You can say this for these ready-mixes—the next generation is not going to have any trouble making pies exactly like mother makes. In a society in which instant food, instant education and even instant cities are everyday phenomena, no product is more swiftly fabricated or more ruthlessly destroyed than the instant celebrity. Nations advancing toward super-industrialism sharply step up their output of these “psycho-economic” products. Instant celebrities burst upon the consciousness of millions like an image-bomb—which is exactly what they are. Within less than one year from the time a graceful girl named Paris Hilton took her first walk down the red carpet, millions of human beings around the globe stored mental images of her in their brain. A platinum blonde with dripping wet blue eyes that look like the Arctic Ocean, soft pillow lips, amazing cheek bones, and legs longer than your marriage, exploded into instant celebrityhood circa 2001. Her winsome face and beautiful malnourished figure suddenly appeared on covers of magazines in Britain, American, France, Italy, Japan, China, Africa and other countries. Overnight, Paris eyelashes, mannikins, perfumes, clothes, jewelry, movies, music, real estate and her custom Barbie BMW began to gush from the fad mills. #RandolphHarris 1 of 21

Critics pontificated about her social significance. News anchors accorded her the kind of coverage normally reserved for a peace treaty or a papal election. By now, however, many would expect our stored mental images of Paris to have been largely erased. Yet, she has not vanished from public view. She defines reality where celebrity status only lasts for six months nowadays. Her images still grace the New York Times, she has even been featured in Ebony and Vibe, Paris is breaking records and shattering boundaries, she may even take over the World! Not long ago I asked a highly intelligent teenager whether she and her classmates had any heroes. I said, “Do you regard Justin Timberlake, for example, as a hero? (Justin being a singer and actor and a former boyfriend of Britney Spears, I was sure she had heard of him.) The child’s response was revealing. “No,” she said, “he’s too old.” At friend I thought she regarded a man in his forties as being too old to be a hero. Soon I realized this was mistaken. What she meant was that Justin Timberlake’s career had peaked too long ago to be of interest. He has no new exploits. Today Justin Timberlake has receded from the foreground of public attention. In effect, his image has decayed. #RandolphHarris 2 of 21

Celebrityhood is a transient state. To be relevant, one has to become a mega star like Reese Witherspoon, Tom Brady, Paris Hilton, Britney Spears, Sean Mendez, Beyonce, Meghan Markle, Prince Harry and even Aaliyah is still trending on Twitter and remember in countless new songs. Thousands of “personalities” parade across the stage of contemporary history. Real people, magnified and projected by the mass media, they are stored as images in the millions of peoples or billions of people who have never met them, never spoken to them, never seen them “in person.” They take on a reality almost as (and sometimes even more) intense than that of many people with whom we do have “in-person” relationships. We form relationships with these “vicarious people,” just as we do with friends, neighbours and colleagues. And just as the through-put of real, in-person people in our lives is increasing, and the duration of our average relationship with them decreasing, the same is true of our ties with the vicarious people who populate our mines, but have not become mega celebrities. Their rate of flow-through is influenced by the real rate of change in the World, we find that the British prime ministership has been turning over since 1922 at a rate some 13 percent faster than in the base period of 1721-1922. In sports, the heavyweight boxing championship now changes hands twice as fast as it did during our father’s youth. Events, moving faster, constantly throw new personalities into the charmed circle of celebrityhood, and old images in the mind decay to make way for the new. #RandolphHarris 3 of 21

The same might be said for the fictional characters spewed out from the pages of books, from television screens, from digital streaming, theaters, movies, and magazines. No previous generation in history has had so many fictional characters flung at it. We may not even get used to Super-Hero, Captain Nice and Mr. Terrific before they fly off our television screens forever. These vicarious people, both live and fictional, play a significant role in our lives, providing models for behaviour, acting out of us various roles and situations from which we draw conclusions about our own lives. We deduce lessons from their activities, consciously or not. We learn from their triumphs and tribulations. They make it possible for us to “try on” various roles or life styles without suffering the consequences that might attend such experiments in real life. The accelerated flow-through various people cannot contribute to the instability of personality patterns among many real people who have difficulty in finding a suitable life style. These vicarious people, however, are not independent of one another. They preform their roles in a vast, complexly organized “public drama” which is largely a product of the new communications technology. #RandolphHarris 4 of 21

