People are the same most everywhere you go, they just make their living in different ways. A thing’s being a good X for K is treated as equivalent to its having the properties which it is rational for K to want in an X in view of one’s interests and aims. Yet we often assess the rationality of a person’s desires, and the definition must be extended to over this fundamental case if it is to serve the purposes of the theory of justice. Now the basic idea at the third stage is to apply the definition of good to plans of life. The rational plan for a person determines one’s good. A person may be regarded as a human life lived according to a plan. An individual says who one is by describing one’s purposes and causes, what one intends to do in one’s life. This plan is characterized by the coherent, systematic purpose of the individual and it makes one a conscious, unified moral person. If this plan is a rational one, then I say that the person’s conception of one’s good is likewise rational. In one’s case the real and the apparent good coincide. Similarly one interests and aims are rational, an it is appropriate to take them as stopping points in making judgments that correspond to the first two stages of the definition. These suggestions are quite straightforward but unfortunately setting out the details is somewhat tedious. Both the inward and outward lives of every human are controlled by a concealed entity—the Overself. Could one but see aright, one would see that everything witnesses to its presence and activity. #RandolphHarris 1 of 20

 A person’s plan for life is rational if, and only if, it is one of the plans that is consistent with the principles of rational choice when these are applied to all the relevant features of one’s situation, and it is that plan among those meeting this condition which would be chosen by one with full deliberative rationality, that is, with full awareness of the relevant fact and after a careful consideration of the consequences. For simplicity I assume that there is one and only one plan that would be chosen, and not several (or many) between which the agent would be indifferent, or whatever. Thus I speak throughout of the plan that would be adopted with deliberative rationality. Secondly, a person’s interests and aims are rational if, and only if, they are to be encouraged and provided for by the plan that is rational for one. Note that in the first of these definitions I have implied that a rational plan is presumably but one of many possible reason for this complication is that these principles do not single out one plan as the best. We have instead a maximal class of plans: each member of this class is superior to all plans not included in it, but given any two plans in the class, neither is superior or inferior to the other. Thus to identify person’s rational plan, I suppose that it is that plan belonging to the maximal class which one would choose with full deliberative rationality. #RandolphHarris 2 of 20

We criticize someone’s plan, then, by showing either that it violates the principles of rational choice, or that it is not the plan that one would pursue were one to assess one’s prospects with care in the light of a full knowledge of one’s situation. A rational plan is fundamental for the definition of good, since a rational plan of life establishes the basic point of view from which all judgments of value relating to a particular person are to be made and final rendered consistent. Indeed, with certain qualification, we can think of a person as being happy when one in in the ways of a successful execution (more or less) of a rational plan of life drawn up under (more or less) favourable conditions, and one is reasonably confident that one’s plan can be carried through. Someone is happy when one’s plans are going well, one’s more important aspirations being fulfilled, and one feels sure that one’s good fortune will endure. Since plans which it is rational to adopt vary from person to person depending upon their endowments and circumstances, and the like, different individuals find their happiness in doing different things. The gloss concerning favourable circumstances is necessary because even a rational arrangement of one’s activities can be a matter of accepting the lesser evil if natural conditions are hard and the demands of humans oppressive. The achievement of happiness in the larger sense of a happy life, or of a happy period of one’s life, always presumes a degree of good fortune. #RandolphHarris 3 of 20

Several other points are important. The first relates to their time structure. A plan, will, to be sure, makes some provision for even the most distant future and for our death, but it becomes relatively less specific for later periods. Certain broad contingencies are insured against and general means provided for, but the details are filled in gradually as more information becomes available and our wants and needs are known with greater accuracy. Indeed, one principle of rational choice is that of postponement: if in the future we may want to do one of several things but are unsure which, then, other things equal, we are to plan now so that these alternatives are both kept open. We must not imagine that a rational plan is a detailed blueprint for action stretching over the whole course of life. It consists of hierarchy of plans, the more specific subplans being filled in at the appropriate time. The second point is connected with the first. The structure of a plan not only reflects the lack of specific information but it also mirrors a hierarchy of desires proceeding in similar fashion from the more to the less general. The main features of a plan encourage and secure the fulfillment of the more permanent and general aims. A rational plan must, for example, allow for the primary goods, since otherwise no plan can succeed; but the particular form that the corresponding desires will take is usually unknown in advance and can wait for the occasion. #RandolphHarris 4 of 20

