I have given them every opportunity. Every type of advancement and profit sharing as well, but they want me in residence. They want my authority. Learning is not the accumulation of scraps of knowledge. It is a growth, where every act of knowledge develops the learner, thus making one capable of constituting ever more and more complex objectivities—and the object growth in complexity parallels the subjective growth in capacity. As we have been exploring the deeper significance of wish, we have noticed that a curious theme has been constantly emerging. Something more is going in a wish than meets the eye. This theme is implied when we speak of the autonomous element in wishing, or when we speak of the wish to imagination and spontaneity. And the theme is present especially when we consider the meaning of the wish, that aspect of the wish in human beings that goes beyond mere force and is expressed in language, art, and other symbols. The same theme was also present as the big “X” which James leaped over in his illustration of getting out of bed on a cold morning. Among the most common inner conflicts are those that are hard to resolve in any reasonable manner. Everyone has had to face the frustrations of wanting to hurt someone one likes, feeling guilty because of pleasures of the flesh they are feeling towards someone beyond their reach, aching to achieve certain unattainable goals, or feeling unworthy because one’s wishes to exploit others. #RandolphHarris 1 of 20

There is nothing in World more pitiful than an irresolute mortal, oscillating between two feelings, who would willingly unite the two, and who does not perceive that nothing can unite them. Most real-life situations cannot be neatly summarized. This is because there are important elements in the conflict that draw the person toward choice, but each good thing seems to be balanced by a disadvantage. One solution to such a conflict is to take the bad with the good. Another, of course, is to stay away from the entire situation, losing the benefits as well as the punishment. Making a choice can be so difficult, creates so much stress, that individuals experiences decidophobia—a fear of making a decision. Unless you are a very rare bird, you have undoubtedly experienced this particular phobia. In come people, it can get to be a pattern in which they never seem to be able to resolve any of their problems. This theme, running through our discussion like an obligato, is intentionality. By intentionality, I mean the structure which gives meaning to experience. It is not to be identified with intentions, but is the dimension which underlies them; it is mortal’s capacity to have intentions. It is our imaginative participation in the coming day’s possibilities in James’s example out of which comes the awareness of our capacity to form, to mold, to change ourselves and the day in relation to each other. James’s reverie as he lay in bed is a beautiful, albeit denied, expression of it. Intentionality is at the heart of consciousness. I believe that it is also the key to the problem of wish and will. #RandolphHarris 2 of 20

First, what does the term mean? We shall define it in two stages; the preliminary stage is the fact that our intentions are decisive with respect to how we perceive the World. This afternoon, for instance, I go up to see a house in the mountains. Suppose, first, that I am looking for a place which come friends can rent for the Summer months. When I approach the house, I shall question whether it is sound and well-built, gets enough Sun, and other things having the meaning of shelter to me. Or suppose that I am a real estate speculator: then what will strike me will be how easily the house can be fixed up, whether it will bring a price attractively higher than what I shall have to pay for it, and other things meaning profit. Or let us say that it is the house of friends I am visiting: then I shall look at it with eyes which see it as hospitality—its open patio and easy chairs which will make our afternoon talk more pleasant. Or, if this is a cocktail party at the house of friends who have snubbed me at a party at my house, I find myself feeing things that indicate that anyone would prefer my cottage to theirs, and other aspects of the invidious envy and social state for which we human beings are notorious. #RandolphHarris 3 of 20

Or, finally, if this afternoon I am outfitted with my watercolor materials and bent on doing a sketch, I shall see how the house clings to the side of the mountain, the pattern of the lines of the roof leading up to the peaks above and sweeping away into the valley below, and, indeed, now I even prefer the house without too many fancy features for the greater artistic possibilities this give me. In each one of these five instances, it is the same house that provides the stimulus, and I am the same mortal responding to it. However, in each case, the house and experience have an entirely different meaning. However, this is only one side of intentionality. The other side is that it also does come from the object. Intentionality is the bridge between these. It is the structure of meaning which makes it possible for us, subjects that we are, to see and understand the outside World, objective as it is. In intentionality, the dichotomy between subject and object is partially overcome. The concept seems to me so important, and has been so neglected in contemporary psychology, that I ask the reader to go with me into an exploration of its meaning. What is given to the eyes [in our terms, what is perceived] is the intention of the soul. The soul is the tension of the body. It then meant how we know reality, that is, it was an epistemology. Two kinds of intentionality were made distinct: intensio primo, referring to knowing particular things—that is, objects which actually exist; and intensio secundo, the relations of these objects to general concepts—that is, knowing by conceptualization. #RandolphHarris 4 of 20

