looking. #RandolphHarris 4 of 21

The individual caught out may then shift one’s gaze, often with embarrassment and a little shame, or one may carefully act as if one had merely been seen in the moment of observation that is permissible; in either case we see evidence of the propriety that should have been maintained. To behave properly and to have the right to civil inattention are related: propriety on the individual’s part tends to ensure one’s being accorded civil inattention; extreme impropriety on one’s part is likely to result in one’s being stared at or studiously not seen. Improper conduct, however, does not automatically release others from the obligation of extending civil inattention to the offender, although it often weakens it. In any case, civil inattention may be extended in the face of offensive simply as an act of tactfulness, to keep an orderly appearance in the situation in spite of what is happening. Ordinarily, in middle-class society, failure to extend civil inattention to others is not negatively sanctioned in a direct and open fashion, except in the social training of servants and children, the latter especially in connection with according civil inattention to the physically disabled and deformed. For examples of such direct sanctions among adults one must turn to despotic societies where glancing at the emperor or one’s agents may be a punishable offense, or to the rather refined rules prevailing in some of our Southern states concerning how much of a look certain men can give to a particular woman, over how much distance, before it is interpreted as punishable advance in pleasures of the flesh. #RandolphHarris 5 of 21

Given the pain of being stared at, it is understandable that staring itself is widely used as a means of negative sanctions, socially controlling all kinds of improper public conduct. Indeed it often constitutes the first warning an individual receives that one is “out of line” and the last warning that it is necessary to give one. In fact, in the case of those whose appearance tests to the limit the capacity of a gathering to proffer civil inattention, staring itself may become a sanction against staring. The autobiography of an ex-dwarf provides an illustration: “There were the thick-skinned ones, who stared like hill people come down to see a traveling show. There were the paper-peekers, the furtive kind who would withdraw blushing if you caught them at it. There were the pitying ones, whose tongue clickings could almost be heard after they had passed you. However, even worse, there were the chatters, whose every remark might as well have been “How do you do, poor boy?” They said it with their eyes and their manners and their tone of voice. I had a standard defense—a cold stare. Thus anesthetized against my fellow man, I could contend with the basic problem—getting in and out of the subway alive.” In order to understand more clearly what I am going to say, you must try to remember that we have no control over our consciousness. When I said that we can become more conscious, or that a human can be made conscious for a moment simply by asking one if one is conscious or not, I used the words “conscious” and “consciousness” in relative sense. #RandolphHarris 6 of 21

There are so many degrees of consciousness and every higher degree means more “conscious” in relation to a lower degree. However, although we have no control over consciousness itself, we have a certain control over our thinking about consciousness, as we can construct our thinking in such a way as to bring consciousness. By giving our thoughts a direction which they would have in a moment of consciousness, we can, in this way, induce consciousness. Now try to formulate what you noticed when you tried to observe yourself. You should have noticed three things. First, that you do not remember yourself, that is to say, you are not aware of yourself at the time when you try to observe yourself. Secondly, that observation is made difficult by the incessant stream of thoughts, images, echoes of conversation, fragments of emotions flowing through your mind and very often distracting your attention from observation. And thirdly, that as soon as you start self-observation—if you really tried it—is a constant struggle with imagination. Now this is the chief point in work upon oneself. If one realized that all the difficulties in the work depend on the fact that one cannot remember oneself, one already knows what one must do. One must try to remember oneself. In order to do this one must struggle with mechanical thoughts and one must struggle with imagination. If one does this conscientiously and persistently one will see results in a comparatively short time. However, one must not think that it is easy or that one can master this practice immediately. #RandolphHarris 7 of 21

Self-remembering, as it is called, is a very difficult thing to learn to practice. It must not be based on expectation of results, otherwise one becomes lost in thinking about one’s efforts. It must be based on the realization of the fact that we do not remember ourselves if we try sufficiently hard and in the right way. We cannot become conscious at will, at the moment when we want to, because we have no command over states of consciousness. However, we can remember ourselves for a short time at will because we have a certain command over our thoughts. And if we start remembering ourselves by the special construction of our thoughts, that is, by the realization that we do not remember ourselves; that no one remembers oneself, and by the realizing what this means, this realization will bring us to consciousness. You must understand that we have found the weak spot in the wall of our mechanicalness. This is the knowledge that we do not remember ourselves and the realization that we can try to remember ourselves. With the understanding of the necessity for actual change in ourselves, the possibility of work begins. The practice of self-remembering, connected with self-observation and with the struggle against imagination, has not only a psychological meaning, but it also changes the subtlest part of our metabolism and produced definite chemical, or perhaps it is better to say alchemical, effects in our body. So from psychology we come to alchemy; to the idea of the transformation of coarse elements into finer ones. #RandolphHarris 8 of 21