Thus while we know that over any extended period of time we shall always have desires for food and drink, it is not until the moment comes that we decide to have a meal consisting of this or that course. These decisions depend on the choices available, on the menu that the situation allows. Thus planning is in part scheduling. We try to organize our activities into a temporal sequence in which each is carred on for a certain length of time. In this way a family of interrelated desires can be satisfied in an effective and harmonious manner. The basic resources of time and energy are allotted to activities in accordance with the intensity of the wants that they answer to and the contributions that they are likely to make to the fulfillment of other ends. The aim of deliberation is to find that plan which best organizes our activities and influences the formation of our subsequent wants so that our aims and interests can be fruitfully combined into one scheme of conduct. Desires that tend to interfere with other ends, or which undermine the capacity for other activities, are weeded out; whereas those that are enjoyable in themselves and support other aims as well are encouraged. A plan, then, is made up of subplans suitably arranged in a hierarchy, the broad features of the plan allowing for the more permanent aims and interests that complement one another. Since only the outlines of these aims and interest can be foreseen, the operative parts of the subplans that provide for them are finally decided upon independently as we go along. #RandolphHarris 5 of 20

Revisions and changes at the lower levels do not usually reverberate through the entire structure. If this conception of plans is sound, we should expect that the good things in life are, roughly speaking, those activities and relationships which have a major place in rational plans. And primary goods should turn out to be those things which are generally necessary for carrying out such plans successfully whatever the particular nature of the plan and of its final ends. If future shock were a matter of physical illness alone, it might be easier to prevent and to treat. However, future shock attacks the psyche as well. Just as the body cracks under the strain of environmental overstimulation, the “mind” and its decision processes behave erratically when overloaded. By indiscriminately racing the engines of change, we may be undermining not merely the health of those least able to adapt, but their very ability to act rationally on their own behalf. The striking signs of confusional breakdown we see around us—the spreading use of drugs, the rise of mysticism, the recurrent outbreaks of vandalism and undirected violence, the politics of nihilism and nostalgia, the sick apathy of millions—can all be understood better by recognizing their relationship to future shock. These forms of social irrationality may well reflect the deterioration of individual decision-making under conditions of environmental overstimulation. #RandolphHarris 6 of 20

Psychophysiologists studying the impact of change on various organisms have shown that successful adaptation can occur only when the level of stimulation—the amount of change and novelty in the environment—is neither too low nor too high. “The central nervous system of a higher animal,” says Professors D. E. Berlyne of the university of Toronto, “is designed to cope with environments that produce a certain rate of simulation. It will naturally not perform at its best in an environment that overstresses or overloads it.” He makes the same point about environments that understimulate it. Indeed, experiments with deer, dogs, mice and men all point unequivocally to the existence of what might be called an “adaptive range” below which and above which the individual’s ability to cope simply falls apart. Future shock is the response to overstimulation. It occurs when the individual is forced to operate above one’s adaptive range. Considerable research has been devoted to studying the impact of inadequate change and novelty on human performance. Studies of humans in isolated Antarctic outposts, experiments in sensory deprivation, investigations into on-the-job performance in factories, all show a falling off of mental and physical abilities in response to understimulation, but such evidence as does exist is dramatic and unsettling. Soldiers in battle find themselves trapped in environments that are rapidly changing, unfamiliar, and unpredictable. #RandolphHarris 7 of 20