All of this presupposes that we could not know a thing unless we already, in some way, participated in it. Intentionality is what the is what the intellect grasps about the thing understood. The intellect through a species of being informed in the act of intelligence through a species of being informed in the act of intelligence, forms itself some intention of the understood thing. In the process of knowing, we are in-formed by the thing understood, and in the same act, our intellect simultaneously gives form to the thing we understand. What is important here is the word in-form, or forming in. To tell someone something, to in-form one, is to form one—a process that can sometimes become very powerful in psychotherapy by the therapist’s saying just one sentence, or one word, at the right moment. How different this is from the indoctrination many of us got in graduate school, that information is simply dry data, external to us, which we manipulate! Intentionality thus begins as an epistemology, a way of knowing reality. It carries the meaning of reality as we know it. The mind is not simply passive clay on which sensations write, or something which merely absorbs and classifies facts. What really happens is that objects themselves conform to our ways of understanding. A good example of this is mathematics. These are constructs in our minds; but nature conforms, “answers,” to them. #RandolphHarris 5 of 20

Physics is mathematical not because we know so much about the physical World, but because we know so little; it is only its mathematical properties that we can discover. The human mind is an active, forming participant in what it knows. Understanding, itself, is then constitutive of its World. Consciousness is defined by the fact that it intends something, points toward something outside itself—specifically, that it intends the object. Thus, intentionality gives meaningful contents to consciousness. There are not-too-rare cases of the influence of the ideas of one mortal on another in such a germane way that they become part and parcel of the second mortal’s thought and may seem to have always been in his or hers. Intentionality is built into the warp and woof to free association, dreams, and fantasies. Consciousness never exists in a subjective vacuum but is always consciousness of something. Consciousness not only cannot be separated from its objective World, but, indeed constitutes its World. The upshot is that meaning is an intention of the mind. The act and experience of consciousness itself is a continuous molding and remolding of our World, self related to objects and objects to self in inseparable ways, self participating in the World as well as observing it, neither pole of self or World being conceivable without the other. This, of course, does not mean that we cannot bracket for the moment the subjective or objective side of the experience. #RandolphHarris 6 of 20

When I measure my house to see how paint it will take to repaint it, or when I get a report on some endocrinological tests on my child, I bracket for the moment how I feel about it: I want only to understand as clearly as I can these measurements. However, then my responsibility is to put these objective facts back into the context in which they have meaning for me—my project to paint my house, or my caring for the health of my child. I believe that one of our serious errors in psychology is to bracket out part of experience and never put it back together again. If faith is the state of being ultimately concerned, all preliminary concerns are subject to it. The ultimate concern gives depth, direction and unity to all other concerns and, with them, to the whole personality. A personal life which has these qualities is integrated, and the power of a personality’s integration is one’s faith. It must be repeated at this point that such an assertion would be absurd if faith were wat it is in its distorted meaning, the belief in things without evidence. Yet the assertion is not absurd, but evident, if faith is ultimate concern. Ultimate concern is related to all sides of reality and to all sides of human personality. The ultimate is one object beside others, and the ground of all others. As the ultimate is the ground of everything that is, so ultimate concern is the integrating center of the personal life. Being without it is being with a center. #RandolphHarris 7 of 20

When a person has lost their essence, such a state can only be approached but never fully reached, because a human being deprived completely of a center would cease to be a human being. For this reason once cannot admit that there is any mortal without an ultimate concern or without faith. The center unites all elements of a mortal’s personal life, the bodily, the unconscious, the conscious, the spiritual ones. In the act of faith every nerve of mortal’s body, every striving of mortal’s soul, every function of mortal’s spirit participates. However, body, soul, spirit, are not three parts of mortal. They are dimensions of mortal’s being, always within each other; for mortals is a unity and not composed of parts. Faith, therefore, is not a matter of the mind in isolation, or of the soul in contrast to mind and body, or of the body (in the sense of terrestrial faith), but is the centered movement of the whole personality toward something of ultimate meaning and significance. Ultimate concern is passionate concern; it is a matter of infinite passion. Passion is not real without a bodily basis, even if it is the most spiritual passion. #RandolphHarris 8 of 20

