Many people would like to believe in reincarnation because they are attached to their loved ones and want them to stay with the forever. However, it is possible that the soul is immortal, it is even possible that reincarnation and the transference of the soul is possible. Nonetheless, even if your loved one returns and has memories of you and who they are, it does not mean that they will accept you or even love you the same, as it the past, so it could leave you vulnerable, and in a position to get hurt over and over and over again as you try to work with them and be understanding. You may even see characteristics of the past person in this new form, but you have to understand that they have had difference experiences. And, as you know, death can be traumatic, so if someone could return from the day, they may care about you, but they may also be a different person. There are some people who believe in reconstitution of the soul, and they may spend a decade or even a lifetime looking for their loved one to return because no one they have met has ever be as kind and loving as the soul who has transitioned. Any reconstitution doctrine of the soul is confronted with the question, “How is the reconstituted person on the last day to be identified as the original individual, as opposed to a mere replica, an appropriately brilliant forgery? Well, the whole purpose of believing in reconstitution of the soul is because love and the familiar make many people feel safe and protected in the World. It might also be suggested that though there might indeed be cases in which all other merely human observers must be entirely at a loss, the person himself could not fail to know whether he was the original person rather than a channeling or a replica. I have seen in one particular case where there was a discrepancy between who was the original and who was the reconstituted. Reconstituted people may only be mere replicas of and surrogates for their Earthly predecessors. The person claiming to be the original knew intimate details that only an individual who had been there could know. The problem was not two people battling over an identity. However, it was his son having problems accepting him because the way he was treating him.  

Nevertheless, the individual in question claimed that he was actually the individual and it was his right to have special privileges and that his son should be understanding towards him considering what he had been through and the fact that he had been here all along watching him and knew of things that had happened and was upset. The point can be brought out better in the case of the argument that the person cannot fail to know who he is. This argument depends on the premises that if I remember doing something, I must have done it and that normal people in normal situations are usually able to remember the most important features of their lives. However, honest and however convinced, claims that you did something do not guarantee that you actually did it. All the time he was singing, the music held me in its spell, filling my head with images of his service in the war and what happened to his friends, and only he would know that, and with emotions of the Oakland A’s games we used to go to when I was a kid, that had long been absent. My eyes pricked with tears.  The objection will be that it will not be identically the same man that shall rise again…After the change wrought by death the selfsame man cannot be repeated. When I heard the reverberation of the plainsong in the upper echelons of the cathedral or the stalls of our little country church, I had a moment of understanding. The voice startled me back to the present. I turned to see this man with a shock of copper hair and an open, thoughtful face smiling at me. The soul, even after separation from the body, retain the being which accrues to it when in the body…Consequently there has been no interruption in the substantial being of a man, as would make it impossible for the selfsame man to return on account of an interruption in his being. At that is precisely why this man is claiming that he is the original, he is the one who has been here all along. The nature of the soul and its relation to the bodily machine can be characterized to serve certain ends. The soul is justified by its purpose, and cannot be referred either to the mind or to the body alone. Again, in the air there always are and always have been vulgar or not so vulgar theories about bodies, minds, and souls and their survival natures, destinies and relations, with no guarantee that these theories can be harmonized with the meanings of such terms as “mind” or “soul.”  

I took it away. First and foremost, to save Fella from those who might have destroyed it, and it had sent that child’s true soul Heavenward. It was a dreadful error. Some people believe that the soul is a vapor, blood, or something that order and must that extent ne interpreted as embryonic scientists and those thinkers who urged that the essence of the soul is motion, sensation, or some combination of the two. The mind is like a compass certain sort of achievement. In this sense of “mind,” then, someone can do these things because he is endowed with a first-class mind. The soul is the person. We are our souls. We use our hands, our eyes, our whole bodies. Thus, I cannot be my body. Yet, it is agreed that I must be my soul, my body, or a combination of both. However, because the user and the thing used are always different and because I use my body, I cannot be either my body or my body and soul combined. Thus, I must be my soul. Eyes sometimes play tricks on us, this shows that we see not with, but through, them, that they are, as it were, built-in optical instruments. We are sometimes dragged down by the weakness of the body or some part of it.  I was dreaming about a family I knew, and I went back to visit them, and I was surprised that the kids had not aged because it had been over a decade. The house still looked exactly the same, but I noticed that the father now had blue eyes, instead of brown, but he looked exactly the same. The mother was also still the same age as when I met her, but her personality had changed. She was very uptight and all she did was clean the house. In the dream, I had a vision of the original mother, who I did not now and she had thick brown hair, and the mother who I did know had fought her to when the matriarch position in the family, but now had become a cleaning woman who lived in the back of the house because she had aged and was replaced by this younger uptight woman. These families did not die out, but they would keep the same names and replace members as they started to age. Strong witches appeared in various generations. Perhaps it was to care for the young children who never seemed to age. The origins of the family history are that a witch has called up a spirit quite by accident, a spirit who appeared to be a brown-eyed man—a spirit who was to haunt the family for generations. It was the ghost of a human being or some astral being without a human story. 