The soldier is torn this way and that. Shells burst on every side. Bullets whiz past erratically. Flares light the sky. Shouts, groans and explosions fill one’s ears. Circumstances change from instant to instant. To survive in such overstimulating environments, the solider is driven to operate in the upper reaches of one’s adaptive range. Sometimes, one is pushed beyond one’s limits. During World War II a bearded Chindit soldier, fighting with General Wingate’s forces behind the Japanese lines in Burma, actually fell asleep while a storm of machine gun bullets splattered around him. Subsequent investigation revealed that this solider was not merely reacting to physical fatigue or lack of sleep, but surrendering to a sense of overpowering apathy. Death-inviting lassitude was so common, in fact, among guerrilla troops who had penetrated behind enemy lines that British military physicians gave it a name. They termed in Long Range Penetration Strain. A soldier who suffered from it became, in their words, “incapable of doing the simplest thing for himself and seemed to have the mind of a child.” This deadly lethargy, moreover, was not confined to guerrilla troops. One year after the Chindit incident, similar symptoms cropped up en masse among the allied troops who invaded Normandy, and British researchers, after studying 5,000 American and English combat casualties, concluded that this strange apathy was merely the final stage in a complex process of psychological collapse. #RandolphHarris 8 of 20

Mental deterioration often began with fatigue. This was followed by confusion and nervous irritability. The human become hypersensitive to the slightest stimuli around one. One would “hit the dirt” at the least provocation. One showed signs of bewilderment. One seemed unable to distinguish the sound of enemy fire from other, less threatening sounds. One became tense, anxious, and heatedly irascible. One’s comrades never knew when one would flail out in anger, even violence, in response to minor inconvenience. Then the final stage of emotional exhaustion set in. The soldier seemed to lose the very will to live. One gave up the struggle to save oneself, to guide oneself rationally through the battle. One became, in the words of R. L. Swank, who headed the British investigation, “dull and listless…mentally and physically retarded, preoccupied.” Even one’s face became dull and apathetic. The fight to adapt had ended in defeat. The stage of total withdrawal was reached. That humans behave irrationally, acting against their own clear interest, when thrown into conditions of high change and novelty is also borne out by studies of human behaviour in times of fire, flood, earthquake, and other crises. Even the most stable and “normal” people, unhurt physically, can be hurled into anti-adaptive states. Often reduced to total confusion and mindlessness, they seem incapable of the most elementary rational decision-making. #RandolphHarris 9 of 20

Thus in a study of responses to tornadoes in Texas, H. E. Moore writers that “the first reaction may be one of dazed bewilderment, sometimes one of disbelief, or at least of refusal to accept the fact. This, it seems to us, is the essential explanation of the behaviour of persons and groups in Waco when it was devastated in 1953. On the personal level, it explains why a girl climbed into a music store through a broke display window, camply purcansed a record, and walked out again, even though the plate glass front of the building had blown out and articles were flying through the air inside the building.” A study of a tornado in Udall, Kansas, quotes a housewife saying: “After it was over, my husband and I just got up and jumped out of the window and ran. I do not know where we were running to but…I just did not care. I just wanted to run.” The classic disaster photograph shows a mother holding a dead or wounded baby in her arms, her face blank and numb as though she could no longer comprehend the reality around her. Sometimes she sits rocking gently on her porch with a doll, instead of a baby, in her arms. In disaster, therefore, exactly as in certain combat situations, individuals can be psychologically overwhelmed. Once again the source may be traced to a high level of environmental stimulation. The disaster victim finds oneself suddenly caught in a situation in which familiar objects and relationships are transformed. Where once one’s house stood, there maybe nothing more than smoke and rubble. #RandolphHarris 10 of 20