In every act of genuine faith the body participates, because genuine faith is a passionate act. “Behold, when the time cometh that they shall dwindle in unbelief, after they have received so great blessings from the hand of the Lord—having a knowledge of the creation of the Earth, and all mortals, knowing the great and marvelous works of the Lord from the creation of the World; having power given them to do all things by faith; having all the commandments from the beginning, and having been brought by his infinite goodness into this precious land of promise—behold, I say, if the day shall come that they will reject the Holy One of Israel, the true Messiah, their Redeemer and their God, behold, the judgments of him that is just shall rest upon them,” reports 2 Nephi 1.10. The way in such the soul participates is manifold. The body can participate both in vital ecstasy and in asceticism leading to spiritual ecstasy. However, whether in vital fulfillment or vital restriction, the body participates in the life of faith. The same is true of the unconscious strivings, the so-called instincts of mortal’s psyche. They determine the choice of symbols and types of faith. Therefore, every community of faith tries to shape the unconscious strivings of its members, especially of the new generations. “My heart hath been weighed down with sorrow from time to time, for I have feared, lest for the hardness of your hearts the Lord your God should come out in the fulness of his wrath upon you, that ye be cut off and destroyed forever,” reports 2 Nephi 1.17. #RandolphHarris 9 of 20

Still, that is not the only fear I have been hiding in my heart, it is not the only burden that has been troubling my soul. I worry “that a cursing should come upon you for the space of many generations; and ye are visited by sword, and by famine, and are hated, and are le according to the will and captivity of the Devil. These things might come upon you, but you are a choice and favored people of the Lord. However, behold, his (God’s) will be done; for his ways are righteousness forever,” reports 2 Nephi 1.18-19. If the faith of somebody expresses itself in symbols which are adequate to one’s unconscious strivings, these strivings cease to be chaotic. They do not need repression, because they have received sublimation and are untied with the conscious activities of the person. Faith also directs mortal’s conscious life by giving it a central object of con-centration. The disrupting trends of mortal’s consciousness are one of the great problems of all personal life. If a uniting center is absent, the infinite variety of the encountered World, as well as of the inner movements of the human mind, is able to produce or complete disintegration of the personality. There can be no other uniting center than the ultimate concern of the mind. There are various ways in which faith unites mortal’s mental life and gives it a dominating center. #RandolphHarris 10 of 20

Faith can be the way of discipline which regulates the daily life; it can be the way of prayer and contemplation; it can be the way of concentration on the ordinary work, or on a special aim or on another human being. In each case, faith is presupposed; none of it could be done without faith. Mortal’s spiritual function, artistic creation, scientific knowledge, ethical formation and political organization are consciously or unconsciously expressions of an ultimate concern which gives passion and creative love to them, making them inexhaustible in depth and untied in aim. We have shown how faith determines and unites all elements of personal life, how and why it is its integrating power. In doing so we have painted a picture of what faith can do. However, we have not brought into this picture the forces of disintegration and disease which prevent faith from creating a fully integrated personal life, even in those who represent the power of faith most conspicuously, the saint, the great mystics, the prophetic personalities. Mortals are integrated only fragmentarily and have elements of disintegration or disease in all dimensions of one’s being.  There is a close, inner relationship between caring and intentionality, suggested already by the fact that the root word “tend”—to take care of—is the center of the term intentionality. #RandolphHarris 11 of 20

A word itself embodies a cumulative, creative wisdom in that it is the product of centuries of molding, forming, and re-forming on the part of an infinite number of people who are trying to communicate something important to themselves and to the fellow members of their culture. Let us see what help we can find in understanding intentionality and its related terms intend and intention by tracking down their etymological sources. All of these terms come from Latin Stem intendere, which consists of in plus tendere, tensum, the latter, interestingly enough, meaning to stretch, and from which we get our word tension. This tells us immediately that intention is a stretching toward something. Now a fact which may be surprising to many readers, as it was to me, is that the first meaning given for intend in Webster’s does not have to do with purpose or design, as when we say, “I intend to do something,” but is rather, to mean, signify. Only secondly does Webster give the definition to have in mind a purpose or a design. Most people in our voluntaristic Victorian tradition have tended to skip over the primary and central meaning and to use the concept only in its derivative meaning of conscious design and purpose. And since our psychology soon became able to prove that such conscious designs and purposes were mostly illusions and that we are not at all creatures of these nice, freely-chosen, voluntary plans, we were constrained to throw out the whole package of intents with the caboodle of intentions. #RandolphHarris 12 of 20