It was biding its time, generation by generation, until a witch would bear its children, a witch with psychic powers enough to assist it to possess that unborn fetus and be reborn within it. Over generations he brought this family great wealth in any number of ways. And the men he despises and punished if they got in his way. The spirit did not understand who he was or what he wanted, except to be reborn. He guided everything to that purpose: to come through, to be flesh and blood again. We may infer that we drive our bodies as we drive our cars. Personal pronouns, personal names, and all other person words, words which clearly must refer to something which, it seems, equally clearly cannot refer to bodies, the only available corporeal objects, must therefore refer to some incorporeal objects, the conclusion is that these are the objects to which we apply the term souls. You must keep your name to be part of the family, if you were to be connected to the Legacy. People are what you meet. We do not meet only the sinewy containers in which other people are kept, and they do not encounter only the fleshy houses that we ourselves inhabit. It is therefore wrong to suggest that the word “person” is equivalent to the word “soul” in this sense of “soul” and, hence, to imply that it is contradictory to deny that people are incorporeal objects and that it is absurd to say that you can see a person. We all have certain ideal concepts, such as the ideal of perfect equality, which we cannot have acquired in our lives because they are never fully instantiated in this World. In both forms, the conclusions is that these facts can be accounted for only in terms of memory. We, or “our souls,” must have acquired our knowledge of the conclusion of the theorem of Pythagoras, which states that the soul is immortal, and it transmigrates as comprehensive soul that includes all psychic faculties. Pythagoras also believed that the soul preserved personal identity and could be well contained in the pattern of emotions, that constitute a person’s character. For the soul to be reincarnated, it is then believed that life as a human is actually enjoyable. After certain periods of time the things that have happened once happen again and nothing is absolutely new. This is the doctrine of eternal recurrence. 

Transmigration this seems to have been extended to include the idea that we and indeed the whole World will be reborn into the lives that are exactly the same as those we are living and have already lives. Pythagoras actually believed that he was an incarnation of the God Apollo, which seems rational because he was a very smart man, he knew remarkable thing and possessed the greatest wealth of intelligence and accomplished all sort of wise deeds. Pythagoras even invented the Pythagorean theorem, which is a fundamental relation in Euclidean geometry among the three sides of a right triangle. It states that the square of the hypotenuse (the side opposite the right angel) is equal to the sum of the squares of the other two sides. Architects use the Pythagorean theorem, which is expressed by the equation: a2+b2= c2, in designing and computing the measurements of building structures and bridges. One example is involving roof design. A gable roof is made of two right triangles, where the base of one right triangle is called the run, the height is called the rise and the slope is called the rafter. When looking at Victorian architecture, it is so opulent and detailed that I often wondered, what kind of people would think to design and build such houses, which seem to defy physics and were built by hand, one hundred years ago and even earlier. Well, perhaps they were Gods or had lived more than one life. For instance, Pythagoras reported he remembered being an incorporeal being in the Underworld for three years and that is when he decided to be reincarnated. However, reincarnation has never been so popular in Western society because the idea of pre-existence involved in the conclusion does not square with Western orthodoxy. However, how were these great thinkers born with such important logic and a link between (true) memory and personal identity. If I really do remember certain truths or being acquainted with certain objects, then it follows that at some time in the past I must have learned them or made that acquaintance.   And most human’s today, are so diluted that they are no longer capable of critical thinking. Genetically modified food is the way to go and people should be focused on perfecting plants and vegetables to exactly replicate the taste and textures of a steak or chicken or even your favorite fish. 

The Winchester Mystery House

 Follow your tour guide, as you explore the fascinating history and unsettling lore clinging to the haunted mansion. https://winchestermysteryhouse.com/