One may encounter a cabin floating on the flood tide or a rowboat sailing through the air.  The environment is filled with change and novelty. And once again the response is marked by confusion, anxiety, irritability, and withdrawal into apathy. Usually at times of physical, political, economic, and spiritual distress, that is when the mind turns towards the future, and when anticipations, utopias, and apocalyptic visions multiply. One thinks, for instance, of the chiliastic expectations of the Augustan age at the beginning of the Christian era, or of the spiritual changes in the West which accompanied the end of the first millennium. Today, as we are nearly a quarter of the way through the second millennium, we are again living in an age filled with apocalyptic images of universal destruction. What is the significance of that split, symbolized by the “Iron Curtain,” which divides humanity into two halves? What will become of our civilization, and of humans themselves, if the hydrogen bombs begin to go off, or if the spiritual and moral darkness of State absolutism should spread over Europe? We have no reason to take this threat lightly. Everywhere in the New World there are subversive marginalized groups who, sheltered by out humanitarianism and our sense of justice, hold the incendiary torches ready, with nothing to stop the spread of their ideas except the critical reason of a single, fairly intelligent, mentally stable stratum of the population. #RandolphHarris 11 of 20

 One should not overestimate the thickness of this stratum. It varies from country to country in accordance with national temperament. Also, it is regionally dependent on public education and is subject to the influence of acutely disturbing factors of a political and economic nature. Taking plebiscites as a criterion, one could on an optimistic estimate put its upper limits at about forty percent of the electorate. A rather more pessimistic view would not be unjustified either, since the gift of reason and critical reflection is not one of human’s outstanding peculiarities, and even where it exists it proves to be wavering and inconsistent, the more so, as a rule, the bigger the political groups are. The mass crushes out the insight and reflection that are still possible with the individual, and this necessarily leads to doctrinaire and authoritarian tyranny if ever the constitutional State should succumb to a fit of weakness. Culture shock, the profound disorientation suffered by the traveler who has plunged without adequate preparation into an alien culture, provides a third example of adaptive breakdown. Here we find none of the obvious elements of war or disaster. The scene may be totally peaceful and riskless. Yet the situation demands repeated adaptation to novel conditions. Culture shock, according to psychologist Seven Lundstedt, is a “form of personality maladjustment which is a reaction to a temporarily unsuccessful attempt to adjust to new surroundings and people.” #RandolphHarris 12 of 20

The culture shocked person, like the soldier and disaster victim, is forced to grapple with unfamiliar and unpredictable events, relationships and objects. One’s habitual ways of accomplishing things—even simple tasks like placing a telephone call—are no longer appropriate. The strange society may itself be changing only very slowly, yet for one it is all new. Signs, sounds, and other psychological cues rush past one before one can grasp their meaning. The entire experience takes on a surrealistic air. Every word, every action is shot through with uncertainty. In this setting, fatigue arrives more quickly than usual. Along with it, the cross-cultural traveler often experiences what Dr. Lundstedt describes as “a subjective feeling of loss, and a sense of isolation and loneliness.” The unpredictability arising from novelty undermines one’s sense of reality. Thus one longs, as Professor Lundstedt put it, “For an environment in which the gratification of important psychological and physical needs is predictable and less uncertain.” One becomes “anxious, confused, and other appears apathetic.” In fact, Dr. Lundstedt concludes, “culture shock can be viewed as a response to stress by emotional and intellectual withdraw.” It is hard to read these (and many other) accounts of behaviour breakdown under a variety of stresses without becoming acutely aware of their similarities. #RandolphHarris 13 of 20

While there are differences, to be sure, between a soldier in combat, a disaster victim, and a culturally dislocated traveler, all three face rapid change, high novelty, or both. All three are required to adapt rapidly and repeatedly to unpredictable stimuli. And there are striking parallels in the way all three respond to this overstimulation. First, we find the same evidences of confusion, disorientation, or distortion of reality. Second, there are the same signs of fatigue, anxiety, tenseness, or extreme irritability. Third, in all cases there appears to be a point of no return—a point at which apathy and emotional withdraw set in. The available evidence strongly suggests that overstimulation may lead to bizarre and anti-adaptive behaviour. Rational argument can be conducted with some prospect of success only so long as the emotionality of a given situation does not exceed a certain critical degree. If the affective temperature rises above this level, the possibility of reason’s having any effect ceases and its place is taken by slogans and chimerical wish-fantasies. That is to say, a sort of collective possession results which rapidly develops into a psychic epidemic. Under these conditions all those elements whose existence is merely tolerated as asocial under the rule of reason come to the top. Such individuals are by no means rare curiosities to be met with only in prisons and lunatic asylums. #RandolphHarris 14 of 20