This public drama, in which celebrities upstage and replace celebrities at an accelerating rate, has the effect of making leadership more unstable than it would be otherwise. Contretemps, upsets, follies, contests, scandals, make a feast of entertainment or a spinning political roulette wheel. Fads come and go at a dizzying pace. A country like the United States of America has an open public drama, in which new faces appear daily, there is always a contest to steal the show, and almost anything can happen and often does. What we are observing is a rapid turnover of symbolic leaders, which may make incumbent leaders less attractive, especially if the people are not happy with public policy, the jobs report, the economy, housing costs, health care cost, the price of food, utilities, insurances, tax rates, transportation costs, and performance in the stock market. This can be extended, however, into a far more powerful statement: what is happening is not merely a turnover of real people or even fictional characters, but a more rapid turnover of the images and image-structures in our brains. Our relationships with these images of reality, upon which we base our behaviour, are growing, on average, more and more transient. #RandolphHarris 5 of 21

If we do not wish to lose it, the intuition first presents itself to us as a fine delicate filament which we must treat tenderly. The entire knowledge system in society is undergoing violent upheaval. The very concepts and codes in terms of which we think are turning over at a furious and accelerating pace. We are increasing the rate at which we must form and forget our images of reality. The fact is that with the knowledge and actual experience of these inner images a way is opened for reason and feeling to gain access to those other images which the teachings of religion offer humankind. Psychology thus does just the opposite of what it is accused of: it provides possible approaches to a better understanding of these things, it open people’s eyes to the real meaning of strict doctrines, and, far from destroying, it throws open an empty house to new inhabitants. I can corroborate this from countless experiences: people belong to creeds of all imaginable kinds, who had played the apostate or cooled off in their faith, have found a new approach to their old truths, not a few Catholics among them. Even a Parsee found the way back to the Zoroastrian fire-temple, which should bear witness to the objectivity of my point of view. However, this objectivity is just what my psychology is most blamed for: it is said not to decide in favour of this or that religious doctrine. #RandolphHarris 6 of 21

Without prejudice to my own subjective convictions I should like to raise the question: Is it not thinkable that when one refrains from setting oneself up as an arbiter mundi and, deliberately renouncing all subjectivism, cherishes on the contrary the belief, for instance, that God has expressed Himself in many languages and appeared in divers forms and that all these statements are true—is it not thinkable, I say, that this too is a decision? The objection raised, more particularly by Christians that it is impossible for contradictory statements to be true, must permit itself to be politely asked: Does one equal three? How can three be one? Can a mother be a virgin? And so on. Has it not yet been observed that all religious statements contain logical contradictions and assertions that are impossible in principle, that this is in fact the very essence of religious assertion? As witness to this we have Tertullian’s avowal: “And the Son of God is dead, which is worthy of belief because it is absurd. And when buried He rose again, which is certain because it is impossible.” If Christianity demands faith in such contradictions it does not seem to me that it can very well condemn those who asset a few paradoxes more. Oddly enough the paradox is one of the most valuable spiritual possessions, while uniformity of meaning is a sign of weakness. #RandolphHarris 7 of 21