We had known already that the road to Hell is paved with good intentions, and we now saw that these intentions, good or bad, were figments of our own self-conceit anyway. However, if you change self-conceit to self-concern and realize that there is no knowledge or act at all without this self-concern—that everything has its concern or intent in it, and that we know our World by virtue of these intents—if you make these sifts from the pejorative to the absolute form of the same words, how different the implication is! The more significant aspect of intention is its relation to meaning. We use this in one form in the legal phrase asking: What is the intent of the law? when referring to its meaning. Intent is the turning of the mind toward an object, hence a design, purpose. The design and purpose come after the hence. That is to say, the voluntaristic aspects of the experience are possessed in the fact that already the mind is turned toward an object which has a certain import and meaning for us. All the way through this etymology is, of course, that little word tend. It refers to movement toward something—tend toward tendency. To me, it seems to be the core of our whole quest; its presence there in the center is a perpetual reminder that our meanings are never purely intellectual or our acts purely result of pushes from the past; but in both we are moving toward something. And mirabile dictu, the word also means, as we briefly say, to take care of—we tend our sheep and cattle, and we tend to ourselves. #RandolphHarris 13 of 20

Thus, when I declare, “Meaning is an intention of the mind,” I include both the meaning and the act, the movement toward something. I point out this dual meaning in the German language: the word meinung which signifies either opinion or meaning, has the same stem as the Germany verb meinen, to intend. In pondering the English language at this point, I was surprised—being brought up to think that the objective fact was the epitome of everything and occupied the place next to God is not indeed His Throne itself—to find that we also have that dual import. When I say, “I mean the BMW is black,” you take my sentence as giving you merely a statement of fact; it is a unilateral equivalence, “A” is “B.” However, when I say, “I mean to turn the corner, but the car says it is not recommended,” you take my mean as my intention, a statement of my commitment and conviction. Only later will we see if I can make it come true. Therefore, every meaning has within it a commitment. And this does not refer to the use of my muscles after I get an idea in order to accomplish the idea. And most of all, it does not refer to what a behaviorist might say on reading these paragraphs, “Just as we have always said—the consciousness is only in the act anyway, and we might as well study only the muscular action, the behavior, to start with.” No, our analysis leads to exactly the opposite conclusion, that a sheer movement of the muscles, as the larynx in talking, is exactly what you do not have. #RandolphHarris 14 of 20

You have, rather, a human being intending something. And you cannot understand the overt behavior expect as you see it in relation to, and as an expression of, its intention. Meaning has no meaning apart from intention. Each act of consciousness tends toward something, is a turning of the person toward something, and has within it, no matter how latent, some push toward a direction for action. Cognition, or knowing, and conation, or willing, then go together. We could not have one without the other. This is why commitment is so important. If I do not will something, I could never know it; and if I do not know it; and if I do not know something, I would never have any content for my willing. In this sense, it can be said directly that mortals make their own meaning. Note that I do not say that they only makes one’s meaning, or that it is not dialectically related at every instant to reality; I say that if one is not engaged in making one’s meaning, one will never know reality. My task, so far, has been to define the concept of intentionality. I have emphasized that it contains both our knowing and our forming reality, and that these are inseparable from each other. From the point of view of intentionality, James’s reverie as he is compelled in bed is entirely sensible, and his sudden act of getting up is not at all a will-o’-the-wisp lucky instant or fortunate happening, but an understandable and reliable expression of his connection with the day’s events. It is his imaginative participation in the day and the events of the day, which is reaching out to him, grasping him, that accomplishes the getting up. #RandolphHarris 15 of 20

One can also say that the integrating power of faith has healing power. This statement, however, needs comment in view of linguistic and actual distortions of the relation of faith and healing. Linguistically (and materially) one must distinguish the integrating power of faith from what has been called faith healing. Faith healing, as the term is actually used, is the attempt to heal others or oneself by mental concentration on the healing power in others or in oneself. There is such healing power in nature and mortals, and it can be strengthened by mental acts. In a non-depreciating sense one could speak of the use of magic power; and certainly there is healing magic in human relationships as well as in the relation to oneself. It is a daily experience and sometimes one that is astonishing in its intensity and success. However, one should not use the word faith for it, and one should not confuse it with the integrating power of an ultimate concern. The integrating power of faith in a concrete situation is dependent on the subjective and objective factors. The subjective factor is the degree to which a person is open for the power of faith, and how strong and passionate is his ultimate concern. Such openness is what religion calls grace. It is given and cannot be produced intentionally. #RandolphHarris 16 of 20