Heavenly Father knew we would all make mistakes in this mortal life. So, He loves us and forgives us so we can learn from our mistakes and realize they are opportunities to grow. Mistakes are a fact of life. Learning to skillfully play the piano is essentially impossible without making thousands of mistakes. Success is not the absence of failure, but going from failure to failure to failure without any loss of enthusiasm. Think about a time when you made a mistake or failed at something. Were you sad? Did you want to give up? What did you do? Often times, if you are wrong, it is best to admit it. People, being human, sometimes want a sense of being important; so when one apologizes for making a mistake, it allows them to nourish their self-esteem, and that may take them to the magnanimous attitude of showing mercy. There is a certain degree of satisfaction in having the courage to admit one’s errors, and it will keep you from becoming a liar and making even larger errors. Admitting a mistake not only clears the air of guilt and defensiveness, but often helps solve the problem created by error. Any fool can try to defend one’s mistakes—and most fools do—but it raises one above the herd and gives one a feeling of nobility and exultation to admit one’s mistakes. None of us are perfect. We make mistakes. What comes next can mean the difference between success and endless spinning our wheels. It is easy to say you are sorry or to make amends when you accidentally bump into somebody or misinterpret something that someone said. However, what about the big mistakes? #RandolphHarris 9 of 21

 Some larger companies can make mistakes that have significant consequences—like contaminating their air we breathe, making thousands of faulty pieces of furniture, or accidently renting apartments with electrical appliances that leak water on the floor. These errors are extremely difficult to put right and can harm others if company leaders do not take responsibility. These leaders face a moral dilemma: Do they alert customers and fix the issues, dealing with the extra costs and embarrassment, or do they do nothing, hoping to avoid any negative affect to their profits? The answer should always be to do what is best for customers. The same is true in small business. We should always take the initiative to recall any piece of our work that is not up to standard. Therefore, set core values early. Core values are values you believe in and try to live by: honesty, trustworthiness, fairness. You do not want to get caught questioning what you believe in when you are in the middle of a crisis. Set your values. Write them down. Believe them. Trust that if you follow them, your business will thrive. Who you are is what your company will stand for. Do not be afraid to repent. You may want to do this in the spiritual sense and a physical sense. The original meaning of repent is “to change.” So when you have made a mistake with a customer, take responsibility, make it right, and figure out how to change your process so you do not do it again. Make the customer happy and save yourself a lot of future headaches. Listen even when you are not wrong. It takes a lot of patience to hear out complaints. Rather than starting the blame game, listen carefully and take notes. #RandolphHarris 10 of 21

Establish an environment where employees trust you enough to voice their concerns. Then patiently review responsibilities with them so that everyone understands what one is accountable for. Remember, it is the people you should care about most. Big mistakes lead to big solutions. Many products are safer today because companies took responsibility for early mistakes in design or production and made changes. These changes sometimes came at great cost in the short run, but the investment paid off in the long run. Remember, God wants us to improve and grow. Sometimes it is painful to accept responsibility and make things right, but it does pay off spiritually as well as temporally. When we are right, let us try to win people gently and tactfully to our way of thinking, and when we are wrong—and that will be surprisingly often, if we are honest with ourselves—let us admit our mistakes quickly and with enthusiasm. Not only will that technique produce astonishing results; but, believe it or not, it is a lot more fun, under the circumstances, than trying to defend oneself. By fighting you never get enough, but by yielding you get more than you expected. Signals are usually associated with locations rather than agents. Restaurants are crowded. Neighbourhoods are well kept. Jobs have pay scales. This is an important contrast with agent following. If you make friends with someone who is a good musician, you may meet people who visit the restaurants musicians like. However, your friend may choose places on a completely different basis, unrelated to a signal such as whether they are popular and busy. If you like jazz, you may meet jazz lovers who go to restaurants where it is played. You are less likely to meet people who like whatever restaurant is currently in vogue. #RandolphHarris 11 of 21