Hence when it losses or waters down its paradoxes, a religion becomes inwardly impoverished; but their multiplication enriches because only the paradox comes anywhere near to comprehending the fulness of life. Non-ambiguity and non-contradiction are one-sided and thus unsuited to express the incomprehensible. Not everyone possesses the spiritual strength of a Tertullian. It is evident not only that one had the strength to sustain paradoxes but that they actually afforded one the highest degree of religious certainty. The inordinate number of spiritual weakliness makes paradoxes dangerous. So long as the paradox remains unexamined and is taken for granted as a customary part of life, it is harmless enough. However, when it occurs to an insufficiently cultivated mind (always, as we know, the most sure of itself) to make the paradoxical nature of some tent of faith the object of its lucubrations, as earnest as they are impotent, it is not long before such a one will break out into iconoclastic and scornful laughter, pointing to the manifest absurdity of the mystery. Things have gone rapidly downhill since the Age of Enlightenment, for, once this petty reasoning mind, which cannot endure any paradoxes, is awakened, no sermon on Earth can keep in down. #RandolphHarris 8 of 21

A new task then arises: to lift this still undeveloped mind step by step to a higher level and to increase the number of persons who have at least some inkling of the scope of paradoxical truth. If this is not possible, then it must be admitted that the spiritual approaches to Christianity are as good as blocked. We simply do not understand any more what is meant by the paradoxes contained in the strict doctrines; and the more external our understanding of them becomes the more we are affronted by their irrationality, until finally they become completely obsolete, curious relics of the past. The human who is stricken in this way cannot estimate the extent of one’s spiritual loss, because one has never experienced the sacred images as one’s inmost possession and has never realized their kindship with one’s own psychic structure. However, it is just this indispensable knowledge that the psychology of the unconscious can give one, and its scientific objectivity is of the greatest value here. Were psychology bound to creed it would not and could not allow the unconscious of the individual that free play which is the basic condition for the production of archetypes. It is precisely the spontaneity of archetypal contents that convinces, whereas any prejudiced intervention is a bar to genuine experience. #RandolphHarris 9 of 21

If the theologian really believes in the almighty power of God on the one hand and in the validity of strict doctrines in the other, why then does one not trust God to speak in the soul? Why this fear of psychology? Or is, in complete contradiction to strict doctrines, the soul itself is hell from which only demons gibber? Even if this ere really so it would not be any the less convincing; for as we all know the horrified perception of the reality of evil has led to at least as many conversations as the experience of good. The archetypes of the unconscious can be shown empirically to be the equivalents of strict religious doctrines. In the hermeneutic language of the Fathers the Church possesses a rich store of analogies with the individual and spontaneous products to be found in psychology. What the unconscious expresses is far from being merely arbitrary or opinionated; it is something that happens to be “just-so,” as is the case with every other natural being. It stands to reason that the expressions of the unconscious are natural and not formulated dogmatically; they are exactly like the patristic allegories which draw the whole of nature into the orbit of their amplificants. If these present us with some astonishing allegoriae Christi, we find much the same sort of thing in the psychology of the unconscious. #RandolphHarris 10 of 21

The only difference is that the patristic allegory as Christum spectat—refers to Christ—whereas the psychic archetype is simply itself and can therefore be interpreted according to time, place, and milieu. In the New World the archetype is filled out with the dogmatic figure of Christ; in the Old World, with Purusha, the Atman, Hiranyagarbha, the Buddha, and so on. The religious point of view, understandably enough, put the accept on the imprinter, whereas scientific psychology emphasizes the typos, the imprint—the only thing it can understand. The religious point of view understands the imprint as the working of an imprinter; the scientific point of view understands it as the symbol of an unknown and incomprehensible content. Since the typos is less definite and more variegated than any of the figures postulated by religion, psychology is compelled by its empirical material to express the typos by means of terminology not bound by time, pace, or milieu. If, for example, the typos agreed in every detail with the dogmatic figure of Christ, and if it contained no determinant that went beyond that figure, we would be bound to regard the typos as at least a faithful copy of the dogmatic figure, and to name it accordingly. The typos would coincide with Christ. #RandolphHarris 11 of 21