The objective factor is the degree to which a faith has conquered its idolatrous elements and is directed toward the really ultimate. Idolatrous faith has a definite dynamic: it can be extremely passionate and exercise a preliminary integrating power. It can heal and unite the personality, including its soul and body. The gods of polytheism have shown healing power, not only in a magic way but also in terms of genuine reintegration. The objects of modern secular idolatry, such as nation and success, have shown healing power, not only by the magic fascination of a leader, a slogan or a promise but also by the fulfillment of otherwise unfulfilled strivings for a meaningful life. However, the basis of the integration is too narrow. Idolatrous faith breaks down sooner or later and the disease is worse than before. The one limited element which has been elevated to ultimacy is attacked by other limited elements. The mind is split, even if each of these elements represents a high value. The fulfillment of the unconscious drives does not last; they are repressed or explode chaotically. The concentration of the mind vanishes because the object of concentration has lost its convincing character. Spiritual creativity shows an increasingly shallow and empty character, because no infinite meaning gives depth to it. The passion of faith is transformed into the suffering of unconquered doubt and despair, and in many cases into an escape to neurosis and psychosis. #RandolphHarris 17 of 20

Idolatrous faith has more disintegrating power than indifference, just because it is fait and produces a transitory integration. This is the extreme danger of misguided, idolatrous faith, and the reason why the prophetic Spirit is above all the Spirit which fights against the idolatrous distortion of faith. The healing power of faith raises the question of its relation to other agencies of healing. We have already referred to an element of magic influence from mind to mind without referring to the medical art, its scientific presuppositions and its technical methods. There is an overlapping of all agencies of healing and none of them should claim exclusive validity. Nevertheless, it is possible conceptually to limit each of them to a special function. Perhaps one can say that the healing power of faith is related to the whole personality, independent of any special disease of body or mind, and effective positively or negatively in every moment of one’s life. It precedes, accompanies and follows all other activities of healing. However, it does not suffice alone in the development of the personality. In finitude and estrangement mortals are not a whole, but are disrupted into different elements. Each of these elements can disintegrate independently of other elements. Parts of the body can become sick, without producing mental disease; and the mind can become sick without visible bodily failures. In some forms of mental sickness, especially neurosis, and in almost all forms of bodily disease the spiritual life can remain completely healthy and even gain in strength. #RandolphHarris 18 of 20

Therefore, medical art must be used wherever such separated elements of the whole of the personality are disintegrating for external or internal reasons. This is true of mental as well as bodily medicine. And there is no conflict between them and the healing power of the state of ultimate concern. It is also clear that medical activities, including mental healing, cannot produce a reintegration of the personality as a whole. Only faith can do this. The tension between the two agencies of health would disappear if both sides knew their special functions and their special limits. Then they would not be worried about the third agency, the healing by magic concentration on the powers of healing. They would accept its help while revealing at the same time its great limitations. There are as many types of integrated personalities as there are types of faith. There is also the type of integration which unites many characteristics of the different types of personal integration. It was this kind of personality which was created by early Christianity, and missed again and again in the history of the Church. Its character cannot be described from the point of view of faith alone; it leads to the questions of faith and love, and of faith and action. “And because of the intercession for all, all mortals come unto God; wherefore, they stand in the presence of him, to be judged of him according to the truth and holiness which is in him. I leave unto you a blessing, yea, even my first blessing,” reports 2 Nephi 2.9 and 10 and 2 Nephi 1. 28. #RandolphHarris 19 of 20

Having a family who want the worse for you and that you cannot trust is the biggest cruse in the World, worse than death. Count your blessings. Even if they are not the richest people, be happy they love and protect you. Eventually the tables turn, even in corruption, destiny has to take place, there is a wheel and sometimes you are low and other times you are high, hopefully you get a nice long spin on the high road to balance it out. Do not bother telling people the painful things you feel towards them, just hold on to it and release it in constructive ways. Talk to a friend or something. When people do bad things, especially to good people, it eventually has to reflect on their sou and one day they will know they need to seek forgiveness. All the money and possessions in the World cannot replace love and chances are bad people are not well loved anyway. They are all drying out from all of their emotions.  As long as you try as hard as you can to be a good person and do the right thing is what matters. And stay sober. Like First Lady Nancy Reagan preached in the 1980s, “Just say no to drugs.” Enjoying reality with a clear mind is the best thing. We need to see things as they are and find safe ways to deal with things that can be unpleasant. “The is the work and the end is silence. And in between are all the stories,” reports Kate Atkinson. #RandolphHarris 20 of 20