For every manifest case of insanity there are, in my estimation, at least ten latent cases who seldom get to the point of breaking out openly but whose views and behaviour, for all their appearance of normality, are influenced unconsciously by pathological and perverse factors. There are, of course, no medical statistics on the frequency of latent psychoses—for understandable reasons. However, even if their number should amount to less than ten times that of the manifest psychoses and manifest criminality, the relatively small percentage of the population figures they represent is more than compensated for by the peculiar dangerousness of these people. Their mental state is that of a collectively exited group ruled by affective judgments and wish-fantasies. In a milieu of this kind they are the adapted ones, and consequently they feel quite at home in it. They know from their own experience the language of these conditions, and they know how to handle them. Their chimerical idea, sustained by fanatical resentment, appeal to the collective irrationality and find fruitful soil there; they expressed all these motives and resentments which lurk in more normal people under the clock of reason and insight. They are, therefore, despite their small number in comparison with the population as a whole, dangerous as sources of infection precisely because the so-called normal person possesses only a limited degree of self-knowledge. #RandolphHarris 15 of 20

The greatest question of our time is not communism versus individualism, not Europe verses America, not even the Old World versus the New World; it is whether humans can live without God. What is wrong? Hypocrisy, betrayal, and greed unsettle the nation’s soul. At a time of moral disarray, America seeks to rebuild a structure of values. Yet even in the midst of this long-overdue national soul-searching, who is to decide what are the “right” values? Does ultimate moral authority lie with institutions such as church and state to codify and impose? Or, in a free society, are these matters of private conscience, with final choice belonging to the individual? We live in a society in which all transcendent values have been removed and thus there is no moral standard by which anyone can say right is right and wrong is wrong. What we live in is a naked public square. On the surface, a value-free society sounds liberal, progressive, and enlightened. It certainly sounded that way to the generations of sixties and seventies—probably many of the same people now wringing their hands on the pages of Time. However, when the public square is naked, truth and values drift with the winds of public favour and there is nothing objective to govern how we are to live together. Why should we be shocked, then, by the inevitable consequences; why should we be surprised to discover that society yield what is planted? #RandolphHarris 16 of 20

When parents fail to set stnadards of right behaviour in the home, when school teachers will not offer a moral opinion in the classroom, either out of fear of litigation or because they cannot “come from a position of what is right and what is wrong,” one New Jersey teacher out it, why are we surprised that crime soars steadily among juveniles? When pleasures of the flesh are treated as casualy as going out for a Frosty at Wendy’s—why are we horrified at the growing consequences of sexual promiscuity—including a life-threatening epidemic? When they have been preaching a get-rich-quick gospel all along, way are we shocked at disclosures of religious leader bilking their ministries of millions? Why the wonderment over the fact that for enough dollars or sexual favours, government employees and military personnel sell out their nation’s secrets? We laugh at honour and are shocked to find traitors in our midst. Why is it so surprising that Wall Street yuppies make fast millions on insider information or tax fraud? Without objective values, the community or one’s neighbour has no superior claim over one’s own desires. Whether we like to hear it or not, we are reaping the consequences of the decades since World War II when we have, in Solzhenitsyn’s words, “forgotten God.” What we have left is the reign of relativism. However, humanity cannot survive without some law. The truly naked public square is at best a transitional phenomenon. It is a vacuum begging to be filled. #RandolphHarris 17 of 20