However, as experience shows, this is not the case, seeing that the unconscious, like the allegories employed by the Church Fathers, produces countless other determinants that are not explicitly contained in the dogmatic formula: that is to say, non-Christian figures such as those mentioned above are included in the typos. However, neither do these figures comply with the indeterminate nature of the archetype. It is altogether inconceivable there could be any definite figure capable of expressing archetypal indefiniteness. For this reason I have found myself obliged to give the corresponding archetype the psychological name of the “self” – a terms on the one hand definite enough to convey the essence of human wholeness and on the other hand indefinite enough to express the indescribable and indeterminable nature of this wholeness. The paradoxical qualities of the term are a reflection of the fac that wholeness consist partly of the conscious human and partly of the unconscious human. However, we cannot define the latter or indicate one’s boundaries. Hence in its scientific usage the term “self” refers neither to Christ not to the Buddha but to the totality of the figures that are its equivalent, and each of these figures is a symbol of the self. #RandolphHarris 12 of 21

This mode of expression is an intellectual necessity in scientific psychology and in no sense denotes a transcendental prejudice. On the contrary, as we have said before, this objective attitude enables one human to decide in favour of the determinant Christ, another in favour of the Buddha, and so on. Those who are irritated by this objectivity should reflect that science is quite impossible without it. Consequently by denying psychology the right to objectivity they are making an untimely attempted to extinguish the life-light of a science. Even if such a preposterous attempt were to succeed, it would only widen the already catastrophic gulf between the secular mind on the one hand and Church and religion on the other. One’s need is to recognize these half-formed intuitions for what they are, to rescue them from their vagueness, develop, nurture, and formulate them. When this first faint intrusion is sensed, the need is for utter relaxation, for becoming passive and yielding. Only so can the aspirant follow intuitive prompting more and more inwards until it becomes stronger and stronger, clearer and clearer. One’s early development of intuition is largely a matter of confused and uncertain impressions. #RandolphHarris 13 of 21

When seeking intuitional light upon a subject, the aspirant is advised to put one’s body in a recumbent position. This, passive as it is, will correlate with the passivity of the mind that one should cultivate at such a time. Because an intuitive feeling is usually soft and delicate where egoistic ones are often strong and passionate, it is too many times not recognized for what it is, until someone else formulates it and offers it from outside, as a statement of truth or a suggestion for action. If allowed to grow, an intuition which is vague and weak in the beginning may become clear and certain in the end. With this beginning of the momentary “catch” in attention, one must follow by waiting with much patience, listening inwardly all the while. Have faith in your inner promptings and accept their guidance. When you are uncertain about them, wait and they will gradually clarify themselves. One is to defend oneself against false intuitions, not only by silencing wishful thoughts, but also by purifying the personal emotions. They are messages brought from the infinite for the blessing and guidance of finite humans. However, one must recognize their value and esteem their source. What we see here is not an impossible dream, a hopeless idealization. If we turn our efforts under God in the right direction, it can be done and has been done. #RandolphHarris 14 of 21

And that direction would be one that makes spiritual formation in Christlikeness the exclusive primary goal of the local congregation. That is what one would natural expect after having read what Saint Paul says—and, indeed, after having read what Jesus sent his World revolutionaries out to do. “And Jesus came and said to them, ‘All authority in Heaven and on Earth has been given to me. Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey everything that I have commanded you,” reports Matthew 28.18-20. Pay attention to the “principle and absolutes” of the New Testament church and, one might suppose, everything else will fall into place—in large part because “everything else” really does not matter much one way or the other. To fail to put the focus on those principles and absolutes, on the other hand, is to wander off into a state of distraction, which is where most of our local congregations actually are. They wind up majoring on minors and allowing the majors, from the New Testament point of view, to disappears. “For God said, ‘Light shall shine out of darkness,’ is the One who has shone in our hearts to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Christ. However, we have this treasure in earthen vessels, that the surpassing greatness of the power may be of God and not from ourselves,” reports 2 Corinthians 4.6-7. #RandolphHarris 15 of 21