Following a signal relies implicitly—and sometimes even explicitly—on a belief that the signal goes together with consequences an agent will prefer. Some of those consequences are directed—lower noise, to return to the example of choosing apartments. However, usually there are indirect consequences as well, among those are interactions with others who follow the same signal. In a building with quiet apartments you may have neighbours who prize quiet. At the tops of treacherous mountains, you meet people who are devoted to mountain climbing. Signal following leads to locations that attract others who follow the same or related signals. Agents following leads to others an agent interacts with, through whatever mechanism. The former leads to interaction associated with the signal, the latter to interactions associated with the leading agent. Often agents themselves have a property that can serve as a signal to other agents. Amazingly enough, even if such a property is assigned to the agents completely arbitrarily, it can still serve to help the agents organize their interaction patterns and thereby achieve greater success. We call such a property a tag—an initially arbitrary property of an agent (say, a number between 0 and 1) that is detectable by other agents and that can be copied by other agents. Examples of tags might include accents and styles of clothing. Tags work by allowing agents to interact with others having desirable tags—in many cases this will be their own. #RandolphHarris 12 of 21

When agents with mutually desirable tags interact a lot, they create a neighbourhood. Even if those in a neighbourhood initially have nothing in common but their tags, the fact that they interact with each other more than with others can make a big difference. The interesting thing is that tags allow compatibility of rules to be created from within the population itself. The key is that imitation of the tags of successful others helps neighbourhoods to form, focusing the interaction patterns of an agent among those with similar tags, making the tag a meaningful basis for selective cooperation. Unfortunately, agents can make errors in copying strategies, and so over time rules accumulated in a cooperative neighbourhood may be misunderstood and improperly implemented. Arbitrary tags will not always allow for populations to form cooperative neighbourhoods. Nor are all such neighbourhood destined to break down over time. However, these dynamics do occur. Rates of copying errors can prevent cooperation from emerging by being either too high or too low. This illustrates a characteristic virtue, as well as a difficulty, of simulating a Complex Adaptive System. While the results do not tell us what will always happen, they do show us one way that complexity can sometimes be harnessed to help a population break out of mutually reinforcing selfishness. There is also a weakness in tags as a method of harnessing complexity: they are not able to maintain “policing” of the cooperative neighbourhoods they create. The success of this tag space method of harnessing complexity depends on mutual support among the rules of the agents. #RandolphHarris 13 of 21

A similar dynamic can occur in other cases. In the infancy of a social movement, for example, each new supporter who is gained increases the value of the movement for existing supporters and increases the attractiveness of the movement to those who might subsequently join. However, if some rules are exploited, things will not remain simple. Then a signal can be followed to build a concentration of one kind of rule, but it may subsequently serve as a guide to agents who would prey upon that concentration. Senior citizens may name an Internet newsgroup for discussing their common interest in travel. However, later, when they have built up its membership, unscrupulous fraud artists can use the list to sell worthless vacation bargains. Beyond the work on tags that we have described, there are many other dynamics of neighbourhoods based on signals. For example, cases occur among fashion leaders and fashion imitators in many fields such as clothing, music, hairstyles, and advertising techniques. In this interesting form of signal following, the logic is that some agents want to be among the distinctive few. Eventually, however, the fashion leaders attract others who want to be like them. This imitation reduces their distinctiveness. Finally, the fashion leaders must move on to new bases of distinction, only to be followed again. Signal following may have advantages and disadvantages. On the beneficial side of the ledger, the followed signal itself sets a context for interpreting what happens. If you worked to obtain a promotion and now you are enjoying your new colleagues, the improved job status may seem a likely cause. A weakness of signal following is that the signal may be a bad predictor of the quality of the interactions that follow. #RandolphHarris 14 of 21

The residents of a more expensive neighbourhood may prefer privacy or travel heavily and so they do not interact with you. The signal may not be casually associated with the interactions experienced, as when your child goes to a better school but has a bad year because of a teacher’s undiagnosed health problems. Since you do not know the true cause, you might conclude that the problem stemmed from some distinctive feature of the school you that was “better,” such as its (oversized?) new building or its students with (overly?) ambitious parents. The two mechanisms of following an agent and following a signal do not exhaust the possibilities for changing interaction patterns by moving through space. They are, nevertheless, the most important causes. Making your strategic moves credible is not easy. However, it is not impossible, either. When we first raised this issue, we said that to make a strategic move credible, you must take a supporting or collateral action. We called such an action commitment. We now offer eight devices for achieving credible commitments. This is called the “eightfold path” to credibility. Depending on the circumstances, one or more of these tactics may prove effective for you. Behind this system are three underlying principles. The first principle is to change the payoffs of the game. The idea is to make in in your interest to follow through on your commitment: turn a threat into a warning, a promise into an assurance. This can be done through a variety of ways. First, establish and use a reputation, and write contracts. Both these tactics make it more costly to break the commitment than to keep it. #RandolphHarris 15 of 21