Exercise belief in God and you are left with only two principle: the individual and the state. In this situation, however, there is no mediating structure to generate moral values and, therefore, no counterbalance to the inevitable ambition of the state-as-church, toward totalitarianism. As we have seen, this has already occurred in Marxist nation where the death of God has created a new form of messiah—the all-power state whose political ideology acquires the force of religion. The same is true, though not as extreme, in the West where traditional religious influences have been excluded from public debated either by law or Chesterton’s taboo of tact of convention. As a result, government is free to makes its own ultimate judgments. Hence government ideology acquires the force of religion. The removal of the transcendent sucks the meaning from the law. Without an absolute standard of moral judgment backing government “morality,” where is the protection for the marginalized groups and the powerless? When in our public life no legal prohibition can be articulated with a force of transcendent authority, then there are no rules rooted in ultimacies that can protect the poor, the powerless, and the marginal, as indeed there are now no rules protecting the unborn, and only fragile inhibitions surrounding the ages and defective. With no ultimate reference point supporting it—no just cause for obedience—law can only be enforced by the bayonet. So the state seeks more and more coercive power. #RandolphHarris 18 of 20

Since the time of Adam, people have turned away from the gospel. They have turned away no matter how long and hard the prophets tried to teach the love of Heavenly Father and Jesus Christ and of Their desire for us to live with Them and enjoy all that They have for eternity. Each period of time when there has been at least one prophet on the Earth is called a “dispensation.” The prophets of each dispensation have had the power and authority of God, known as the priesthood, to help them testify of Jesus Christ and His gospel and perform the ordinances necessary for people to return to Him and Heavenly Father. “The prayers of the faithful shall be heard,” reports 2 Nephi 26.15. Know that the Lord loves you. You are a choice child of God. Pray always. Look to Him for guidance. He will not desert you in your hour of need. One will feel that this nobler self actually overshadows one at times. This is literally true. Hence we have named it the Overself. When humans shall discover the hidden power within oneself enabled one to be conscious and to think, one will discover the holy spirit, the ray of Infinite Mind lighting one’s little finite mind. If we could penetrate to the deeper regions of personality, the deeper layer of consciousness, we would find at the core a state that is utterly paradoxical. For it combines, at one and the same time, the highest degree of dynamic being and extreme degree of static being. #RandolphHarris 19 of 20

This is the abiding essence of a human, one’s true self against one’s ephemeral person. Whoever enters into its consciousness enters into timelessness, a wonderful experience where the flux of pleasures and pains comes to an end in utter serenity, where regrets from the past, impatience at the present, and fears of the future are unknown. Nothing could be nearer to a human than the Overself for it is the source of one’s life, mind, and feeling. Nothing could be farther from one, nevertheless, for it eludes all one’s familiar instruments of experience awareness. Without the Overself no human creature could be what it is—conscious, living, and intelligent. The Lord who hath been mindful of us, may He bless us; may He bless the house of America; may He bless the house of Aaron. May He bless them that revere the Lord, small and great alike. May the Lord increase you, you and your children. Blessed may you be by the Lord, the Maker of Heaven and Earth. The Heavens are the Heavens of the Lord, but the Earth hath He given to the children of men. The dead praise not the Lord, neither any that go down into silence; but we will bless the Lord. From this time forth and forever. Hallelujah. I delight when the Lord hears the voice of my supplications. For He inclines His ear unto me on the day I call upon Him. The cords of death had encircled me, and the straights of the netherworld had overtaken me; I was in anguish and sorrow. But I called upon the name of the Lord: “O Lord, do Thou save me.” The Lord guarded the simple; when I was brought low, He saved me. #RandolphHarris 20 of 20

Winchester Mystery House

Experience Sarah Winchester’s Mystery House in person or from the comfort of your own home.

A 160-room mansion built to appease the spirits who died at the hands of the Winchester Rifle 👻
🗝 winchestermysteryhouse.com

Self-Guided Mansion Tour:
👉 Link winchestermysteryhouse.com

Immersive 360 Tour:
👉 Link winchestermysteryhouse.com

Video Access Tour:
👉 Link winchestermysteryhouse.com