Some people feel like they are lost to the World, hidden from sight and memory. However, the love of Jesus Christ is unconditional, caring love. Humans are not separate from their Creator, nor can God misunderstand them. The place for which He designs them in His scheme of things is the place they are made for. When they reach it their nature is fulfilled and their happiness attained: a broken bone in the Universe has been set, the anguish is over. When we want to be something other than the thing God wants us to be, we must be wanting what, in fact, will not make us happy. Those Divine demands which sound to our natural ears most like those of a despot and least like those of a lover, in fact marshal us where we should want to go if we knew what we wanted. God demands our worship, our obedience, our prostration. Do we suppose that they can do Him any good, or fear, like the chorus in Milton, that human irreverence can bring about “His glory’s diminution”? A human can no more diminish God’s glory by refusing to worship Him than a lunatic can put out the sun by scribbling the word “darkness” on the walls of one’s cell. However, God wills our good, and our good is to love Him (wit that responsive love proper to creatures) and to love Him we must know Him: and if we know Him, we shall in fact fall on our faces. #RandolphHarris 16 of 21

If we do not fall on our faces, that only shows that what we are trying to love is not yet God—though it may be the nearest approximation to God which our thought and fantasy can attain. Yet the call is not only to prostration and awe; it is to a reflection of the Divine life, a creaturely participation in the Divine attributes which is far beyond our present desires. We are bidden to “put on Christ,” to become like God. That is, whether we like it or not, God intends to give us what we need, not what we now think we want. Once more, we are embarrassed by the intolerable compliment, by too much love, not too little. Yet perhaps even this view falls short of the truth. It is not simply that God has arbitrarily made us such that He is our only good. Rather God is the only good of all creatures: and by necessity, each must find its good in that kind and degree of the fruition of God which is proper to its nature. The kind and degree may very with the creature’s nature: but that there ever could be any other good, is an atheistic dream. You must be strong with God’s strength and blessed with God’s blessedness, for He has no other to give us. God gives what He has, not what He has not: He gives the happiness that there is, not the happiness that is not. #RandolphHarris 17 of 21

To be God—to be like God and to share His goodness is humanly response—to be miserable—these are the only three alternatives. If we will not learn to eat the only food that the Universe grows—the only food that any possible Universe ever can grow—then we must starve eternally. Mercy is especially to be attributed to God, as seen in its effect, but not as an affection of passion. In proof of which it must be considered that a person is said to be merciful, as being, so to speak, sorrowful at heart; being affected with sorrow at the misery of another as though it were one’s own. Hence it follows that one endeavours to dispel that misery, whatever be the defect we call by that name. Now defects are not removed, except by the perfection of some kind of goodness; and the primary source of goodness is God. It must, however, be considered that to bestow perfection appertains not only to the divine goodness, but also to His justice, liberality, and mercy; yet under different aspects. The communicating of perfections, absolutely considered, appertains to goodness; in so far as perfections are given to things in proportion, the bestowal of them belongs to justice, as has already been said; in so far God does not bestow them for His own use, but only on account of His goodness, it belongs to liberality; in so far as perfections given to things by God expels defects, it belongs to mercy. #RandolphHarris 18 of 21

Mercy is regarded as an affection of passion. God acts mercifully, not indeed by going against His justice, but by doing something more than justice; thus a human who pays another two hundred pieces of money, though owing one only one hundred, des nothing against justice, but acts liberally or mercifully. The case is the same with one who pardons an offence committed against one, for in remitting it one may be said to bestow a gift. Hence the Apostle calls remission a forgiving: “Forgive one another, as Christ has forgiven you,” report Ephesians 4.32. Hence it is clear that mercy does not destroy justice, but in a sense is the fulness thereof. And thus it is said: “Mercy exalteth itself above judgement,” reports James 2.13. Since in the beginning God alone is, there is no second substance that can be used for such “creation.” God is forced to use His own substance for the purpose. God is Infinite Mind, so he uses mental power—Imagination—working on mental substances—Thought—to produce the result which appears to us as the Universe. Therefore existence cannot be derived from non-existence. If the Universe exists today, then its essence must have existed when the Universe itself had not been formed. This essence needed no “creation” for it was God, World-Mind, Itself. #RandolphHarris 19 of 21