A second avenue is to change the game to limit your ability to back out of a commitment. In this category, we consider three possibilities. Them most radical is simply to deny yourself any opportunity to back down, either by cutting yourself off from the situation or by destroying any avenues of retreat. There is even the possibility of removing yourself from the decision-making position and leaving the outcome to chance. Cut off communication. Burn the brides behind you. Leave the outcome to change. These two principles can be combined: both the possible actions and their outcomes can be changed. If a large commitment is broken down into many smaller ones, then the gain from breaking a little one may be more than offset by the loss of the remaining contract. Thus we have: Move in small steps. A third route is to use others to help you maintain commitment. A team may achieve credibility more easily than an individual. Or you may simply hire others to act in your behalf. Develop credibility through teamwork. Employ mandated negotiating agents. If you try a strategic move in a game and then back off, you may lose your reputation for credibility. In a once-in-a-lifetime situation, reputation may be unimportant and therefore of little commitment value. However, you typically play several games with different rivals at the same time, or the same rivals at different times. Then you have an incentive to establish a reputation, and this serves as a commitment that makes your strategic moves credible. During the Berlin crisis in 1961, President John F. Kennedy explained the importance of the U.S.A. reputation: If we do not meet our commitments to Berlin, where will we later stand? If we are not true to our word there, al that we have achieved in collective security, which relies on these words, will mean nothing. #RandolphHarris 16 of 21

Another example is Israel’s standing policy not to negotiate with terrorists. This is a threat intended to deter terrorists from taking hostages to barter for ransom or release of prisoners. If the no-negotiation threat is credible, terrorists will come to recognize the futility of their actions. In the meantime, Israel’s resolve will be tested. Each time the threat must be carried out, Israel suffers; a refusal to compromise may sacrifice Israeli hostages’ lives. Each confrontation with terrorists puts Israel’s reputation and credibility on the line. Giving in means more than just meeting the current demands; it makes future terrorism more attractive. (Even the Israelis have lost some of their reputation for toughness. Their willingness to swap 3,000 Arab prisoners for 3 of their air force pilots suggests that exceptions will sometimes be made.) More discussion on the path to credibility will be discussed in the future. In Bluefield, West Virginia USA, on November 9, 1989, a school teacher wept. All across the World, millions shared her moment of joy. Glued to their television screens, they saw the Berlin Wall brought down. For an entire generation, East Germany had been imprisoned, maimed, or shot for trying to get past that twenty-eight-mile wall. Now they were pouring through it into West Germany, eyes gleaming, faces registering everything from exhilaration to culture shock. Soon the hammers went to work. And today remnants of the wall that once bisected Berlin, and indeed all of Germany, are souvenirs of stone and cement gathering dust on countless mantelpieces. #RandolphHarris 17 of 21

Because it concretized, one might say, the end of the Soviet-imposed totalitarianism throughout Central and Eastern Europe, the downfall of the wall drew an elated response in the West. Shortsighted intellectuals and politicians joined in an ode to joy that would have done Beethoven proud. With Marxism on the ropes, they chorused, the future of democracy was now assured. We had reached the very end of ideology itself. Today Easter Europe seethes with instability. Poland faces total economic breakdown. Romanian crows clash in the streets. And Yugoslavia’s president warns that “extreme right parties” and “revanchist forces” could ignite “civil war and the possibility of foreign armed intervention like we are seeing in Ukraine.” Anti-Semitism and ancient ethnic hatred run rampant. Post-war borders are called into question. The collapse of Soviet power over Eastern Europe, far from assuring democracy, has opened a combustive vacuum into which fools and firebrands seem ready to rush. Western Europe’s drive toward integration has been thrown into confusion. Looming over this vast continental spectacle are threats of a Soviet split-up that could easily trigger a generation of wars, raising anew nuclear dangers that were supposed to have been relaxed. Ironically, even as millions who have never had it grope for freedom, the established democracies in North America, Western Europe, and Japan themselves face an expected internal crisis. Democracy is entering its decisive decades. For we are t the end of the age of mass democracy—and that is the only kind that the industrial World has ever known. #RandolphHarris 18 of 21