The Universe is the World-Mind coming out of itself and therefore making its manifestation out of its own substance—that is, Mind—just as the spider spins out a web from itself. The visible cosmos has come into being out of the invisible absolute by a process of emanation. That is why the relation between them is not only pantheistic but also transcendent. The creation is inseparable from its creator; indeed, they are but two names for one and the same thing, for God has objectified part of His own being as the Universe which we see. The World-Mind, limiting itself, shutting down its cous, produces what we know as the physical Universe. The fact that the cosmic existence is a beginningless and endless one eliminates the need of finding a Creator. It is itself a manifestation of an eternal principle, which is its own divine soul and not a second and separate thing Prospero says, in Shakespeare’s play, “We are such stuff as dreams are made on” he implies the existence of some greater Mind in which we are the dreams. Any hypnotist may invent a seeming Word for you but it will be gone in a few minutes or hours. Only the World-Mind can invent one that will last and outlast the whole human race. When will the cosmic dream come to an end? If one’s personal life is a dream for humans, is the Universe a dream for God? The answer is that the World-Mind controls its dream, humans do not. #RandolphHarris 20 of 21

Mind is the first and last Real, the Doer Maker and Destroyer. It imagines the World even as it creates it. The Universe is the imaginative construction of the World-Mind. The core and the surface of life are essentially the same. Every form of existence can be reduced to a form of consciousness. The final essence of all these consciousnesses is God. The tree of mental ideas raise from a common but unknow root—God. One who knows God as the root and the Universe as the branch of the tree of life fears not. As spears, as swords, as arrows, the Sun sends out its rays, as weapons from the hands of a mighty warrior, to strike down falsehood and untrue ways. As spears, as swords, as arrows, send out your rays, as weapons from the hands of a might warrior, to strike down falsehood and untrue ways. In mercy God gives light to the Earth and to those who dwell thereon. In His goodness, God renewest each day the work of creation. O King, God alone is exalted of yore, glorified and extolled from the days of old. O everlasting God, in Thine abundant mercy, have compassion upon us. Lord of our strength, Rock of our stronghold, please Shield our salvation, Thou art a stronghold unto us. There is none to be compared to Thee, neither is there any besides Thee; there is none but Thee. Who is like unto Thee? There is none like unto Thee, O Lord our God, in this World, neither is there any besides Thee, O our King in the World to come. #RandolphHarris 21 of 21

MILLS STATION AT CRESLEIGH RANCH

Rancho Cordova, CA |

Now Selling!

Mills Station at Cresleigh Ranch is Rancho Cordova’s newest home community! This charming neighborhood offers an array of home types with eye catching architecture styles such as Mission, Mid-Century Modern, California Modern, and Contemporary Farmhouse.

Located off Douglas Road and Rancho Cordova Parkway, the residents of Cresleigh Ranch will enjoy, being just minutes from shopping, dining, and entertainment, and quick access to Highway 50 and Grant Line Road providing a direct route into Folsom. Residents here also benefit from no HOA fees, two community parks and the benefits of being a part of the highly-rated Elk Grove Unified School District.

Cresleigh offers charming architecture with generous home sites at Mills Station. Enjoy a prime location with access to amenities, award-winning schools, and easy commuter routes. This luxury community offers modern single-family homes in a truly picturesque location.

You don’t need to live on Pinterest to know the best way to make your table pop — we’ve done that all for you. 😉 Check out today’s blog to learn some tips and tricks for making the perfect table setting! Link in bio. https://cresleigh.com/blog/

#CresleighHomes