As we consider the human body, in most parts of the body, the finest blood vessels, capillaries, pass within a few cell diameters of every point. Certain white blood cells can leave these vessels to move among the neighbouring cells. Immune machines and similar devices, being even smaller, could do likewise. In some tissues, this will be easy, in some harder, but with careful design and testing, essentially any point of the body should become accessible for healing repairs. Merely fighting organisms in the bloodstream would be a major advance, cutting their numbers and inhibiting their spread. Roving medical nanomachines, though, will be able to hunt down invaders throughout the body and eliminate them entirely. Caners are a prime example. The immune system recognized and eliminates most potential cancers, but some get by. Physicians can recognize cancer cells by their appearance and by molecular markers, but they cannot always remove them through surgery, and often cannot find a selective poison. Immune machines, however, will have no difficulty identifying cancer cells, and will ultimately be able to track them down and destroy them wherever they may be growing. Destroying every cancer cell will cure the cancer. Bacteria, protozoa, worms, and other parasites have even more obvious molecular markers. Once identified, they could be destroyed, ridding the body of the disease they cause. #RandolphHarris 19 of 21

Immune machines thus could deal with tuberculosis, strep throat, leprosy, malaria, amoebic dysentery, sleeping sickness, river blindness, hookworm, flukes, candida, valley fever, antibiotic-resistant bacteria, and even athlete’s foot. All are caused by invading cells or larger organisms (such as worms). Health officials estimate that parasitic diseases, common in the Third World, affect more than one billion people. For many of these diseases, no satisfactory drug treatment exists. All can eventually be eliminated as threats to human health by sufficiently advanced form of nanomedicine. Destroying invaders will be helpful, but injuries and structural problems pose other problems. Truly advanced medicine will be able to build up and restructure tissues. Here, medical nanodevices can stimulate and guide the body’s own construction and repair mechanisms to restore healthy tissue. What is healthy tissue? It consists of normal cells in normal patterns in a normal matrix all organized in a normal relationship to the surrounding tissues. Surgeons today (with their huge, crude tools) can fix some problems at the tissue level. A wound disrupts the healthy relationship between two different pieces of tissue, and surgical glues and sutures can partly remedy this problem by holding the tissues in a position that promotes healing. Likewise, coronary-artery bypass surgery brings about a more healthy overall configuration of tissues—one that provides working plumbing to supply blood to the heart muscle. Surgeons cut and stitch, but then they must reply on the tissue to heal it wounds as best it can. #RandolphHarris 20 of 21

With enough knowledge of how these processes work (and nanoinstruments can help gather that knowledge) and with good enough software to guide the process—a more difficult challenge—medical nanomachines will be able to guide this healing process. The problem here is to guide the motion and behavior of the mob of active, living cells—a process that can be termed cell herding. Cells respond to a host of signals from their environment: to chemicals in the surrounding fluids, to signal molecules on neighbouring cells, and to mechanical forces applied to them. Cell-herding devices would use these signals to spur cell division where it is needed and to discourage it where it is not. They would nudge cells to encourage them to migrate in appropriate directions, or would simply pick them up, move them along, and deliver them where needed, encouraging them to nestle into a proper relationship with their neighbours. Finally, they would stimulate cells to surround themselves with the proper intercellular-matrix materials. Or—like the owner of a small dog who, on a cold day, wraps the beast in a wool jacket—they would directly build the proper surrounding structures for the cells in its new location. In this way, cooperating terms of cell-herding devices could guide the healing or restructuring of tissues, ensuring that their cells form healthy patterns and a healthy matrix and that those tissues have a healthy relationship to their surroundings. Where necessary, cells could even be adjusted internally, as we will discuss later. #RandolphHarris 21 of 21

Cresleigh Homes

At Riverside Residence 1, there’s space for all of it. 👏 All your clothes, shoes, furniture – you name it, we’ve got a place for it! Can’t wait for you to take in the spacious floor plan for yourself.

Let your decor dreams take flight and find the home that gives you the space to truly be yourself. It is 2023 and you deserve a place you love! Come check out all we have to offer on our website. https://cresleigh.com/cresleigh-riverside-at-plumas-ranch/

The well-equipped kitchen is highlighted by a large center island with breakfast bar, plenty of counter and cabinet space, and sizable walk-in pantry. 

#PlumasRanch
#CresleighHomes